Search results for 'J. Sylvester Douglas' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  20
    Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester & Kenneth W. Abbott (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1):43-60.
    Risk management of nanotechnology is challenged by the enormous uncertainties about the risks, benefits, properties, and future direction of nanotechnology applications. Because of these uncertainties, traditional risk management principles such as acceptable risk, cost–benefit analysis, and feasibility are unworkable, as is the newest risk management principle, the precautionary principle. Yet, simply waiting for these uncertainties to be resolved before undertaking risk management efforts would not be prudent, in part because of the growing public concerns about nanotechnology (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  2.  3
    Gary E. Marchant & Douglas J. Sylvester (2006). Transnational Models for Regulation of Nanotechnology. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (4):714-725.
    Like all technologies, nanotechnology will inevitably present risks, whether they result from unintentional effects of otherwise beneficial applications, or from the malevolent misuse of technology. Increasingly, risks from new and emerging technologies are being regulated at the international level, although governments and private experts are only beginning to consider the appropriate international responses to nanotechnology. In this paper, we explore both the potential risks posed by nanotechnology and potential regulatory frameworks that law may impose. In so doing, we also explore (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  3. Gary E. Marchant & Douglas J. Sylvester (2006). Transnational Models for Regulation of Nanotechnology. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):714-725.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  6
    Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester & Kenneth W. Abbott (2009). What Does the History of Technology Regulation Teach Us About Nano Oversight? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (4):724-731.
    As policy makers struggle to develop regulatory oversight models for nanotechnologies, there are important lessons that can be drawn from previous attempts to govern other emerging technologies. Five such lessons are the following: public confidence and trust in a technology and its regulatory oversight is probably the most important factor for the commercial success of a technology; regulation should avoid discriminating against particular technologies unless there is a scientifically based rationale for the disparate treatment; regulatory systems need to be flexible (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  4
    Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester, Kenneth W. Abbott & Tara Lynn Danforth (2009). International Harmonization of Regulation of Nanomedicine. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 3 (3).
    Nanomedicine holds enormous promise for the improved prevention, detection and treatment of disease. Yet, at the same time, countervailing concerns about the potential safety risks of nano-technologies generally, and nanomedical products specifically, threaten to derail or at least delay the introduction and commercial viability of many nanomedicine applications. All around the globe, national governments are struggling with balancing these competing benefits and risks of nanotechnology in the medical and other sectors. It is becoming increasingly clear that reasonable, effective and predictable (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester & Kenneth W. Abbott (2009). What Does the History of Technology Regulation Teach Us About Nano Oversight? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):724-731.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  27
    E. Marchant Gary, J. Sylvester Douglas & W. Abbott Kenneth (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1).
    Risk management of nanotechnology is challenged by the enormous uncertainties about the risks, benefits, properties, and future direction of nanotechnology applications. Because of these uncertainties, traditional risk management principles such as acceptable risk, cost–benefit analysis, and feasibility are unworkable, as is the newest risk management principle, the precautionary principle. Yet, simply waiting for these uncertainties to be resolved before undertaking risk management efforts would not be prudent, in part because of the growing public concerns about nanotechnology driven by risk perception (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. J. Conrad, V. Crapanzano, M. Crick, J. Cripps, M. David, J. Derrida, N. B. Dirks, T. Docherty, N. Dorian & M. Douglas (1997). Collard, J. 54 Comito, T. 198 Condor, J. 205n2 Condry, E. 87-8, 90, 91. In Andrew Dawson, Jennifer Lorna Hockey & Andrew H. Dawson (eds.), After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology. Routledge 264.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. J. Douglas (2006). Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen," The Myth of Atomism,". Review of Metaphysics 59:843-70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  5
    A. E. Douglas (1985). Seneca's Troades Elaine Fantham: Seneca's Troades. A Literary Introduction with Text, Introduction and Commentary. Pp. Xii + 412. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983. £31.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):33-34.
  11.  5
    A. E. Douglas (1967). James J. Murphy: Quintilian on the Early Education of the Citizen-Orator. Pp. Xxx + 122. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965. Paper, $1.45. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (1):106.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    A. J. Cronin, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & J. F. Douglas (2011). British Transplant Research Endangered by the Human Tissue Act. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):512-514.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  38
    T. Douglas & J. Savulescu (2010). Synthetic Biology and the Ethics of Knowledge. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):687-693.
    Synthetic biologists aim to generate biological organisms according to rational design principles. Their work may have many beneficial applications, but it also raises potentially serious ethical concerns. In this article, we consider what attention the discipline demands from bioethicists. We argue that the most important issue for ethicists to examine is the risk that knowledge from synthetic biology will be misused, for example, in biological terrorism or warfare. To adequately address this concern, bioethics will need to broaden its scope, contemplating (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  15.  75
    Andrew J. Douglas (2013). C.L.R. James and the Struggle for Humanism. Constellations 20 (1):85-101.
  16.  19
    E. Corazza, H. Douglas, J. L. Dowell, J. Franklin, A. S. Gillies, S. C. Goldberg, D. K. Heikes, C. Liu, C. Ortiz Hill & M. W. Pelczar (2004). Cling, AD, 101. Synthese 137 (477).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  12
    Neil Levy, Thomas Douglas, Guy Kahane, Sylvia Terbeck, Philip J. Cowen, Miles Hewstone & Julian Savulescu (2014). Disease, Normality, and Current Pharmacological Moral Modification. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (2):135-137.
  18.  4
    Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell, John Harris, Robin Lovell-Badge, Debra J. H. Mathews & Alan Regenberg (2015). Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  6
    Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry & Annelie J. Harvey (2015). Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Thinking and Reasoning 22 (1):57-77.
    We hypothesised that belief in conspiracy theories would be predicted by the general tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it is unlikely to exist. We further hypothesised that this tendency would explain the relationship between education level and belief in conspiracy theories, where lower levels of education have been found to be associated with higher conspiracy belief. In Study 1 participants were more likely to agree with a range of conspiracy theories if they also tended to attribute intentionality and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  9
    Neil Levy, Thomas Douglas, Guy Kahane, Sylvia Terbeck, Philip J. Cowen, Miles Hewstone & Julian Savulescu (2014). Are You Morally Modified?: The Moral Effects of Widely Used Pharmaceuticals. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (2):111-125.
  21.  5
    Andrew J. Douglas (2011). In a Milieu of Scarcity: Sartre and the Limits of Political Imagination. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (3):354.
  22.  6
    J. W. B. Douglas & J. M. Blomfield (1957). Maternal Employment and the Welfare of Children: An Account of a Survey in Progress. The Eugenics Review 49 (2):69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  11
    Rodney J. Douglas & Bernard P. Keaney (1985). Popper and Eccles' Psychophysical Interaction Theses Examined. Grazer Philosophische Studien 23:129-153.
    Popper and Eccles present two different notions of Interactionism. Popper's arguments arise out of the traditional philosophical debate, whereas Eccles' arguments arise out of a mixture of neurophysiology and personal belief. Popper's three-world ontology is the philosophical foundation of both their positions. However, it is precisely against the background of the three Worlds that the considerable differences between their positions are apparent. Despite these defects, Interactionism is a productive notion since it does not place the Self beyond experimental investigation. Indeed, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  22
    A. J. Douglas (2010). Democratic Darkness and Adorno's Redemptive Criticism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (7):819-836.
    Adorno’s critical theory aims to open space for the expression of alternative futures, but its insistence on dialectical reflection encourages at the same time our sustained attentiveness to the psychic and material constraints that may prevent the very possibilities we imagine. In this article, I argue that dialectical reflection signals a location at which transcendental claims enter our thinking and that, for Adorno, such reflection provides a locus for a critically animating interplay between rhetorical figurations of darkness and redemption, or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  1
    Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry & Annelie J. Harvey (forthcoming). Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories:1-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    J. A. Douglas & J. M. Edmonds (1950). John Phillips's Geological Maps of the British Isles. Annals of Science 6 (4):361-375.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  12
    J. F. Douglas, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & A. J. Cronin (2011). Transplant Research and Deceased Donors: Laws, Licences and Fear of Liability. Clinical Ethics 6 (3):140-145.
    Transplantation research on samples and organs from deceased donors in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is under threat. The key problems relate to difficulties encountered in gaining consent for research projects, as distinct from consent to donation for clinical transplantation. They are due partly to the terms of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (the 2004 Act), and partly to its interpretation by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA). They include excessive interaction with donor representatives regarding ‘informed consent’ to research projects, uncertainty (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  4
    Robert J. Douglas (1979). The Hippocampus and its Apparent Migration to the Parietal Lobe. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (4):498-499.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  3
    A. E. Douglas & M. J. Lossau (1966). Untersuchungen Zur Antiken Demosthenesexegese. Journal of Hellenic Studies 86:190.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  3
    Judith Boss, Giordano Bruno, Vere Chappell, John Cottingham, Peter A. Danielson, Rene Descartes, Thomas Douglas, John Finis, R. J. Hollingdale & Vittorio Hösle (1999). Boss, Judith and James M. Nuzum. Teaching Philosophy 22 (2):237.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  3
    A. J. Cronin, J. Douglas & S. Sacks (2012). Licenced to Transplant: UK Overkill on EU Organ Directive Provides Golden Opportunity for Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):593-595.
    Progress in transplantation outcomes depends on continuing research into both donor and recipient factors that may enhance graft and patient survival. A system of licencing for transplantation research, introduced by the Human Tissue Act 2004, which separates it from the transplantation process (then exempt from licencing), has damaged this vital activity by a combination of inflexible interpretation of the 2004 Act and fear of criminal liability on the part of researchers. Now, following the European Union (EU) Directive (2010) on standards (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  1
    Robert J. Douglas (1979). Working Memory, Interference, and Inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (3):327-328.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  3
    J. F. Douglas & A. J. Cronin (2010). Requested Allocation of a Deceased Donor Organ: Laws and Misconceptions. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):321-321.
    In the Laura Ashworth case in 2008, the Human Tissue Authority considered itself bound to overturn a deceased daughter's alleged wish that one of her kidneys should go to her mother, who at the time had end stage kidney failure and was on dialysis. 12 This was so even though Laura's earlier wish to be a living donor would most likely have been authorised, had the formal assessment process begun. The decision provoked much criticism. The recent Department of Health document (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    J. A. Douglas (1921). The Redemption of Saint Sophia. Journal of Hellenic Studies 41:307.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. John M. Bartholow, Aaron J. Douglas & Jonathan G. Taylor (1995). Balancing Hydropower and Environmental Values: The Resource Management Implications of the US Electric Consumers Protection Act and the AWARE Software. Environmental Values 4 (3):257-270.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Marcus Tullius Cicero, J. G. F. Powell & A. E. Douglas (1990). Cicero, Laelius, on Friendship & the Dream of Scipio = Laelius de Amicitia & Somnium Scipionis. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  37. Js Cohen & J. Douglas (1986). Differential Reinforcement Expectancies and Successive Dmts Performance in Rats. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):321-321.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Andrew J. Douglas (2013). In the Spirit of Critique: Thinking Politically in the Dialectical Tradition. State University of New York Press.
    _Offers a new perspective on the political significance of the Hegelian dialectical legacy._.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Andrew J. Douglas (2014). In the Spirit of Critique: Thinking Politically in the Dialectical Tradition. State University of New York Press.
    _Offers a new perspective on the political significance of the Hegelian dialectical legacy._.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Carol G. Kelley, Amy R. Lipson, Barbara J. Daly & Sara L. Douglas (2006). Use of Advance Directives in the Chronically Critically Ill. Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 8 (2):42-47.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  8
    John M. Bartholow, Aaron J. Douglas & Jonathan G. Taylor (1995). Balancing Hydropower and Environmental Values: The Resource Management Implications of the US Electric Consumers Protection Act and the AWARE™ Software. [REVIEW] Environmental Values 4 (3):257-270.
    This paper reviews the AWARE™ software distributed by the Electric Power Research Institute. The program is designed to facilitate the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission license renewal process for US hydropower installations. The discussion reviews the regulatory, legal, and social contexts that give rise to the creation and distribution of AWARE™. The principal legal impetus for AWARE™ is the Electric Consumer Protection Act of 1986 that directs FERC to give equal consideration to power and non-power resources during relicensing. The software is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  3
    S. M. J. (1893). Book Review:The Effects of Machinery on Wages. J. Shield Nicholson. [REVIEW] Ethics 3 (2):267-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  13
    H. J. (1999). Georges B. J. Dreyfus Recognizing Reality: Dharmakirti's Philosophy and its Tibetan Interpretations. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997). Pp. 462+Notes, Tibetan-Sanskrit-English Glossary, Bibliography, and Indexes. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  10
    W. J. (1995). E.-J. Marey's Visual Rhetoric and the Graphic Decomposition of the Body. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (2):175-204.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Douglas J. Den Uyl (1993). The Right to Welfare and the Virtue of Charity*: Douglas J. Den Uyl. Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (1):192-224.
    As each individual abandons himself to the solicitous aid of the State, so, and still more, he abandons to it the fate of his fellow-citizens. Wilhelm Von Humboldt, On the Limits of State Action.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. I. Grattan-Guinness (1996). The Emergence of the American Mathematical Research Community, 1876-1900: J. J. Sylvester, Felix Klein, and E. H. Moore by Karen Hunger Parshall; David E. Rowe. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 87:187-188.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. J. Webster (1995). Book Reviews : Creation, Eschaton and Ethics. The Ethical Significance of the Creation-Eschaton Relation in the Thought of Emil Brunner and Jiirgen Moltmann, by Douglas J. Schuurman. New York, Peter Lang, 1991. 187pp. US $35.95. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 8 (1):143-144.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  7
    E. J. Kenney (1972). Erasmus Erasmus. Chapters by M. M. Phillips, A. E. Douglas, J. W. Binns, B. Hall, D. F. S. Thomson, and T. A. Dorey. Edited by T. A. Dorey. (Studies in Latin Literature and its Influence.) Pp. X+163. London: Routledge, 1970. Cloth, £2·50 Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (03):401-403.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  5
    Douglas W. Hands (1979). Review Symposium : Douglas W. Hands G. C. Archibald Joseph Agassi on S. J. Latsis, Ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Pp. VIII + 218. $17.50 the Methodology of Economic Research Programmes. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (3):293-303.
  50. Charles B. Cousar (forthcoming). Book Review: Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul's Narrative Soteriology by Michael J. Gorman Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 2009. 394 Pp. $24.00. ISBN 978-0-8028-6265-5.; Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision by N. T. Wright InterVarsity, Downers Groves, Ill., 2009. 279 Pp. $25.00 (Cloth). ISBN 978-0-8308-3863-9.; The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul by Douglas A. Campbell Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 2009. 1,248 Pp. $60.00 (Cloth). ISBN 978-0-8028-3126-2. [REVIEW] Interpretation 64 (4):414-416.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000