Search results for 'J. R. & Searle' (try it on Scholar)

44 found
Order:
  1. John R. Searle (2002). Twenty-One Years in the Chinese Room. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2.  93
    J. R. Searle (1956). Report on Analysis 'Problem' No. 9 "Does It Make Sense to Suppose That All Events, Including Personal Experiences, Could Occur in Reverse?". Analysis 16 (6):124-125.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  14
    J. R. Searle (1982). The Chinese Room Revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):345.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  4.  15
    J. N. Findlay, J. E. McGechie, John R. Searle & Richard Taylor (1956). Report on Analysis 'Problem' No. 9. Analysis 16 (6):121 - 126.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. J. R. Searle (2007). Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Science. In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation. Oxford University Press 3--17.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    J. R. Searle & Daniel Vanderveken (1989). The Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (6):745-748.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Pierre Schneider, J. R. Searle & Ruth Mellinkoff (1971). Louvre Dialogues. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 30 (2):275-276.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. J. R. Searle (1995). Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion, and Cognitive Science. BBS 13: 585-642. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):612.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. J. R. Searle (1998). Die Konstruktion der gesellshaftlichen Wirklichkeit. Zur Ontologie sozialer Tatsachen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 46 (4):705.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. J. R. Searle (2001). Further Reply to Libet. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (8):63-65.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. J. R. Searle (1997). Replies To Critics of the Construction of Social Reality. History of the Human Sciences 10 (4):103-110.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. John R. Searle & A. J. Ayer (1961). Logical Positivism. Philosophical Review 70 (3):411.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. John R. Searle (1994). The Connection Principle and the Ontology of the Unconscious: A Reply to Fodor and Lepore. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):847-55.
  14.  21
    Jane Heal (1974). Essays on J. L. Austin By Sir Isaiah Berlin, L. W. Forguson, D. F. Pears, G. Pitcher, J. R. Searle, P. F. Strawson and G. J. Warnock Clarendon Press, 1973, 190 Pp. £3.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 49 (188):219-.
  15. Helmut Kuhn (1980). "Hinweise auf": G. Ripanti: Agostino teorico dell' interpretazione; W. Totok : Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie; P. Aubenque : Etudes sur la Métaphysique d'Aristote; Malebranche: Oeuvres I. S. Dietzsch : Natur-Kunst-Mythos; R. Scruton: The Aesthetics of Architecture; E. Rothacker: Das "Buch der Natur"; Wittgenstein Lectures, Cambridge 1930-1932, 1932-1935; G. Ryle: On Thinking; J. R. Searle: Expression and Meaning; R. Gätschenberger: Zeichen, die Fundamente des Wissens; K. Schumann: Husserl-Chronik; H. Zeltner: Sozialphilosophie; G. Radnitzky u. G. Andersson : Fortschritt und Rationalität der Wissenschaft. [REVIEW] Philosophische Rundschau 27:305-308.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Jacek Woźniak (1989). Czynności mowy (J. R. Searle, \"Czynności mowy\", przeł. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa 1987). Studia Filozoficzne 280 (3).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. L. Holborow (1972). SEARLE, J. R. - "Speech Acts". [REVIEW] Mind 81:458.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  7
    Roger Montague (1965). “Ought” From “Is” 1 I Am Grateful for Criticisms of an Earlier Version From Mr. R. M. Hare (Who Kindly Showed Me a Paper of His Own on the Earlier Part of Searle's Specimen Argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):144-167.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Jack Copeland (1998). Turing's o-Machines, Searle, Penrose, and the Brain. Analysis 58 (2):128-138.
    In his PhD thesis (1938) Turing introduced what he described as 'a new kind of machine'. He called these 'O-machines'. The present paper employs Turing's concept against a number of currently fashionable positions in the philosophy of mind.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  20.  9
    N. J. H. Dent (1996). The Construction of Social Reality By John R. Searle Allen Lane: The Penguin Press, 1995, Xiii + 241 Pp., £20.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):313-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Michael J. Dodds (2016). Response to John R. Searle’s “The Future of Philosophy”. Nova et Vetera 14 (2):559-564.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. C. B. Martin & Karl Pfeifer (1986). Intentionality and the Non-Psychological. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (June):531-54.
  23.  28
    Dale Jacquette (2014). Intentionality in Reference and Action. Topoi 33 (1):255-262.
    This essay asks whether there is a relation between action-serving and meaning-serving intentions. The idea that the intentions involved in meaning and action are nominally designated alike as intentionalities does not guarantee any special logical or conceptual connections between the intentionality of referential thoughts and thought-expressive speech acts with the intentionality of doing. The latter category is typified by overt physical actions in order to communicate by engaging in speech acts, but also includes at the origin of all artistic and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  62
    Dale Jacquette (1990). Fear and Loathing (and Other Intentional States) in Searle's Chinese Room. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):287-304.
    John R. Searle's problem of the Chinese Room poses an important philosophical challenge to the foundations of strong artificial intelligence, and functionalist, cognitivist, and computationalist theories of mind. Searle has recently responded to three categories of criticisms of the Chinese Room and the consequences he attempts to conclude from it, redescribing the essential features of the problem, and offering new arguments about the syntax-semantics gap it is intended to demonstrate. Despite Searle's defense, the Chinese Room remains ineffective (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  32
    Neal Jahren (1990). Can Semantics Be Syntactic? Synthese 82 (3):309-28.
    The author defends John R. Searle's Chinese Room argument against a particular objection made by William J. Rapaport called the Korean Room. Foundational issues such as the relationship of strong AI to human mentality and the adequacy of the Turing Test are discussed. Through undertaking a Gedankenexperiment similar to Searle's but which meets new specifications given by Rapaport for an AI system, the author argues that Rapaport's objection to Searle does not stand and that Rapaport's arguments seem (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26. Stephan Zelewski (1991). Die Starke KI-These: Zu Searle's Wiederbelebung einer fragwürdigen Debatte über die Grundlagen des Erkenntnisprogramms der Erforschung Künstlicher Intelligenz. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (2):337-348.
    The Strong AI-Thesis. The controversy about the strong AI-thesis was recently revived by two interrelated contributions stemming from J. R. Searle on the one hand and from P. M. and P. S. Churchland on the other hand. It is shown that the strong AI-thesis cannot be defended in the formulation used by the three authors. It violates some well accepted criterions of scientific argumentation, especially the rejection of essentialistic definitions. Moreover, Searle's 'proof' is not conclusive. Though it may (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Maureen Chun & Timothy Attanucci (eds.) (2014). Derrida/Searle: Deconstruction and Ordinary Language. Cup.
    Raoul Moati intervenes in the critical debate that divided two prominent philosophers in the mid-twentieth century. In the 1950s, the British philosopher J. L. Austin advanced a theory of speech acts, or the "performative," that Jacques Derrida and John R. Searle interpreted in fundamentally different ways. Their disagreement centered on the issue of intentionality, which Derrida understood phenomenologically and Searle read pragmatically. The controversy had profound implications for the development of contemporary philosophy, which, Moati argues, can profit greatly (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  11
    Marzenna Cyzman (2011). “Lying, Poets Tell the Truth …”. “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse” by John Searle – a Still Possible Solution to an Old Problem? Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (4):317-326.
    The purpose of this article is to consider an answer to the question whether Searle’s idea of sentence in a literary text is still relevant. Understanding literary utterances as specific speech acts, pretended illocutions, is inherent in the process of considering the sentence in a literary text in broader terms. Accordingly, it appears necessary to outline it. Reference to other ideas formulated both in the theory of literature as a speech act [R. Ohmann, S. Levin] as well as in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  12
    R. Vaughan (1989). Searle's Narrow Content. Ratio 2 (2):185-90.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    Rafael Ferber, Moral Judgments as Descriptions of Institutional Facts.
    This is the abbreviated and slightly revised English version of my paper “Moralische Urteile als Beschreibungen institutioneller Tatsachen. Unterwegs zu einer Theorie moralischer Urteile“, in: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 79, 1993, 372-392. It deals with the question of what a moral judgment is. On the one hand, a satisfactory theory of moral judgments must take into account the descriptive character of moral judgments and the realistic language of morals. On the other hand, it must also meet the non-descriptive character (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. M. Bennett, D. C. Dennett, P. M. S. Hacker & J. R. & Searle (eds.) (2007). Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language. Columbia University Press.
    "Neuroscience and Philosophy" begins with an excerpt from "Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience," in which Maxwell Bennett and Peter Hacker question the ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  32.  7
    Bruno Celano (2016). Pre-Conventions. A Fragment of the Background. Revus.
    In this paper I argue that there exist conventions of a peculiar sort which are neither norms nor regularities of behaviour, partaking of both. I proceed as follows. After a brief analysis of the meaning of ‘convention’, I give some examples of the kind of phenomena I have in mind: bodily skills, know-how, taste and style, habitus, “disciplines”. Then I group some arguments supporting my claim: considerations about the identity conditions of precedents and about the projectibility of predicates in inductive (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  52
    Aaron Sloman (1969). Transformations of Illocutionary Acts. Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.
    Speech-Act analyses of words like 'good', 'true', 'know' and 'probable' were criticised by j.R. Searle in "speech acts". I have tried to show how his criticisms can be met by an analysis in terms of operators on speech acts which 'transform' them into other speech-Acts. I conclude, Not that speech-Act analyses are correct, But that they survive searle's criticism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  11
    Stephan Zelewski (1991). Die Starke KI-These. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (2):337 - 348.
    The Strong AI-Thesis. The controversy about the strong AI-thesis was recently revived by two interrelated contributions stemming from J. R. Searle on the one hand and from P. M. and P. S. Churchland on the other hand. It is shown that the strong AI-thesis cannot be defended in the formulation used by the three authors. It violates some well accepted criterions of scientific argumentation, especially the rejection of essentialistic definitions. Moreover, Searle's 'proof' is not conclusive. Though it may (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  9
    Stephan Zelewski (1991). Die Starke KI-TheseThe Strong AI-Thesis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (2):337-348.
    Summary The controversy about the strong AI-thesis was recently revived by two interrelated contributions stemming from J. R. Searle on the one hand and from P. M. and P. S. Churchland on the other hand. It is shown that the strong AI-thesis cannot be defended in the formulation used by the three authors. It violates some well accepted criterions of scientific argumentation, especially the rejection of essentialistic definitions. Moreover, Searle's ‘proof’ is not conclusive. Though it may be reconstructed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  23
    Adrienne Lehrer (1970). Theory of Meaning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
    Meaning in philosophy, by K. Lehrer.--Meaning in linguistics, by A. Lehrer.--Theories of meaning, by W. Alston.--Of names, by J. S. Mill.--Of words, by J. Locke.--Of language, by G. Berkeley.--Signs and behavior situations, by C. Morris.--Meaning and verification, by M. Schlick.--Meaning and use, by R. Wells.--The meaning of a word, by J. Austin.--Meaning and speech acts, by J. R. Searle.--Meaning and linguistic analysis, by C. C. Fries.--The semantic compound of a linguistic description, by J. J. Katz.--Componential analysis and universal semantics, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  7
    Calvin Dwight Rollins (ed.) (1962). Knowledge and Experience. [Pittsburgh, Pa.]University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Truth and correspondence, by G.J. Warnock.--Some exercises in epistemic logic, by A.N. Prior.--Symposium: Meaning and speech acts, by J.R. Searle.--Comments, by Zeno Vendler.--Comments, by Paul Benacerraf.--Rejoinders, by J.R. Searle.--Symposium: Wittgenstein on criteria, by Newton Garver.--Commments, by Carl Ginet.--Comments by F.A. Siegler.--Comments, by Paul Ziff.--Rejoinders, by Newton Garver.--Symposium: The private-language argument, by H-N. Castañeda.--Comments, by V.C. Chappell.--Comments, by J.F. Thomson.--Rejoinders, by H-N. Castañeda.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Aloysius Martinich (ed.) (2008). The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
    What is meaning? How is linguistic communication possible? What is the nature of language? What is the relationship between language and the world? How do metaphors work? The Philosophy of Language, considered the essential text in its field, is an excellent introduction to such fundamental questions. This revised edition collects forty-six of the most important articles in the field, making it the most up-to-date and comprehensive volume on the subject. Revised to address changing trends and contemporary developments, the fifth edition (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  39. Massimo Pigliucci (2014). 5 Questions on Science & Religion. In Gregg D. Caruso (ed.), 5 Questions on Science & Religion. Automatic Press 163-170.
    Are science and religion compatible when it comes to understanding cosmology (the origin of the universe), biology (the origin of life and of the human species), ethics, and the human mind (minds, brains, souls, and free will)? Do science and religion occupy non-overlapping magisteria? Is Intelligent Design a scientific theory? How do the various faith traditions view the relationship between science and religion? What, if any, are the limits of scientific explanation? What are the most important open questions, problems, or (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  12
    Zdravko Radman (ed.) (2012). Knowing Without Thinking: Mind, Action, Cognition and the Phenomenon of the Background. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Machine generated contents note: -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on Contributors -- Introduction; Z.Radman -- The Mystery of the Background qua Background; H.L.Dreyfus -- PART I: ECHOING SEARLE'S AND DREYFUS' VIEWS ON THE BACKGROUND -- Ground-Level Intelligence:Action-Oriented Representation and the Dynamics of the Background; M.Cappuccio& M.Wheeler -- Exposing the Background: Deep and Local; D.D.Hutto -- The Background as Intentional, Conscious, and Nonconceptual; M.Schmitz -- Social Cognition, the Chinese Room, and the Robot Replies; S.Gallagher -- Contesting John's Searle' (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  24
    John F. Stins (2009). Establishing Consciousness in Non-Communicative Patients: A Modern-Day Version of the Turing Test. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):187-192.
    In a recent study of a patient in a persistent vegetative state, [Owen, A. M., Coleman, M. R., Boly, M., Davis, M. H., Laureys, S., & Pickard, J. D. . Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science, 313, 1402] claimed that they had demonstrated the presence of consciousness in this patient. This bold conclusion was based on the isomorphy between brain activity in this patient and a set of conscious control subjects, obtained in various imagery tasks. However, establishing consciousness in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42. Karsten R. Stueber (1996). Indeterminacy and the First Person Perspective. In C. Martinez Vidal (ed.), Verdad: Logica, Representacion Y Mundo. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  12
    Herbert Hochberg (1994). From Carnap's Vienna To Meinong's Graz. Grazer Philosophische Studien 48:1-50.
    The development of the systematic ontology of Bergmannes posthumous 1992 work New Foundations of Ontology from its roots in his early criticisms of R. Camap's work on semantics to his acceptance of fundamental Meinongian ideas, is traced, critically examined and compared to views of others, such as G.E. Moore, B. Russell, W.V. Quine, and J. Searle. The discussion, focusing on main themes of his final metaphysical system, deals with problems posed by universals and particulars, predication and the Bradley "paradox", (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  14
    Sita Anantha Raman, Robert Nichols Richard, Joshua Searle-White, Heather T. Frazer, Timothy Lubin, Robin Rinehart, Joel R. Smith, Andrea Pinkney, David Gordon White, John Powers, Phyllis Herman, Lawrence A. Babb, Carl Olson, June McDaniel, Knut A. Jacobsen, John E. Cort, Gregory P. Fields & Jeffrey J. Kripal (2000). Book Reviews and Notices. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 4 (2):185-216.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography