38 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
James Dreier [37]James Lawrence Dreier [1]
See also:
Profile: James Dreier (Brown University)
  1. James Dreier (forthcoming). Boundless Good. Ms.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. James Dreier (2011). In Defense of Consequentializing. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 1. Oxford University Press.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James Dreier (2010). 1. Wedgwood's Argument. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Oxford University Press. 5--153.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. James Dreier (2010). When Do Goals Explain the Norms That Advance Them? In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Oxford University Press. 5--153.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James Dreier (2010). When Do Goals Advance the Norms That Explain Them? In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 5. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. James Dreier (2009). Practical Conditionals. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press. 116--133.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. James Dreier (2009). Relativism (and Expressivism) and the Problem of Disagreement. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):79-110.
    Many philosophers, in different areas, are tempted by what variously goes under the name of Contextualism, Speaker Relativism, Indexical Relativism. (I’ll just use Indexical Relativism in this paper.) Thinking of certain problematic expressions as deriving their content from elements of the context of use solves some problems. But it faces some problems of its own, and in this paper I’m interested in one in particular, namely, the problem of disagreement. Two alternative theories, tempting for just the same kinds of expressions (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James Dreier (ed.) (2006). Defending Moral Particularism. Blackwell.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James Dreier (2006). Negation for Expressivists: A Collection of Problems with a Suggestion for Their Solution. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 1:217-233.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James Lawrence Dreier (ed.) (2006). Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Blackwell Pub..
    Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory features pairs of newly commissioned essays by some of the leading theorists working in the field today. Brings together fresh debates on the most controversial issues in moral theory Questions include: Are moral requirements derived from reason? How demanding is morality? Are virtues the proper starting point for moral theorizing? Lively debate format sharply defines the issues, and paves the way for further discussion. Will serve as an accessible introduction to the major topics in contemporary (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James Dreier (2004). Decision Theory and Morality. In Piers Rawling & Al Mele (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford. 156--181.
  12. James Dreier (2004). Lockean and Logical Truth Conditions. Analysis 64 (1):84–91.
    1. In ‘A problem for expressivism’ Frank Jackson and Philip Pettit argue ‘that expressivists do not have a persuasive story to tell about how ethical sentences can express attitudes without reporting them and, in particular, without being true or false’ (1998: 240). Briefly: expressivists say that ethical sentences serve to express non-cognitive attitudes, but that these sentences do not report non-cognitive attitudes. The view that ethical sentences do report non-cognitive attitudes is not Expressivism (and not non-cognitivism), but rather a version (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. James Dreier (2004). Meta‐Ethics and the Problem of Creeping Minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):23–44.
    This is a paper about the problem of realism in meta-ethics (and, I hope, also in other areas, but that hope is so far pretty speculative). But it is not about the problem of whether realism is true. It is about the problem of what realism is. More specifically, it is about the question of what divides meta-ethical realists from irrealists. I start with a potted history of the Good Old Days.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James Dreier (2004). Why Ethical Satisficing Makes Sense and Rational Satisficing Doesn't. In Michael Byron (ed.), Satisficing and Maximizing. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. James Dreier (2002). Critical Study: Timmons, Mark; Morality Without Foundations: A Defense of Moral Contextualism. [REVIEW] Noûs 36 (1):152–168.
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. James Dreier (2002). Metaethics and Normative Commitment. Philosophical Issues 12 (s1):241-263.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. James Dreier (2002). Philosophical Issues, 12, Realism and Relativism, 2002. In Ernest Sosa & Enrique Villanueva (eds.), Realism and Relativism. Blackwell. 241.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. James Dreier (2002). Troubling Developments in Metaethics. [REVIEW] Noûs 36 (1):152 - 168.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. James Dreier (2002). The Expressivist Circle: Invoking Norms in the Explanation of Normative Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):136–143.
  20. James Dreier (2001). Charles Leslie Stevenson. In David Sosa & A. P. Martinich (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. James Dreier (2001). Humean Doubts About Categorical Imperatives. In Elijah Millgram (ed.), Varieties of Practical Reasoning. MIT Press. 27--48.
  22. James Dreier (2000). Dispositions and Fetishes: Externalist Models of Moral Motivation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):619-638.
  23. James Dreier (2000). Dispositions and Fetishes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):619 - 638.
  24. James Dreier (1999). Transforming Expressivism. Noûs 33 (4):558-572.
    In chapter five of Wise Choices, Apt Feelings Allan Gibbard develops what he calls a ‘normative logic’ intended to solve some problems that face an expressivist theory of norms like his. The first is “the problem of embedding: The analysis applies to simple contexts, in which it is simply asserted or denied that such-and-such is rational. It says nothing about more complex normative assertions.”1 That is the problem with which I will be concerned. Though he doesn’t list it as one (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. James Dreier (1999). The Authority of Reason, Jean Hampton. Cambridge University Press, 1998, Vi + 310 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 15 (02):311-.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. James Dreier (1997). Humean Doubts About the Practical Justification of Morality. In Garrett Cullity & Gaut Berys (eds.), Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford Clarendon Press. 81--100.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. James Dreier (1996). Accepting Agent Centred Norms: A Problem for Non-Cognitivists and a Suggestion for Solving It. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3):409–422.
    Non-cognitivists claim to be able to represent normative judgment, and especially moral judgment, as an expression of a non-cognitive attitude. There is some reason to worry whether their treatment can incorporate agent centred theories, including much of common sense morality. In this paper I investigate the prospects for a non-cognitivist explanation of what is going on when we subscribe to agent centred theories or norms. The first section frames the issue by focusing on a particularly simple and clear agent centred (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. James Dreier (1996). Book Review: The Moral Problem by Michael Smith. [REVIEW] Mind 105 (418):363-367.
  29. James Dreier (1996). Expressivist Embeddings and Minimalist Truth. Philosophical Studies 83 (1):29-51.
    This paper is about Truth Minimalism, Norm Expressivism, and the relation between them. In particular, it is about whether Truth Minimalism can help to solve a problem thought to plague Norm Expressivism. To start with, let me explain what I mean by 'Truth Minimalism' and 'Norm Expressivism.'.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. James Dreier (1996). Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. James Dreier (1996). Projectivism. In Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. James Dreier (1996). Rational Preference: Decision Theory as a Theory of Practical Rationality. Theory and Decision 40 (3):249-276.
    In general, the technical apparatus of decision theory is well developed. It has loads of theorems, and they can be proved from axioms. Many of the theorems are interesting, and useful both from a philosophical and a practical perspective. But decision theory does not have a well agreed upon interpretation. Its technical terms, in particular, ‘utility’ and ‘preference’ do not have a single clear and uncontroversial meaning. How to interpret these terms depends, of course, on what purposes in pursuit of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. James Dreier (1994). Perspectives on the Normativity of Ethics. [REVIEW] Noûs 28 (4):514 - 525.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. James Dreier (1993). Structures of Normative Theories. The Monist 76 (1):22-40.
    Normative theorists like to divide normative theories into classes. One special point of focus has been to place utilitarianism into a larger class of theories which do not necessarily share its view about what is alone of impersonal intrinsic value, namely, individual human well-being, but do share another structural feature, roughly its demand that each person seek to maximize the realization of what is of impersonal intrinsic value. The larger class is distinguished from its complement in two apparently different ways. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. James Dreier (1992). The Supervenience Argument Against Moral Realism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):13-38.
    In 1971, Simon Blackburn worked out an argument against moral realism appealing to the supervenience of the moral realm on the natural realm.1 He has since revised the argument, in part to take account of objections,2 but the basic structure remains intact. While commentators3 seem to agree that the argument is not successful, they have not agreed upon what goes wrong. I believe this is because no attempt has been made to see what happens when Blackburn's argument is addressed to (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. James Dreier (1991). Book Review: Value and Justification: The Foundations of Liberal Theory by Gerald F. Gaus. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (1):164-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. James Dreier (1991). Skepticism in Ethics, by Panayot Butchvarov. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):934-938.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. James Dreier (1990). Internalism and Speaker Relativism. Ethics 101 (1):6-26.
    In this article I set out a reason for believing in a form of metaethical relativism. In rough terms, the reason is this: a widely held thesis, internalism, tells us that to accept (sincerely assert, believe, etc.) a moral judgment logically requires having a motivating reason. Since the connection is logical, or conceptual, it must be explained by a theory of what it is to accept a moral claim. I argue that the internalist feature of moral expressions can best be (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation