367 found
Order:
  1. Jaakko Hintikka (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
  2. Jaakko Hintikka (1962). Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance? Philosophical Review 71 (1):3-32.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  3.  88
    Jaakko Hintikka (2007). Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning. Cambridge University Press.
    Most current work in epistemology deals with the evaluation and justification of information already acquired. In this book, Jaakko Hintikka instead discusses the more important problem of how knowledge is acquired in the first place. His model of information-seeking is the old Socratic method of questioning, which has been generalized and brought up-to-date through the logical theory of questions and answers that he has developed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  4.  25
    Jaakko Hintikka (1996). The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
    This book, written by one of philosophy's pre-eminent logicians, argues that many of the basic assumptions common to logic, philosophy of mathematics and metaphysics are in need of change. It is therefore a book of critical importance to logical theory. Jaakko Hintikka proposes a new basic first-order logic and uses it to explore the foundations of mathematics. This new logic enables logicians to express on the first-order level such concepts as equicardinality, infinity, and truth in the same language. The famous (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  5.  25
    Jaakko Hintikka (1975). The Intensions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   60 citations  
  6. Jaakko Hintikka (1973). Logic, Language-Games and Information: Kantian Themes in the Philosophy of Logic. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
    I LOGIC IN PHILOSOPHY— PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC i. On the relation of logic to philosophy I n this book, the consequences of certain logical insights for ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   58 citations  
  7. Jaakko Hintikka (1999). The Emperor's New Intuitions. Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):127 - 147.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  8.  73
    Jaakko Hintikka (1998). What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (3):503 -.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   24 citations  
  9. Jaakko Hintikka (1969). Models for Modalities. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
  10. Jaakko Hintikka (1998). Inquiry as Inquiry a Logic of Scientific Discovery.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  11.  5
    Jaakko Hintikka (forthcoming). Philosophical Research: Problems and Prospects. Diogenes:0392192116640720.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Jaakko Hintikka & Ilpo Halonen (1995). Semantics and Pragmatics for Why-Questions. Journal of Philosophy 92 (12):636-657.
  13.  63
    Ilpo Halonen & Jaakko Hintikka (2005). Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation. Synthese 143 (1-2):5 - 61.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  14. Jaakko Hintikka (1975). Impossible Possible Worlds Vindicated. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):475 - 484.
  15. Jaakko Hintikka (2011). What is the Axiomatic Method? Synthese 183 (1):69-85.
    The modern notion of the axiomatic method developed as a part of the conceptualization of mathematics starting in the nineteenth century. The basic idea of the method is the capture of a class of structures as the models of an axiomatic system. The mathematical study of such classes of structures is not exhausted by the derivation of theorems from the axioms but includes normally the metatheory of the axiom system. This conception of axiomatization satisfies the crucial requirement that the derivation (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Jaakko Hintikka (1972). Transcendental Arguments: Genuine and Spurious. Noûs 6 (3):274-281.
  17. Jaakko Hintikka (1998). Truth Definitions, Skolem Functions and Axiomatic Set Theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):303-337.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  11
    Jaakko Hintikka (1967). Aspects of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam, North Holland Pub. Co..
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  19.  65
    Jaakko Hintikka (1988). On the Development of the Model-Theoretic Viewpoint in Logical Theory. Synthese 77 (1):1 - 36.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  20. Jaakko Hintikka (1970). On Attributions of Self-Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 67 (February):73-87.
  21. Jaakko Hintikka (1996). Knowledge Acknowledged: Knowledge of Propositions Vs. Knowledge of Objects. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):251-275.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Jaakko Hintikka (1999). The Emperor's New Intutions. Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):127-147.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  23. Risto Vilkko & Jaakko Hintikka (2006). Existence and Predication From Aristotle to Frege. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):359–377.
    One of the characteristic features of contemporary logic is that it incorporates the Frege-Russell thesis according to which verbs for being are multiply ambiguous. This thesis was not accepted before the nineteenth century. In Aristotle existence could not serve alone as a predicate term. However, it could be a part of the force of the predicate term, depending on the context. For Kant existence could not even be a part of the force of the predicate term. Hence, after Kant, existence (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Jaakko Hintikka (1963). Cogito, Ergo Sum as an Inference and a Performance. Philosophical Review 72 (4):487-496.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  52
    Jaakko Hintikka (2004). A Fallacious Fallacy? Synthese 140 (1-2):25 - 35.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  26.  16
    Jaakko Hintikka (1970). Information and Inference. D. Reidel.
  27.  83
    Jaakko Hintikka & Gabriel Sandu (1995). The Fallacies of the New Theory of Reference. Synthese 104 (2):245 - 283.
    The so-called New Theory of Reference (Marcus, Kripke etc.) is inspired by the insight that in modal and intensional contexts quantifiers presuppose nondescriptive unanalyzable identity criteria which do not reduce to any descriptive conditions. From this valid insight the New Theorists fallaciously move to the idea that free singular terms can exhibit a built-in direct reference and that there is even a special class of singular terms (proper names) necessarily exhibiting direct reference. This fallacious move has been encouraged by a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  28. Jaakko Hintikka, Ilkka Niiniluoto & Esa Saarinen (1982). Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic. Studia Logica 41 (4):432-433.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  29.  33
    Jaakko Hintikka (1988). What is the Logic of Experimental Inquiry? Synthese 74 (2):173-90.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  30.  2
    Jaakko Hintikka (forthcoming). Response to Moran and Jacquette. Diogenes:0392192116640721.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  60
    Gabriel Sandu & Jaakko Hintikka (2001). Aspects of Compositionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):49-61.
    We introduce several senses of the principle ofcompositionality. We illustrate the difference between them with thehelp of some recent results obtained by Cameron and Hodges oncompositional semantics for languages of imperfect information.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  32.  59
    Jaakko Hintikka (1961). Modality and Quantification. Theoria 27 (3):119-128.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  33.  39
    Jaakko Hintikka (2012). Which Mathematical Logic is the Logic of Mathematics? Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):459-475.
    The main tool of the arithmetization and logization of analysis in the history of nineteenth century mathematics was an informal logic of quantifiers in the guise of the “epsilon–delta” technique. Mathematicians slowly worked out the problems encountered in using it, but logicians from Frege on did not understand it let alone formalize it, and instead used an unnecessarily poor logic of quantifiers, viz. the traditional, first-order logic. This logic does not e.g. allow the definition and study of mathematicians’ uniformity concepts (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  85
    Jaakko Hintikka (1972). III. Kantian Intuitions. Inquiry 15 (1-4):341 – 345.
    By way of a reply to Charles Parsons's paper in the Nagel Festschrift, Kant's notion of intuition (Anschauung) is examined. It is argued that for Kant the immediate relation which an intuition has to its object is a mere corollary to its singularity. It does not presuppose (as Parsons suggests) any presence of the object to the mind. This is shown, e.g., by the Prolegomena § 8, where the objects of intuitions a priori are denied by Kant to be so (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  35.  13
    Alan R. White & Jaakko Hintikka (1965). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Philosophical Quarterly 15 (60):268.
  36. Merrill B. Hintikka & Jaakko Hintikka (1983). How Can Language Be Sexist? In Merrill B. Hintikka & Sandra Harding (eds.), Discovering Reality:Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Springer 139-148.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  12
    Jaakko Hintikka (1987). The Fallacy of Fallacies. Argumentation 1 (3):211-238.
    Several of the so-called “fallacies” in Aristotle are not in fact mistaken inference-types, but mistakes or breaches of rules in the questioning games which were practiced in the Academy and in the Lyceum. Hence the entire Aristotelian theory of “fallacies” ought to be studied by reference to the author's interrogative model of inquiry, based on his theory of questions and answers, rather than as a part of the theory of inference. Most of the “fallacies” mentioned by Aristotle can in fact (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  38.  42
    Jaakko Hintikka (2003). The notion of intuition in Husserl. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2:57-79.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  36
    Jaakko Hintikka (1989). The Role of Logic in Argumentation. The Monist 72 (1):3-24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  40.  44
    Jaakko Hintikka (1981). On the Logic of an Interrogative Model of Scientific Inquiry. Synthese 47 (1):69 - 83.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  41.  31
    Annie Kuipers & Jaakko Hintikka (1995). Editorial. Synthese 102 (3):131-131.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Jaakko Hintikka (1989). Rules, Games and Experiences: Wittgenstein's Discussion of Rule-Following in the Light of His Development in Wittgenstein (1889-1989). [REVIEW] Revue Internationale de Philosophie 43 (169):279-297.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  43.  71
    Jaakko Hintikka (2011). Method of Analysis: A Paradigm of Mathematical Reasoning? History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):49 - 67.
    The ancient Greek method of analysis has a rational reconstruction in the form of the tableau method of logical proof. This reconstruction shows that the format of analysis was largely determined by the requirement that proofs could be formulated by reference to geometrical figures. In problematic analysis, it has to be assumed not only that the theorem to be proved is true, but also that it is known. This means using epistemic logic, where instantiations of variables are typically allowed only (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  15
    Jaakko Hintikka (1991). Preface. Synthese 87 (1):1-1.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  35
    Jaakko Hintikka (1985). A Spectrum of Logics of Questioning. Philosophica 35.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  46.  96
    Jaakko Hintikka (1958). On Wittgenstein's `Solipsism'. Mind 67 (265):88-91.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47. Jaakko Hintikka (1984). Are There Nonexistent Objects? Why Not? But Where Are They? Synthese 60 (3):451 - 458.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  64
    Jaakko Hintikka (1996). Cogito, Ergo Quis Est? Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50 (195):5-21.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49. Jaakko Hintikka (1974). Quantifiers Vs. Quantificational Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 5:153--77.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  50.  40
    Jaakko Hintikka (1967). Kant on the Mathematical Method. The Monist 51 (3):352-375.
1 — 50 / 367