Search results for 'J. R. & Searle' (try it on Scholar)

30 found
Sort by:
  1. John R. Searle (2002). Twenty-One Years in the Chinese Room. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.score: 1170.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. R. Searle (1982). The Chinese Room Revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):345.score: 870.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. R. Searle (1995). Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion, and Cognitive Science. BBS 13: 585-642. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):612.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. J. R. Searle (2001). Further Reply to Libet. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (8):63-65.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. J. R. Searle (1956). Report on Analysis 'Problem' No. 9 "Does It Make Sense to Suppose That All Events, Including Personal Experiences, Could Occur in Reverse?". Analysis 16 (6):124-125.score: 870.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. R. Searle (2007). Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Science. In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation. Oxford University Press. 3--17.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. N. Findlay, J. E. McGechie, John R. Searle & Richard Taylor (1956). Report on Analysis 'Problem' No. 9. Analysis 16 (6):121 - 126.score: 810.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John R. Searle (1994). The Connection Principle and the Ontology of the Unconscious: A Reply to Fodor and Lepore. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):847-55.score: 540.0
  9. Jane Heal (1974). Essays on J. L. Austin By Sir Isaiah Berlin, L. W. Forguson, D. F. Pears, G. Pitcher, J. R. Searle, P. F. Strawson and G. J. Warnock Clarendon Press, 1973, 190 Pp. £3.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 49 (188):219-.score: 261.0
  10. Jacek Woźniak (1989). Czynności mowy (J. R. Searle, \"Czynności mowy\", przeł. B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa 1987). Studia Filozoficzne 280 (3).score: 261.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Roger Montague (1965). “Ought” From “Is” 1 I Am Grateful for Criticisms of an Earlier Version From Mr. R. M. Hare (Who Kindly Showed Me a Paper of His Own on the Earlier Part of Searle's Specimen Argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):144-167.score: 243.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jack Copeland (1998). Turing's o-Machines, Searle, Penrose, and the Brain. Analysis 58 (2):128-138.score: 189.0
    In his PhD thesis (1938) Turing introduced what he described as 'a new kind of machine'. He called these 'O-machines'. The present paper employs Turing's concept against a number of currently fashionable positions in the philosophy of mind.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. C. B. Martin & Karl Pfeifer (1986). Intentionality and the Non-Psychological. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (June):531-54.score: 162.0
  14. Dale Jacquette (2014). Intentionality in Reference and Action. Topoi 33 (1):255-262.score: 162.0
    This essay asks whether there is a relation between action-serving and meaning-serving intentions. The idea that the intentions involved in meaning and action are nominally designated alike as intentionalities does not guarantee any special logical or conceptual connections between the intentionality of referential thoughts and thought-expressive speech acts with the intentionality of doing. The latter category is typified by overt physical actions in order to communicate by engaging in speech acts, but also includes at the origin of all artistic and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Neal Jahren (1990). Can Semantics Be Syntactic? Synthese 82 (3):309-28.score: 153.0
    The author defends John R. Searle's Chinese Room argument against a particular objection made by William J. Rapaport called the Korean Room. Foundational issues such as the relationship of strong AI to human mentality and the adequacy of the Turing Test are discussed. Through undertaking a Gedankenexperiment similar to Searle's but which meets new specifications given by Rapaport for an AI system, the author argues that Rapaport's objection to Searle does not stand and that Rapaport's arguments seem (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Dale Jacquette (1990). Fear and Loathing (and Other Intentional States) in Searle's Chinese Room. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):287-304.score: 135.0
    John R. Searle's problem of the Chinese Room poses an important philosophical challenge to the foundations of strong artificial intelligence, and functionalist, cognitivist, and computationalist theories of mind. Searle has recently responded to three categories of criticisms of the Chinese Room and the consequences he attempts to conclude from it, redescribing the essential features of the problem, and offering new arguments about the syntax-semantics gap it is intended to demonstrate. Despite Searle's defense, the Chinese Room remains ineffective (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. N. J. H. Dent (1996). The Construction of Social Reality By John R. Searle Allen Lane: The Penguin Press, 1995, Xiii + 241 Pp., £20.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):313-.score: 117.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. R. Vaughan (1989). Searle's Narrow Content. Ratio 2 (2):185-90.score: 108.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Marzenna Cyzman (2011). “Lying, Poets Tell the Truth …”. “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse” by John Searle – a Still Possible Solution to an Old Problem? Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (4):317-326.score: 108.0
    The purpose of this article is to consider an answer to the question whether Searle’s idea of sentence in a literary text is still relevant. Understanding literary utterances as specific speech acts, pretended illocutions, is inherent in the process of considering the sentence in a literary text in broader terms. Accordingly, it appears necessary to outline it. Reference to other ideas formulated both in the theory of literature as a speech act [R. Ohmann, S. Levin] as well as in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. M. Bennett, D. C. Dennett, P. M. S. Hacker & J. R. & Searle (eds.) (2007). Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language. Columbia University Press.score: 87.0
    "Neuroscience and Philosophy" begins with an excerpt from "Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience," in which Maxwell Bennett and Peter Hacker question the ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Adrienne Lehrer (1970). Theory of Meaning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.score: 87.0
    Meaning in philosophy, by K. Lehrer.--Meaning in linguistics, by A. Lehrer.--Theories of meaning, by W. Alston.--Of names, by J. S. Mill.--Of words, by J. Locke.--Of language, by G. Berkeley.--Signs and behavior situations, by C. Morris.--Meaning and verification, by M. Schlick.--Meaning and use, by R. Wells.--The meaning of a word, by J. Austin.--Meaning and speech acts, by J. R. Searle.--Meaning and linguistic analysis, by C. C. Fries.--The semantic compound of a linguistic description, by J. J. Katz.--Componential analysis and universal semantics, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Aaron Sloman (1969). Transformations of Illocutionary Acts. Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.score: 87.0
    Speech-Act analyses of words like 'good', 'true', 'know' and 'probable' were criticised by j.R. Searle in "speech acts". I have tried to show how his criticisms can be met by an analysis in terms of operators on speech acts which 'transform' them into other speech-Acts. I conclude, Not that speech-Act analyses are correct, But that they survive searle's criticism.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Calvin Dwight Rollins (ed.) (1962). Knowledge and Experience. [Pittsburgh, Pa.]University of Pittsburgh Press.score: 87.0
    Truth and correspondence, by G.J. Warnock.--Some exercises in epistemic logic, by A.N. Prior.--Symposium: Meaning and speech acts, by J.R. Searle.--Comments, by Zeno Vendler.--Comments, by Paul Benacerraf.--Rejoinders, by J.R. Searle.--Symposium: Wittgenstein on criteria, by Newton Garver.--Commments, by Carl Ginet.--Comments by F.A. Siegler.--Comments, by Paul Ziff.--Rejoinders, by Newton Garver.--Symposium: The private-language argument, by H-N. Castañeda.--Comments, by V.C. Chappell.--Comments, by J.F. Thomson.--Rejoinders, by H-N. Castañeda.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Stephan Zelewski (1991). Die Starke KI-TheseThe Strong AI-Thesis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (2):337-348.score: 87.0
    Summary The controversy about the strong AI-thesis was recently revived by two interrelated contributions stemming from J. R. Searle on the one hand and from P. M. and P. S. Churchland on the other hand. It is shown that the strong AI-thesis cannot be defended in the formulation used by the three authors. It violates some well accepted criterions of scientific argumentation, especially the rejection of essentialistic definitions. Moreover, Searle's ‘proof’ is not conclusive. Though it may be reconstructed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Stephan Zelewski (1991). Die Starke KI-These. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (2):337 - 348.score: 87.0
    The Strong AI-Thesis. The controversy about the strong AI-thesis was recently revived by two interrelated contributions stemming from J. R. Searle on the one hand and from P. M. and P. S. Churchland on the other hand. It is shown that the strong AI-thesis cannot be defended in the formulation used by the three authors. It violates some well accepted criterions of scientific argumentation, especially the rejection of essentialistic definitions. Moreover, Searle's 'proof' is not conclusive. Though it may (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Karsten R. Stueber (1996). Indeterminacy and the First Person Perspective. In C. Martinez Vidal (ed.), Verdad: Logica, Representacion Y Mundo. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.score: 81.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Sita Anantha Raman, Robert Nichols Richard, Joshua Searle-White, Heather T. Frazer, Timothy Lubin, Robin Rinehart, Joel R. Smith, Andrea Pinkney, David Gordon White, John Powers, Phyllis Herman, Lawrence A. Babb, Carl Olson, June McDaniel, Knut A. Jacobsen, John E. Cort, Gregory P. Fields & Jeffrey J. Kripal (2000). Book Reviews and Notices. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 4 (2):185-216.score: 81.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Zdravko Radman (ed.) (2012). Knowing Without Thinking: Mind, Action, Cognition and the Phenomenon of the Background. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 81.0
    Machine generated contents note: -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on Contributors -- Introduction; Z.Radman -- The Mystery of the Background qua Background; H.L.Dreyfus -- PART I: ECHOING SEARLE'S AND DREYFUS' VIEWS ON THE BACKGROUND -- Ground-Level Intelligence:Action-Oriented Representation and the Dynamics of the Background; M.Cappuccio& M.Wheeler -- Exposing the Background: Deep and Local; D.D.Hutto -- The Background as Intentional, Conscious, and Nonconceptual; M.Schmitz -- Social Cognition, the Chinese Room, and the Robot Replies; S.Gallagher -- Contesting John's Searle' (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Herbert Hochberg (1994). From Carnap's Vienna To Meinong's Graz. Grazer Philosophische Studien 48:1-50.score: 81.0
    The development of the systematic ontology of Bergmannes posthumous 1992 work New Foundations of Ontology from its roots in his early criticisms of R. Camap's work on semantics to his acceptance of fundamental Meinongian ideas, is traced, critically examined and compared to views of others, such as G.E. Moore, B. Russell, W.V. Quine, and J. Searle. The discussion, focusing on main themes of his final metaphysical system, deals with problems posed by universals and particulars, predication and the Bradley "paradox", (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Aloysius Martinich (ed.) (2008). The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.score: 81.0
    What is meaning? How is linguistic communication possible? What is the nature of language? What is the relationship between language and the world? How do metaphors work? The Philosophy of Language, considered the essential text in its field, is an excellent introduction to such fundamental questions. This revised edition collects forty-six of the most important articles in the field, making it the most up-to-date and comprehensive volume on the subject. Revised to address changing trends and contemporary developments, the fifth edition (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation