Search results for 'Jeffrey Brand‐Ballard' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. J. Ryberg (2011). Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging * by Jeffrey Brand-Ballard. Analysis 71 (4):796-798.score: 450.0
    No categories
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Dyzenhaus (2011). Brand-Ballard , Jeffrey . Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging .Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 354. $65.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 121 (2):420-423.score: 435.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jeffrey Brand (2013). Beyond Consequentialism. Philosophical Review 122 (4):657-661.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jeffrey Brand (2013). Civil Disobedience. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Myles Brand (1979). On Tye's 'Brand on Event Identity'. Philosophical Studies 36 (1):61 - 68.score: 180.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2003). Consistency, Common Morality, and Reflective Equilibrium. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3):231-258.score: 87.0
    : Biomedical ethicists often assume that common morality constitutes a largely consistent normative system. This premise is not taken for granted in general normative ethics. This paper entertains the possibility of inconsistency within common morality and explores methodological implications. Assuming common morality to be inconsistent casts new light on the debate between principlists and descriptivists. One can view the two approaches as complementary attempts to evade or transcend that inconsistency. If common morality proves to be inconsistent, then principlists might have (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jeffrey Brand-ballard (2007). Why One Basic Principle? Utilitas 19 (2):220-242.score: 87.0
    Principle monists believe that our moral duties, such as fidelity and non-maleficence, can be justified in terms of one basic moral principle. Principle pluralists disagree, some suggesting that only an excessive taste for simplicity or a desire to mimic natural science could lead one to endorse monism. In Ideal Code, Real World (Oxford, 2000), Brad Hooker defends a monist theory, employing the method of reflective equilibrium to unify the moral duties under a version of rule consequentialism. Hooker's arguments have drawn (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jeffrey Brand‐Ballard (2004). Contractualism and Deontic Restrictions. Ethics 114 (2):269-300.score: 87.0
    In response to the charge that deontic ("argent-centered") restrictions are paradoxical, several recent writers suggest that such restrictions find support within T.M. Scanlon's contractualism. I suggest that this claim is only interesting if these restrictions are stronger than those supported by indirect consequentialism. I argue that contractualism cannot support restrictions any stronger than those supported by indirect consequentialism. The contractualists have mislocated the source of the paradox, which arises under any theory that defines right action in patient-focused terms. Consequentialism and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2005). Review of Garrett Cullity, The Moral Demands of Affluence. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (6).score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2010). Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging. Oxford University Press.score: 87.0
    Introduction -- Practical reasons and judicial use of force -- Deviating from legal standards -- The legal duties of judges -- The normative classification of legal results -- Reasons to deviate -- Adherence rules -- Obeying adherence rules -- The judicial oath -- Legal duty and political obligation -- Systemic effects -- Agent-relative principles -- Optimal adherence rules -- Guidance rules -- Treating like cases alike -- Implementation -- Theoretical implications -- Conclusion.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2007). Review of F.M. Kamm, Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (5).score: 87.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard, Lexisnexis™ Academic.score: 87.0
    Legal theorists in this century have often perceived a need for a theory capable of occupying a stable middle ground between natural law theory and nineteenth-century legal positivism. The prolific German-American legal philosopher, Hans Kelsen, was perhaps not the first to feel the need for such a theory, but he was certainly among the first to attempt to construct one. n1 Although Kelsen's own efforts failed, in many ways they defined the ambitions of twentieth-century legal theory and inspired others to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Matthew Adler, Peter Alces, Larry Alexander, Susan Bandes, Saba Bazargan, Vera Bergelson, Mitchell Berman, Brian Bix, Gabriella Blum & Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2012). Please Join Us in Thanking All of Those Experts in Law and Philosophy for Devoting Time and Effort to Review the Papers We Have Sent Them. The Editor and Publisher Acknowledge the Colleagues Listed Below for Their Excellent Reviews of Papers for Which Final Decisions Have Been Made in 2011. Law and Philosophy 31:367-368.score: 87.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Daniel Attas, Charles Beitz, Jeffrey Brand-Ballard, Kimberley Brownlee, Sharon Byrd, Michael Cahill, Edward Cheng, Vincent Chiao, John Christman & Sean Coyle (2013). Please Join Us in Thanking All of Those Experts in Law and Philosophy for Devoting Time and Effort to Review the Papers We Have Sent Them. The Editor and Publisher Acknowledge the Colleagues Listed Below for Their Excellent Reviews of Papers for Which Final Decisions Have Been Made in 2013. Law and Philosophy 32:823-824.score: 87.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2009). Innocents Lost: Proportional Sentencing and the Paradox of Collateral Damage. Legal Theory 15 (2):67.score: 87.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2008). Review of W.J. Waluchow, A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (11).score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Marilyn McCord Adams, Louise M. Antony, Andrew Beards, Simon Blackburn, Linda Aw Brakel, Jeffrey Brand-Ballard, Oleg V. Bychkov, Anne Sheppard & David E. Cartwright (2010). Abell, Catharine, and Bantinaki, Katerina (Eds.) Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction, Oxford University Press, 2010. 241pp,£ 40 Adams, Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory, Continuum, 2010. 344pp,£ 12.99. [REVIEW] Thought 288:65.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2010). Den Otter , Ronald C. Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2009. Pp. X+346. $94.99 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 121 (1):198-204.score: 87.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2010). Ronald C. Den Otter, Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism. Ethics 121 (1):198.score: 87.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. David DeGrazia & Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (eds.) (2010). Biomedical Ethics. Mcgraw-Hill Higher Education.score: 87.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Samuel Scheffler, David Miller, Jeffrey Brand‐Ballard, Michael Ridge & Jacob T. Levy (2004). 10. Robert Nozick, Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World Robert Nozick, Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World (Pp. 364-368). [REVIEW] Ethics 114 (2).score: 87.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Peggy Zeglin Brand (2006). Feminist Art Epistemologies: Understanding Feminist Art. Hypatia 21 (3):166-189.score: 60.0
    : Feminist art epistemologies (FAEs) greatly aid the understanding of feminist art, particularly when they serve to illuminate the hidden meanings of an artist's intent. The success of parodic imagery produced by feminist artists (feminist visual parodies, FVPs) necessarily depends upon a viewer's recognition of the original work of art created by a male artist and the realization of the parodist's intent to ridicule and satirize. As Brand shows in this essay, such recognition and realization constitute the knowledge of a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Peg Brand (2006). Feminist Art Epistemologies: Understanding Feminist Art. Hypatia 21 (3):166 - 189.score: 60.0
    Feminist art epistemologies (FAEs) greatly aid the understanding of feminist art, particularly when they serve to illuminate the hidden meanings of an artist's intent. The success of parodic imagery produced by feminist artists (feminist visual parodies, FVPs) necessarily depends upon a viewer's recognition of the original work of art created by a male artist and the realization of the parodist's intent to ridicule and satirize. As Brand shows in this essay, such recognition and realization constitute the knowledge of a well-(in)formed (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Richard C. Jeffrey (2004). Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits. Hackett Pub..score: 60.0
    This brief paperback is designed for symbolic/formal logic courses. It features the tree method proof system developed by Jeffrey. The new edition contains many more examples and exercises and is reorganized for greater accessibility.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Richard C. Jeffrey (1992). Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Richard Jeffrey is beyond dispute one of the most distinguished and influential philosophers working in the field of decision theory and the theory of knowledge. His work is distinctive in showing the interplay of epistemological concerns with probability and utility theory. Not only has he made use of standard probabilistic and decision theoretic tools to clarify concepts of evidential support and informed choice, he has also proposed significant modifications of the standard Bayesian position in order that it provide a (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Dana Ballard (1991). Animate Vision. Artificial Intelligence 48:57-86.score: 30.0
  27. David Ballard & William Boshuck (1998). Definability and Descent. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):372-378.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peggy Zeglin Brand & Mary Devereaux (2003). Introduction: Feminism and Aesthetics. Hypatia 18 (4).score: 30.0
  29. Richard C. Jeffrey (1956). Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses. Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-246.score: 30.0
  30. Edward G. Ballard (1961). Socrates' Problem. Ethics 71 (4):296-300.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Richard C. Jeffrey (1974). Preference Among Preferences. Journal of Philosophy 71 (13):377-391.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Edward G. Ballard (1957). Descartes' Revision of the Cartesian Dualism. Philosophical Quarterly 7 (28):249-259.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Myles Brand (1975). On Philosophical Definitions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (2):151-172.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Richard Jeffrey (1987). Indefinite Probability Judgment: A Reply to Levi. Philosophy of Science 54 (4):586-591.score: 30.0
    Isaac Levi and I have different views of probability and decision making. Here, without addressing the merits, I will try to answer some questions recently asked by Levi (1985) about what my view is, and how it relates to his.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Dana Ballard (2002). Our Perception of the World has to Be an Illusion. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (5-6):54-71.score: 30.0
  36. Peg Zeglin Brand (1999). Beauty Matters. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (1):1-10.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Myles Brand (1968). Danto on Basic Actions. Noûs 2 (2):187-190.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Myles Brand (1979). The Fundamental Question in Action Theory. Noûs 13 (2):131-151.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Richard C. Jeffrey (1971). On Interpersonal Utility Theory. Journal of Philosophy 68 (20):647-656.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Peg Brand (2007). Painting the Difference: Sex and Spectator in Modern Art by Harrison, Charles. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):244–246.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Richard Jeffrey (1993). Take Back the Day! Jon Dorling's Bayesian Solution of the Duhem Problem. Philosophical Issues 3:197-207.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Myles Brand (1970). Causes of Actions. Journal of Philosophy 67 (21):932-947.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jochen Triesch, Dana Ballard, Mary Hayhoe & Brian Sullivan (2003). What You See is What You Need. Journal of Vision 3 (1):86-94.score: 30.0
  44. Clive Ballard (2002). Disturbances of Conscious in Dementia with Lewy Bodies Assocated with Alterantion in Nicotonic Receoptor Binding in the Temporal Cortex. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (3):461-474.score: 30.0
  45. David Ballard & Karel Hrbacek (1992). Standard Foundations for Nonstandard Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):741-748.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peggy Zeglin Brand & Carolyn Korsmeyer (1990). Introduction. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (4):277-280.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Laurence Jacquot, Julie Monnin & Gérard Brand (2004). Unconscious Odor Detection Could Not Be Due to Odor Itself. Brain Research 1002 (1):51-54.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Richard C. Jeffrey (1965). Ethics and the Logic of Decision. Journal of Philosophy 62 (19):528-539.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Richard Jeffrey (2002). Logicism Lite. Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496.score: 30.0
    Logicism Lite counts number‐theoretical laws as logical for the same sort of reason for which physical laws are counted as as empirical: because of the character of the data they are responsible to. In the case of number theory these are the data verifying or falsifying the simplest equations, which Logicism Lite counts as true or false depending on the logical validity or invalidity of first‐order argument forms in which no numbertheoretical notation appears.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Richard Jeffrey (1992). Radical Probabilism (Prospectus for a User's Manual). Philosophical Issues 2:193-204.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000