16 found
Sort by:
  1. J. M. Dieterle (2011). Animal Ethics in Context. Environmental Ethics 33 (2):223-224.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. M. Dieterle (2011). The Fetal Position. Teaching Philosophy 34 (4):423-425.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. M. Dieterle (2010). Social Construction in the Philosophy of Mathematics: A Critical Evaluation of Julian Cole's Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):311-328.
    Julian Cole argues that mathematical domains are the products of social construction. This view has an initial appeal in that it seems to salvage much that is good about traditional platonistic realism without taking on the ontological baggage. However, it also has problems. After a brief sketch of social constructivist theories and Cole’s philosophy of mathematics, I evaluate the arguments in favor of social constructivism. I also discuss two substantial problems with the theory. I argue that unless and until social (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. J. M. Dieterle (2010). Wild Justice. Environmental Ethics 32 (1):95-98.
  5. J. M. Dieterle (2008). Freedom of Conscience, Employee Prerogatives, and Consumer Choice: Veal, Birth Control, and Tanning Beds. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):191 - 203.
    Does a pharmacist have a right to refuse to fill certain prescriptions? In this paper, I examine cases in which an employee might refuse to do something that is part of his or her job description. I will argue that in some of these cases, an employee does have a right of refusal and in other cases an employee does not. In those cases where the employee does not have a right of refusal, I argue that the refusals (if repeated) (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. M. Dieterle (2008). Unnecessary Suffering. Environmental Ethics 30 (1):51-67.
    The philosophical literature on the ethical treatment of animals is largely divided between two distinct kinds of approaches: (1) the rights-based approach; and (2) the utilitarian approach. A third approach to the debate is possible. The general moral principle “It is wrong to cause unnecessary pain or suffering” is sufficient to render many human activities involving nonhuman animals morally wrong, provided an appropriate account of unnecessary is developed to give the principle its force. The moral principle can be easily applied (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. M. Dieterle (2007). Physician Assisted Suicide: A New Look at the Arguments. Bioethics 21 (3):127–139.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. J. M. Dieterle (2005). Affirmative Action and Desert. Public Affairs Quarterly 19 (2):81-94.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. J. M. Dieterle (2001). Ockham's Razor, Encounterability, and Ontological Naturalism. Erkenntnis 55 (1):51-72.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. J. M. Dieterle (2000). Critical Studies/Book Reviews. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):347-348.
  11. J. M. Dieterle (2000). Supervenience and Necessity: A Response to Balaguer. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):302-309.
  12. Mark Balaguer & J. M. Dieterle (1999). Reviews-Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):775-780.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. M. Dieterle (1999). Mathematical, Astrological, and Theological Naturalism. Philosophia Mathematica 7 (2):129-135.
    persuasive argument for the claim that we ought to evaluate mathematics from a mathematical point of view and reject extra-mathematical standards. Maddy considers the objection that her arguments leave it open for an ‘astrological naturalist’ to make an analogous claim: that we ought to reject extra-astrological standards in the evaluation of astrology. In this paper, I attempt to show that Maddy's response to this objection is insufficient, for it ultimately either (1) undermines mathematical naturalism itself, leaving us with only scientific (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation