Order:
Disambiguations
James W. Hikins [5]James Hikins [1]
  1.  48
    On the Ontological and Epistemological Dimensions of Expertise: Why “Reality” and “Truth” Matter and How We Might Find Them.James Hikins & Richard Cherwitz - 2011 - Social Epistemology 25 (3):291 - 308.
    This essay expands Johanna Hartelius? rhetorical understanding of expertise by probing the concept?s ontological and epistemological grounds. Viewed through the lens of a realist-based theory of rhetoric, we contend that notions of being, consciousness, meaning, and knowing are essential to understanding expertise. Applying our theory of rhetorical perspectivism to link these concepts to expertise permits coherent distinctions between genuine expertise and faux expertise. The theory also suggests a philosophy of education centered on the preparation of experts who are ?intellectual entrepreneurs.? (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  8
    Editors' introduction.Richard A. Cherwitz & James W. Hikins - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (1):119-122.
    Among the challenges posed by postmodernity are significant questions concerning the proper role and even the ultimate legitimacy of traditional theories and practices of argument. This introduction positions the essays that follow against the intellectual landscape of postmodern thought.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Realism and its implications for rhetorical theory.James W. Hikins - 1990 - In Richard A. Cherwitz (ed.), Rhetoric and Philosophy. L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 21--77.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  17
    The given of achievement and the reluctance to assent: Argument and inquiry in the post-postmodern world. [REVIEW]James W. Hikins - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (1):137-162.
    Changes in the social, political, and intellectual climate worldwide portend radical changes in how humans view themselves and their world. This essay argues that the twenty-first century will usher in apost-postmodern age. The new epoch will be one in which argument practices more closely resemble their modernist forbears. The ‘given of achievement’ will overcome the postmodern ‘reluctance to assent.’ Argument will be practiced against the backdrop of realist philosophical frameworks and will be viewed as contributing to the accretion of knowledge.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark