Search results for 'Jeff Faux' (try it on Scholar)

978 found
Sort by:
  1. Jeff Faux (2005). Political and Moral Implications of Global Capital Mobility. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 2 (1):153-169.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Faux & Ii Faux (forthcoming). Qwerty, Wingdings, Question Marks, and Smileys. Semiotics:49-58.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Kirk Ian, Wilson Jessica, Courtney Danielle, Lodhia Veema & Hamm Jeff (2013). Evidence of Hyperplasticity in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 30.0
  4. Bednark Jeff, Steffens Michelle & Cunnington Ross (2013). Shifts in Spatial Attention Predict Decisions for Voluntary Action. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 30.0
  5. Harold L. Miller & Steven Faux (1979). On the Commonalities Among Religious and Moral Codes: Proximate Analysis From a Sociobiological-Behavioristic Integration. Zygon 14 (1):83-93.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ph D. Horn Jeff (forthcoming). Enlightenment Science and the State in Revolutionary France: The Legacy of Charles Coulston Gillispie. Perspectives on Science 13 (1):112-132.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Searle Jordan & Hamm Jeff (2013). Allocation of Attention to the Front of an Object Precedes Orientation-Dependent Asymmetries of the Rotation-Related Negativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 30.0
  8. Kosloff Spee, Greenberg Jeff & Solomon Sheldon (2006). Considering the Roles of Affect and Culture in the Enactment and Enjoyment of Cruelty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):232.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Isabelle Richard (2013). La Fidélité En Traduction Juridique: Stratégies de Traduction, de L'anglais Vers le Français, de Vrais Et Faux Amis. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (3):651-671.score: 18.0
    Traduire consiste à faire passer la teneur d’un message exprimé dans une langue, dans une autre, avec la plus grande fidélité. Pour que la traduction soit fidèle au texte de départ il est donc nécessaire de comprendre ledit texte. Lorsque ce dernier est de nature juridique, traduire sous-tend de comparer deux systèmes de droit (tradition civiliste et Common Law pour les textes qui nous intéressent) qui généralement ne coïncident que de manière partielle. On se propose d’analyser la traduction de concepts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Volker Dieringer (2009). Is a Jamesian Wager the Only Safe Bet? On Jeff Jordan's New Book on Pascal's Wager. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (2):237-247.score: 12.0
    In his new book on Pascal's Wager, Jeff Jordan argues that only the ‘Jamesian’ version of the wager argument, as he sees it presented in William James' essay The Will to Believe , constitutes a sound pragmatic argument in favour of theism, whereas Pascal's original wager argument is doomed to fail on various grounds. This article argues that Jordan's theory is untenable. The many-gods objection is used as an example: it is demonstrated that the Jamesian Wager argument too is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Re'em Segev (2007). Lesser Evil and Responsibility: Comments on Jeff McMahan's Analysis of the Morality of War. Israel Law Review 40 (3):709-729.score: 12.0
    The main aim of Jeff McMahan's manuscript on the morality of war is to answer the question: why and accordingly when is it justified or permissible to kill people in war? However, McMahan argues that the same principles apply to individual actions and to war. McMahan rejects all doctrines of collective responsibility and liability. His claim is that every individual is liable for what he has done and not for the actions of others - even if both are part (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Christopher Norris (2004). Reply to Jeff Malpas: On Truth, Realism, Changing One's Mind About Davidson (Not Heidegger), and Related Topics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):357 – 374.score: 12.0
    This essay responds to Jeff Malpas's foregoing article, itself written in response to my various publications over the past two decades concerning Donald Davidson's ideas about truth, meaning, and interpretation. It has to do mainly with our disagreement as regards the substantive content of Davidson's truth-based semantic approach in relation to the problematic legacy of logical empiricism, including Quine's incisive but no less problematical critique of that legacy. I also raise questions with respect to Malpas's coupling of Davidson with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ross Parker (2013). Deep and Wide: A Response to Jeff Jordan on Divine Love. Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):444-461.score: 12.0
    Recently Jeff Jordan has argued against the view that divine perfection would require God to love every human with equal maximal intensity. He asserts that his argument depends on principles of perfect being theology which he develops and defends. In this paper I argue that Jordan’s case can be better understood as two conceptually distinct arguments, only one of which depends on his proffered principles of perfect being theology. I then critically evaluate each of these arguments, arguing that both (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter Suber, Review of Jeff Mason, Philosophical Rhetoric. [REVIEW]score: 12.0
    Can we interpret human reason simultaneously as a product of neurochemistry and natural selection and as a transcendental standard? Jeff Mason asks the analogous question of philosophical writing. Can we interpret philosophical discourse as "rhetorical," embodied in language, and designed to persuade historical audiences, and at the same time preserve its traditional intention to disclose truths that transcend language, history, and audiences? Mason argues that these polar attitudes toward philosophical writing are untenable precisely when they exclude each other. This (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Angie Biondi (2010). Imagens do cotidiano ou o real construído? O jogo do real e do ficcional na narrativa fotográfica de Jeff Wall. Logos 17 (1):17-28.score: 12.0
    Este texto observa alguns aspectos da relação entre fotografia e produção de um discurso sobre o cotidiano contemporâneo, através do trabalho de Jeff Wall. O que se inscreve nestas imagens é a proposição de um diálogo entre espaço e personagem, como duas figuras narrativas privilegiadas, vistas sob o jogo de uma inversão dos estatutos do real e do ficcional como elemento de uma estratégia visual responsável pela construção de uma releitura do cotidiano. Trata-se de observar os elementos enunciativos presentes (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jeff Mcmahan (2010). 20 Cognitive Disability and Cognitive Enhancement Jeff McMahan. In Eva Feder Kittay & Licia Carlson (eds.), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. 345.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Rahul Kumar (2008). Permissible Killing and the Irrelevance of Being Human. Journal of Ethics 12 (1):57 - 80.score: 9.0
    This is a review essay of Jeff McMahan's recent book The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life (OUP: 2002). In the first part, I lay out the central features of McMahan's account of the wrongness of killing and its implications for when it is permissible to kill. In the second part of the essay, I argue that we ought not to accept McMahan's rejection of species membership as having any bearing on whether it is permissible to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Uwe Steinhoff (2012). Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants. Journal of Ethics 16 (4):339-366.score: 9.0
    According to the dominant position in the just war tradition from Augustine to Anscombe and beyond, there is no “moral equality of combatants.” That is, on the traditional view the combatants participating in a justified war may kill their enemy combatants participating in an unjustified war— but not vice versa (barring certain qualifications). I shall argue here, however, that in the large number of wars (and in practically all modern wars) where the combatants on the justified side violate the rights (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Paul Bartha (2008). Review: Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God – Jeff Jordan. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):571–574.score: 9.0
  20. Christopher Toner (2010). The Logical Structure of Just War Theory. Journal of Ethics 14 (2):81-102.score: 9.0
    A survey of just war theory literature reveals the existence of quite different lists of principles. This apparent arbitrariness raises a number of questions: What is the relation between ad bellum and in bello principles? Why are there so many of the former and so few of the latter? What order is there among the various principles? To answer these questions, I first draw on some recent work by Jeff McMahan to show that ad bellum and in bello principles (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Roxana Baiasu (2009). Heidegger's Topology: Being, Place, World, by Jeff Malpas. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):315-323.score: 9.0
  22. N. Athanassoulis (2005). Jeff McMahan, the Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life, New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, Pp. VII+540. Utilitas 17 (1):117-119.score: 9.0
  23. Daniel Howard-Snyder, Trinity. The Routledge Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 9.0
    This 9,000+ word entry briefly assesses five models of the Trinity, those espoused by (i) Richard Swinburne, (ii) William Lane Craig, (iii) Brian Leftow, (iv) Jeff Brower and Michael Rea, and (v) Peter van Inwagen.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Uwe Steinhoff (2008). Debate: Jeff McMahan on the Moral Inequality of Combatants. Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (2):220–226.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Don Marquis (2003). Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life:The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Ethics 113 (2):437-440.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Nils Holtug (2011). Killing and the Time-Relative Interest Account. Journal of Ethics 15 (3):169-189.score: 9.0
    Jeff McMahan appeals to what he calls the “Time-relative Interest Account of the Wrongness of Killing” to explain the wrongness of killing individuals who are conscious but not autonomous. On this account, the wrongness of such killing depends on the victim’s interest in his or her future, and this interest, in turn, depends on two things: the goods that would have accrued to the victim in the future; and the strength of the prudential relations obtaining between the victim at (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Douglas P. Lackey (2010). Killing in War – by Jeff McMahan. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):212-215.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter Nichols (2012). Abortion, Time-Relative Interests, and Futures Like Ours. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):493-506.score: 9.0
    Don Marquis ( 1989 ) has argued most abortions are immoral, for the same reason that killing you or me is immoral: abortion deprives the fetus of a valuable future (FLO). Call this account the FLOA. A rival account is Jeff McMahan’s ( 2002 ), time-relative interest account (TRIA) of the wrongness of killing. According to this account, an act of killing is wrong to the extent that it deprives the victim of future value and the relation of psychological (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Christopher Grau (forthcoming). McMahan on Speciesism and Deprivation. Southern Journal of Philosophy.score: 9.0
    Jeff McMahan has shown himself to be a vigorous and incisive critic of speciesism, and he has been particularly critical of speciesist arguments that draw inspiration from Wittgenstein. In this essay I argue that McMahan’s ethical framework (as outlined in The Ethics of Killing) is more nuanced and more open to the incorporation of speciesist intuitions regarding deprivation than he himself sometimes suggests. I will also argue that a sensible speciesism can be pluralist and flexible enough to accommodate many (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Robert Danderson (2008). Review: Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God - by Jeff Jordan. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 49 (1):94-96.score: 9.0
  31. Micheal Walzer (2006). Response to Jeff McMahan. Philosophia 34 (1):19-21.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Michael Lacewing (2002). Review of Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (11).score: 9.0
  33. Carleton B. Christensen (2001). Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Jeff E. Malpas. Mind 110 (439):789-792.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Paul Saka (2007). Jeff Jordan Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006). Pp. X+227. $65.00; £35.00 (Hbk). ISBN 978 0199291328. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 43 (4):492-496.score: 9.0
  35. Nate Zuckerman (2010). Steven Crowell and Jeff Malpas (Eds): Transcendental Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):575-578.score: 9.0
  36. Ayse Pinar Saygin (2001). Robert B. Horn (Illustrator), Jeff Yoshimi, Mark Deering, Russ McBride, David Fleischman (Illustrator), Thierry Didonna (Illustrator), Jennifer Wedel (Editor), Mapping Great Debates. Can Computers Think?: 7 Maps and a Handbook. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 11 (3):442-445.score: 9.0
  37. J. Louise (2011). Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover * Edited by Nancy Ann Davis, Richard Keshen and Jeff McMahan. Analysis 71 (4):788-790.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jeff Wisdom (2012). Why a Diachronic View of Base Property Exemplification is Necessary in Metaethics. Metaphysica 13 (1):43-50.score: 9.0
    In a recent issue of this journal, Jorn Sonderholm presents two main criticisms of my 2008 case for a diachronic view of base property exemplification in metaethics. This essay contends that neither of Sonderholm’s criticisms hit their mark, and that there are additional reasons to adopt a diachronic view of base property exemplification. Thus, the case for a diachronic view of base property exemplification in metaethics is stronger than previously thought.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Myriam Hecquet-Devienne (2005). L'authenticité de Métaphysique "Alpha" (meizon ou elatton) d'Aristote, un faux problème? Une confirmation codicologique. Phronesis 50 (2):129 - 149.score: 9.0
    La discussion sur l'authenticité du deuxième livre de la Métaphysique d'Aristote (Petit Alpha), qui dure depuis un millénaire, a pour origine une scholie qui se trouve dans le Parisinus gr. 1853 (Xe siècle) à la jonction du premier et du deuxième livre. Or, cette scholie a été copiée par la même main que celle qui a ajouté une scholie d'un contenu comparable à la fin de la Métaphysique de Théophraste. Ce fait était passé inaperçu, parce que ce scribe a utilisé (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David Kolb (2007). Review of Jeff Malpas, Heidegger's Topology: Being, Place, World. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (6).score: 9.0
  41. Gerald Lang (2010). Review of N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen, Jeff McMahan (Eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Soren Holm (2000). John McKie, Jeff Richardson, Peter Singer, and Helga Kuhse, The Allocation of Health Care Resources: An Ethical Evaluation of the “QALY” Approach:The Allocation of Health Care Resources: An Ethical Evaluation of the “QALY” Approach. Ethics 110 (3):627-629.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Anthony Egan (2012). Minorities Within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity. Edited by Avigail Eisenberg & Jeff Spiner-Halevy . Pp. Xii, 390, Cambridge University Press, 2005, $43.67. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 53 (3):534-535.score: 9.0
  44. Whitley Kaufman (2010). McMahan, Jeff . Killing in War . New York: Oxford University Press, 2009 . Pp. 250. $35.00 (Cloth). Ethics 120 (2):399-404.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. L. K. McPherson (2010). Killing in War, by Jeff McMahan. Mind 119 (474):511-515.score: 9.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Cato Wittusen (2012). Exalting Points of View A Discussion of Michael Fried's Interpretation of Wittgenstein's Contribution to Aesthetic Thought. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 23 (43).score: 9.0
    This paper discusses how Wittgenstein’s thinking informs recent conversations about art and aesthetic practice by examining his influence on the work of the noted modernist art critic, Michael Fried. Fried considers an excerpt from Wittgenstein’s Culture and Value, with a puzzling thought experiment, to help us see more clearly the Canadian artist Jeff Wall’s photographic vision and aesthetic. I consider Fried’s account of the photographic practice of Jeff Wall, especially his photograph Morning Cleaning, Mies van der Rohe Foundation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Nick Fotion (2009). Review of Jeff McMahan, Killing in War. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (8).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Alan Sokal, A Physics Prof Drops a Bomb on the Faux Left.score: 9.0
    When I was a child, my favorite story was "The Emperor's New Clothes." A chorus of adults praises the Emperor's new wardrobe, but a child blurts out the truth: The Emperor is in fact stark naked. From this tale, I learned that adults could be intimidated into endorsing all kinds of flummery. The longer I teach at the university, the more I return to this story for consolation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Paul Brazier (2010). The Lord of the Rings: Scholarship in Honor of Richard E. Blackwelder. Edited by Wayne G. Hammond and Christina Scull, Shadows and Chivalry: Pain, Suffering, Evil and Goodness in the Works of George MacDonald and C.S. Lewis (Studies in Christian History & Thought). By Jeff McInnis and Inklings of Heaven: C. S. Lewis and Eschatology. By Sean Connolly. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 51 (1):161-164.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. C. Duncan (2008). Review: Jeff Jordan: Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (468):1082-1086.score: 9.0
1 — 50 / 978