Search results for 'Jeanne M. Powers' (try it on Scholar)

771 found
Sort by:
  1. Jeanne M. Powers (2007). The Relevance of Critical Race Theory to Educational Theory and Practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (1):151–166.score: 870.0
  2. John Powers (2006). Review Of: William M. Bodiford, Ed., Going Forth: Visions of Buddhist Vinaya. [REVIEW] Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 33:194-198.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. B. M. (1970). Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. Review of Metaphysics 24 (1):141-142.score: 360.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Commercial Loan Powers (1989). Janice M. Moulton. In A. Pablo Iannone (ed.), Contemporary Moral Controversies in Business. Oxford University Press.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David S. Powers (2000). M. Izzi Dien, The Theory and the Practice of Market Law in Medieval Islam: A Study of Kitāb Niṣāb Al-Lḥthisāb of Umar B. Muḥammad Al-Sunāmī (Fl. 7th–8th/13th–14th Century). Np: EJW Gibb Memorial Trust, 1997. Pp. Vii, 247; 2 Black-and-White Figures. S99. Distributed in the US by the David Brown Book Company, PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779. [REVIEW] Speculum 75 (2):482-483.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas M. Powers (2006). Prospects for a Kantian Machine. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21 (4):46-51.score: 300.0
    This paper is reprinted in the book Machine Ethics, eds. M. Anderson and S. Anderson, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David M. W. Powers (2006). On the Unproductiveness of Language and Linguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):82-84.score: 260.0
    van der Velde & de Kamps (dvV&dK) present a response to Jackendoff's four challenges in terms of a computational model. This commentary supports the position that neural assemblies mediated by recurrence and delay indeed have sufficient theoretical power to deal with all four challenges. However, we question the specifics of the model proposed, in terms of both neurophysiological plausibility and computational complexity.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2005). Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):99-107.score: 240.0
    In this paper, we focus attention on the role of computer system complexity in ascribing responsibility. We begin by introducing the notion of technological moral action (TMA). TMA is carried out by the combination of a computer system user, a system designer (developers, programmers, and testers), and a computer system (hardware and software). We discuss three sometimes overlapping types of responsibility: causal responsibility, moral responsibility, and role responsibility. Our analysis is informed by the well-known accounts provided by Hart and Hart (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Werner Menski, Carl Olson, William Cenkner, Anne E. Monius, Sarah Hodges, Jeffrey J. Kripal, Carol Salomon, Deepak Sarma, William Cenkner, John E. Cort, Peter A. Huff, Joseph A. Bracken, Larry D. Shinn, Jonathan S. Walters, Ellison Banks Findly, John Grimes, Loriliai Biernacki, David L. Gosling, Thomas Forsthoefel, Michael H. Fisher, Ian Barrow, Srimati Basu, Natalie Gummer, Pradip Bhattacharya, John Grimes, Heather T. Frazer, Elaine Craddock, Andrea Pinkney, Joseph Schaller, Michael W. Myers, Lise F. Vail, Wayne Howard, Bradley B. Burroughs, Shalva Weil, Joseph A. Bracken, Christopher W. Gowans, Dan Cozort, Katherine Janiec Jones, Carl Olson, M. D. McLean, A. Whitney Sanford, Sarah Lamb, Eliza F. Kent, Ashley Dawson, Amir Hussain, John Powers, Jennifer B. Saunders & Ramdas Lamb (2005). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 9 (1-3):153-228.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Thomas M. Powers (2004). Real Wrongs in Virtual Communities. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):191-198.score: 240.0
    Beginning with the well-knowncyber-rape in LambdaMOO, I argue that it ispossible to have real moral wrongs in virtualcommunities. I then generalize the account toshow how it applies to interactions in gamingand discussion communities. My account issupported by a view of moral realism thatacknowledges entities like intentions andcausal properties of actions. Austin's speechact theory is used to show that real people canact in virtual communities in ways that bothestablish practices and moral expectations, andwarrant strong identifications betweenthemselves and their online identities. Rawls'conception (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Grimes, Robin Rinehart, Hillary Rodrigues, John M. Koller, Elaine Craddock, Ludo Rocher, Will Sweetman, Boyd H. Wilson, Edward C. Dimock, Thomas Forsthoefel, Hal W. French, Timothy C. Cahill, William J. Jackson, John Powers, Frederick M. Smith, Gavin Flood, Lelah Dushkin, Sheila McDonough, Frank J. Hoffman, Karni Pal Bhati, Anne E. Monius, Fred Dallmayr, Marcia Hermansen, Joseph A. Bracken, Carl Olson, William P. Harman, Donatella Rossi, Anna B. Bigelow & Jeffrey J. Kripal (1998). Book Reviews and Notices. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 2 (2):267-310.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Thomas M. Powers (2009). Machines and Moral Reasoning. Philosophy Now 72:15-16.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Thomas M. Powers (2013). On the Moral Agency of Computers. Topoi 32 (2):227-236.score: 240.0
    Can computer systems ever be considered moral agents? This paper considers two factors that are explored in the recent philosophical literature. First, there are the important domains in which computers are allowed to act, made possible by their greater functional capacities. Second, there is the claim that these functional capacities appear to embody relevant human abilities, such as autonomy and responsibility. I argue that neither the first (Doman-Function) factor nor the second (Simulacrum) factor gets at the central issue in the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David M. W. Powers (2006). Comparative, Continuity, and Computational Evidence in Evolutionary Theory: Predictive Evidence Versus Productive Evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):294-296.score: 240.0
    Of three types of evidence available to evolution theorists – comparative, continuity, and computational – the first is largely productive rather than predictive. Although comparison between extant species or languages is possible and can be suggestive of evolutionary processes, leading to theory development, comparison with extinct species and languages seems necessary for validation. Continuity and computational evidence provide the best opportunities for supporting predictions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Nathan M. Powers (2014). Void and Space in Stoic Ontology. Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):411-432.score: 240.0
    The Stoics claim that only a body can be a substance (οὐσία). They also claim that the cosmos taken as a whole is one continuous body, finite in extent, comprising within itself all the bodies that there are. Given these claims, one might expect that when confronted with the question of what lies outside the cosmos, the Stoics would take the Aristotelian line: namely, that there is nothing whatsoever outside the cosmos. But this is not what the Stoics say. They (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2008). Computers as Surrogate Agents. In M. J. van den Joven & J. Weckert (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 251.score: 240.0
  17. Keith D. Warner, Kent M. Daane, Christina M. Getz, Stephen P. Maurano, Sandra Calderon & Kathleen A. Powers (2011). The Decline of Public Interest Agricultural Science and the Dubious Future of Crop Biological Control in California. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (4):483-496.score: 240.0
    Drawing from a four-year study of US science institutions that support biological control of arthropods, this article examines the decline in biological control institutional capacity in California within the context of both declining public interest science and declining agricultural research activism. After explaining how debates over the public interest character of biological control science have shaped institutions in California, we use scientometric methods to assess the present status and trends in biological control programs within both the University of California Land (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. James Brodman, J. N. Hillgarth, James F. Powers, Thomas N. Bisson, William M. Bowsky, Nancy Partner, Gene Brucker, Karl F. Morrison, Nancy van Deusen & Paul W. Knoll (forthcoming). Memoirs of Fellows and Corresponding Fellows of the Medieval Academy of America. Speculum.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Tim Dalgleish & M. J. Powers (eds.) (1999). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley.score: 240.0
  20. Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2009). Ethics and Technology: A Program for Future Research. In M. Winston and R. Edelbach (ed.), Society, Ethics, and Technology, 4th edition.score: 240.0
    This chapter is reprinted from our lead essay in the Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, ed. C. Mitcham, Gale, 2005.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Richard Eduard Leibbrandt & D. M. Powers (2010). Frequent Frames as Cues to Part-of-Speech in Dutch: Why Filler Frequency Matters. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. M. Powers (1997). Cosculluela, V.-The Ethics of Suicide. Philosophical Books 38:272-272.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas M. Powers (2005). Deontological Machine Ethics. In M. Anderson, S. L. Anderson & C. Armen (eds.), Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium Technical Report.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Thomas M. Powers (2008). Environmental Holism and Nanotechnology. In F. Allhoff & P. Lin (eds.), Nanotechnology and Society: Current and Emerging Ethical Issues. Springer.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Scott M. Powers (ed.) (2011). Evil in Contemporary French and Francophone Literature. Cambridge Scholars Pub..score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. M. Powers (1997). Fairbairn, GJ-Contemplating Suicide. Philosophical Books 38:272-273.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Thomas M. Powers & Paul Kamolnick (eds.) (1999). From Kant to Weber: Freedom and Culture in Classical German Social Theory. Krieger.score: 240.0
    This collection of essays came from an NEH Summer Seminar in 1995 at the University of Chicago.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David M. W. Powers (1991). Goal Directed Behavior in the Sensorimotor and Language Hierarchies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):572-574.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. M. E. Powers, A. Sun, M. Parker, W. E. Dietrich & J. T. Wootton (1995). Hydraulic Food-Chain Models− An Approach to the Study of Food-Web Dynamics in Large Rivers. BioScience 45:159-167.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Scott M. Powers (2011). Introduction. In , Evil in Contemporary French and Francophone Literature. Cambridge Scholars Pub..score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Thomas M. Powers (2004). Ideas, Expressions, Universals, and Particulars: Metaphysics in the Realm of Software Copyright Law. In H. Tavani & R. Spinello (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World. Idea Group.score: 240.0
    in Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World, eds. H. Tavani and R. Spinello, 2004.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Thomas M. Powers (2011). Incremental Machine Ethics. IEEE Robotics and Automation 18 (1):51-58.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Scott M. Powers (2011). Jonathan Littell's The Kindly Ones : Evil and the Ethical Limits of the Post-Modern Narrative. In , Evil in Contemporary French and Francophone Literature. Cambridge Scholars Pub..score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David M. W. Powers (1991). Language Acquisition in the Absence of Proof of Absence of Experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):629-630.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Thomas M. Powers (2011). One Way to View the Puzzle of Machine Ethics is to Consider How. In M. Anderson S. Anderson (ed.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge Univ. Press. 464.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Thomas M. Powers (2009). Preface. In Jinfen Yan & David E. Schrader (eds.), Creating a Global Dialogue on Value Inquiry: Papers From the Xxii Congress of Philosophy (Rethinking Philosophy Today). Edwin Mellen Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Thomas M. Powers (2002). Responsibility in Software Engineering: Uncovering an Ethical Model. In T. W. Bynum I. Alvarez (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International ETHICOMP Conference.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Thomas M. Powers (1999). The Integrity of Body: Kantian Moral Constraints on the Physical Self. Philosophy and Medicine 60 (3):209-232.score: 240.0
  39. Thomas M. Powers (1999). The Legacy of Kantian Rationalism for Social Theory. In TM Powers & P. Kamolnick (ed.), From Kant to Weber: Freedom and Culture in Classical German Social Theory.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Stephen Lake (1999). Thomas M. Powers and Paul Kamolnick, Eds., From Kant to Weber: Freedom and Culture in Classical German Social Theory Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 19 (6):438-440.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. G. L. Cawkwell (1976). Great and Small Cities M. Amit: Great and Small Poleis. A Study in the Relations Between the Great Powers and the Small Cities in Ancient Greece. (Collection Latomus, 134.) Pp. 194. Brussels: Latomus, 1973. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (02):229-230.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John Heil (2004). Review of Powers: A Study in Metaphysics} by George M Olnar. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 101:438-43.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Bertrand Hespel (1993). Desmond M. Clarke, Occult Powers and Hypotheses. Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis XIV. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 91 (91):473-474.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. H. Judah (1990). BURKE, MR and MAGIDOR, M., Shelah's Pcf Theory and its Applications EDA, K., Boolean Powers of Abelian Groups HRUSHOVSKI, E., Unidimensional Theories Are Superstable. [REVIEW] Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50:303.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. Weinstein (1967). Review: M. Machover, A Note on Sentences Preserved Under Direct Products and Powers. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (4):533-533.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jessica M. Wilson (2011). Non-Reductive Realization and the Powers-Based Subset Strategy. The Monist (Issue on Powers) 94 (1):121-154.score: 48.0
    I argue that an adequate account of non-reductive realization must guarantee satisfaction of a certain condition on the token causal powers associated with (instances of) realized and realizing entities---namely, what I call the 'Subset Condition on Causal Powers' (first introduced in Wilson 1999). In terms of states, the condition requires that the token powers had by a realized state on a given occasion be a proper subset of the token powers had by the state that realizes (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Brisbin (1991). Currents in Ornithology Current Ornithology. Vol. 7 Dennis M. Power. BioScience 41 (3):176-177.score: 46.7
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. P. Ekman (1999). In T. Dalgleish & M. Power. In Tim Dalgleish & M. J. Powers (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley. 3--19.score: 46.7
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jill A. Fisher (2006). Playing Patient, Playing Doctor: Munchausen Syndrome, Clinical S/M, and Ruptures of Medical Power. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 27 (3):135-149.score: 46.0
    This article deploys sadomasochism as a framework for understanding medical practice on an institutional level. By examining the case of the factitious illness Munchausen syndrome, this article analyzes the operations of power in the doctor-patient relationship through the trope of role-playing. Because Munchausen syndrome causes a disruption to the dyadic relationship between physicians and patients, a lens of sadomasochism highlights dynamics of power in medical practice that are often obscured in everyday practice. Specifically, this article illustrates how classification and diagnosis (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. L. M. Demchenko (2008). About the Unity of Power, Knowledge, Communication in M. Fuco's “Archeological Search”. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:37-44.score: 44.0
    Mishel Fuco not only influenced the consciousness of modern West, but changed the modus of thinking, the way of perception of many traditional notions, transformed the opinions about the reality, history, person. Philosopher’s principle research programme which attaches the entirety to his works is “archeology of knowledge” programme, the search of human knowledge’s original layers. Let us mark that all Fuco’s works in 1960s are devoted to main aim: to clear up the conditions of historical origin of different mental aims (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 771