7 found
Sort by:
  1. Jeffrey Olen (1988). Moral Freedom. Temple University Press.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. N. C. A. Costdaa, David Harrah, Michael Tye, D. S. Clarke, Jeffrey Olen, Robert Young, Richard Campbell, Michael McKinsey, John Peterson, Alex C. Michalos, John Glucker, John T. Blackmore, Eileen Bagus & Barbara Goodwin (1985). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 15 (1-2):279-281.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jeffrey Olen (1983). Herman Tennessen, Problems of Knowledge Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 3 (3):150-151.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jeffrey Olen (1979). Perception, Inference, and Aesthetic Qualities. The Monist 62 (4):482-495.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jeffrey Olen (1977). Knowledge, Probability, and Nomic Connections. Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):521-526.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jeffrey Olen (1977). Theories, Interpretations, and Aesthetic Qualities. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (4):425-431.
    It is argued that the application of such predicates as 'is lovely' and 'is somber' to works of art must be construed relativistically. it is first argued that interpretations of works of art bear important similarities to scientific theories, such that the application of aesthetic predicates cannot proceed independently of these interpretations. it is then argued that there are important differences between scientific theories and works of art, such that relativism is precluded with respect to the former but demanded with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jeffrey Olen (1976). Is Undefeated Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 36 (3):150 - 152.
    Discussion of the sufficiency of the traditional account of knowledge as justified true belief has focused on cases in which justified true belief does not constitute knowledge because one's justification depends essentially on a false belief or is defeated by a false statement. I propose three cases designed to show that the traditional account is insufficient for other reasons and that, Consequently, Even undefeated justified true belief does not constitute knowledge.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation