28 found
Order:
  1.  20
    John Sisko (2012). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. By John Palmer. Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):407-415.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  18
    John E. Sisko (2009). On the Question of Homoeomereity in Anaxagorean Physics. Apeiron 42 (2):89-104.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. John Sisko (2004). Reflexive Awareness Does Belong to the Main Function of Perception: Reply to Victor Caston. Mind 113 (451):513-521.
  4.  16
    John E. Sisko (2003). Anaxagoras' Parmenidean Cosmology: Worlds Within Worlds Within the One. Apeiron 36 (2):87 - 114.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  42
    John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras on Matter, Motion, and Multiple Worlds. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):443-454.
    In this article, both Anaxagoras' theory of multiple worlds and the principles of his theory of matter are examined. It is argued that the five principles, which are set out explicitly in the extant fragments, (No Becoming, Indefinite Types, Universal Mixture, Predominance, and Infinite Divisibility) form a consistent set. Further, it is argued that the principle of Homoeomereity, which Anaxagoras attributes to Anaxagoras, is consistent with Anaxagoras' other principles and is likely to be a genuine principle of Anaxagoras' physics.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  26
    John E. Sisko (2005). Anaxagoras and Recursive Refinement. Ancient Philosophy 25 (2):239-245.
  7.  9
    John E. Sisko & Yale Weiss (2015). A Fourth Alternative in Interpreting Parmenides. Phronesis 60 (1):40-59.
    _ Source: _Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 40 - 59 According to current interpretations of Parmenides, he either embraces a token-monism of things, or a type-monism of the nature of each kind of thing, or a generous monism, accepting a token-monism of things of a specific type, necessary being. These interpretations share a common flaw: they fail to secure commensurability between Parmenides’ alētheia and doxa. We effect this by arguing that Parmenides champions a metaphysically refined form of material monism, a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  42
    John E. Sisko (1999). On Separating the Intellect From the Body: Aristotle's De Anima III.4, 429a10-B5. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81 (3):249-67.
  9.  50
    John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato. Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
    In this article, it is argued that, although there is significant debate over the nature of Anaxagoras' response to Parmenides, it is likely that Anaxagoras advances his physical theory in opposition to Parmenides' Numerical Monism. It is unlikely that Anaxagoras aims to develop a theory that harmonizes with the Predicational Monism that is sometimes ascribed to Parmenides. In addition, it is argued that, although some modern scholars suggest that Anaxagoras posits nous as a planning cause, no compelling argument has yet (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. John E. Sisko (1998). Alteration and Quasi-Alteration: A Critical Notice of Stephen Everson, Aristotle on Perception'. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16:331-52.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. John Sisko (2000). Aristotle's Nous and the Modern Mind. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16:177-98.
  12.  1
    John Sisko (2000). Colloquium 6. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 16 (1):177-198.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  4
    John E. Sisko (1998). Aristotle on Contradictory Pairs. The Classical Review 48 (2):350-351.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  25
    John E. Sisko (1996). Material Alteration and Cognitive Activity in Aristotle's "De Anima". Phronesis 41 (2):138 - 157.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  23
    John Sisko (1996). Material Alteration and Cognitive Activity in Aristotle's De Anima. Phronesis 41 (2):138-157.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  15
    John E. Sisko (2010). Anaxagoras of Clazomenae. Ancient Philosophy 30 (1):159-167.
  17.  14
    John E. Sisko (2002). OUSIA IN ARISTOTLE M. V. Wedin: Aristotle's Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta. Pp. Xii + 482. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Cased, £37.50. ISBN: 0-19-823855-X. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (01):51-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  11
    J. E. Sisko (2003). Taste, Touch, and Temperance in Nicomachean Ethics 3.10. Classical Quarterly 53 (1):135-140.
  19.  5
    John Sisko (2002). Ousia In Aristotle. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (1):51-53.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  9
    John E. Sisko (1997). Space, Time and Phantasms in Aristotle, De Memoria 2, 452B7-25. Classical Quarterly 47 (01):167-.
    Aristotle thinks that in order to remember, one must be cognizant of aphantasmaused as a copy of that of which it is a phantasma,and one must be cognizant of the time at which the original experience occurred . In De Memoria1, he uses the first half, , of this schematic account in order to explain certain kinds of mis-rememberings. For instance, he says that mad people sometimes conjure up fantastic images and take them to be memories of past experience; such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  3
    John E. Sisko (2000). THEOPHRASTUS J. M. Van Ophuijsen, M. Van Raalte (Edd.): Theophrastus. Reappraising the Sources . (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities 8.) Pp. Ix + 410. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 1998. Cased, $54.95. ISBN: 1-56000-328-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):148-.
  22.  6
    John E. Sisko (1999). Sense-Organs T. K. Johansen: Aristotle on the Sense-Organs . Pp. Xvi + 304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Cased, £37.50/$59.95. ISBN: 0-521-58338-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):122-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  6
    J. Sisko (1998). Aristotle's De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. C W A Whitaker. The Classical Review 48 (2):350-351.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  1
    JohnE Sisko (2013). Empedocles in the Shadow of Elea. In Frisbee Sheffield & James Warren (eds.), Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Routledge 49.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  7
    John E. Sisko (2002). Review of David Sedley (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume XX. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. John Sisko (ed.) (forthcoming). History of Philosophy of Mind: Pre-Socratics to Augustine. Acumen.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. John Sisko (ed.) (2017). Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, Volume 1. Routledge.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. John Sisko (2001). Review of David Sedley. [REVIEW] Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 20.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography