Search results for 'James J. Graham' (try it on Scholar)

326 found
Sort by:
  1. Gordon Graham (2007). The Re-Enchantment of the World: Art Versus Religion. OUP Oxford.score: 900.0
    The Re-enchantment of the World is a philosophical exploration of the role of art and religion as sources of meaning in an increasingly material world dominated by science. Gordon Graham takes as his starting point Max Weber's idea that contemporary Western culture is marked by a 'disenchantment of the world' -- the loss of spiritual value in the wake of religion's decline and the triumph of the physical and biological sciences. Relating themes in Hegel, Nietzsche, Schleiermacher, Schopenhauer, and Gadamer (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. James J. Graham (1957). The Examined Life. New Scholasticism 31 (3):431-433.score: 870.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James E. Graham, Glenn V. Ostir, Steven R. Fisher & Kenneth J. Ottenbacher (2008). Assessing Walking Speed in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (4):552-562.score: 810.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. A. J. Graham (1993). Adolfo J. Domínguez Monedero: La Polis y la Expansión Colonial Griega (Siglos VIII–VI). (Historia Universal Antigua, 6.) Pp. 287; 15 Figs, (Maps and Drawings). Madrid: Sintesis, 1991. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):195-196.score: 540.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peter J. Graham (2011). Perceptual Entitlement and Basic Beliefs. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 153 (3):467-475.score: 520.0
    Perceptual entitlement and basic beliefs Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9603-3 Authors Peter J. Graham, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA USA Journal Philosophical Studies Online ISSN 1573-0883 Print ISSN 0031-8116.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel W. Graham (2006). De Haas (F.), Mansfeld (J.) (Edd.) Aristotle's On Generation and Corruption, Book I: Symposium Aristotelicum. Pp . X + 347. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Cased. £45. ISBN: 0-19-924292-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 56 (01):63-.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gordon Graham (1996). James Tully, Ed., Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, Pp. Xvi + 273. Utilitas 8 (01):131-.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Keith Graham (1977). J. L. Austin: A Critique of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvester Press.score: 360.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Emma-Jayne Graham (2012). Childhood (K.) Mustakallio, (J.) Hanska, (H.-L.) Sainio, (V.) Vuolanto (Edd.) Hoping for Continuity: Childhood, Education and Death in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. (Acta Instituti Romani Finlandiae 33.) Pp. Xii + 253, Ills. Rome: Institutum Romanum Finlandiae, 2005. Paper, €35. ISBN: 952-5323-09-9. (V.) Dasen, (T.) Späth (Edd.) Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture. Pp. Xvi + 373, Ills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Cased, £70, US$125. ISBN: 978-0-19-955679-3. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (1):257-262.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Gordon Graham (2011). Thomas Reid: Essays on the Active Powers of Man, Ed. Knud Haakonssen and James A. Harris. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010. Xxv+ 388 Pp.# 100 Hbk. ISBN 9780748617081. [REVIEW] Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2):253-254.score: 360.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. George Graham (1985). Ecological Ethics and Politics. By H. J. McCloskey. Modern Schoolman 62 (2):143-144.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Daniel W. Graham (1989). Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 4: A Festschrift for J.L. Ackrill. History of European Ideas 10 (1):103-104.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. R. L. Graham (1973). Review: James Rosenberg, The Application of Ternary Semigroups to the Study of $N$-Valued Sheffer Functions. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (3):520-520.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter J. Graham (1997). What is Testimony? Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):227-232.score: 300.0
    C.A.J. Coady, in his book Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), offers conditions on an assertion that p to count as testimony. He claims that the assertion that p must be by a competent speaker directed to an audience in need of evidence and it must be evidence that p. I offer examples to show that Coady’s conditions are too strong. Testimony need not be evidence; the speaker need not be competent; and, the statement need not be relevant (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Frederick J. Evans & Charles Graham (1980). Subjective Random Number Generation and Attention Deployment During Acquisition and Overlearning of a Motor Skill. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):391-394.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Bettina G. Bergo, Bernard Boxill, Matthew B. Crawford, Patrick Croskery, Michael J. Degnan, Paul Graham, Kenneth Kipnis, Avery H. Kolers, Henry S. Richardson & David S. Weberman (2002). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (4):884-889.score: 280.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. I. P. L. McLaren, Andy J. Wills & S. Graham (2011). Representation Development, Perceptual Learning, and Concept Formation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):141-142.score: 280.0
    We argue for an example of based on Diamond and Carey's (1986) work on expertise and recognition, which is not made use of in The Origin of Concepts. This mechanism for perceptual learning seems to have all the necessary characteristics in that it is innate, domain-specific (requires stimulus sets possessing a certain structure), and demonstrably affects categorisation in a way that strongly suggests it will influence concept formation as well.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John J. Paris, Neil Graham, Michael D. Schreiber & Michele Goodwin (2006). Has the Emphasis on Autonomy Gone Too Far? Insights From Dostoevsky on Parental Decisionmaking in the NICU. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (02):147-151.score: 280.0
  19. P. J. Webster & S. Graham (2012). Completion of Consent Forms in Colorectal Surgery: Are We Getting It Right? Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (9):574-574.score: 280.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Philip C. J. Donoghue, Anthony Graham & Robert N. Kelsh (2008). The Origin and Evolution of the Neural Crest. Bioessays 30 (6):530-541.score: 280.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. J. Gibson & K. Graham (1997). Postmodern Becomings: From the Space of Form to the Space of Potentiality. In Georges Benko & Ulf Strohmayer (eds.), Space and Social Theory: Interpreting Modernity and Postmodernity. Blackwell Publishers.score: 280.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. J. Lewis & J. Graham (2007). Research Participants' Views on Ethics in Social Research: Issues for Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics 3 (3):73-79.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Siobhan O'Donnell, Ann Cranney, Mary J. Jacobsen, Ian D. Graham, Annette M. O'Connor & Peter Tugwell (2006). Understanding and Overcoming the Barriers of Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (2):174-181.score: 280.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. M. J. Peterson & S. E. Graham (1974). Visual Detection and Visual Imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):509.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. H. Pickard, J. Poland & G. Graham (2011). Review of Addiction and Responsibility. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 11.score: 280.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John J. Stachowicz, Michael Graham, Matthew Es Bracken & Amber I. Szoboszlai (2008). Diversity Enhances Cover and Stability of Seaweed Assemblages: The Role of Heterogeneity and Time. In Carolyn Merchant (ed.), Ecology. Humanity Books. 3008-3019.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Peter J. Graham (2011). Does Justification Aim at Truth? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):51-72.score: 240.0
    Does epistemic justification aim at truth? The vast majority of epistemologists instinctively answer 'Yes'; it's the textbook response. Joseph Cruz and John Pollock surprisingly say no. In 'The Chimerical Appeal of Epistemic Externalism' they argue that justification bears no interesting connection to truth; justification does not even aim at truth. 'Truth is not a very interesting part of our best understanding' of justification (C&P 2004, 137); it has no 'connection to the truth.' A 'truth-aimed ... epistemology is not entitled to (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter J. Graham (forthcoming). The Function of Perception. In Abrol Fairweather (ed.), Virtue Scientia: Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library.score: 240.0
    What is the biological function of perception? I hold perception, especially visual perception in humans, has the biological function of accurately representing the environment. Tyler Burge argues this cannot be so in Origins of Objectivity (Oxford, 2010), for accuracy is a semantical relationship and not, as such, a practical matter. Burge also provides a supporting example. I rebut the argument and the example. Accuracy is sometimes also a practical matter if accuracy partly explains how perception contributes to survival and reproduction.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Peter J. Graham (2011). Intelligent Design and Selective History: Two Sources of Purpose and Plan. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3:67-88.score: 240.0
  30. Peter J. Graham (2012). Epistemic Entitlement. Noûs 46 (3):449-482.score: 240.0
  31. Peter J. Graham (2004). Metaphysical Libertarianism and the Epistemology of Testimony. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):37-50.score: 240.0
    Reductionism about testimony holds that testimonial warrant or entitlement is just a species of inductive warrant. Anti-Reductionism holds that it is different from inductive but analogous to perceptual or memorial warrant. Perception receives much of its positive epistemic status from being reliably truthconducive in normal conditions. One reason to reject the epistemic analogy is that testimony involves agency – it goes through the will of the speaker – but perception does not. A speaker might always choose to lie or otherwise (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter J. Graham (forthcoming). Functions, Warrant, History. In Abrol Fairweather & Owen Flanagan (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    I hold that epistemic warrant consists in the normal functioning of the belief-forming process when the process has forming true beliefs reliably as an etiological function. Evolution by natural selection is the central source of etiological functions. This leads many to think that on my view warrant requires a history of natural selection. What then about learning? What then about Swampman? Though functions require history, natural selection is not the only source. Self-repair and trial-and-error learning are both sources. Warrant requires (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Peter J. Graham (2010). Theorizing Justification. In Knowledge and Skepticism. MIT Press.score: 240.0
    The standard taxonomy of theories of epistemic justification generates four positions from the Foundationalism v. Coherentism and Internalism v. Externalism disputes. I develop a new taxonomy driven by two other distinctions: Fundamentalism v. Non-Fundamentalism and Actual-Result v. Proper-Aim conceptions of epistemic justification. Actual-Result theorists hold that a belief is justified only if, as an actual matter of fact, it is held or formed in a way that makes it more likely than not to be true. Proper-Aim theorists hold that a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Peter J. Graham (2006). Can Testimony Generate Knowledge? Philosophica 78:105-127.score: 240.0
    Orthodoxy in epistemology maintains that some sources of belief, e.g. perception and introspection, generate knowledge, while others, e.g. testimony and memory, preserve knowledge. An example from Jennifer Lackey B the Schoolteacher case B purports to show that testimony can generate knowledge. It is argued that Lackey's case fails to subvert the orthodox view, for the case does not involve the generation of knowledge by testimony. A modified version of the case does. Lackey's example illustrates the orthodox view; the revised case (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter J. Graham (2010). Testimonial Entitlement and the Function of Comprehension. In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 148--174.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Peter J. Graham (2006). Liberal Fundamentalism and its Rivals. In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford. 93--115.score: 240.0
    Many hold that perception is a source of epistemically basic (direct) belief: for justification, perceptual beliefs do not need positive inferential support from other justified beliefs, especially from beliefs about one’s current sensory episodes. Perceptual beliefs can, however, be defeated or undermined by other things one believes, and so to be justified in the end there must be no undefeated undermining grounds. Similarly for memory and introspection.1..
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Peter J. Graham (2000). The Reliability of Testimony. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):695-709.score: 240.0
  38. George Graham & J. Neisser (2000). Probing for Relevance: What Metacognition Tells Us About the Power of Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):172-177.score: 240.0
    Metacognitive attitudes can affect behavior but do they do so, as Koriat claims, because they enhance voluntary control? This Commentary makes a case for saying that metacognitive consciousness may enhance not control but subjective predictability and may be best studied by examining not just healthy, well-integrated cognizers, but victims of multilevel mental disorders.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Linda J. Graham (2011). The Product of Text and 'Other' Statements: Discourse Analysis and the Critical Use of Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6):663-674.score: 240.0
    Much has been written on Michel Foucault's reluctance to clearly delineate a research method, particularly with respect to genealogy (Harwood, 2000; Meadmore, Hatcher & McWilliam, 2000; Tamboukou, 1999). Foucault (1994, p. 288) himself disliked prescription stating, ‘I take care not to dictate how things should be’ and wrote provocatively to disrupt equilibrium and certainty, so that ‘all those who speak for others or to others’ no longer know what to do. It is doubtful, however, that Foucault ever intended for researchers (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Peter J. Graham (2007). The Theoretical Diagnosis of Skepticism. Synthese 158 (1):19 - 39.score: 240.0
    Radical skepticism about the external implies that no belief about the external is even prima facie justified. A theoretical reply to skepticism has four stages. First, show which theories of epistemic justification support skeptical doubts (show which theories, given other reasonable assumptions, entail skepticism). Second, show which theories undermine skeptical doubts (show which theories, given other reasonable assumptions, do not support the skeptic’s conclusion). Third, show which of the latter theories (which non-skeptical theory) is correct, and in so doing show (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Peter J. Graham (2000). Transferring Knowledge. Noûs 34 (1):131–152.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter J. Graham (2007). Review of Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Moral Skepticisms. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (3).score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peter J. Graham (1999). Defending Millianism. Mind 108 (431):555-561.score: 240.0
    Millianism is the view that all there is to the meaning of a name is its bearer. In a recent paper Bryan Frances seeks to undercut the traditional argument against Millianism as well as offer a new argument in favor of Millianism. I argue that both endeavors fail.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Peter J. Graham (2000). Conveying Information. Synthese 123 (3):365-392.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Peter J. Graham (1999). Brandom on Singular Terms. Philosophical Studies 93 (3):247-264.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter J. Graham (2006). Testimonial Justification: Inferential or Non-Inferential? Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):84-95.score: 240.0
    Anti-Reductionists hold that beliefs based upon comprehending (both force and content) of tellings are non-inferentially justified. Comprehension as such, like perceptual representation, confers non-inferential justification on belief. Reductionists, on the other hand, reject this. Comprehension as such is not in itself a warrant for belief. Beliefs based on comprehension are justified only if inferentially supported by other things the subject believes. I discuss an argument from Elizabeth Fricker from her ‘Trusting Others in the Sciences: A Priori or Empirical Warrant?’ She (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Linda J. Graham & Roger Slee (2008). An Illusory Interiority: Interrogating the Discourse/s of Inclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (2):277–293.score: 240.0
    It is generally accepted that the notion of inclusion derived or evolved from the practices of mainstreaming or integrating students with disabilities into regular schools. Halting the practice of segregating children with disabilities was a progressive social movement. The value of this achievement is not in dispute. However, our charter as scholars and cultural vigilantes (Slee & Allan, 2001) is to always look for how we can improve things; to avoid stasis and complacency we must continue to ask, how can (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. A. J. Graham (1986). Campania Martin Frederiksen (Ed. With Additions by Nicholas Purcell): Campania. Pp. Xviii + 368; 6 Maps, 15 Plates. London: British School at Rome, 1984. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (01):105-108.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. L. Graham (1999). Room Enough for One: Towards a Solution for Color Incompatibility. Philosophical Investigations 22 (3):240-261.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 326