41 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
James H. Moor [41]James Haller Moor [1]
  1. James H. Moor (1985). What is Computer Ethics? Metaphilosophy 16 (4):266-275.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   55 citations  
  2. James H. Moor (2005). Why We Need Better Ethics for Emerging Technologies. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):111-119.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  3.  13
    James H. Moor (1997). Towards a Theory of Privacy in the Information Age. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 27 (3):27-32.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  4.  49
    James H. Moor (1978). Three Myths of Computer Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):213-222.
  5.  29
    Herman T. Tavani & James H. Moor (2001). Privacy Protection, Control of Information, and Privacy-Enhancing Technologies. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 31 (1):6-11.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  6.  69
    James H. Moor (1976). An Analysis of the Turing Test. Philosophical Studies 30 (4):249 - 257.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  7. James H. Moor (2001). The Future of Computer Ethics: You Ain't Seen Nothin' Yet! [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):89-91.
    The computer revolution can beusefully divided into three stages, two ofwhich have already occurred: the introductionstage and the permeation stage. We have onlyrecently entered the third and most importantstage – the power stage – in which many ofthe most serious social, political, legal, andethical questions involving informationtechnology will present themselves on a largescale. The present article discusses severalreasons to believe that future developments ininformation technology will make computerethics more vibrant and more important thanever. Computer ethics is here to stay!
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  8. James H. Moor (1999). Just Consequentialism and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):61-65.
    Computer and information ethics, as well as other fields of applied ethics, need ethical theories which coherently unify deontological and consequentialist aspects of ethical analysis. The proposed theory of just consequentialism emphasizes consequences of policies within the constraints of justice. This makes just consequentialism a practical and theoretically sound approach to ethical problems of computer and information ethics.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  9.  51
    Masahiko Mizutani, James Dorsey & James H. Moor (2004). The Internet and Japanese Conception of Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):121-128.
  10. James H. Moor (2001). The Status and Future of the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
    The standard interpretation of the imitation game is defended over the rival gender interpretation though it is noted that Turing himself proposed several variations of his imitation game. The Turing test is then justified as an inductive test not as an operational definition as commonly suggested. Turing's famous prediction about his test being passed at the 70% level is disconfirmed by the results of the Loebner 2000 contest and the absence of any serious Turing test competitors from AI on the (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  6
    Deborah G. Johnson, James H. Moor & Herman T. Tavani (2000). Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 30 (4):6-9.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  12.  24
    James H. Moor (1999). Using Genetic Information While Protecting the Privacy of the Soul. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):257-263.
    Computing plays an important role in genetics (and vice versa).Theoretically, computing provides a conceptual model for thefunction and malfunction of our genetic machinery. Practically,contemporary computers and robots equipped with advancedalgorithms make the revelation of the complete human genomeimminent – computers are about to reveal our genetic soulsfor the first time. Ethically, computers help protect privacyby restricting access in sophisticated ways to genetic information.But the inexorable fact that computers will increasingly collect,analyze, and disseminate abundant amounts of genetic informationmade available through the (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13.  5
    James H. Moor (1998). Reason, Relativity, and Responsibility in Computer Ethics. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 28 (1):14-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  54
    James H. Moor (1982). Split Brains and Atomic Persons. Philosophy of Science 49 (March):91-106.
    Many have claimed that split-brain patients are actually two persons. I maintain that both the traditional separation argument and the more recent sophistication argument for the two persons interpretation are inadequate on conceptual grounds. An autonomy argument is inadequate on empirical grounds. Overall, theoretical and practical consequences weigh heavily in favor of adopting a one person interpretation.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  74
    Deborah G. Johnson, James H. Moor & Herman T. Tavani (2001). Introduction to Computer Ethics: Philosophy Enquiry. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):1-2.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  36
    James H. Moor (1978). Explaining Computer Behavior. Philosophical Studies 34 (October):325-7.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  27
    James H. Moor (1995). Is Ethics Computable? Metaphilosophy 26 (1-2):1-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. James H. Moor (1988). The Pseudorealization Fallacy and the Chinese Room Argument. In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Aspects of AI. D
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Terrell Ward Bynum & James H. Moor (eds.) (1998). How Computers Are Changing Philosophy. Blackwell.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  4
    James H. Moor (1998). If Aristotle Were a Computing Professional. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 28 (3):13-16.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21. James H. Moor (1988). Testing Robots for Qualia. In Herbert R. Otto & James A. Tuedio (eds.), Perspectives on Mind. Kluwer
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  19
    James H. Moor (1999). Introduction to the Power of the Net. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):93-94.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. James H. Moor (1976). An Analysis of Turing's Test. Philosophical Studies 30:249-257.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  5
    James H. Moor (2002). Editorial Commentary. Minds and Machines 12 (1):1-1.
  25.  5
    James H. Moor (2002). Preface. Minds and Machines 12 (2):157-158.
  26.  17
    James H. Moor (1998). Assessing Artificial Intelligence and its Critics. In T. W. Bynum & Moor J. (eds.), The Digital Phoenix. Cambridge: Blackwell 213--230.
  27.  12
    James H. Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (2002). Introduction to Cyberphilosophy. In James Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (eds.), Metaphilosophy. Blackwell Pub. 4-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  6
    James H. Moor (1976). Rationality and the Social Sciences. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:3 - 11.
    In this paper a conception of rationality is developed which bears on three important issues in the social sciences -- the status of the principle of rationality, the criteria for rational actions, and the nature of rational explanations. It is argued that the principle of rationality should be interpreted as a methodological principle and is valuable only inasmuch as it leads to true hypotheses about human action. Definitions of rational beliefs, rational means, and rational ends are provided. These definitions provide (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  7
    James H. Moor (2000). Thinking Must Be Computation of the Right Kind. In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Doc Ctr 115-122.
    In this paper I argue for a computational theory of thinking that does not eliminate the mind. In doing so, I will defend computationalism against the arguments of John Searle and James Fetzer, and briefly respond to other common criticisms.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  11
    Robert J. Fogelin & James H. Moor (1991). Lehrer on Incompatible Though Equally Coherent Systems. Philosophical Studies 64 (2):229 - 232.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  4
    James H. Moor (1986). Computer-Assisted Instruction and the Guinea Pig Dilemma. Teaching Philosophy 9 (4):351-354.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  2
    James H. Moor (1998). Cognition and Explanation–Foreword. Minds and Machines 8 (1):1-5.
  33.  2
    James H. Moor (1975). Logic and the Keller Plan. Metaphilosophy 6 (3-4):372-375.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    James H. Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (2002). Introduction to Cyberphilosophy. Metaphilosophy 33 (1‐2):4-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  4
    James H. Moor (1973). Book Review:Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems Jerome R. Ravetz. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 40 (3):455-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  4
    James H. Moor (1976). The Cancellation of Symmetrical Contraries and the Principle of Significant Contradictories. Philosophy of Science 43 (4):550-559.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. James H. Moor (forthcoming). Just Consequentialism. Ethics and Information Technology.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. James H. Moor (2000). Special Issues on the 'Turing Test: Past, Present and Future.'. Minds and Machines 10 (4):11.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. James H. Moor (1999). Special Note. Minds and Machines 9 (1):1-2.
  40. James H. Moor (2000). The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Volume 9: Philosophy of Mind. Charlottesville: Philosophy Doc Ctr.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. James H. Moor (2000). 2001. The Turing Test: Past, Present and Future (Special Issues). Minds and Machines 10 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography