Search results for 'Jeff Faux' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  7
    Jeff Faux (2005). Political and Moral Implications of Global Capital Mobility. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 2 (1):153-169.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  7
    Faux & Ii Faux (2004). Qwerty, Wingdings, Question Marks, and Smileys. Semiotics:49-58.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    Ph D. Horn Jeff (forthcoming). Enlightenment Science and the State in Revolutionary France: The Legacy of Charles Coulston Gillispie. Perspectives on Science 13 (1):112-132.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  9
    Harold L. Miller & Steven Faux (1979). On the Commonalities Among Religious and Moral Codes: Proximate Analysis From a Sociobiological-Behavioristic Integration. Zygon 14 (1):83-93.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    Kosloff Spee, Greenberg Jeff & Solomon Sheldon (2006). Considering the Roles of Affect and Culture in the Enactment and Enjoyment of Cruelty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):232.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  8
    Isabelle Richard (2013). La Fidélité En Traduction Juridique: Stratégies de Traduction, de L'anglais Vers le Français, de Vrais Et Faux Amis. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (3):651-671.
    Traduire consiste à faire passer la teneur d’un message exprimé dans une langue, dans une autre, avec la plus grande fidélité. Pour que la traduction soit fidèle au texte de départ il est donc nécessaire de comprendre ledit texte. Lorsque ce dernier est de nature juridique, traduire sous-tend de comparer deux systèmes de droit (tradition civiliste et Common Law pour les textes qui nous intéressent) qui généralement ne coïncident que de manière partielle. On se propose d’analyser la traduction de concepts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Jeff Jordan (2011). Is the No-Minimum Claim True? Reply to Cullison: Jeff Jordan. Religious Studies 47 (1):125-127.
    Is the no-minimum claim true? I have argued that it is not. Andrew Cullison contends that my argument fails, since human sentience is variable; while Michael Schrynemakers has contended that the failure is my neglect of vagueness. Both, I argue, are wrong.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8.  5
    Louis Painchaud (2014). Assemblées de Smyrne et de Philadelphie et congrégation de Satan : Vrais et faux Judéens dans l’Apocalypse de Jean. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 70 (3):475-492.
    Louis Painchaud | : Pendant près de deux millénaires, « faux-Judéens » et « synagogue de Satan » de Smyrne et de Philadelphie ont été considérés comme des « Juifs », membres des « synagogues » de ces villes, hostiles aux « chrétiens » qu’ils auraient même dénoncés auprès des autorités. Dans la deuxième moitié du xxe siècle, dans un contexte qui a suscité tout un courant de réflexion critique sur l’antisémitisme chrétien, plusieurs ont proposé de voir dans ces (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  84
    Volker Dieringer (2009). Is a Jamesian Wager the Only Safe Bet? On Jeff Jordan's New Book on Pascal's Wager. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2):237-247.
    In his new book on Pascal's Wager, Jeff Jordan argues that only the ‘Jamesian’ version of the wager argument, as he sees it presented in William James' essay The Will to Believe , constitutes a sound pragmatic argument in favour of theism, whereas Pascal's original wager argument is doomed to fail on various grounds. This article argues that Jordan's theory is untenable. The many-gods objection is used as an example: it is demonstrated that the Jamesian Wager argument too is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  45
    Re'em Segev (2007). Lesser Evil and Responsibility: Comments on Jeff McMahan's Analysis of the Morality of War. Israel Law Review 40 (3):709-729.
    The main aim of Jeff McMahan's manuscript on the morality of war is to answer the question: why and accordingly when is it justified or permissible to kill people in war? However, McMahan argues that the same principles apply to individual actions and to war. McMahan rejects all doctrines of collective responsibility and liability. His claim is that every individual is liable for what he has done and not for the actions of others - even if both are part (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  10
    Ross Parker (2013). Deep and Wide: A Response to Jeff Jordan on Divine Love. Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):444-461.
    Recently Jeff Jordan has argued against the view that divine perfection would require God to love every human with equal maximal intensity. He asserts that his argument depends on principles of perfect being theology which he develops and defends. In this paper I argue that Jordan’s case can be better understood as two conceptually distinct arguments, only one of which depends on his proffered principles of perfect being theology. I then critically evaluate each of these arguments, arguing that both (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    David Clarke (2014). Heidegger, Hermeneutics and History: Undermining Jeff Malpas's Philosophy of Place. Philosophia 42 (3):571-591.
    Most works about the philosophy of Martin Heidegger either disregard Heidegger’s attachment to National Socialism or assume the ‘minimalist’ view that his attachment was a brief political aberration of no consequence for his philosophy. This paper contends that the minimalist view is not only factually wrong but also that its assumption promotes methodological errors and poor philosophy. To assess this contention we examine two important texts from one of the more fertile fields in current philosophy: Jeff Malpas’s Heidegger’s Topology: (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  18
    Christopher Norris (2004). Reply to Jeff Malpas: On Truth, Realism, Changing One's Mind About Davidson (Not Heidegger), and Related Topics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (3):357 – 374.
    This essay responds to Jeff Malpas's foregoing article, itself written in response to my various publications over the past two decades concerning Donald Davidson's ideas about truth, meaning, and interpretation. It has to do mainly with our disagreement as regards the substantive content of Davidson's truth-based semantic approach in relation to the problematic legacy of logical empiricism, including Quine's incisive but no less problematical critique of that legacy. I also raise questions with respect to Malpas's coupling of Davidson with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  6
    Susan M. Turner (2005). Beyonde Viande: The Ethics of Faux Flesh, Fake Fur and Thriftshop Leather. Between the Species 13 (5):6.
    Moral debate over vegetarianism forms the backdrop to a preliminary consideration of the questions: Is it ethical to produce, sell and eat faux meat? Is it ethical to produce, sell and wear fake animal skin? Is it ethical to sell or wear secondhand or thriftshop genuine animal skin? If vegetarianism is morally required, the question of just what uses of nonhuman animals are ethical or unethical and on what grounds is always on tap. In this piece, I examine the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  4
    Jeff Mcmahan (2010). 20 Cognitive Disability and Cognitive Enhancement Jeff McMahan. In Eva Feder Kittay & Licia Carlson (eds.), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell 345.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    Angie Biondi (2010). Imagens do cotidiano ou o real construído? O jogo do real e do ficcional na narrativa fotográfica de Jeff Wall. Logos 17 (1):17-28.
    Este texto observa alguns aspectos da relação entre fotografia e produção de um discurso sobre o cotidiano contemporâneo, através do trabalho de Jeff Wall. O que se inscreve nestas imagens é a proposição de um diálogo entre espaço e personagem, como duas figuras narrativas privilegiadas, vistas sob o jogo de uma inversão dos estatutos do real e do ficcional como elemento de uma estratégia visual responsável pela construção de uma releitura do cotidiano. Trata-se de observar os elementos enunciativos presentes (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  4
    Peter Suber, Review of Jeff Mason, Philosophical Rhetoric. [REVIEW]
    Can we interpret human reason simultaneously as a product of neurochemistry and natural selection and as a transcendental standard? Jeff Mason asks the analogous question of philosophical writing. Can we interpret philosophical discourse as "rhetorical," embodied in language, and designed to persuade historical audiences, and at the same time preserve its traditional intention to disclose truths that transcend language, history, and audiences? Mason argues that these polar attitudes toward philosophical writing are untenable precisely when they exclude each other. This (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Koos ten Bras & Thomas Mertens (2011). De onschuld voorbij: Jeff McMahans Killing in War. [REVIEW] Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 1:64-74.
    Jeff McMahan, one of the leading contemporary writers on ‘just war thinking’, argues in the book under review, Killing in War, that one of the central tenets of the ‘ius in bello’, namely the moral equality of combatants, is both conceptually and morally untenable. This results from a reflection upon and a departure from two basic assumptions in Walzer’s work, namely the idea that war itself isn’t a relation between persons, but between political entities and their human instruments and (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Gabriel Cercel, Attila Szigeti, Cristian Ciocan, Cristina Ionescu, Mădălina Diaconu, Roxana Albu, Bogdan Mincă, Bogdan Tătaru-Cazaban & Mihail Neamţu (2001). Gabriel Cercel: Martin HEIDEGGER, Reden Und Andere Zeugnisse Eines Lebensweges; Attila Szigeti: Emmanuel LEVINAS, Positivité Et Transcendance. Suivi de Lévinas Et la Phenomenology; Cristian Ciocan: Jean-Luc MARION, Crucea Vizibilului; Gabriel Cercel: Mądąlina DIACONU, Blickumkehr. MIT Martin Heidegger Zu Einer Relationalen Ästhetik; Cristina Ionescu: Mark WRATHALL, Jeff MALPAS (Eds.), Essays in Honour of Hubert L. Dreyfus; Cristian Ciocan: Ion COPOERU, Aparenţą Şi Sens. Repere Ale Fenomenologiei Constitutive; Cristian Ciocan: Michael INWOOD, A Heidegger Dictionary; Cristian Ciocan: Linda FISCHER, Lester EMBREE (Eds.), Feminist Phenomenology; Mądąlina Diaconu: Renato CRISTIN, Fenomeno Storia. Fenomenologia E Storicità in Husserl E Dilthey; Cristian Ciocan: Michel HAAR, La Philosophie Française Entre Phénoménologie Et Métaphysique; Gabriel Cercel: Otto PöGGELER, Heidegger in Seiner Zeit; Roxana Albu: James RISSER (Ed.), Heidegger Toward the Turn, Essays on the Work of the 1930s; Cristian. [REVIEW] Studia Phaenomenologica 1 (1):319-435.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  5
    Chris Dragos (2013). The No-Minimum Argument, Satisficing, and No-Best-World: A Reply to Jeff Jordan. Religious Studies 49 (3):421-429.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  2
    A. Verhey (2014). Can Calvin Save Medicine? A Response to Jeff Bishop. Christian Bioethics 20 (1):23-42.
    The article begins with a summary of Jeffrey Bishop’s The Anticipatory Corpse. Bishop traces the malady of contemporary medicine to its reliance on the corpse as the “epistemologically normative body” and its “metaphysics of efficient causation.” He displays care for the dying as symptomatic of medicine’s malady. He closes the book with the provocative question of whether “only theology can save medicine.” The article then turns to the theology of John Calvin as a possible resource for the re-imagining of medicine, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  55
    Uwe Steinhoff (2008). Debate: Jeff McMahan on the Moral Inequality of Combatants. Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (2):220–226.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  23.  3
    Thomas Hodgson (2014). Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, Jeff Speaks, New Thinking About Propositions. [REVIEW] Polish Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):80-83.
  24.  62
    Craig Duncan (2008). Review: Jeff Jordan: Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (468):1082-1086.
  25.  13
    Farideh Farhi (1994). Comments on Jeff Goodwin's “Toward a New Sociology of Revolutions”. Theory and Society 23 (6):785-788.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  53
    Micheal Walzer (2006). Response to Jeff McMahan. Philosophia 34 (1):19-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Paul Bartha (2008). Review: Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God – Jeff Jordan. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):571–574.
  28.  11
    E. Christian Brugger, Donald Marquis, Thomas Cavanaugh, James Nelson, Tod Chambers, Lennart Nordenfelt, James Childress, Anders Nordgren, Kai Draper & Fredrik Svenaeus (2006). Lazare Benaroyo Alex John London Universite de Lausanne Carnegie Mellon University Jeff Blustein Jeff McMahan Albert Einstein College of Medicine Rutgers. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27:1.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  17
    Michael Fried (2007). Jeff Wall, Wittgenstein, and the Everyday. Critical Inquiry 33 (3):495-526.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  85
    N. Athanassoulis (2005). Jeff McMahan, the Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life, New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, Pp. VII+540. Utilitas 17 (1):117-119.
  31.  73
    Roxana Baiasu (2009). Heidegger's Topology: Being, Place, World, by Jeff Malpas. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):315-323.
  32. N. Agar (2003). Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):445-446.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33.  53
    Don Marquis (2003). Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life:The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Ethics 113 (2):437-440.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  10
    Dennis McKerlie (2005). The Ethics of Killing by Jeff McMahan. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):477-490.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  7
    Angelika Kratzer, Manfred Krifka, Bill Ladusaw, Shalom Lappin, Young-Suk Lee, Harold Levin, Godehard Link, Jan Tore LCnning, Peter Ludlow & Bill Lycan (1995). 680 ACKNOWLEDGMENT King, Jeff Klein, Elaine Kobes, Bernie. Linguistics and Philosophy 17:679-680.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  36
    J. Louise (2011). Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover * Edited by Nancy Ann Davis, Richard Keshen and Jeff McMahan. Analysis 71 (4):788-790.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  45
    Douglas P. Lackey (2010). Killing in War – by Jeff McMahan. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):212-215.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  39
    Nate Zuckerman (2010). Steven Crowell and Jeff Malpas (Eds): Transcendental Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):575-578.
  39.  48
    Robert Anderson (2008). Review: Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God - by Jeff Jordan. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 49 (1):94-96.
  40.  6
    David Zsiral (forthcoming). La Charte de Niquinta: Un Faux Moderne? Medioevo.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  11
    James B. Rule (1994). Reply to Jeff Goodwin. Theory and Society 23 (6):767-769.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Gerald Lang (2005). Review of Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing. [REVIEW] Ratio 18 (3):365-369.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  38
    Carleton B. Christensen (2001). Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Jeff E. Malpas. Mind 110 (439):789-792.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  9
    Aaron Landry (2012). Jeff Mitscherling, The Image of a Second Sun: Plato on Poetry, Rhetoric, and the Technē of Mimēsis. [REVIEW] Symposium 16 (2):266-270.
  45.  27
    Soren Holm (2000). John McKie, Jeff Richardson, Peter Singer, and Helga Kuhse, The Allocation of Health Care Resources: An Ethical Evaluation of the “QALY” Approach:The Allocation of Health Care Resources: An Ethical Evaluation of the “QALY” Approach. Ethics 110 (3):627-629.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  34
    Michael Lacewing (2002). Review of Jeff McMahan, The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (11).
  47.  3
    Joseph Sartorelli (1994). Mary Bittner Wiseman, Gary Shapiro, Michael L. Hall, Walter L. Reed, John J. Stuhr, George Poe, Bruce Krajewski, Walter Broman, Christopher McClintick, Jerome Schwartz, Roberta Davidson, Christopher Clausen, Michael Calabrese, Guy Willoughby, Don H. Bialostosky, Thomas R. Hart, Tom Conley, Michael McGaha, W. Wolfgang Holdheim, Mark Stocker, Sandra Sherman, Michael J. Weber, Sylvia Walsh, Mary Anne O'Neil, Robert Tobin, Donald M. Brown, Susan B. Brill, Oona Ajzenstat, Jeff Mitchell, Michael McClintick, Louis MacKenzie, Peter Losin, C. S. Schreiner, Walter A. Strauss, Eric J. Ziolkowski, William J. Berg, and Patrick Henry. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 18 (2):354.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Roger Pouivet (2010). Jeff Jordan, Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. Philosophy in Review 29 (1):41-43.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  32
    Paul Saka (2007). Jeff Jordan Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006). Pp. X+227. $65.00; £35.00 (Hbk). ISBN 978 0199291328. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 43 (4):492-496.
  50.  4
    Marc J. Stern (2001). A Review of Jeff Schmidt's Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul‐Battering System That Shapes Their Lives. [REVIEW] Business and Society Review 106 (2):180-186.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000