Search results for 'James K. Beilby' (try it on Scholar)

21 found
Sort by:
  1. James K. Beilby (ed.) (2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Cornell University Press.score: 870.0
    In this, the first book to address the ongoing debate, Plantinga presents his influential thesis and responds to critiques by distinguished philosophers from a ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. James K. Beilby (2006). Epistemology As Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology. Ashgate.score: 870.0
    Why does he eschew the necessity of natural theology, something that is from a historical perspective the most common approach to defending the epistemic status of Christianity? Answering this question is critical to understanding Plantinga's ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Tyler Wunder (2007). Critical Study of James K. Beilby, Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology. Philo 10 (2):168-186.score: 486.0
    James Beilby’s Epistemology as Theology is the first monograph to address Alvin Plantinga’s completed Warrant Trilogy. The book provides a thorough introduction to Plantinga’s current religious epistemology, but readers hoping for a critical treatment of Plantinga will be largely disappointed: while Beilby does level criticisms against Plantinga, he often underestimates their significance. One of Beilby’s main goals is to sketch out how a version of Reformed epistemology, even if not exactly Plantinga’s version, can withstand its critics. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Daniel Hill (2003). Review of James K. Beilby and Paul R. Eddy (Eds) Divine Foreknowledge: Four Views. (Downers Grove IL: Intervarsity Press, 2001), (Carlisle: Paternoster, 2001). [REVIEW] Religious Studies 39 (2):241-246.score: 450.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Geoffrey Turner (2013). Justification: Five Views. By James K. Beilby and Paul R. Eddy. Pp. 319, SPCK, London, 2012, £15.99. Justification: A Guide for the Perplexed. By Alan J. Spence. Pp. Viii, 173, T & T Clark International, London, 2012, £14.99. Justification: God's Plan And. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 54 (1):143-145.score: 450.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Geoffrey Turner (2012). The Historical Jesus: Five Views. Edited by James K. Beilby & Paul R. Eddy . Pp. 312, London, SPCK, 2010, £12.99. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 53 (2):326-326.score: 450.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. James Beilby (1997). Is Evolutionary Naturalism Self-Defeating? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (2):69-78.score: 240.0
  8. James Beilby (2010). Tayloring Reformed Epistemology. Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):470-474.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James Beilby (1995). William Rowe on the Evidential Value of Appearances. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):251-259.score: 240.0
    While William Rowe has argued that the principle of credulity does not lend justification to religious experience, he must affirm something quite like the principle of credulity in his empirical argument from evil. To do so Rowe has proposed a modified version of the principle of credulity.I shall argue that Rowe’s modified principle of credulity creates for him a dilemma regarding the justification of belief in other minds. I further suggest it is not adequate for bridging the logical gap between (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James Beilby (1996). Does the Empirical Problem of Evil Prove That Theism Is Improbable? Religious Studies 32 (3):315 - 323.score: 240.0
    William Rowe's empirical argument from evil is designed to prove that God's existence is improbable based on the existence of gratuitous evil. One of the most significant objections to Rowe's argument is what William Alston has termed the Agnostic Thesis. The Agnostic Thesis claims that the human epistemic situation is such that we are unable to determine whether or not actual gratuitous evil exists. This paper takes issue with Rowe's response to the Agnostic Thesis. It is my contention that Rowe's (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James Beilby (2005). Thinking Through Rituals. Faith and Philosophy 22 (4):504-508.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. James Beilby (2002). The Relationship Between Faith and Evidence in St. Augustine. Sophia 41 (1):19-32.score: 240.0
    There has been much debate in both theological and philosophical circles over the matter of evidentialism—that is, whether an individual must augment or supplement their belief in God with evidences supportive of that belief. However, what has been (for the most part) lacking is a discussion which endeavors to integrate theological and philosophical desiderata. In this paper I will suggest that the framework for such a discussion can be found in the work of St. Augustine—in particular, in the way he (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. James Beilby (1999). An Evaluation of Gordon Kaufman's Theological Proposal. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 20 (2):123 - 146.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James Beilby (forthcoming). Alvin Plantinga's Pox on Metaphysical Naturalism. Philosophia.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. James Beilby (2007). Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief. In Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. James Beilby (1994). Rationality, Warrant, and Religious Diversity. Philosophia Christi 17:1-14.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Paul Draper (2004). James Beilby (Ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (1):65-68.score: 120.0
  18. Hugo Meynell (2007). Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology. By James Beilby. Heythrop Journal 48 (2):331–333.score: 120.0
  19. John Post, REVIEW of Beilby, James, Ed., Naturalism Defeated? For Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2002). [REVIEW]score: 120.0
    This collection of eleven critical essays, together with Plantinga's replies, examines his evolutionary argument against naturalism (EAAN). All but one of the eleven are printed here for the first time, all are of high quality, and all receive Plantinga's trademark treatment -- rigorous, perceptive, thorough. In view of the numerous arguments, sub-arguments and observations advanced by the eleven against EAAN, his responses amount to a tour de force . It would take too long to sort through the point-counterpoint with a (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John F. Post (2002). Review of James Beilby (Ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Michael Thune (2006). Naturalism, Hope, and Alethic Rationality. Philo 9 (1):5-11.score: 24.0
    In my “Plantinga Untouched,” I argued that James Beilby’s recent objection to Plantinga’s EAAN was unsuccessful. Beilby has sincereplied that a naturalist can grant the Inscrutability Thesis and yet be alethically rational in hoping for a high P(R/N and future developments of E) and, therefore, needn’t accept the alethic defeater for R. I argue that this is impossible, since a naturalist cannot consistently grant that thesis and meet Beilby’s own criteria for alethic hope. Consequently, Plantinga is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation