12 found
Sort by:
  1. Salomi S. Asaridou & James M. McQueen (2013). Speech and Music Shape the Listening Brain: Evidence for Shared Domain-General Mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology 4.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Holger Mitterer, Odette Scharenborg & James M. McQueen (2013). Phonological Abstraction Without Phonemes in Speech Perception. Cognition 129 (2):356-361.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Abder El Aissati, James M. McQueen & Anne Cutler (2012). Finding Words in a Language That Allows Words Without Vowels. Cognition 124 (1):79-84.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. James M. McQueen (2009). Eight Questions About Spoken Word Recognition. In Gareth Gaskell (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James M. McQueen, Anne Cutler & Dennis Norris (2006). Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon. Cognitive Science 30 (6):1113-1126.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. James M. McQueen, Dennis Norris & Anne Cutler (2006). Are There Really Interactive Processes in Speech Perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (12):533.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis Bosch & James M. McQueen (2005). How Should a Speech Recognizer Work? Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James M. McQueen (2003). The Ghost of Christmas Future: Didn't Scrooge Learn to Be Good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus, and Aslin (2003). Cognitive Science 27 (5):795-799.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Anne Pier Salverda, Delphine Dahan & James M. McQueen (2003). The Role of Prosodic Boundaries in the Resolution of Lexical Embedding in Speech Comprehension. Cognition 90 (1):51-89.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Dennis Norris, James M. McQueen & Anne Cutler (2000). Feedback on Feedback on Feedback: It's Feedforward. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):352-363.
    The central thesis of our target article is that feedback is never necessary in spoken word recognition. In this response we begin by clarifying some terminological issues that have led to a number of misunderstandings. We provide some new arguments that the feedforward model Merge is indeed more parsimonious than the interactive alternatives, and that it provides a more convincing account of the data than alternative models. Finally, we extend the arguments to deal with new issues raised by the commentators (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Dennis Norris, James M. McQueen & Anne Cutler (2000). Merging Information in Speech Recognition: Feedback is Never Necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):299-325.
    Top-down feedback does not benefit speech recognition; on the contrary, it can hinder it. No experimental data imply that feedback loops are required for speech recognition. Feedback is accordingly unnecessary and spoken word recognition is modular. To defend this thesis, we analyse lexical involvement in phonemic decision making. TRACE (McClelland & Elman 1986), a model with feedback from the lexicon to prelexical processes, is unable to account for all the available data on phonemic decision making. The modular Race model (Cutler (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Charles Clifton, Anne Cutler, James M. McQueen & Brit van Ooijen (1999). The Processing of Inflected Forms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1018-1019.
    Clahsen proposes two distinct processing routes, for regularly and irregularly inflected forms, respectively, and thus is apparently making a psychological claim. We argue that his position, which embodies a strictly linguistic perspective, does not constitute a psychological processing model.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation