Search results for 'Jeanne M. Powers' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  26
    Jeanne M. Powers (2007). The Relevance of Critical Race Theory to Educational Theory and Practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (1):151–166.
  2.  14
    M. B. M. (1970). Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. Review of Metaphysics 24 (1):141-142.
  3.  8
    John Powers (2006). Review Of: William M. Bodiford, Ed., Going Forth: Visions of Buddhist Vinaya. [REVIEW] Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 33 (1):194-198.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  2
    B. M. M. (1970). Essays on the Active Powers of the Human Mind. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 24 (1):141-142.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    David S. Powers (2000). M. Izzi Dien, The Theory and the Practice of Market Law in Medieval Islam: A Study of Kitāb Niṣāb Al-Lḥthisāb of Umar B. Muḥammad Al-Sunāmī (Fl. 7th–8th/13th–14th Century). Np: EJW Gibb Memorial Trust, 1997. Pp. Vii, 247; 2 Black-and-White Figures. S99. Distributed in the US by the David Brown Book Company, PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779. [REVIEW] Speculum 75 (2):482-483.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Commercial Loan Powers (1989). Janice M. Moulton. In A. Pablo Iannone (ed.), Contemporary Moral Controversies in Business. Oxford University Press
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. David S. Powers (2000). The Theory and the Practice of Market Law in Medieval Islam: A Study of Kitāb Niṣāb Al-Iḥtisāb of Umar B. Muḥammad Al-Sunāmī .M. Izzi Dien. [REVIEW] Speculum 75 (2):482-483.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Thomas M. Powers (2006). Prospects for a Kantian Machine. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21 (4):46-51.
    This paper is reprinted in the book Machine Ethics, eds. M. Anderson and S. Anderson, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9.  38
    Thomas M. Powers (2004). Real Wrongs in Virtual Communities. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):191-198.
    Beginning with the well-knowncyber-rape in LambdaMOO, I argue that it ispossible to have real moral wrongs in virtualcommunities. I then generalize the account toshow how it applies to interactions in gamingand discussion communities. My account issupported by a view of moral realism thatacknowledges entities like intentions andcausal properties of actions. Austin's speechact theory is used to show that real people canact in virtual communities in ways that bothestablish practices and moral expectations, andwarrant strong identifications betweenthemselves and their online identities. Rawls'conception (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  10.  53
    Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2005). Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):99-107.
    In this paper, we focus attention on the role of computer system complexity in ascribing responsibility. We begin by introducing the notion of technological moral action (TMA). TMA is carried out by the combination of a computer system user, a system designer (developers, programmers, and testers), and a computer system (hardware and software). We discuss three sometimes overlapping types of responsibility: causal responsibility, moral responsibility, and role responsibility. Our analysis is informed by the well-known accounts provided by Hart and Hart (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  11.  11
    Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2008). Computers as Surrogate Agents. In M. J. van den Joven & J. Weckert (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 251.
  12. Thomas M. Powers (2011). Incremental Machine Ethics. IEEE Robotics and Automation 18 (1):51-58.
  13.  23
    Keith D. Warner, Kent M. Daane, Christina M. Getz, Stephen P. Maurano, Sandra Calderon & Kathleen A. Powers (2011). The Decline of Public Interest Agricultural Science and the Dubious Future of Crop Biological Control in California. Agriculture and Human Values 28 (4):483-496.
    Drawing from a four-year study of US science institutions that support biological control of arthropods, this article examines the decline in biological control institutional capacity in California within the context of both declining public interest science and declining agricultural research activism. After explaining how debates over the public interest character of biological control science have shaped institutions in California, we use scientometric methods to assess the present status and trends in biological control programs within both the University of California Land (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Thomas M. Powers (2005). Deontological Machine Ethics. In M. Anderson, S. L. Anderson & C. Armen (eds.), Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium Technical Report.
  15. Tim Dalgleish & M. J. Powers (eds.) (1999). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley.
  16.  30
    Thomas M. Powers (2013). On the Moral Agency of Computers. Topoi 32 (2):227-236.
    Can computer systems ever be considered moral agents? This paper considers two factors that are explored in the recent philosophical literature. First, there are the important domains in which computers are allowed to act, made possible by their greater functional capacities. Second, there is the claim that these functional capacities appear to embody relevant human abilities, such as autonomy and responsibility. I argue that neither the first (Doman-Function) factor nor the second (Simulacrum) factor gets at the central issue in the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  12
    Richard Eduard Leibbrandt & D. M. Powers (2010). Frequent Frames as Cues to Part-of-Speech in Dutch: Why Filler Frequency Matters. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2009). Ethics and Technology: A Program for Future Research. In M. Winston and R. Edelbach (ed.), Society, Ethics, and Technology, 4th edition.
    This chapter is reprinted from our lead essay in the Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, ed. C. Mitcham, Gale, 2005.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Thomas M. Powers (2008). Environmental Holism and Nanotechnology. In F. Allhoff & P. Lin (eds.), Nanotechnology and Society: Current and Emerging Ethical Issues. Springer
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  20
    Thomas M. Powers (2009). Machines and Moral Reasoning. Philosophy Now 72:15-16.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Thomas M. Powers (2002). Responsibility in Software Engineering: Uncovering an Ethical Model. In T. W. Bynum I. Alvarez (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International ETHICOMP Conference.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  25
    Werner Menski, Carl Olson, William Cenkner, Anne E. Monius, Sarah Hodges, Jeffrey J. Kripal, Carol Salomon, Deepak Sarma, William Cenkner, John E. Cort, Peter A. Huff, Joseph A. Bracken, Larry D. Shinn, Jonathan S. Walters, Ellison Banks Findly, John Grimes, Loriliai Biernacki, David L. Gosling, Thomas Forsthoefel, Michael H. Fisher, Ian Barrow, Srimati Basu, Natalie Gummer, Pradip Bhattacharya, John Grimes, Heather T. Frazer, Elaine Craddock, Andrea Pinkney, Joseph Schaller, Michael W. Myers, Lise F. Vail, Wayne Howard, Bradley B. Burroughs, Shalva Weil, Joseph A. Bracken, Christopher W. Gowans, Dan Cozort, Katherine Janiec Jones, Carl Olson, M. D. McLean, A. Whitney Sanford, Sarah Lamb, Eliza F. Kent, Ashley Dawson, Amir Hussain, John Powers, Jennifer B. Saunders & Ramdas Lamb (2005). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 9 (1-3):153-228.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  3
    David M. W. Powers (1991). Language Acquisition in the Absence of Proof of Absence of Experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):629-630.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  18
    John Grimes, Robin Rinehart, Hillary Rodrigues, John M. Koller, Elaine Craddock, Ludo Rocher, Will Sweetman, Boyd H. Wilson, Edward C. Dimock, Thomas Forsthoefel, Hal W. French, Timothy C. Cahill, William J. Jackson, John Powers, Frederick M. Smith, Gavin Flood, Lelah Dushkin, Sheila McDonough, Frank J. Hoffman, Karni Pal Bhati, Anne E. Monius, Fred Dallmayr, Marcia Hermansen, Joseph A. Bracken, Carl Olson, William P. Harman, Donatella Rossi, Anna B. Bigelow & Jeffrey J. Kripal (1998). Book Reviews and Notices. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 2 (2):267-310.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  5
    Nathan M. Powers (2014). Void and Space in Stoic Ontology. Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):411-432.
    The Stoics claim that only a body can be a substance (οὐσία). They also claim that the cosmos taken as a whole is one continuous body, finite in extent, comprising within itself all the bodies that there are. Given these claims, one might expect that when confronted with the question of what lies outside the cosmos, the Stoics would take the Aristotelian line: namely, that there is nothing whatsoever outside the cosmos. But this is not what the Stoics say. They (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    David M. W. Powers (1991). Goal Directed Behavior in the Sensorimotor and Language Hierarchies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):572-574.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  8
    David M. W. Powers (2006). Comparative, Continuity, and Computational Evidence in Evolutionary Theory: Predictive Evidence Versus Productive Evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):294-296.
    Of three types of evidence available to evolution theorists – comparative, continuity, and computational – the first is largely productive rather than predictive. Although comparison between extant species or languages is possible and can be suggestive of evolutionary processes, leading to theory development, comparison with extinct species and languages seems necessary for validation. Continuity and computational evidence provide the best opportunities for supporting predictions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  7
    David M. W. Powers (2006). On the Unproductiveness of Language and Linguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):82-84.
    van der Velde & de Kamps (dvV&dK) present a response to Jackendoff's four challenges in terms of a computational model. This commentary supports the position that neural assemblies mediated by recurrence and delay indeed have sufficient theoretical power to deal with all four challenges. However, we question the specifics of the model proposed, in terms of both neurophysiological plausibility and computational complexity.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  1
    Thomas M. Powers (2011). One Way to View the Puzzle of Machine Ethics is to Consider How. In M. Anderson S. Anderson (ed.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge Univ. Press 464.
  30. James Brodman, J. N. Hillgarth, James F. Powers, Thomas N. Bisson, William M. Bowsky, Nancy Partner, Gene Brucker, Karl F. Morrison, Nancy van Deusen, Paul W. Knoll, Maureen Boulton, Malcolm B. Parkes, Margaret Switten, David Nicholas, Walter Prevenier & Bryce Lyon (2003). Memoirs of Fellows and Corresponding Fellows of the Medieval Academy of America. Speculum 78 (3):1044-1055.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. M. Powers (1997). Cosculluela, V.-The Ethics of Suicide. Philosophical Books 38:272-272.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Scott M. Powers (ed.) (2011). Evil in Contemporary French and Francophone Literature. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. M. Powers (1997). Fairbairn, GJ-Contemplating Suicide. Philosophical Books 38:272-273.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Thomas M. Powers & Paul Kamolnick (eds.) (1999). From Kant to Weber: Freedom and Culture in Classical German Social Theory. Krieger.
    This collection of essays came from an NEH Summer Seminar in 1995 at the University of Chicago.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Scott M. Powers (2011). Introduction. In Evil in Contemporary French and Francophone Literature. Cambridge Scholars Pub.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Thomas M. Powers (2004). Ideas, Expressions, Universals, and Particulars: Metaphysics in the Realm of Software Copyright Law. In H. Tavani & R. Spinello (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World. Idea Group
    in Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World, eds. H. Tavani and R. Spinello, 2004.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Scott M. Powers (2011). Jonathan Littell's The Kindly Ones : Evil and the Ethical Limits of the Post-Modern Narrative. In Evil in Contemporary French and Francophone Literature. Cambridge Scholars Pub.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Thomas M. Powers (2009). Preface. In Jinfen Yan & David E. Schrader (eds.), Creating a Global Dialogue on Value Inquiry: Papers From the Xxii Congress of Philosophy (Rethinking Philosophy Today). Edwin Mellen Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Thomas M. Powers (1999). The Integrity of Body: Kantian Moral Constraints on the Physical Self. Philosophy and Medicine 60 (3):209-232.
  40. Thomas M. Powers (1999). The Legacy of Kantian Rationalism for Social Theory. In TM Powers & P. Kamolnick (ed.), From Kant to Weber: Freedom and Culture in Classical German Social Theory.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  12
    J. P. M. (1975). Analysis of Metaphor in the Light of W. M. Urban's Theories. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 29 (1):150-151.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. D. M. (2002). Playing Dice with Einstein - M. Jammer, Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology. (268 Pp.) Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1999, Hardback, US $26.95, UK £18.95, ISBN 0-691-00699-7. [Translation and Revision of Einstein Und Die Religion Published by Universitatsverlag Konstanz.]. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (1):95-100.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  9
    P. M. (1915). Der Philhellenismus einst und jetzt. Professor August Von Heisenberg.(Beck. 40 pp. M. 0.80.). The Classical Review 29 (01):31-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  7
    C. M. (1921). Greek History: Its Problems and its Meaning Greek History: Its Problems and Its Meaning. By E. M. Walker. Small 8vo. Pp. 165. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1921. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (5-6):126-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    A. M. (1972). Gelassenheit de M. Heidegger. Review of Metaphysics 25 (4):761-761.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    W. F. S. M. (1999). G. A. J. Rogers, J. M. Vienne and Y. C. Zarka (Eds.) The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. (International Archives of the History of Ideas). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997). Pp. Xiv+249. NLG 250.00, £89.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.
  47.  10
    P. J. M. (1966). Contributions to Logic and Methodology in Honor of J. M. Bochenski. Review of Metaphysics 19 (3):607-607.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  5
    W. F. S. M. (2001). Johannes M. Van Ophuijsen Plato and Platonism (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 33). (Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1999). PP. Vii+365. £59.95 (Hbk). ISBN 0 8132 0910 2. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 37 (1):123-124.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  10
    P. M. (1916). Die Religion der Griechen, by Prof E. Samter ( Aus Natur und Geisteswelt). Leipzig: Teubner. M. 1.25. The Classical Review 30 (03):95-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    W. F. S. M. (1999). Allison P. Coudret, Richard H. Popkin and Gordon M. Weiner (Eds.) Leibniz, Mysticism and Religion. (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998). (International Archives of the History of Ideas, Vol. 158). Pp. Vii+198. NLG180. £61 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (3):385-388.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000