24 found
Sort by:
  1. James E. Taylor (2013). Introduction to Conceptual Foundations. In. In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer. 13--17.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. James E. Taylor (2013). The New Atheism and Models of God: The Case of Richard Dawkins. In. In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer. 735--744.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James E. Taylor (2011). Hume's Problem of Induction. In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
  4. James E. Taylor & Stefanie Rocknak (2011). Hume and the Problem of Induction. In Michael Bruce Steven Barbone (ed.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. 174--179.
  5. James E. Taylor (2010). Rationalism, Platonism and God – Michael Ayers. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):189-192.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. James E. Taylor (2010). The Clarity of God's Existence: The Ethics of Belief After the Enlightenment. By Owen Anderson. Heythrop Journal 51 (3):513-514.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. James E. Taylor (2008). Evidence and Faith. Faith and Philosophy 25 (2):216-221.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James E. Taylor (2007). Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism. Philosophy Compass 2 (4):611–624.
    Philosophers continue to debate about David Hume’s case against the rationality of belief in miracles. This article clarifies semantic, epistemological, and metaphysical questions addressed in the controversy. It also explains the main premises of Hume’s argument and discusses criticisms of them. The article concludes that one’s evaluation of Hume’s argument will depend on one’s views about (a) the definitions of ’miracle’ and ’natural law’; (b) the type of reasoning one ought to employ to determine the probability that a particular miracle (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James E. Taylor (2007). Response to Ted Peters' “Models of God”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):289-292.
    In Models of God, Ted Peters discusses a methodology for formulating and evaluating models of God, surveys nine models, and proposes one that he entitles Eschatological Panentheism. This paper provides critical comments on Peters’ methodological claims, taxonomy of models of God, and specific proposal. This paper has been delivered during APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.Both Peters’ Models of God and these comments were presented at the Models of God mini-conference at the Pacific Division Meetings of the American (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James E. Taylor (1999). The Value of Epistemology: A Defense. Philosophical Papers 28 (3):169-185.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James E. Taylor (1998). Richard Foley, Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 214 + X Pp, USD $35.00. [REVIEW] Noûs 32 (2):265–275.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. James E. Taylor (1996). The Concept of Faith: A Philosophical Investigation. Philosophical Books 37 (1):68-70.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Janine Marie Idziak, James E. Taylor & Frank B. Dilley (1995). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 37 (3):181-188.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James E. Taylor (1995). Plantinga on Epistemic Warrant. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):421-426.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. James E. Taylor (1995). Review: Plantinga on Epistemic Warrant. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):421 - 426.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Donald Wiebe, Abrahim H. Khan, Stephen N. Dunning, James E. Taylor, David L. Paulsen, Blake T. Ostler, William L. Power & Eric von der Luft (1994). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 35 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. James E. Taylor (1993). Belief, Justification and Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (2):480-484.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. James E. Taylor (1993). Conceptual Analysis and the Essence of Knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (1):15 - 26.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. James E. Taylor (1993). Scepticism and the Nature of Knowledge. Philosophia 22 (1-2):3-27.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. James E. Taylor & William P. Alston (1991). Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge.Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):249.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. James E. Taylor & Alvin Plantinga (1991). Plantinga's Proper Functioning Analysis of Epistemic Warrant. Philosophical Studies 64 (2):185 - 202.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. James E. Taylor (1990). Epistemic Justification and Psychological Realism. Synthese 85 (2):199 - 230.
    The main thesis of this paper is that it is not possible to determine the nature of epistemic justification apart from scientific psychological investigation. I call this view the strong thesis of methodological psychologism. Two sub-theses provide the primary support for this claim. The first sub-thesis is that no account of epistemic justification is correct which requires for the possession of at least one justified belief a psychological capacity which humans do not have. That is, the correct account of epistemic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. James E. Taylor (1990). Kelly on the Logic of Eternal Knowledge. The Modern Schoolman 67 (2):141-147.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. James E. Taylor (1987). Cohen on Cognitive Competence: Can Human Rationality Be Philosophically Demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (2):311.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation