Search results for 'J. M. Delden Johannevans' (try it on Scholar)

41 found
Sort by:
  1. A. C. Rietjens Judith, J. Der Maas Pauvanl, D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje, J. M. Delden Johannevans & Agnes van der Heide (2009). Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia From the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3).score: 2010.0
    Two decades of research on euthanasia in the Netherlands have resulted into clear insights in the frequency and characteristics of euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands. These empirical studies have contributed to the quality of the public debate, and to the regulating and public control of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. No slippery slope seems to have occurred. Physicians seem to adhere to the criteria for due care in the large majority of cases. Further, it has been shown (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. E. J. D. Prinsen & J. J. M. van Delden (2009). Can We Justify Eliminating Coercive Measures in Psychiatry? Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):69-73.score: 85.5
    The practice of coercive measures in psychiatry is controversial. Although some have suggested that it may be acceptable if patients are a danger to others or to themselves, others committed themselves to eliminate it. Ethical, legal and clinical considerations become more complex when the mental incapacity is temporary and when the coercive measures serve to restore autonomy. We discuss these issues, addressing the conflict between autonomy and beneficence/non-maleficence, human dignity, the experiences of patients and the effects of coercive measures. We (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rosemarie D. L. C. Bernabe, Ghislaine J. M. W. Van Thiel, Jan A. M. Raaijmakers & Johannes J. M. Van Delden (2013). News Media Coverage of Euthanasia: A Content Analysis of Dutch National Newspapers. [REVIEW] Bmc Medical Ethics 2012 13 14 (1):6-.score: 85.5
    BackgroundThe Netherlands is one of the few countries where euthanasia is legal under strict conditions. This study investigates whether Dutch newspaper articles use the term ‘euthanasia’ according to the legal definition and determines what arguments for and against euthanasia they contain.MethodsWe did an electronic search of seven Dutch national newspapers between January 2009 and May 2010 and conducted a content analysis.ResultsOf the 284 articles containing the term ‘euthanasia’, 24% referred to practices outside the scope of the law, mostly relating to (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. A. L. Bredenoord, N. A. A. Giesbertz & J. J. M. van Delden (2013). Consent for Medical Device Registries: Commentary on Schofield, B. (2013) The Role of Consent and Individual Autonomy in the PIP Breast Implant Scandal. Public Health Ethics 6 (2):226-229.score: 85.5
    The clinical introduction of medical devices often occurs with relatively little oversight, regulation and (long-term) follow-up. Some recent controversies underscore the weaknesses of the current regime, such as the complications surrounding the metal-on-metal hip implants and the scandal surrounding the global breast implant scare of silicone implants made by France's Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) Company. The absence of national registries hampered the collection of reliable information on the risks and harms of the PIP breast implants. To warrant long-term safety, a (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Udo Schüklenk, Johannes J. M. van Delden, Jocelyn Downie, Sheila A. M. Mclean, Ross Upshur & Daniel Weinstock (2011). End-of-Life Decision-Making in Canada: The Report by the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making. Bioethics 25 (s1):1-73.score: 85.5
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Riekeder Graaf & Johannes J. M. Delden (forthcoming). On Using People Merely as a Means in Clinical Research. Bioethics.score: 85.5
    It is often argued that clinical research should not violate the Kantian principle that people must not be used merely as a means for the purposes of others. At first sight, the practice of clinical research itself, however, seems to violate precisely this principle: clinical research is often beneficial to future people rather than to participants; even if participants benefit, all things considered, they are exposed to discomforts which are absent both in regular care for their diseases and in other (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2010). Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model. Ethical Perspectives 17 (2):183-202.score: 85.5
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2012). On Using People Merely as a Means in Clinical Research. Bioethics 26 (2):76-83.score: 85.5
    It is often argued that clinical research should not violate the Kantian principle that people must not be used merely as a means for the purposes of others. At first sight, the practice of clinical research itself, however, seems to violate precisely this principle: clinical research is often beneficial to future people rather than to participants; even if participants benefit, all things considered, they are exposed to discomforts which are absent both in regular care for their diseases and in other (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. R. Janssens, J. J. M. van Delden & G. A. M. Widdershoven (2012). Palliative Sedation: Not Just Normal Medical Practice. Ethical Reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's Guideline on Palliative Sedation. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (11):664-668.score: 85.5
    The main premise of the Royal Dutch Medical Association's (RDMA) guideline on palliative sedation is that palliative sedation, contrary to euthanasia, is normal medical practice. Although we do not deny the ethical distinctions between euthanasia and palliative sedation, we will critically analyse the guideline's argumentation strategy with which euthanasia is demarcated from palliative sedation. First, we will analyse the guideline's main premise, which entails that palliative sedation is normal medical treatment. After this, we will critically discuss three crucial propositions of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Annelien L. Bredenoord, Rieke der Graavanf & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2010). Toward a “Post-Posthuman Dignity Area” in Evaluating Emerging Enhancement Technologies. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):55-57.score: 85.5
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. H. M. Buiting, A. van Der Heide, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, M. L. Rurup, J. A. C. Rietjens, G. Borsboom, P. J. van Der Maas & J. J. M. van Delden (2009). Physicians' Labelling of End-of-Life Practices: A Hypothetical Case Study. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):24-29.score: 85.5
    Objectives: To investigate why physicians label end-of-life acts as either ‘euthanasia/ending of life’ or ‘alleviation of symptoms/palliative or terminal sedation’, and to study the association of such labelling with intended reporting of these acts. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random, stratified sample of 2100 Dutch physicians (response: 55%). They were asked to label six hypothetical end-of-life cases: three ‘standard’ cases and three cases randomly selected (out of 47), that varied according to (1) type of medication, (2) physician’s intention, (3) (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Johannes J. M. van Delden, Rieke der Graavanf & Annelien L. Bredenoord (2010). Toward a “Post-Posthuman Dignity Area” in Evaluating Emerging Enhancement Technologies. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):55-57.score: 85.5
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2009). What is the Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (3):35 – 43.score: 85.5
    During the past decennium, one of the main issues discussed in research ethics has been focused on the care that should be provided to the control group in a clinical trial. This discussion is also called the standard of care debate . Current international research ethics guidelines contain a wide variety of standards for the standard of care—including the provision of the highest attainable, the best available, the best current, a proven , and an established effective treatment. In this article, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Georg Bosshard, , Tore Nilstun, , Johan Bilsen, , Michael Norup, , Guido Miccinesi, , Johannes J. M. van Delden, Karin Faisst, , Agnes van der Heide & for the European End-of-Life, Forgoing Treatment at the End of Life in 6 European Countries.score: 85.5
    Modern medicine provides unprecedented opportunities in diagnostics and treatment. However, in some situations at the end of a patient’s life, many physicians refrain from using all possible measures to prolong life. We studied the incidence of different types of treatment withheld or withdrawn in 6 European countries and analyzed the main background characteristics.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. H. M. Buiting, M. A. C. Karelse, H. A. A. Brouwers, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, A. van Der Heide & J. J. M. van Delden (2010). Dutch Experience of Monitoring Active Ending of Life for Newborns. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):234-237.score: 85.5
    Introduction In 2007, a national review committee was instituted in The Netherlands to review cases of active ending of life for newborns. It was expected that 15–20 cases would be reported. To date, however, only one case has been reported to this committee. Reporting is essential to obtain societal control and transparency; the possible explanations for this lack of reporting were therefore explored. Methods Data on end-of-life decision-making were scrutinised from Dutch nation-wide studies (1995, 2001 and 2005), before institution of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. H. M. Buiting, J. K. M. Gevers, J. A. C. Rietjens, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, P. J. van Der Maas, A. van Der Heide & J. J. M. van Delden (2008). Dutch Criteria of Due Care for Physician-Assisted Dying in Medical Practice: A Physician Perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e12-e12.score: 85.5
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. Cohen, J. van Delden, F. Mortier, R. Lofmark, M. Norup, C. Cartwright, K. Faisst, C. Canova, B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen & J. Bilsen (2008). Influence of Physicians' Life Stances on Attitudes to End-of-Life Decisions and Actual End-of-Life Decision-Making in Six Countries. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):247-253.score: 85.5
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. J. M. van Delden (2004). The Unfeasibility of Requests for Euthanasia in Advance Directives. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):447-451.score: 85.5
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. J. J. M. van Delden (2007). Terminal Sedation: Source of a Restless Ethical Debate. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):187.score: 85.5
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. and Agnes van der Heide Judith A. C. Rietjens, Paul J. Van der Maas, Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Johannes J. M. Van Delden (2009). Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia From the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):271.score: 85.5
    Two decades of research on euthanasia in the Netherlands have resulted into clear insights in the frequency and characteristics of euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands. These empirical studies have contributed to the quality of the public debate, and to the regulating and public control of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. No slippery slope seems to have occurred. Physicians seem to adhere to the criteria for due care in the large majority of cases. Further, it has been shown (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. G. J. M. W. van Thiel & J. J. M. van Delden (2001). The Principle of Respect for Autonomy in the Care of Nursing Home Residents. Nursing Ethics 8 (5):419-431.score: 85.5
    Respect for autonomy is well known as a core element of normative views on good care. Most often it is interpreted in a liberal way, with a focus on independence and self-determination. In this article we argue that this interpretation is too narrow in the context of care in nursing homes. With the aim of developing an alternative view on respect for autonomy in this setting we described four interpretations and investigated the moral intuitions (i.e. moral judgements) of caregivers regarding (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. G. J. M. W. van Thiel & J. J. M. van Delden (2008). Phase IV Research: Innovation in Need of Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):415-416.score: 85.5
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Johannes J. M. van Delden, Loes Pijnenborg & Paul J. van der Maas (1993). Reports From the Netherlands. Dances with Data. Bioethics 7 (4):323-329.score: 85.5
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Sophie M. Bruinsma, Judith A. C. Rietjens, Siebe J. Swart, Roberto S. G. M. Perez, Johannes J. M. Van Delden & Agnes van der Heide (forthcoming). Estimating the Potential Life-Shortening Effect of Continuous Sedation Until Death: A Comparison Between Two Approaches. Journal of Medical Ethics:2013-101459.score: 85.5
    Context In some cases, physicians estimate that continuous sedation until death may have a life-shortening effect. The accuracy of these estimations can be questioned. Aim The aim of this study is to compare two approaches to estimate the potential life-shortening effect of continuous sedation until death. Methods In 2008, 370 Dutch physicians filled out a questionnaire and reported on their last patient who received continuous sedation until death. The potential life-shortening effect of continuous sedation was estimated through a direct approach (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. M. K. Schoonman, G. J. M. W. van Thiel & J. J. M. van Delden (forthcoming). Non-Physician-Assisted Suicide in The Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among the General Public. Journal of Medical Ethics.score: 85.5
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Maria C. Stuifbergen & Johannes J. M. Van Delden (2011). Filial Obligations to Elderly Parents: A Duty to Care? [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):63-71.score: 85.5
    A continuing need for care for elderly, combined with looser family structures prompt the question what filial obligations are. Do adult children of elderly have a duty to care? Several theories of filial obligation are reviewed. The reciprocity argument is not sensitive to the parent–child relationship after childhood. A theory of friendship does not offer a correct parallel for the relationship between adult child and elderly parent. Arguments based on need or vulnerability run the risk of being unjust to those (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. J. M. Van Delden & Margaret P. Battin (2008). Euthanasia: Not Just for Rich Countries. In Ronald M. Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oup Oxford.score: 85.5
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. G. J. M. W. van Thiel & J. J. M. van Delden (2009). The Justificatory Power of Moral Experience. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):234-237.score: 85.5
    A recurrent issue in the vast amount of literature on reasoning models in ethics is the role and nature of moral intuitions. In this paper, we start from the view that people who work and live in a certain moral practice usually possess specific moral wisdom. If we manage to incorporate their moral intuitions in ethical reasoning, we can arrive at judgements and (modest) theories that grasp a moral experience that generally cannot be found outside the practice. Reflective equilibrium (RE) (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. H. M. Buiting, J. K. M. Gevers, J. A. C. Rietjens, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, P. J. van Der Maas, Agnes van der Heide & J. J. M. van Delden (2008). Dutch Criteria of Due Care for Physician-Assisted Dying in Medical Practice: A Physician Perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e12 - e12.score: 85.5
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. J. M. van Delden (2004). Medical Decision Making in Scarcity Situations. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):207-211.score: 85.5
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. S. L. Niemansburg, M. G. J. L. Habets, J. J. M. Van Delden & A. L. Bredenoord (2014). Disclosure of Risks and Uncertainties Are Especially Vital in Light of Regenerative Medicine. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):14-16.score: 85.5
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. N. J. H. Raijmakers, A. van der Heide, P. S. C. Kouwenhoven, G. J. M. W. van Thiel, J. J. M. van Delden & J. A. C. Rietjens (forthcoming). Assistance in Dying for Older People Without a Serious Medical Condition Who Have a Wish to Die: A National Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Ethics.score: 85.5
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Johannes J. M. Delden, Loes Pijnenborg & Paul J. Maas (1993). The Remmelink Study: Two Years Later. Hastings Center Report 23 (6):24-27.score: 85.5
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Peggy DesAutels, Margaret P. Battin, Larry May & Johannes J. M. Van Delden (2001). Book Reviews-Praying for a Cure. When Medical and Religious Practices Conflict. Bioethics-Oxford 15 (2):160-160.score: 85.5
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Noor A. A. Giesbertz, Annelien L. Bredenoord & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2013). A Thick Opt-Out Is Often Sufficient. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):44 - 46.score: 85.5
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. R. H. H. Groenwold, R. van der Graaf & J. J. M. van Delden (2013). How and When Does Consent Bias Research? American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):46 - 48.score: 85.5
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Margje H. Haverkamp & Johannes J. M. Van Delden (2006). Une mort tres douce. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (3):367-376.score: 85.5
    Cette étude analyse la pensée actuelle sur les décisions-fin-de-vie (DfdV) en France d’un point de vue hollandais. Un nombre limité d’interviews avec des ‘opinion-leaders’ français est pris comme base du project. Jusqu’au jour présent, le domaine des DfdV en France a été troublé en l’absence de définitions et de législation plus spécifiques. Les médecins français pourront faire face à un dilemme en soignant un malade mourant, pris en étau entre le caractère illégal officiel de l’euthanasie d’une part et l’obligation professionnelle (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Annemarie Kalis, Maartje H. N. Schermer & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2005). Ideals Regarding a Good Life for Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: Views of Professional Caregivers. Nursing Ethics 12 (1):30-42.score: 85.5
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Johannes J. M. Van Delden Rosemarie D. L. C. Bernabe, Ghislaine J. M. W. Van Thiel, Jan A. M. Raaijmakers (2012). The Risk-Benefit Task of Research Ethics Committees: An Evaluation of Current Approaches and the Need to Incorporate Decision Studies Methods. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):6.score: 85.5
    BackgroundResearch ethics committees (RECs) are tasked to assess the risks and the benefits of a trial. Currently, two procedure-level approaches are predominant, the Net Risk Test and the Component Analysis.DiscussionBy looking at decision studies, we see that both procedure-level approaches conflate the various risk-benefit tasks, i.e., risk-benefit assessment, risk-benefit evaluation, risk treatment, and decision making. This conflation makes the RECs’ risk-benefit task confusing, if not impossible. We further realize that RECs are not meant to do all the risk-benefit tasks; instead, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Johannes J. M. van Delden (2008). Convergent Trends in Modern Medical Ethics : Medicine-Based Ethics and Human Rights. In Ronald Michael Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.score: 85.5
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel & Johannes J. M. van Delden (2008). Phase IV Research: Innovation in Need of Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):415-416.score: 85.5
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation