4 found
  1.  68
    James G. Tabery (2004). Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism. Philosophy of Science 71 (1):1-15.
    Stuart Glennan, and the team of Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden, and Carl Craver have recently provided two accounts of the concept of a mechanism. The main difference between these two versions rests on how the behavior of the parts of the mechanism is conceptualized. Glennan considers mechanisms to be an interaction of parts, where the interaction between parts can be characterized by direct, invariant, change-relating generalizations. Machamer, Darden, and Craver criticize traditional conceptualizations of mechanisms which are based solely on parts (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   42 citations  
  2. Paul E. Griffiths & James G. Tabery (2013). Developmental Systems Theory: What Does It Explain, and How Does It Explain It? In Richard M. Lerner & Janette B. Benson (eds.), Embodiment and Epigenesis: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Understanding the Role of Biology Within the Relational Developmental System Part A: Philosophical, Theoretical, and Biological Dimensions. Elsevier 65--94.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. James G. Tabery (2004). The "Evolutionary Synthesis" of George Udny Yule. Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):73-101.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. James G. Tabery & Paul E. Griffiths (2010). Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Behavioral Genetics and Developmental Science. In Kathryn Hood, Halpern E., Greenberg Carolyn Tucker, Lerner Gary & M. Richard (eds.), Handbook of Developmental Science, Behavior and Genetics. Wiley-Blackwell 41--60.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography