77 found
Order:
  1. James Cargile (2005). The Fallacy of Epistemicism. In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. OUP Oxford 33.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. James Cargile (2010). The Language of Thought Revisited. Analysis 70 (2):359-367.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. James Cargile (2000). Skepticism and Possibilities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):157-171.
    One skeptical strategy against A’s claim to know that P is to hold that it is logically possible for someone to have the same “base” for P as A does in spite of its not being true that P. Philosophical replies have focussed on showing that these are not genuine possibilities. Whether they are can be an interesting question of metaphysics, but it is argued in this paper that this metaphysical discussion is not the proper focus for an assessment of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. James Cargile (1969). The Sorites Paradox. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):193-202.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  5.  49
    James Cargile (1986). Critical Notice. Mind 95 (377):116 - 126.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  71
    James Cargile (1964). Utilitarianism and the Desert Island Problem. Analysis 25 (1):23 - 24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  97
    James Cargile (1998). The Problem of Induction. Philosophy 73 (2):247-275.
    No one doubts that philosophers have discussed at length ‘the problem of induction’, but it would also be generally recognized that there would be disagreement as to precisely what that problem is. Rather than tackle the formulation problem, I will borrow from a popular text: Our existence as well as science itself is based on the principle of induction that tells us to reason from past frequencies to future likelihoods, from the limited known of the past and present to the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  79
    James Cargile (2003). On Russell's Argument Against Resemblance Nominalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):549 – 560.
    Russell famously argued that Resemblance Nominalism leads to a vicious infinite regress in attempting to avoid admitting universals. Saying that a number of things are white only in that they resemble a particular white thing leaves a number of resemblances to that white thing, each of them constituting the holding of the same relation to the paradigm, qualifying that resemblance relation as a universal. Trying to dismiss that new universal by appeal to resemblances between those first resemblances only leads to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  23
    James Cargile (1970). A Note on "Iterated Knowings". Analysis 30 (5):151 - 155.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  10.  74
    James Cargile (1972). In Reply to a Defense of Skepticism. Philosophical Review 81 (2):229-236.
  11.  46
    James Cargile (1982). Pascal's Wager. In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), Philosophy. Oxford University Press 250-.
    A. Pascal's statement of his wager argument is couched in terms of the theory of probability and the theory of games, and the exposition is unclear and unnecessarily complicated. The following is a ‘creative’ reformulation of the argument designed to avoid some of the objections which have been or might be raised against the original.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  12.  54
    James Cargile (1971). On Near Knowledge. Analysis 31 (5):145 - 152.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  41
    James Cargile (1995). Justification and Misleading Defeaters. Analysis 55 (3):216 - 220.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  44
    James Cargile (1997). On the Burden of Proof. Philosophy 72 (279):59 - 83.
    The phrase ‘burden of proof’ or ‘onus probandi’ originally referred to something determined by a judge in a legal proceeding. Some claims would be accepted as true by the court, and other relevant claims would require proving. The burden of doing this proving could be assigned to one or another party by the judge. Success or failure to meet this burden could be determined by the judge or the jury, as could consequences of success or failure.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  15.  63
    James Cargile (1996). Some Comments on Fatalism. Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):1-11.
    This paper discusses fatalism, defined as the view that it is never both in one's power to do X and in one's power to not do X. It is argued that this view is made out as more plausible than it really is, because of unclarity as to its meaning. Some philosophers, such as Michael Dummett or David Lewis, who criticise fatalism, actually advocate views closely in line with fatalism as defined here.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  59
    James Cargile (2003). On "Alexander's" Dictum. Topoi 22 (2):143-149.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  11
    James Cargile (1984). Review of Rational Decision and Causality. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):163-168.
  18.  48
    James Cargile (1993). Vagueness. An Investigation Into Natural Languages and the Sorites Paradox. Philosophical Books 34 (1):22-24.
  19.  37
    James Cargile (1975). Newcomb's Paradox. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):234-239.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  20.  36
    James Cargile (1970). IV. Davidson's Notion of Logical Form. Inquiry 13 (1-4):129-139.
  21.  16
    James Cargile (1992). On a Problem About Probability and Decision. Analysis 52 (4):211 - 216.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22.  30
    James Cargile (1967). The Surprise Test Paradox. Journal of Philosophy 64 (18):550-563.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  20
    James Cargile (1967). On Believing You Believe. Analysis 27 (6):177 - 183.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  36
    James Cargile (1996). Evidence and Inquiry by Susan Haack. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (3):621-625.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  17
    James Cargile (1995). Supposing for the Sake of Argument. Inquiry 15 (1):76-79.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  30
    James Cargile (1967). On Omnipotence. Noûs 1 (2):201-205.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  4
    James Cargile (1995). The Revision Theory of Truth. Philosophical Books 36 (3):165-173.
  28.  11
    James Cargile (2013). Panteísmo. Areté. Revista de Filosofía 13 (2):5-28.
    This paper begins with various interpretations of a basic pantheist slogan. The ambiguity of the slogan is illustrated by a critique of Jonathan Bennett's interpretation of Spinoza's pantheism, which has Spinoza's "Whatever is, is in God" entail further that whatever is in God, is God. Next it is argued that pantheism does not offer any solution to the problem theists have over whether there are things distinct from God but not created by God. Then it is argued that the existence (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  9
    James Cargile (1973). Review: P. F. Strawson, Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (2):320-323.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  15
    James Cargile (1969). On Consequentialism. Analysis 29 (3):78 - 88.
    … if someone really thinks, in advance, that it is open to question whether such an action as procuring the judicial execution of the innocent should be quite excluded from consideration—I do not want to argue with him; he shows a corrupt mind. (G. E. M. Anscombe, ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy, 1958, p. 17).
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  28
    James Cargile (1965). The Universalisability of Lying. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):229 – 231.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  20
    James Cargile (1999). Proposition and Tense. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):250-257.
    McTaggart assumed (1) that propositions cannot change in truth value and (2) if (a) there is real change, then (b) events must acquire the absolute property of being present and then lose this property. He held that {1,2b} is an inconsistent set and thus inferred 2a--that there is no real change. The B theory rejects 2 and the A theory rejects 1. I accept 1, 2, 2a, and consequently, 2b, and argue that this is consistent. There is an absolute property (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  15
    James Cargile (1966). On Having Reasons. Analysis 26 (6):189 - 192.
    Thesis: Even after the observation of the frequent or constant conjunction of objects, we have no reason to draw any inference concerning any object beyond those of which we have had experience. (Hume) Antithesis: A man who knows of at least one case of an X being a Y, and who does not know of any positive reason for thinking that an X might not be a Y, has some reason for thinking that all X's are Y's (p. 81). When (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  4
    James Cargile (1965). Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103.
  35.  18
    James Cargile (1993). Slippery Slope Arguments By Douglas Walton University of Virginia. Philosophy 68 (266):566-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  23
    James Cargile (1999). On an Argument Against Closure. Noûs 33 (2):239-246.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. James Cargile (1989). Graham Priest, In Contradiction Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (6):243-249.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  15
    James Cargile (1975). The Ontological Argument. Philosophy 50 (191):69 - 80.
    There are several styles of ontological argument. Here are examples of the first style. God has all perfections. Existence is a perfection. ∴God exists. All perfect beings exist. God is a perfect being. ∴God exists. God couldn't be improved. A being that doesn't exist could be improved . ∴God exists.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  10
    James Cargile (1996). Pseudo-Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):975-977.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  27
    James Cargile (1979). Paradoxes, a Study in Form and Predication. Cambridge University Press.
    These are not just tricks or puzzles, but are intimately connected with some of the liveliest and most basic philosophical disputes about logical form, ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  12
    Andrew Woodfield, James Cargile & Tadeusz Szubka (2005). Philosophy of Language. Philosophical Books 46 (3):272-278.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    James Cargile (1994). Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2):479-482.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  12
    James Cargile (1989). What Is a Natural Property? Philosophy 64 (248):137 - 158.
    In Principia Ethica Moore held that the meaning of the word ‘good’ is a simple, unanalysable, non-natural property. Several features of this claim might be questioned. It might be questioned whether there are properties at all, and whether, even if there are, they are ever the meanings of words. Again, it might be questioned whether the word ‘good’ expresses a property, even assuming that some other words do. Moore considers this latter question, but not the former . The two questions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  11
    James Cargile (1987). Definitions and Counter-Examples. Philosophy 62 (240):179 - 193.
    In his paper ‘A Function for Thought Experiments’, T. S. Kuhn asks: Ought we demand of our concepts, as we do of our laws and theories, that they be applicable to any and every situation that might conceivably arise in any possible world? Is it not sufficient to demand of a concept, as we do of a law or theory, that it be unequivocally applicable in every situation which we expect ever to encounter?
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. James Cargile (1986). Martin, R. L. , "Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox". [REVIEW] Mind 95:116.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46.  1
    James Cargile (1965). A Paradox Regained. Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  9
    James Cargile (1990). Paradoxes By R. M. Sainsbury Cambridge University Press, 1988, Vii + 163 Pp., £22.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy 65 (251):106-.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  9
    James Cargile (1966). Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (64):347-a-347.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  8
    James Cargile (1972). On an Interpretation Oft, S4, Ands. Philosophia 2 (1-2):137-158.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  1
    James Cargile (1968). Review: E. J. Lemmon, On Sentences Verifiable by Their Use; Jaakko Hintikka, Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance? [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):615-616.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 77