9 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
James Beilby [14]James K. Beilby [2]
  1. James Beilby (2010). Tayloring Reformed Epistemology. Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):470-474.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. James Beilby (2007). Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief. In Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James Beilby (2005). Thinking Through Rituals. Faith and Philosophy 22 (4):504-508.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. James Beilby (2003). Alvin Plantinga’s Pox on Metaphysical Naturalism. Philosophia Christi 5 (1):131-142.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James Beilby (2002). The Relationship Between Faith and Evidence in St. Augustine. Sophia 41 (1):19-32.
    There has been much debate in both theological and philosophical circles over the matter of evidentialism—that is, whether an individual must augment or supplement their belief in God with evidences supportive of that belief. However, what has been (for the most part) lacking is a discussion which endeavors to integrate theological and philosophical desiderata. In this paper I will suggest that the framework for such a discussion can be found in the work of St. Augustine—in particular, in the way he (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. James K. Beilby (ed.) (2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Cornell University Press.
    In this, the first book to address the ongoing debate, Plantinga presents his influential thesis and responds to critiques by distinguished philosophers from a ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. James Beilby (1997). Is Evolutionary Naturalism Self-Defeating? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (2):69-78.
  8. James Beilby (1995). William Rowe on the Evidential Value of Appearances. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):251-259.
    While William Rowe has argued that the principle of credulity does not lend justification to religious experience, he must affirm something quite like the principle of credulity in his empirical argument from evil. To do so Rowe has proposed a modified version of the principle of credulity.I shall argue that Rowe’s modified principle of credulity creates for him a dilemma regarding the justification of belief in other minds. I further suggest it is not adequate for bridging the logical gap between (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James Beilby (1994). Rationality, Warrant, and Religious Diversity. Philosophia Christi 17:1-14.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation