67 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
James Rachels [67]James Webster Rachels [1]
  1.  62
    James Rachels (2009). Active and Passive Euthanasia. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  2. James Rachels (1986). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   98 citations  
  3. James Rachels (1990/1991). Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford University Press.
    From Bishop Wilberforce in the 1860s to the advocates of "creation science" today, defenders of traditional mores have condemned Darwin's theory of evolution as a threat to society's values. Darwin's defenders, like Stephen Jay Gould, have usually replied that there is no conflict between science and religion--that values and biological facts occupy separate realms. But as James Rachels points out in this thought-provoking study, Darwin himself would disagree with Gould. Darwin, who had once planned on being a clergyman, was convinced (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   39 citations  
  4. James Rachels (1986). The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. Oxford University Press.
  5. James Rachels (1975). Why Privacy is Important. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
  6. James Rachels (2001). Killing and Letting Die. In Lawrence C. Becker Mary Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd Edition. Routledge
    Is it worse to kill someone than to let someone die? It seems obvious to common sense that it is worse. We allow people to die, for example, when we fail to contribute money to famine-relief efforts; but even if we feel somewhat guilty, we do not consider ourselves murderers. Nor do we feel like accessories to murder when we fail to give blood, sign an organ-donor card, or do any of the other things that could save lives. Common sense (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7. James Rachels (1974). Two Arguments Against Ethical Egoism. Philosophia 4 (2-3):297-314.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  10
    James Rachels (1974). Applications of Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 71 (3):84-88.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  50
    James Rachels (1979). Killing and Starving to Death. Philosophy 54 (208):159 - 171.
    Although we do not know exactly how many people die each year of malnutrition or related health problems, the number is very high, in the millions. By giving money to support famine relief efforts, each of us could save at least some of them. By not giving, we let them die.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  10. James Rachels (1996). Can Ethics Provide Answers?: And Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Esteemed moral philosopher James Rachels here collects fifteen essays, some classic and others extensively revised, on the nature and limits of moral reasoning. Rachels argues that, rather than simply expressing societal conventions, moral philosophy can subvert received opinion and replace it with something better. Combining a concern for ethical theory with a discussion of practical moral issues such as euthanasia, the rights of animals, privacy, and affirmative action. Can Ethics Provide Answers is an excellent collection for students, scholars, and anyone (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11. James Rachels (2004). Drawing Lines. In Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.), Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford University Press 162--174.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12. James Rachels (1997). Punishment and Desert. In Hugh LaFollette - (ed.), Ethics in Practice. Basil Blackwell 466--74.
    Retributivism—the idea that wrongdoers should be “paid back” for their wicked deeds—fits naturally with many people’s feelings. They find it deeply satisfying when murderers and rapists “get what they have coming,” and they are infuriated when villains “get away with it.” But others dismiss these feelings as primitive and unenlightened. Sometimes the complaint takes a religious form. The desire for revenge, it is said, should be resisted by those who believe in Christian charity. After all, Jesus himself rejected the rule (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  42
    James Rachels (2000). Naturalism. In Hugh LaFollette - (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers
    Twentieth century philosophy began with the rejection of naturalism. Many modern philosophers had assumed that their subject was continuous with the sciences, and that facts about human nature and other such information were relevant to the great questions of ethics, logic, and knowledge. Against this, Frege argued that “psychologism” in logic was a mistake. Logic, he said, is an autonomous subject with its own standards of truth and falsity, and those standards have nothing to do with how the mind works (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  48
    James Rachels (1969). On Liking. Analysis 29 (4):143 - 144.
  15.  48
    James Rachels (ed.) (1998). Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press.
    Rachels's two-volume Ethical Theory provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary moral philosophy, reprinting classic and contemporary articles, including many that are not otherwise readily available. Each volume contains a clearly written, substantial introduction that guides the beginner through the intricacies of the subject.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16. James Rachels (1971). Moral Problems. New York,Harper & Row.
    Abortion: The morality of abortion, by P. Ramsey. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect, by P. Foot. Whatever the consequences, by J. Bennett.--Sex: Sexual perversion, by T. Nagel. On sexual morality, by S. Ruddick.--Human rights and civil disobedience: Rights, human rights, and racial discrimination, by R. Wasserstrom. The justification of civil disobedience, by J. Rawls. Law and civil disobedience, by R. M. Dworkin.--Criminal punishment: The responsibility of criminals, by W. Kneale. Murder and the principles of punishment, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  17. James Rachels (2009). Egoism and Moral Scepticism. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. James Rachels (2009). The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  45
    James Rachels (1981). Reasoning About Killing and Letting Die. Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):465-473.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. James Rachels (1980). Can Ethics Provide Answers? Hastings Center Report 10 (June):32-40.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  21. James Rachels (1980). Euthanasia. In Tom L. Beauchamp & Tom Regan (eds.), Matters of Life and Death. Temple University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  27
    James Rachels (1982). God and Human Attitudes. In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), Religious Studies. Oxford University Press 325 - 337.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  52
    James Rachels (1970). On Moral Absolutism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):338 – 353.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  48
    James Rachels (2002). Ethics and the Bible. Think (1):93-101.
    How should we live? To answer that question, many people turn to the Bible. What they find is often inspiring, although it may set standards that are uncomfortably high: love your neighbor as yourself, treat others as you would like to be treated, and walk humbly with God. Inspiration, however, can be found in a great many books. To Kill a Mockingbird teaches the virtue of tolerance, and A Tale of Two Cities impresses us with the nobility of self-sacrifice. William (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  18
    David E. Cooper, Robert L. Arrington & James Rachels (eds.) (1998). Ethics: The Classic Readings. Blackwell Publishers.
    Ranging from Plato to Sartre and representing classic texts such as Hume's TREATISE and J.S. Mill's UTILITARIANISM, this collection brings together essential ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  34
    James Rachels (1972). Evaluating From a Point of View. Journal of Value Inquiry 6 (2):144-157.
    [This essay originally appeared in the Journal of Value Inquiry, vol. 6 (1972), pp. 144-157.] I In recent years the concept of a point of view has come to play an important role in philosophical ethics. Writers such as Kurt Baier, William Frankena, Paul Taylor, Kai Nielsen, G.J. Warnock, and J.O. Urmson1 have all urged a view of the nature of morality according to which, in making a moral judgment, what a person is doing is expressing a preference from within (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  3
    James Rachels (1971). God and Human Attitudes: James Rachels. Religious Studies 7 (4):325-337.
    Kneeling down or grovelling on the ground, even to express your reverence for heavenly things, is contrary to human dignity.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  16
    James Rachels (1991). When Philosophers Shoot From the Hip. A Report From America. Bioethics 5 (1):67–71.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  31
    James Rachels (1978). Can the Egoist Have It Both Ways? Philosophia 8 (2-3):425-428.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  11
    James Rachels (1991). When Philosophers Shoot From the Hip. Bioethics 5 (1):67-71.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. James Rachels (1977). John Dewey and the Truth About Ethics. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), New Studies in the Philosophy of John Dewey. Published for the University of Vermont by the University Press of New England 149--171.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  5
    Carey Heckman, James Rachels & Stuart Rachels (2010). Ethics and the Future of Computing. Ethics 1:6.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  21
    James Rachels (1984). Euthanasia and the Physician's Professional Commitments. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):281-285.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. James Rachels (1989). The Right Thing to Do Basic Readings in Moral Philosophy. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  12
    James Rachels (2002). The Value of Human Life. Philosophical Inquiry 24 (1-2):3-16.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  6
    James Rachels (2007). Moral, aborto e religião. Critica.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  15
    James Rachels (1969). Wanting and Willing. Philosophical Studies 20 (1-2):9 - 13.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  19
    James Rachels (1998). The Principle of Agency. Bioethics 12 (2):150–161.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  11
    James Rachels (1968). Wants, Reasons, and Justifications. Philosophical Quarterly 18 (73):299-309.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  19
    James Rachels (2001). Theory and Practice. In Lawrence C. Becker Mary Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Routledge
    The idea that some things are fine in theory, but do not work in practice, was already an “old saying” when Kant wrote about it in 1793. Kant, who was annoyed that a man named Garve had criticized his ethical theory on this ground, responded by pointing out that there is always a gap between theory and practice. Theory provides general rules but it cannot tell us how to apply them--for that, practical judgment is needed. “[T]he general rule,” said Kant, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  18
    James Rachels (1993). Why Darwinians Should Support Equal Treatment for Other Great Apes. In Paolo Cavalieri Peter Singer (ed.), The Great Ape Project. Fourth Estate 152--157.
    A few years ago I set out to canvass the literature on Charles Darwin. I thought it would be a manageable task, but I soon realized what a naïve idea this was. I do not know how many books have been written about him, but there seem to be thousands, and each year more appear.1 Why are there so many? Part of the answer is, of course, that he was a tremendously important figure in the history of human thought. But (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    James Rachels (2004). A questão da objectividade em ética. Critica.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  5
    James Rachels (1971). Reasons for Action. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):173 - 187.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  2
    James Rachels (1987). A Report From America: Baby M. Bioethics 1 (4):357–365.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  14
    James Rachels (1982). Moral Education in Public Schools. Journal of Philosophy 79 (11):678-679.
  46.  13
    James Rachels (1986). Darwin's Moral Lapse. National Forum:22-24.
    One reason Darwin's letters and journals are such a pleasure to read is that in them we meet a modest, decent man who commands our respect, and even our affection. He was not only a great scientist; he was an exemplary human being. Yet there was one famous episode in Darwin's life in which he and his friends acted badly. Perhaps because he was so admirable a man, historians have tended to gloss over this moral lapse, sometimes even to the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    James Rachels (1983). Barney Clark's Key. Hastings Center Report 13 (2):17-19.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  7
    James Rachels (1987). Darwin, Species, and Morality. The Monist 70 (1):98-113.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. James Rachels, Note.
    for both introductory courses in philosophy, or philosophical methodology, as well as independent study for anyone interested in the methods of argument, assessment and criticism used in contemporary analytic philosophy. It is unique in approach, and written in a pleasant and considerate tone. Its authors are both competent philosophers, and the book visibly reflects their deep sympathy to the discipline and their appreciation of its unique character. This book will help one to get going to do philosophy, but more advanced (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    James Rachels (2009). Serão as pessoas responsáveis pelo que fazem? Critica.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 67