See also:
Profile: Jason Rogers (University of Rochester, George Mason University)
  1. Jason Rogers & Jonathan Matheson (2011). Bergmann's Dilemma: Exit Strategies for Internalists. Philosophical Studies 152 (1):55 - 80.
    Michael Bergmann claims that all versions of epistemic internalism face an irresolvable dilemma. We show that there are many plausible versions of internalism that falsify this claim. First, we demonstrate that there are versions of "weak awareness internalism" that, contra Bergmann, do not succumb to the "Subject's Perspective Objection" horn of the dilemma. Second, we show that there are versions of "strong awareness internalism" that do not fall prey to the dilemma's "vicious regress" horn. We note along the way that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2. Jason Rogers (2010). In Defense of a Version of Satisficing Consequentialism. Utilitas 22 (2):198-221.
    In this paper, I develop, motivate and offer a qualified defense of a version of satisficing consequentialism (SC). I develop the view primarily in light of objections to other versions of SC recently posed by Ben Bradley. I motivate the view by showing that it (1) accommodates the intuitions apparently supporting those objections, (2) is supported by certain ‘common sense’ moral intuitions about specific cases, and (3) captures the central ideas expressed by satisficing consequentialists in the recent literature. Finally, I (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Jason Rogers & Jonathan Matheson (2011). Bergmann’s Dilemma: Exit Strategies for Internalists. Philosophical Studies 152 (1):55-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography