Search results for 'Jeffrey P. Toth' (try it on Scholar)

21 found
Sort by:
  1. Jeffrey P. Toth, Brian Levine, Donald T. Stuss, Alfred Oh, Gordon Winocur & Nachshon Meiran (1995). Dissociation of Processes Underlying Spatial S-R Compatibility: Evidence for the Independent Influence of What and Where. Consciousness and Cognition 4 (4):483-501.score: 870.0
  2. Jeffrey P. Toth (2000). Nonconscious Forms of Human Memory. In Endel Tulving (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford University Press. 245--261.score: 870.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Larry L. Jacoby, J. P. Toth & Andrew P. Yonelinas (1993). Separating Conscious and Unconscious Influences of Memory: Measuring Recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology 122 (2):139-54.score: 240.0
  4. Jeffrey Toth, Eyal M. Reingold & Larry Jacoby (1994). Toward a Redefinition of Implicit Memory: Process Dissociations Following Elaborative Processing and Self-Generation. Journal Of Experimental Psychology 20 (2):290-303.score: 240.0
  5. Eyal M. Reingold & Jeffrey Toth (1996). Process Dissociations Versus Task Dissociations: A Controversy in Progress. In G. Underwood (ed.), Implicit Cognition. Oxford University Press. 159-202.score: 240.0
  6. Jeffrey Toth, Eyal M. Reingold & Larry Jacoby (1995). A Response to Graf and Komatsu's (1994) Critique of the Process-Dissociation Procedure: When is Caution Necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 7:113-130.score: 240.0
  7. M. C. Beltrão, E. M. R. Toth, S. M. N. Neme & M. P. R. Fonseca (1984). Perspectivas arqueo-geológicas do Projeto Central. Nota prévia. Clio 6:15-26.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Larry L. Jacoby, J. P. Toth, D. S. Lindsay & J. A. Debner (1992). Lectures for a Layperson: Methods for Revealing Unconscious Processes. In Robert F. Bornstein & B. Pittman (eds.), Perception Without Awareness: Cognitive, Clinical, and Social Perspectives. Guilford Press.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Larry L. Jacoby, D. Ste-Marie & J. P. Toth (1993). Redefining Automaticity: Unconscious Influences, Awareness, and Control. In A. D. Baddeley & Lawrence Weiskrantz (eds.), Attention: Selection, Awareness,and Control. Oxford University Press.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Larry L. Jacoby, J. P. Toth, Andrew P. Yonelinas & J. A. Debner (1994). The Relation Between Conscious and Unconscious Influences: Independence or Redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. J. P. Toth, D. S. Lindsay & Larry L. Jacoby (1992). Awareness, Automaticity, and Memory Dissociations. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (eds.), Neuropsychology of Memory. Guilford Press. 46--57.score: 240.0
  12. J. P. Toth & Eyal M. Reingold (1996). Beyond Perception: Conceptual Contributions to Unconscious Influences of Memory. In G. Underwood (ed.), Implicit Cognition. Oxford University Press. 41--84.score: 240.0
  13. J. P. Toth, S. Lindsay, L. L. Jacoby, L. R. Squire & N. Butters (1992). The Neuropsychology of Memory. In L. R. Squire & N. Butters (eds.), Neuropsychology of Memory. Guilford Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. P. Ecsedi‐Tóth (1986). On the Expressive Power of Equality‐Free First Order Languages. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 32 (19‐24):371-375.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. P. S. Harris, M. Duermeyer, C. Ehly, S. Hartig-Toth, S. Hayes, L. Holsapple & D. Peters (1999). The" Impossible Patient": Organizational Response to a Clinical Problem. Journal of Clinical Ethics 10 (3):242.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jeremy Fantl & Matthew Mcgrath (2007). On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):558–589.score: 8.0
    We argue, contrary to epistemological orthodoxy, that knowledge is not purely epistemic -- that knowledge is not simply a matter of truth-related factors (evidence, reliability, etc.). We do this by arguing for a pragmatic condition on knowledge, KA: if a subject knows that p, then she is rational to act as if p. KA, together with fallibilism, entails that knowledge is not purely epistemic. We support KA by appealing tothe role of knowledge-citations in defending and criticizing actions, and by giving (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Matthew McGrath (2007). On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):558-589.score: 8.0
    We argue, contrary to epistemological orthodoxy, that knowledge is not purely epistemic -- that knowledge is not simply a matter of truth-related factors (evidence, reliability, etc.). We do this by arguing for a pragmatic condition on knowledge, KA: if a subject knows that p, then she is rational to act as if p. KA, together with fallibilism, entails that knowledge is not purely epistemic. We support KA by appealing tothe role of knowledge-citations in defending and criticizing actions, and by giving (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Janine Jones (2001). What Could Turn Out, Actually Speaking. Philosophical Studies 105 (3):211-236.score: 8.0
    In this paper I distinguish three senses of could turn out/couldhave turned out in an attempt to elucidate how each is connected tothe notion of discovery and how each determines that a statement ofthe form `X could turn out P' (`X could have turned out P') is true.I argue that the actuality-oriented sense of could turn outbest captures what we ordinarily mean when we use could turnout or could have turned out in a nonevidential sense.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Carl G. Wagner (2003). Commuting Probability Revisions: The Uniformity Rule. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 59 (3):349-364.score: 8.0
    A simple rule of probability revision ensures that the final result ofa sequence of probability revisions is undisturbed by an alterationin the temporal order of the learning prompting those revisions.This Uniformity Rule dictates that identical learning be reflectedin identical ratios of certain new-to-old odds, and is grounded in the oldBayesian idea that such ratios represent what is learned from new experiencealone, with prior probabilities factored out. The main theorem of this paperincludes as special cases (i) Field's theorem on commuting probability-kinematical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Olimpia I. Lombardi (2004). What is Information? Foundations of Science 9 (2):105-134.score: 6.0
    The main aim of this work is to contribute tothe elucidation of the concept of informationby comparing three different views about thismatter: the view of Fred Dretske's semantictheory of information, the perspective adoptedby Peter Kosso in his interaction-informationaccount of scientific observation, and thesyntactic approach of Thomas Cover and JoyThomas. We will see that these views involvevery different concepts of information, eachone useful in its own field of application. This comparison will allow us to argue in favorof a terminological `cleansing': it (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jeffrey K. McDonough (2003). A Rosa Multiflora by Any Other Name: Taxonomic Incommensurability and Scientific Kinds. Synthese 136 (3):337 - 358.score: 4.0
    The following paper attempts to explore, criticizeand develop Thomas Kuhn's mostmature – and surprisingly neglected – view ofincommensurability. More specifically, itfocuses on (1) undermining an influential picture ofscientific kinds that lies at the heartof Kuhn's understanding of taxonomic incommensurability;(2) sketching an alternativepicture of scientific kinds that takes advantage ofKuhn's partially developed theory ofdisciplinary matrices; and (3) using these two resultsto motivate revisions to Kuhn'stheory of taxonomic incompatibility, as well as, tothe purported bridge betweentaxonomic incompatibility and some of the traditionalproblems associated (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation