44 found
Order:
  1.  5
    J. M. Fritzman (2015). The Bhagavadgītā, Sen, and Anderson. Asian Philosophy 25 (4):319-338.
    Joshua Anderson argues that Amartya Sen’s reading of the Bhagavadgītā is not accurate and so it cannot serve as an example of Sen’s comprehensive consequentialism. This article presents Sen’s reading of the Bhagavadgītā and Anderson’s criticisms of Sen’s readings. It discusses three types of readers: history readers, activist readers, and interventionist readers. It gives an interventionist reading of the Bhagavadgītā, supplementing Arjuna’s reasons and contesting those of Kṛṣṇa. It shows that Arjuna’s reasons are cogent and it respectfully argues that Kṛṣṇa’s (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  1
    J. M. Fritzman (1993). Rethinking Political Theory Essays in Phenomenology and the Study of Politics. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  12
    J. M. Fritzman (1990). Lyotard's Paralogy and Rorty's Pluralism: Their Differences and Pedagogical Implications. Educational Theory 40 (3):371-380.
  4.  41
    J. M. Fritzman & Molly Gibson (2012). Schelling, Hegel, and Evolutionary Progress. Perspectives on Science 20 (1):105-128.
    This article presents Schelling’s claim that nature has an evolutionary process and Hegel’s response that nature is the development of the concept. It then examines whether evolution is progressive. While many evolutionary biologists explicitly repudiate the suggestion that there is progress in evolution, they often implicitly presuppose this. Moreover, such a notion seems required insofar as the shape of life’s history consists in a directional trend. This article argues that, insofar as a notion of progress is indeed conceptually ineliminatable from (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  16
    Wendy Lynn Clark & J. M. Fritzman (2002). Reducing Spirit to Substance. Idealistic Studies 32 (2):73-100.
    In “Hegel’s Phenomenological Method,” Kenley R. Dove maintains that the method of the Phenomenology of Spirit is not dialectical but instead wholly phenomenological. That is, Dove claims that Hegel’s method is purely descriptive. Dove’s interpretation has been highly influential and widely accepted. This article argues that, although there is a phenomenological aspect to Hegel’s method, that aspect itself presupposes a prior dialectical moment. Failure to account for that dialectical moment results in spirit being reduced to substance.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  28
    J. M. Fritzman & Kristin Parvizian (2012). The Extended Mind Rehabilitates The Metaphysical Hegel. Metaphilosophy 43 (5):636-658.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  11
    J. M. Fritzman (2012). Hegel’s Philosophy—in Putnam’s Vat? Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):7-25.
    Using Putnam’s brain-in-a-vat thought experiment, this article argues that interpretations which assert that Hegel’s philosophy, or some portion of it, develops inan entirely a priori manner are incoherent. An alternative reading is then articulated.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  13
    Katherine Elise Barhydt & J. M. Fritzman (2013). German Idealism Meets Indian Vedānta and Kaśmiri Śaivism. Comparative Philosophy 4 (2).
    0 0 1 152 943 Lewis & Clark College 21 2 1093 14.0 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE Regarding each philosophy as a variation of that of Spinoza , t his article compares the German Idealism of Schelling and Hegel with the Indian Ved ā nta of Śaṅkara and Rāmānuja, as well as Abhinavagupta’s Kaśmiri Śaivism. It argues that only Hegel’s philosophy does not fail. For Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, Abhinavagupta, and Schelling, the experience of ultimate reality—Brahman for Śaṅkara (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  18
    J. M. Fritzman (2009). A Guide to Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception. Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):409-410.
  10.  19
    J. M. Fritzman (2003). Politics of the Other. Radical Philosophy Review 6 (1):75-79.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    J. M. Fritzman (2014). Review Article on Recent Texts on Hegel. Teaching Philosophy 37 (3):399-409.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  6
    J. M. Fritzman (2002). Alfredo Ferrarin, Hegel and Aristotle. Philosophical Inquiry 24 (3-4):131-132.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    J. M. Fritzman (2002). Why I Hardly Read Althusser. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (1):47-59.
    This article discusses Habermas' rejections of the orthodoxy of the philosophy of history, ethical socialism, and scientism. It urges that his attempt to derive rationality and morality from consensus fails, and so he does lapse into ethical socialism. However, ethical socialism only appears to be something to avoidbecause of his belief that consensus could generate rationality and morality. Once the impossibility of that is recognized, ethical socialism can be rehabilitated. Hence, Althusser's version of ethical socialism escapes Habermas' censure.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  13
    J. M. Fritzman & Brianne Riley (2009). Not Only Sub Specie Aeternitatis, but Equally Sub Specie Durationis: A Defense of Hegel's Criticisms of Spinoza's Philosophy. The Pluralist 4 (3):76 - 97.
  15. J. M. Fritzman (1995). From Pragmatism to the Differend. In Michael Peters (ed.), Education and the Postmodern Condition. Bergin & Garvey
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  19
    J. M. Fritzman (2001). Return to Hegel. Continental Philosophy Review 34 (3):287-320.
    This article argues that Hegel read Lacan. Put less paradoxically, it claims that situating Hegel within a Lacanian paradigm results in an understanding of the future as still open and of history as not ended. Absolute knowing, on this model, is the recognition of the way in which history has developed, not a claim that it can advance no further. The article aims to persuade those who might otherwise dismiss Hegel – for example, persons au courant with poststructuralism – that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  4
    J. M. Fritzman (2002). Reducing Spirit to Substance. Idealistic Studies 32 (2):73-100.
    In “Hegel’s Phenomenological Method,” Kenley R. Dove maintains that the method of the Phenomenology of Spirit is not dialectical but instead wholly phenomenological. That is, Dove claims that Hegel’s method is purely descriptive. Dove’s interpretation has been highly influential and widely accepted. This article argues that, although there is a phenomenological aspect to Hegel’s method, that aspect itself presupposes a prior dialectical moment. Failure to account for that dialectical moment results in spirit being reduced to substance.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  16
    J. M. Fritzman (2001). Hwa Yol Jung, Rethinking Political Theory: Essays in Phenomenology and the Study of Politics. [REVIEW] Human Studies 24 (3):261-266.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  14
    J. M. Fritzman (2005). Almeder's Implicit Scientims. Philosophia 33 (1-4):275-296.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  3
    J. M. Fritzman (1993). Escaping Hegel. International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (1):57-68.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  14
    J. M. Fritzman (2009). Surprised by Geist : Hegel's Dialectic as Fish's Artifact. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 23 (1):pp. 51-68.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  9
    J. M. Fritzman (1992). Against Coherence. American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):183 - 191.
  23.  3
    J. M. Fritzman (2000). Review: Redemption, Reconciliation: Either/Or, Both/And? [REVIEW] Human Studies 23 (4):439 - 445.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  7
    J. M. Fritzman (2008). Queer Eye for the Geist Guy. International Studies in Philosophy 40 (1):49-63.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. J. M. Fritzman (1999). Jean-Joseph Goux and Philip R. Wood, Eds., Terror and Consensus: Vicissitudes of French Thought Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (3):181-182.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    Gina Altamura & J. M. Fritzman (forthcoming). Hegel's Pyjamas: Refashioning World History in Light of Postcolonial Criticism. Philosophical Frontiers: Essays and Emerging Thoughts.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  5
    J. M. Fritzman (2004). After Derrida, Hegel! Radical Philosophy Review 7 (1):107-111.
  28.  8
    J. M. Fritzman (2000). Redemption, Reconciliation: Either/or, Both/And. [REVIEW] Human Studies 23 (4):439-445.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  7
    J. M. Fritzman & Howard McGary (1991). Book Review. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 25 (4):385-392.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    Wendy Lynn Clark & J. M. Fritzman (2003). The Nonfoundational Hegelianism of Dove, Maker, and Winfield. Philosophical Forum 34 (1):91–113.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. J. M. Fritzman (1995). Michael O. Hardimon, Hegel's Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (5):329-331.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  3
    J. M. Fritzman (2008). Book Review: Kim, Kyung-Man. (2005). Discourses of Liberation: An Anatomy of Critical Theory. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):411-413.
  33. Louis Althusser, Poststructural Materialist & J. M. Fritzman (1998). Success and Failure. In Michael Peters (ed.), Naming the Multiple: Poststructuralism and Education. Bergin & Garvey 49.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. J. M. Fritzman (1997). Frederick C. Beiser, Ed., The Early Political Writings of the German Romantics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 17 (3):155-157.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. J. M. Fritzman (2014). Hegel. Polity.
    Fritzman goes on to scrutinize Hegel’s claims that history represents the progressive realization of human freedom, and details how Hegel believes that this is also expressed in art and religion.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. J. M. Fritzman (2014). Hegel. Polity.
    GWF Hegel has long been considered one of the most influential and controversial thinkers of the nineteenth century, and his work continues to provoke debate in contemporary philosophy. This new book provides readers with an accessible introduction to Hegel’s thought, offering a lucid and highly readable account of his _Phenomenology of Spirit_, _Science of Logic_, _Philosophy of Nature_, _Philosophy of History_, and _Philosophy of Right_. It provides a cogent and careful analysis of Hegel’s main arguments, considers critical responses, evaluates competing (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. J. M. Fritzman (2014). Hegel. Polity.
    GWF Hegel has long been considered one of the most influential and controversial thinkers of the nineteenth century, and his work continues to provoke debate in contemporary philosophy. This new book provides readers with an accessible introduction to Hegel’s thought, offering a lucid and highly readable account of his _Phenomenology of Spirit_, _Science of Logic_, _Philosophy of Nature_, _Philosophy of History_, and _Philosophy of Right_. It provides a cogent and careful analysis of Hegel’s main arguments, considers critical responses, evaluates competing (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. J. M. Fritzman (2014). Hegel. Polity.
    GWF Hegel has long been considered one of the most influential and controversial thinkers of the nineteenth century, and his work continues to provoke debate in contemporary philosophy. This new book provides readers with an accessible introduction to Hegel’s thought, offering a lucid and highly readable account of his _Phenomenology of Spirit_, _Science of Logic_, _Philosophy of Nature_, _Philosophy of History_, and _Philosophy of Right_. It provides a cogent and careful analysis of Hegel’s main arguments, considers critical responses, evaluates competing (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. J. M. Fritzman (2014). Hegel. Polity.
    GWF Hegel has long been considered one of the most influential and controversial thinkers of the nineteenth century, and his work continues to provoke debate in contemporary philosophy. This new book provides readers with an accessible introduction to Hegel’s thought, offering a lucid and highly readable account of his _Phenomenology of Spirit_, _Science of Logic_, _Philosophy of Nature_, _Philosophy of History_, and _Philosophy of Right_. It provides a cogent and careful analysis of Hegel’s main arguments, considers critical responses, evaluates competing (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. J. M. Fritzman (1999). Jean Hyppolite, Logic and Existence Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (1):28-30.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. J. M. Fritzman (1999). Jeremy Weate, A Young Person's Guide to Philosophy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (3):233-234.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. J. M. Fritzman (1991). N. Scott Arnold, "Marx's Radical Critique of Capitalist Society: A Reconstruction and Critical Evaluation". [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 25 (4):385.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. J. M. Fritzman (2005). "Review of" Marginal Groups and Mainstream American Culture". [REVIEW] Essays in Philosophy 6 (1):7.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. J. M. Fritzman (2001). Review: Political Theory and the Life-World. [REVIEW] Human Studies 24 (3):261 - 266.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography