Works by James A. Hampton ( view other items matching `James A. Hampton`, view all matches )

11 found
Sort by:
  1. Michael Gibbert, James A. Hampton, Zachary Estes & David Mazursky (2012). The Curious Case of the Refrigerator–TV: Similarity and Hybridization. Cognitive Science 36 (6):992-1018.
    This article examines the role of similarity in the hybridization of concepts, focusing on hybrid products as an applied test case. Hybrid concepts found in natural language, such as singer songwriter, typically combine similar concepts, whereas dissimilar concepts rarely form hybrids. The hybridization of dissimilar concepts in products such as jogging shoe mp3 player and refrigerator TV thus poses a challenge for understanding the process of conceptual combination. It is proposed that models of conceptual combination can throw light on the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. James A. Hampton (2008). Context, Categories and Modality: Challenges for the Rumelhart Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):716-717.
  3. James A. Hampton (2005). Modeling Category Coordination: Comments and Complications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):496-497.
    Consideration of color alone can give a misleading impression of the three approaches to category coordination: the nativist, empiricist and culturalist models. Empiricist models can benefit from a wider range of correlational information in the environment. Also, all three approaches may explain a set of perceptual categories within the human repertoire. Finally, a suggestion is offered for supplementing the naming game by varying the social status of agents.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. James A. Hampton (2005). Rules and Similarity – a False Dichotomy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):26-26.
    Unless restricted to explicitly held, sharable beliefs that control and justify a person's behavior, the notion of a rule has little value as an explanatory concept. Similarity-based processing is a general characteristic of the mind-world interface where internal processes (including explicitly represented rules) act on the external world. The distinction between rules and similarity is therefore misconceived.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James A. Hampton (2002). Language’ Role in Enabling Abstract, Logical Thought. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):688-688.
    Carruthers’ thesis is undermined on the one hand by examples of integration of output from domain-specific modules that are independent of language, and on the other hand by examples of linguistically represented thoughts that are unable to integrate different domain-specific knowledge into a coherent whole. I propose a more traditional role for language in thought as providing the basis for the cultural development and transmission of domain-general abstract knowledge and reasoning skills.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. James A. Hampton (2000). Concepts and Prototypes. Mind and Language 15 (2-3):299-307.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. James A. Hampton (1999). Implicit and Explicit Knowledge: One Representational Medium or Many? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):769-770.
    In Dienes & Perner's analysis, implicitly represented knowledge differs from explicitly represented knowledge only in the attribution of properties to specific events and to self-awareness of the knower. This commentary questions whether implicit knowledge should be thought of as being represented in the same conceptual vocabulary; rather, it may involve a quite different form of representation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James A. Hampton (1998). Folk Biology and External Definitions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):574-574.
    Atran's thesis has strong implications for the doctrine of externalism in concepts (Fodor 1994). Beliefs about biological kinds may involve a degree of deference to scientific categories, but these categories are not truly scientific. They involve instead a folk view of science itself.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James A. Hampton (1998). Staying in Touch: Externalism Needs Descriptions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):74-74.
    Externalism cannot work as a theory of concepts without explaining how we reidentify substances as being of the same kind. Yet this process implies just the level of descriptive content to which externalism seeks to deny a role in conceptual content.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James A. Hampton (1989). Concepts and Correct Thinking. Mind and Language 4 (1-2):35-42.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James A. Hampton (1989). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Mind and Language 4 (1-2):130-137.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation