37 found
Sort by:
  1. Mark A. Wilson, Julie Hanlon Rubio, Lisa Tessman, Mary M. Doyle Roche, James F. Keenan, Margaret Urban Walker, Jamie Schillinger, Jean Porter, Jennifer A. Herdt & Edmund N. Santurri (2014). Virtue and the Moral Life: Theological and Philosophical Perspectives. Lexington Books.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mark A. Wilson, Julie Hanlon Rubio, Lisa Tessman, Mary M. Doyle Roche, S. J. Keenan, Margaret Urban Walker, Jamie Schillinger, Jean Porter, Jennifer A. Herdt & Edmund N. Santurri (2014). Virtue and the Moral Life: Theological and Philosophical Perspectives. Lexington Books.
    Virtue and the Moral Life brings together distinguished philosophers and theologians with younger scholars of consummate promise to produce ten essays that engage both academics and students of ethics. This collection explores the role virtues play in identifying the good life and the good society.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jean Porter (2013). Dispositions of the Will. Philosophia 41 (2):289-300.
    According to Aquinas (1888–1906), the virtue of justice is a habit, that is to say, a stable disposition of the will. Many commentators have found this claim to be puzzling, since it is difficult to see what this might entail, beyond a simple tendency to choose and act in accordance with precepts of justice. However, this objection does not take account of the fact that for Aquinas, the will is the principle of human freedom, and as such, it is expressed (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jean Porter (2013). The Natural Law and the Normative Significance of Nature. Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (2):166-173.
    We regard cooperation as generally good, and yet this does not imply that it is morally good. The scholastic conception of nature offers the kind of distinction between levels of normative appraisal that we need, and suggests a fruitful way of thinking about the moral significance of our naturally sociable nature.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Charles Taylor, Fred Dallmayr, William Schweiker, Nicholas Wolterstorff, J. Budziszewski, Jeanne Heffernan Schindler, Joshua Mitchell, Robin Lovin, Jonathan Chaplin, Michael L. Budde, Jean Porter, Eloise A. Buker, Christopher Beem, Peter Berkowitz & Jean Bethke Elshtain (2012). Theology and Public Philosophy: Four Conversations. Lexington Books.
    This volume brings together eminent theologians, philosophers and political theorists to discuss such questions as how religious understandings have shaped the moral landscape of contemporary culture; the possible contributions of theology and theologically informed moral argument to contemporary public life; the problem of religious and moral discourse in a pluralistic society; and the proper relationship between religion and culture.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jean Porter (2011). Does the Law Matter? Legal Integrity and the Rule of Law as Intrinsic Values. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 8 (2):187-203.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jean Porter (2011). In Defense of Living Nature : Finding Common Ground in a Medieval Tradition. In Gregory E. Kaebnick (ed.), The Ideal of Nature: Debates About Biotechnology and the Environment. Johns Hopkins University Press. 17.
  8. Jean Porter (2011). Virtues and Vices. In Brian Davies & Eleonore Stump (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jean Porter (2009). Does the Natural Law Provide a Universally Valid Morality? In Lawrence Cunningham (ed.), Intractable Disputes About the Natural Law: Alasdair Macintyre and Critics. University of Notre Dame Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jean Porter (2009). The Disfigured Face: Traditional Natural Law and its Encounter with Modernity – By Luis Cortest. Modern Theology 25 (3):515-517.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jean Porter (2007). Joseph Pilsner the Specification of Human Action in St Thomas Aquinas. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006). Pp. XI+273. ISBN 0 19 928605. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 43 (3):359-363.
  12. Jean Porter (2007). Virtue. In Gilbert Meilaender & William Werpehowski (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Theological Ethics. Oup Oxford.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Richard J. Bernstein, Jean Bethke Elshtain, Amitai Etzioni, William Galston, Franklin I. Gamwell, Timothy Jackson, James Turner Johnson, John Kelsay & Jean Porter (2006). Universalism Vs. Relativism: Making Moral Judgments in a Changing, Pluralistic, and Threatening World. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Has moral relativism run its course? The threat of 9/11, terrorism, reproductive technology, and globalization has forced us to ask anew whether there are universal moral truths upon which to base ethical and political judgments. In this timely edited collection, distinguished scholars present and test the best answers to this question. These insightful responses temper the strong antithesis between universalism and relativism and retain sensitivity to how language and history shape the context of our moral decisions. This important and relevant (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jean Porter (2003). Tradition in the Recent Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. In Mark C. Murphy (ed.), Alasdair Macintyre. Cambridge University Press. 38--69.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Stephen A. Wilson and & Jean Porter (2003). Focus Introduction: Taking the Measure of Jonathan Edwards for Contemporary Religious Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (2):183-199.
    The Journal of "Religious Ethics" marks the tercentenary of Edwards's birth with the following collection of essays. In keeping with the overall mission of the journal, this tribute takes the form of historical and constructive reflection, in which diverse perspectives on Edwards's work and diverse forms of engagement with it supplement and correct one another. Our hope is that these essays will serve both to generate interest in Edwards's work among those who are unfamiliar with him, and to advance the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephen A. Wilson & Jean Porter (2003). Focus Introduction: Taking the Measure of Jonathan Edwards for Contemporary Religious Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (2):183 - 199.
    The Journal of "Religious Ethics" marks the tercentenary of Edwards's birth with the following collection of essays. In keeping with the overall mission of the journal, this tribute takes the form of historical and constructive reflection, in which diverse perspectives on Edwards's work and diverse forms of engagement with it supplement and correct one another. Our hope is that these essays will serve both to generate interest in Edwards's work among those who are unfamiliar with him, and to advance the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jean Porter (2002). The Virtue of Justice (IIa IIae, Qq. 58–122).”. In Stephen J. Pope (ed.), The Ethics of Aquinas. 272--86.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jean Porter (2001). Virtue Ethics. In Robin Gill (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jean Porter (2000). Responsibility, Passion, and Sin: A Reassessment of Abelard's Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (3):367 - 394.
    This article reassesses Peter Abelard's account of moral intention, or, better, consent, in light of recent work on his own thought and on the twelfth-century background of that thought. The author argues (1) that Abelard's focus on consent as the determining factor for morality does not rule out, but, on the contrary, presupposes objective criteria for moral judgment and (2) that Abelard's real innovation does not lie in his doctrine of consent as the sole source of merit or guilt, but, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jean Porter (2000). Virtue Ethics and Emotional Conflict, Kristjan Kristjansson. American Philosophical Quarterly 37 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. G. Simon Harak, James F. Keenan & Jean Porter (1999). Letters, Notes, & Comments. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):181 - 191.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jean Porter (1998). Review: Recent Studies in Aquinas's Virtue Ethic: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):189 - 215.
    We are currently seeing a revival of interest in Aquinas's moral thought among Christian ethicists, both Protestant and Catholic. Although recent studies of his moral thought have touched on a number of topics, the majority of these have focused on his account of the virtues and their place in the Christian life. Probing the questions of the relation of virtue and law, the role of reason and will, and the place of the passions in Aquinas's moral theology, I will examine (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jean Porter (1997). A Response to Brian Linnane and David Coffey. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):285-292.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jean Porter (1997). Mere History: The Place of Historical Studies in Theological Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):103 - 126.
    This article offers two arguments for the centrality of historical studies to constructive theological ethics. The first is pedagogical: it is argued that precisely because historical texts call for reflective interpretation, the close study of these texts can provide insights that are not readily available in other ways. The second is more foundational: the Christian moral tradition is the proper subject matter of Christian theological ethics, and because that tradition evolves over time and cannot be understood apart from some account (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jean Porter (1997). Moral Language and the Language of Grace. Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):169-198.
    From the standpoint of the moral theologian, perhaps the most influential aspect of Karl Rahner’s theology is the thesis of the fundamental option, that is, the claim that the individual’s status before God is determined by a basic, freely chosen and prethematic orientation of openness towards, or rejection of God which takes place at the level of core or transcendental freedom. This paper argues that this notion of the fundamental option is problematic because it is not concrete enough to provide (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jean Porter (1996). Contested Categories: Reason, Nature, and Natural Order in Medieval Accounts of the Natural Law. Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):207 - 232.
    When we approach medieval writings on the natural law in terms of our contemporary interpretations of such basic categories as reason, nature, and natural order, these writings are bound to seem confused, incomplete, and unsophisticated. Yet if we allow these writings to speak in their own terms, respecting the integrity of their thought, a different picture emerges. We find there an account of the natural law which is significantly different from any contemporary version. This account is illuminating precisely because it (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jean Porter (1996). Making Sense of Humanity. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):489-490.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jean Porter (1996). Thought's Ego in Augustine and Descartes. Augustinian Studies 27 (2):194-195.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jean Porter (1995). Moral Action and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    How do we determine whether an action is right or wrong? Until recently, philosophers assumed that this question could be answered by means of a theory of morality, which set forth clearly established rules for moral behaviour. More recently, however, a number of philosophers have challenged a theory of morality in this sense. Porter is sympathetic to their criticisms but questions whether they go far enough in offering a positive alternative to a modern view of the moral act. She argues (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jean Porter (1993). Basic Goods and the Human Good in Recent Catholic Moral Theology. The Thomist 57 (1):27-49.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jean Porter (1993). The Unity of the Virtues and the Ambiguity of Goodness: A Reappraisal of Aquinas's Theory of the Virtues. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):137 - 163.
    This paper examines Aquinas's contention that the virtues are necessarily connected, in such a way that anyone who fully possesses one of them, necessarily possesses them all. It is argued that this claim, as Aquinas develops it in the "Summa Theologiae", is more complex, interesting, and plausible than it is often taken to be. On his view, the cardinal virtues can be said to be connected in two senses, corresponding to the two senses in which certain virtues can be said (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jean Porter (1992). [Book Review] the Recovery of Virtue, the Relevance of Aquinas for Christian Ethics. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (2):403-404.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jean Porter (1992). Mencius and Aquinas. Faith and Philosophy 9 (4):535-538.
  34. Jean Porter (1992). Review. [REVIEW] The Thomist 56:349-351.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jean Porter (1989). De Ordine Caritatis: Charity, Friendship, and Justice in Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologiae. The Thomist 53 (2):197-213.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jean Porter (1989). Moral Rules and Moral Actions: A Comparison of Aquinas and Modern Moral Theology. Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (1):123 - 149.
    This essay compares Aquinas' understanding of the precepts of justice with the various accounts of moral rules developed in the debate over proportionalism among contemporary moral theologians. It is argued that both sides in this debate oversimplify Aquinas' account of moral rules so drastically as to misread him. Moreover, it is argued that because Aquinas' account reflects a sense of the communal context for moral discernment, it is superior to both traditionalism and proportionalism.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation