Search results for 'Jan Law' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  8
    Alex Law & Jan Law (2002). Magical Urbanism:Walter Benjamin and Utopian Realism in the Film Ratcatcher. Historical Materialism 10 (4):173-211.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Ana Dinerstein, Mark Bould, Stuart Elden, Ishay Landa, Mike Wayne, Anna Kornbluh, Alex Law, Jan Law & Ben Watson (2002). Brill Online Books and Journals. Historical Materialism 10 (4).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Clive Parry, J. A. Hopkins, International Law Fund & British Institute of International and Comparative Law (1963). British International Law Cases a Collection of Decisions of Courts in the British Isles on Points of International Law. --. Stevens.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  1
    Frank S. Ravitch (2010). Arie-Jan Kwak (Ed): Holy Writ: Interpreting Law and Religion. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):515-518.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  3
    Bruce W. Frier (1983). Jan Willem Tellegen: The Roman Law of Succession in the Letters of Pliny the Younger, 1. Pp. Xiv + 204. Zutphen: Terra, 1982. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 33 (02):340-341.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Lorraine Weir (forthcoming). Oral Traditionas Legal Fiction: The Challenge of Dechen TsEdilhtan in Tsilhqotin Nation V. British Columbia. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-31.
    Often understood as synonymous withoral historyin Indigenous title and rights cases in Canada, “oral traditionas theorized by Jan Vansina is complexly imbricated in the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  16
    Jan C. Joerden (2004). Placebo and Criminal Law. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):65-72.
    This article considers issues concerning cases where the use of placebo is lawful or is not lawful under aspects of German criminal law. It will differentiate between (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. John Martin Gillroy & Joe Bowersox (eds.) (2002). The Moral Austerity of Environmental Decision Making: Sustainability, Democracy, and Normative Argument in Policy and Law. Duke University Press Books.
    In _The Moral Austerity of Environmental Decision Making_ a group of prominent environmental ethicists, policy analysts, political theorists, and legal experts challenges the dominating influence of market (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. John Martin Gillroy & Joe Bowersox (eds.) (2002). The Moral Austerity of Environmental Decision Making: Sustainability, Democracy, and Normative Argument in Policy and Law. Duke University Press Books.
    In _The Moral Austerity of Environmental Decision Making_ a group of prominent environmental ethicists, policy analysts, political theorists, and legal experts challenges the dominating influence of market (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  3
    Jan Klabbers & Touko Piiparinen (eds.) (2013). Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance. Cambridge University Press.
    This book addresses conflicts involving how law relates normative orders. The assumption behind the book is that law no longer automatically claims supremacy, but that actors can (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Fredrik Jörgensen & Jan Svanberg (2009). Legal Self-Efficacy and Managers' Use of Law. Archiv Fuer Rechts- Und Sozialphilosphie 95 (1):79-101.
    This study demonstrates that legal effectiveness may depend on how an individual perceives him/herself as a competent user of law. The hypotheses tested in this study (...)are that the self-perceptions of people may be more important for legal effectiveness than are the objective factors such as law enforcement agencies and the effectiveness of commercial legislation. The effectiveness concept was tested on survey data collected from 246 managers in Northwest Russia. The result is that the subjective self-perceptions are a stronger determinant of the use of law than is the perceived institutional efficiency. Persons were to a lesser degree adopting law as an instrument conditioned on their calculation of the efficiency of courts and other institutions, but to a greater degree adopting law as a form of communication conditioned on their feeling of assuredness about their ability to communicate with legal terminology. Therefore there is a latent potential for improvement of legal effectiveness in the enhancement of how individuals perceive themselves as knowledgeable users of law. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  3
    Jan M. Broekman (2007). Trading Signs: Semiotic Practices in Law and Medicine. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 20 (3):223-236.
    Lawyers write, blog and are otherwise producers of words; they structure public life through legal discourse and integrate all issues that reinforce legal reasoning. Even if one (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Jan M. Broekman (1999). A Philosophy of European Union Law. Peeters.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Robert von Friedeburg & Jan Waszink (eds.) (2013). Politics, Law, Society, History and Religion in the "Politica" (1590s-1650s): Interdisciplinary Perspectives on an Interdisciplinary Subject. [REVIEW] Georg Olms.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  20
    Jan-Reinard Sieckmann (1992). Legal System and Practical Reason. On the Structure of a Normative Theory of Law. Ratio Juris 5 (3):288-307.
    It will be argued, firstly, that there is a link between the legal validity of a norm and the rational justifiability of a requirement that judges should (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  2
    David Jan McQuoid-Mason (2014). Terminating the Pregnancy of a Brain-Dead Mother: Does a Fetus Have a Right to Life? The Law in South Africa. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 7 (2):44.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Jan-R. Sieckmann (2009). Reconstructing Relativism. An Analysis of Radbruch's Philosophy of Law. Archiv Fuer Rechts- Und Sozialphilosphie 95 (1):14-27.
    This paper aims at reconstructing Radbruch's relativistic conception of law within the framework of a model of principles. The idea of relativism remains a disputed issue (...)in current legal and moral philosophy. In spite of the fact that Radbruch's legal philosophy lacks coherence, it includes elements that resemble modern conceptions of law as a system including principles to be balanced against each other. Therefore, a reconstruction within a model of principles might as well prove the fruitfulness of the model of principles as render a more appropriate theoretical framework for Radbruch's legal philosophy. After an outline of Radbruch's relativism, I will discuss some critical points of his approach and, subsequently, present a reconstruction according to the model of principles, which makes plausible at least some of Radbruch's contentions. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  12
    Jan Rothkamm (2008). On the Foundations of Law: Religion, Nature, Morals. Ratio Juris 21 (3):300-311.
    Abstract. The article discusses the importance of three extra-legal sourcesdivine inspiration, natural law, and moralityfor a full understanding and effective application of law. Each source (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    Jan Wouters (2005). Perspectives for International Law in the Twenty-First Century: Chaos or a World Legal Order. Ethical Perspectives 7 (1):17-23.
    In our increasingly interactive and interdependent world, we are confronted almost daily with issues in international law: think, for instance, of the recent Pinochet and Öcalan cases, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  3
    Jan Wouters (2000). Perspectives for International Law in the Twenty-First Century. Ethical Perspectives 7 (1):17-23.
    In our increasingly interactive and interdependent world, we are confronted almost daily with issues in international law: think, for instance, of the recent Pinochet and Öcalan cases, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Jan M. Brockman (2009). Law in Life, Life in Law : Llewellyn's Legal Realism Revisited. In Francis J. Mootz (ed.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Jan M. Broekman & William A. Pencak (2010). Signs of Law: The Roberta Kevelson Seminar on Law and Semiotics at Penn State University's Dickinson School of Law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (1):1-1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Jan Klabbers & Silke Trommer (2013). Peaceful Coexistence : Normative Pluralism in International Law. In Jan Klabbers & Touko Piiparinen (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance. Cambridge University Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  4
    Jan Harald Alnes (1999). Sense and Basic Law V in Frege's Logicism. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4:1-30.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  7
    Jan Engberg & Anne Lise Kjær (2011). Approaches to Language and the LawSome Introductory Notes. Hermes 46:7-10.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Jan-Werner Müller (2003). Myth, Law and Order: Schmitt and Benjamin Readreflections on Violence. History of European Ideas 29 (4):459-473.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  4
    Bernard S. Jackson (2001). Literal Meaning and Rabbinic Hermeneutics: A Response to Claudio Luzzati and Jan Broekman. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 14 (2):129-141.
    This response to the articles of Luzzati and Broekman (in this issue)addresses principally the character of early rabbinic legalinterpretation, as viewed by the Rabbis themselves. It (...)considers, withexamples, their concept of ``simple meaning'' (peshat), and itsplace within their overall hermeneutic system and its theologicalpresuppositions. The second section responds more briefly to thetheoretical critiques of Luzzati and Broekman, stressing that (myversion of) semiotics is descriptive rather than normative; resists thereduction of textual meaning to interpretation; and refuses to equatedecision-making with justification. I suggest that traces of traditionaltheological positions may be discerned in the normativist positions ofmy interlocutors. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  9
    Jan M. Broekman (1996). Intertwinements of Law and Medicine. Leuven University Press.
    PREFACE Ubi bene, ibi patria. The proverb expresses an important feature of this book. 'Being somewhere' necessarily implies an orientation towards ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  19
    Jan Yun-Hua (1980). Tao, Principle, and Law: The Three Key Concepts in the Yellow Emperor Taoism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7 (3):205-228.
  30.  2
    Jan Krasnowiecki (1960). A Logical Problem in the Law of Mistake as to Person. Philosophical Quarterly 10 (41):313-321.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    Jan Deckers (2014). Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law by E. Brake, 2012 Oxford, Oxford University Pressx + 256 Pp., £64.00 , £16.99. [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (4):442-444.
  32.  2
    Jan Opsomer (2012). Natural Law Kullmann Naturgesetz in der Vorstellung der Antike, besonders der Stoa. Eine Begriffsuntersuchung. Pp. 189. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2010. Cased, €39. ISBN: 978-3-515-09633-1. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (1):89-91.
  33. Jan M. Broekman (1985). The Minimum Content of Positivism. Positivism in the Law and in Legal Theory. Rechtstheorie 16 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  3
    Jan Berg (1970). Review: J. F. Staal, Negation and the Law of Contradiction in Indian Thought: A Comparative Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4):575-575.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  7
    Jan M. Broekman (1975). A Structuralist Approach to the Philosophy of Law. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 49:37-48.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Jan Hallebeek (2000). Questions of Canon Law Concerning the Election and Consecration of a Bishop for the Church of Utrecht. Bijdragen 61 (1):17-50.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  2
    Letetia van der Poll (2012). Anne Wagner and Jan M Broekman (Eds): Prospects of Legal Semiotics. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (2):295-296.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    Jan Such (2011). Scientific Law Versus Historical Generalization. An Attempt at an Explication. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 97 (1):337-350.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Jan M. Broekman (2000). A Phihsophy of European Union Law. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (1):182-182.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Jan M. Broekman (1997). Bioethics and Law. Rechtstheorie 28 (1):1-20.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. B. Sharon Byrd, Joachim Hruschka & Jan C. Joerdan (eds.) (1994). Jahrbuck Fur Recht Und Ethik (Annual for Law and Ethics). Duncker & Humblot.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. B. Sharon Byrd & Jan C. Joerdan (eds.) (2005). Philosophica Practica Universalis: Festschrift for Joachim Hruschka, Jahrbuch Fur Recht Und Ethik (Annual Review of Law and Ethics). Duncker & Humblot.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Frank Fleerackers, Evert van Leeuwen, Bert van Roermund & Jan M. Broekman (1997). Law, Life and the Images of Man. Modes of Thought in Modern Legal Theory. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (3):588-588.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Jan Hallebeek (2000). Questions of Canon Law Concerning The Election and Consecration of A Bishop for The Church of Utrecht. Bijdragen 61 (1):17-50.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Jan Henrik Klement (2012). Common Law Thinking in German Jurisprudence : on Alexy's Principles Theory. In Matthias Klatt (ed.), Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Jan Narveson (1980). "Law, Legislation and Liberty", Vol. II: "The Mirage of Social Justice" by Friedrich A. Hayek. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10 (3):325.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Dorota Sepczyńska (2008). Katolicyzm a liberalizm. Szkic z filozofii społecznej. Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos.
    In the individual, social, and political dimensions, the shaping of the liberal tradition has met up with and will continue to meet up with the presence of (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  30
    H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
    The Concept of Law is the most important and original work of legal philosophy written this century. First published in 1961, it is considered the masterpiece of (...)span>'s enormous contribution to the study of jurisprudence and legal philosophy. Its elegant language and balanced arguments have sparked wide debate and unprecedented growth in the quantity and quality of scholarship in this area--much of it devoted to attacking or defending <span class='Hi'>Hartspan>'s theories. Principal among <span class='Hi'>Hartspan>'s critics is renowned lawyer and political philosopher Ronald Dworkin who in the 1970s and 80s mounted a series of challenges to <span class='Hi'>Hartspan>'s Concept of Law. It seemed that <span class='Hi'>Hartspan> let these challenges go unanswered until, after his death in 1992, his answer to Dworkin's criticism was discovered among his papers. In this valuable and long-awaited new edition <span class='Hi'>Hartspan> presents an Epilogue in which he answers Dworkin and some of his other most influential critics including Fuller and Finnis. Written with the same clarity and candor for which the first edition is famous, the Epilogue offers a sharper interpretation of <span class='Hi'>Hartspan>'s own views, rebuffs the arguments of critics like Dworkin, and powerfully asserts that they have based their criticisms on a faulty understanding of <span class='Hi'>Hartspan>'s work. <span class='Hi'>Hartspan> demonstrates that Dworkin's views are in fact strikingly similar to his own. In a final analysis, <span class='Hi'>Hartspan>'s response leaves Dworkin's criticisms considerably weakened and his positions largely in question. Containing <span class='Hi'>Hartspan>'s final and powerful response to Dworkin in addition to the revised text of the original Concept of Law, this thought-provoking and persuasively argued volume is essential reading for lawyers and philosophers throughout the world. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   388 citations  
  49. Allen E. Buchanan (2004). Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.
    This book articulates a systematic vision of an international legal system grounded in the commitment to justice for all persons. It provides a probing exploration of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   64 citations  
  50. Seth Lazar (2012). The Morality and Law of War. In Andrei Marmor (ed.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Law. Routledge 364.
    The revisionist critique of conventional just war theory has undoubtedly scored some important victories. Walzers elegantly unified defense of combatant legal equality and noncombatant immunity has (...)been seriously undermined. This critical success has not, however, been matched by positive arguments, which when applied to the messy reality of war would deprive states and soldiers of the permission to fight wars that are plausibly thought to be justified. The appeal to law that is sought to resolve this objection by casting it as a practical concern, a pragmatic worry about implementation, which while germane to debates over the laws of war, need not undermine our convictions in the fundamental principles the revisionists advocate. This response is inadequate. Revisionists have not shown that soldiers should obey the laws of war, in practice, when they conflict with their other moral reasonsour worries about application remain intact. Moreover, a theory of war that offers only an account of the laws of war, and a set of fundamental principles developed in abstraction from feasibility constraints, is radically incomplete. We need to know how to apply those fundamental principles, and whether, when applied, they lead to defensible conclusions. Only two options seem to remain. Perhaps the revisionistsarguments for their chosen fundamental principles are sufficiently compelling that we should stick with them, and accept their troubling conclusionsin other words, accept pacifism. Alternatively, we need to revise our fundamental principles, so that when applied they yield conclusions that we can more confidently endorse. -/- Though it does not save the revisionist view from the responsibility dilemma and cognate objections, the appeal to law does raise an important, and previously inadequately theorized, questionor, rather, resurrects a neglected topic, discussed in depth by historical just war theorists such as Grotius and Vattel. There are good grounds for distinguishing the laws of war from the morality of war, and for adjusting the former to accommodate predictable noncompliance, that should not impact on our account of the latter. Nonetheless, I have argued that there are some profound moral insights underlying both combatant legal equality and noncombatant immunity: specifically, we cannot infer from a combatants side having not satisfied jus ad bellum that he may not justifiably use lethal force; and other things equal, it is more wrongful to harm a nonliable noncombatant than to harm a nonliable combatant. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000