Search results for 'Jeffrey S. Miller' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  13
    Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller (2007). Refuting the Net Risks Test: A Response to Wendler and Miller's "Assessing Research Risks Systematically". Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):487-490.
    Earlier in the pages of this journal (p 481), Wendler and Miller offered the "net risks test" as an alternative approach to the ethical analysis of benefits and harms in research. They have been vocal critics of the dominant view of benefit-harm analysis in research ethics, which encompasses core concepts of duty of care, clinical equipoise and component analysis. They had been challenged to come up with a viable alternative to component analysis which meets five criteria. The alternative must (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. Mitchell Miller (2007). « Review Essay: Miller On Sayre On Metaphysics And Method In Plato’s Statesman ». [REVIEW] Plato: The Internet Journal of the International Plato Society 7.
  3. George Goe, B. van der Waerden & Arthur Miller (1974). Comments on Miller's "The Myth of Gauss' Experiment on the Euclidean Nature of Physical Space". Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 65:83-87.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Adolf Grunbaum & Arthur Miller (1977). Remarks on Miller's Review of Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 68:447-450.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, William Wallace & Arnold V. Miller (1971). Philosophy of Mind. Being Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, 1830, Translated by William Wallace, Together with the Zusätze in Boumann's Text, 1845, Translated by A.V. Miller. With a Foreword by J.N. Findlay. --. [REVIEW] Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  15
    Jeffrey S. Miller (2009). Opportunistic Disclosures of Earnings Forecasts and Non-GAAP Earnings Measures. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):3 - 10.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission requires publicly held US corporations to disclose all information, whether it is positive or negative, that might be relevant to an investor's decision to buy, sell, or hold a company's securities. The decisions made by corporate managers to disclose such information can significantly affect the judgments and decisions of investors. This paper examines academic accounting research on corporate managers' voluntary disclosures of earnings forecasts and non-GAAP earnings measures. Much of the evidence from this research indicates (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  16
    Jeffrey B. Adams & Ronald B. Miller (2008). Bridging Psychology's Scientist Vs. Practitioner Divide: Fruits of a Twenty-Five Year Dialogue. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 28 (2):375-394.
    In 1988, the control of the American Psychological Association shifted to those advocating the interests of professional practice and a substantial segment of the scientific community in psychology seceded to form the American Psychological Society, devoted to scientific psychology and scientific-based practice. In this climate, it has become increasingly difficult for scientists and practitioners to maintain analytical discussions of the philosophical and methodological issues that divide these two groups. For over 25 years, the authors have been fortunate to have the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  7
    Tom L. Beauchamp, Howard Brody, Franklin G. Miller, Alexander S. Curtis, Martina Darragh, Patricia Milmoe, Ronald M. U. S. Green, Sharona Hoffman, Edmund G. Howe & Jeffrey P. Kahn (2003). By Author BAGHERI, Alireza. Criticism of “Brain. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):407-09.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Henry Krakauer, Monica Jia‐Yeong Lin, Eric M. Schone, Dae Park, Richard C. Miller, Jeffrey Greenwald, R. Clifton Bailey, Barbara Rogers, Geoffrey Bernstein, David E. Lilienfeld, Sidney M. Stahl, Raymond S. Crawford & David C. Schutt (1998). 'Best Clinical Practice': Assessment of Processes of Care and of Outcomes in the US Military Health Services System. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (1):11-29.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  22
    George A. Miller & Gilbert Harman (eds.) (1993). Conceptions of the Human Mind: Essays in Honor of George A. Miller. L. Erlbaum Associates.
    This volume is a direct result of a conference held at Princeton University to honor George A. Miller, an extraordinary psychologist. A distinguished panel of speakers from various disciplines -- psychology, philosophy, neuroscience and artificial intelligence -- were challenged to respond to Dr. Miller's query: "What has happened to cognition? In other words, what has the past 30 years contributed to our understanding of the mind? Do we really know anything that wasn't already clear to (...) James?" Each participant tried to stand back a little from his or her most recent work, but to address the general question from his or her particular standpoint. The chapters in the present volume derive from that occasion. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  11. Fred Dycus Miller (1995). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle's Politics. Oxford University Press.
    This comprehensive study of Aristotle's Politics argues that nature, justice, and rights are central to Aristotle's political thought. Miller challenges the widely held view that the concept of rights is alien to Aristotle's thought, and presents evidence for talk of rights in Aristotle's writings. He argues further that Aristotle's theory of justice supports claims of individual rights that are political and based in nature.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  12.  41
    David Marshall Miller (2009). Qualities, Properties, and Laws in Newton's Induction. Philosophy of Science 76 (5):1052-1063.
    Newton’s argument for universal gravitation in the Principia eventually rested on the third “Rule of Philosophizing,” which warrants the generalization of “qualities of bodies.” An analysis of the rule and the history of its development indicate that the term ‘quality’ should be taken to include both inherent properties of bodies and relations among systems of bodies, generalized into `laws'. By incorporating law‐induction into the rule, Newton could legitimately rebuff objections to his theory by claiming that universal gravitation was justified by (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13. Mitchell H. Miller (2004). The Philosopher in Plato's Statesman. Parmenides Pub..
    In the Statesman , Plato brings together--only to challenge and displace--his own crowning contributions to philosophical method, political theory, and drama. In his 1980 study, reprinted here, Mitchell Miller employs literary theory and conceptual analysis to expose the philosophical, political, and pedagogical conflict that is the underlying context of the dialogue, revealing that its chaotic variety of movements is actually a carefully harmonized act of realizing the mean. The original study left one question outstanding: what specifically, in the metaphysical (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  14
    J. Hillis Miller (1976). Ariadne's Thread: Repetition and the Narrative Line. Critical Inquiry 3 (1):57-77.
    The story of Ariadne has, as is the way with myths, its slightly asymmetrical echoes along both the narrative lines which converge in her marriage to Dionysus. Daedalus it was who told Ariadne how to save Theseus with the thread. Imprisoned by Minos in his own labyrinth, he escapes by flight, survives the fall of Icarus, and reaches Sicily safely. Daedalus is then discovered by Minos when he solves the puzzle posed publicly by Minos, with the offer of a reward (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Richard Miller (2011). Choosing What to Do in Afghanistan: A Reply by Richard W. Miller. Ethics & International Affairs 25 (2).
    In this online exclusive, Miller responds to the comments by Lucas, McMahan, Moellendorf, Teson, and Rodin on his essay, "The Ethics of America's Afghan War.".
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  20
    Lantz Miller (2012). Bernard E. Rollin: Putting the Horse Before Descartes: My Life's Work on Behalf of Animals. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):243-248.
    Bernard E. Rollin: Putting the Horse Before Descartes: My Life’s Work on Behalf of Animals Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-6 DOI 10.1007/s10806-011-9316-4 Authors Lantz Miller, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA Journal Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Online ISSN 1573-322X Print ISSN 1187-7863.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  20
    Christian Miller (2005). Review of Alexander Miller, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83:279-281.
    My initial hope when I first saw Miller’s book was that here at least would be a work which satisfies the long standing need for a comprehensive introduction to contemporary metaethics which is accessible enough to be employed in advanced undergraduate courses and introductory graduate seminars. This hope was only partially realized, however, as Miller ends up oscillating between clear presentations of extant debates in the recent literature and his own extended attempts to determine where the truth of (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  19
    David Marshall Miller (2012). Galileo's Impractical Science. Metascience 21 (1):223-225.
    Galileo’s impractical science Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-3 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9534-4 Authors David Marshall Miller, Department of Philosophy, Duke University, 201 West Duke, Durham, NC 27708, USA Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  69
    Jon Miller (ed.) (2011). Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction Jon Miller; Part I. Textual Issues: 1. On the unity of the Nicomachean Ethics Michael Pakaluk; Part II. Happiness: 2. Living for the sake of an ultimate end Susan Sauve;; 3. Contemplation and Eudaimonia in the Nicomachean Ethics Norman O. Dahl; 4. Aristotle on Eudaimonia, Nous, and divinity A. A. Long; Part III. Psychology: 5. Aristotle, agents, and action Iakovos Vasilou; 6. Wicked and inappropriate passion Stephen Leighton; 7. Perfecting pleasures: the metaphysics of pleasure (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Fred D. Miller (1997). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle's Politics. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Fred Miller offers a controversial reappraisal of the Politics, suggesting that nature, justice, and rights are central to Aristotle's political thought. He sheds new light on Aristotle's relation to modern natural rights theorists, and to the current liberalism-communitarianism debate.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  11
    Benjamin S. Wilfond, Paul Steven Miller, Carolyn Korfiatis, Douglas S. Diekema, Denise M. Dudzinski, Sara Goering & The Seattle Growth Attenuation and Ethics Working Group (forthcoming). Navigating Growth Attenuation in Children with Profound Disabilities: Children's Interests, Family Decision-Making, and Community Concerns. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):27-40.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  6
    Jared S. Moore & Dickinson S. Miller (1943). James's Doctrine of "the Right to Believe". Philosophical Review 52 (1):69-70.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  4
    Rod Downey, Denis R. Hirschfeldt, Joseph S. Miller & André Nies (2005). Relativizing Chaitin's Halting Probability. Journal of Mathematical Logic 5 (02):167-192.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  24. Dickinson S. Miller (1951). "Descartes' Myth" and Professor Ryle's Fallacy. Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):270-279.
  25.  63
    Alexander Miller (1999). Horwich, Meaning and Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophical Quarterly 49 (199):161-174.
    Paul Horwich has argued that Kripke's Wittgenstein's 'sceptical challenge' to the notion of meaning and rule-following only gets going if an 'inflationary' conception of truth is presupposed, and he develops a 'use-theoretic' conception of meaning which he claims is immune to Kripke's Wittgenstein's sceptical attack. I argue that even if we grant Horwich his 'deflationary' conception of truth, that is not enough to undermine Kripke's Wittgenstein's sceptical argument. Moreover, Horwich's own 'use-theoretic' account of meaning actually falls prey to that sceptical (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  26.  1
    G. S. Miller (1992). The Mind's I is Illiterate. Philosophy 67 (259):108.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  16
    Dickinson S. Miller (1942). James's Doctrine of "the Right to Believe". Philosophical Review 51 (6):541-558.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  14
    Dickinson S. Miller (1928). A Bird's-Eye View. Journal of Philosophy 25 (14):378-383.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  3
    Dickinson S. Miller (1895). Professor Watson on Professor Fullerton's Translation of Spinoza. Philosophical Review 4 (6):641-642.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  4
    D. S. Miller (1910). Some of the Tendencies of Professor James's Work. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7 (24):645-664.
  31.  6
    Dickinson S. Miller (1936). James's Philosophical Development; Professor Perry's Biography. Journal of Philosophy 33 (12):309-318.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    Dickinson S. Miller (1949). Hume's Deathblow to Deductivism. Journal of Philosophy 46 (23):745-762.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  2
    G. S. Miller (1992). The Mind's I Is Illiterate. Philosophy 67 (259):108 - 114.
  34. D. S. Miller (1906). FULLERTON, G. S. - A System of Metaphysics. [REVIEW] Mind 15:230.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Dickinson S. Miller (1916). Llwood's The Social Problem. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):81.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Timothy S. Miller (1998). Virgil S. Crisafulli and John W. Nesbitt, Transs., The Miracles of St. Artemios: A Collection of Miracle Stories by an Anonymous Author of Seventh-Century Byzantium. With an Edition of the Greek Text. (The Medieval Mediterranean: Peoples, Economies and Cultures, 400–1453, 13.) Leiden, New York, and Cologne: E. J. Brill, 1997. Pp. Xxi, 319; 1 Map, 1 Plan, and 1 Table. $106.50. [REVIEW] Speculum 73 (4):1126-1128.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Alan S. Miller (1990). Gaia Connections: An Introduction to Ecology, Ecoethics, and Economics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    'Miller's writing style makes the book easy to pick up and difficult to put down. Written at a level appropriate for advanced undergraduates, it is an important and valuable acquisition for academic libraries.' |s CHOICE.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  29
    Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2005). Personal Identity. Cambridge University Press.
    What is a person? What makes me the same person today that I was yesterday or will be tomorrow? Philosophers have long pondered these questions. In Plato's Symposium, Socrates observed that all of us are constantly undergoing change: we experience physical changes to our bodies, as well as changes in our 'manners, customs, opinions, desires, pleasures, pains, [and] fears'. Aristotle theorized that there must be some underlying 'substratum' that remains the same even as we undergo these changes. John Locke rejected (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  3
    Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2002). Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Technological innovations and social developments have led to dramatic changes in the practice of medicine and in the way that scientists conduct medical research. Change has brought beneficial consequences, yet these gains have come at a cost, for many modern medical practices raise troubling ethical questions: Should life be sustained mechanically when the brain's functions have ceased? Should potential parents be permitted to manipulate the genetic characteristics of their embryos? Should society ration medical care to control costs? Should fetal stem (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Ellen Frankel Paul, Jnr Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2002). Bioethics: Volume 19, Part 2. Cambridge University Press.
    Technological innovations and social developments have led to dramatic changes in the practice of medicine and in the way that scientists conduct medical research. Change has brought beneficial consequences, yet these gains have come at a cost, for many modern medical practices raise troubling ethical questions: Should life be sustained mechanically when the brain's functions have ceased? Should potential parents be permitted to manipulate the genetic characteristics of their embryos? Should society ration medical care to control costs? Should fetal stem (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (1995). Contemporary Political and Social Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    These essays represent the latest research of a number of prominent political theorists. The essays explore the role of government, the nature of public discourse and the obligations of citizens. Some examine the sources of our need for government, asking what form of government we should establish and whether a single form can be suitable for all societies. Some seek to discover the proper aims of government - asking, for example, whether government should promote equality among its citizens or whether (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller & Jeffrey Paul (2004). Freedom of Speech: Volume 21, Part 2. Cambridge University Press.
    Whether free speech is defended as a fundamental right that inheres in each individual, or as a guarantee that all of society's members will have a voice in democratic decision-making, the central role of expressive freedom in liberating the human spirit is undeniable. Freedom of expression will, as the essays in this volume illuminate, encounter new and continuing controversies in the twenty-first century. Advances in digital technology raise pressing questions regarding freedom of speech and, with it, intellectual property and privacy (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  1
    Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2012). Natural Rights Individualism and Progressivism in American Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    "In 1776, the American Declaration of Independence appealed to "the Laws of nature and of Nature's God" and affirmed "these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  38
    Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2005). Natural Rights Liberalism From Locke to Nozick. Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays is dedicated to the memory of the late Harvard philosopher Robert Nozick, who died in 2002. The publication of Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974 revived serious interest in natural rights liberalism, which, beginning in the latter half of the eighteenth century, had been eclipsed by a succession of antithetical political theories including utilitarianism, progressivism, and various egalitarian and collectivist ideologies. Some of our contributors critique Nozick's political philosophy. Other contributors examine earlier figures in the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2010). Natural Rights Liberalism From Locke to Nozick: Volume 22, Part 1. Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays is dedicated to the memory of the late Harvard philosopher Robert Nozick, who died in 2002. The publication of Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974 revived serious interest in natural rights liberalism, which, beginning in the latter half of the eighteenth century, had been eclipsed by a succession of antithetical political theories including utilitarianism, progressivism, and various egalitarian and collectivist ideologies. Some of our contributors critique Nozick's political philosophy. Other contributors examine earlier figures in the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2011). Natural Rights Liberalism From Locke to Nozick: Volume 22, Part 1. Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays is dedicated to the memory of the late Harvard philosopher Robert Nozick, who died in 2002. The publication of Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974 revived serious interest in natural rights liberalism, which, beginning in the latter half of the eighteenth century, had been eclipsed by a succession of antithetical political theories including utilitarianism, progressivism, and various egalitarian and collectivist ideologies. Some of our contributors critique Nozick's political philosophy. Other contributors examine earlier figures in the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2004). Natural Rights Liberalism From Locke to Nozick: Volume 22, Part 1. Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays is dedicated to the memory of the late Harvard philosopher Robert Nozick, who died in 2002. The publication of Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974 revived serious interest in natural rights liberalism, which, beginning in the latter half of the eighteenth century, had been eclipsed by a succession of antithetical political theories including utilitarianism, progressivism, and various egalitarian and collectivist ideologies. Some of our contributors critique Nozick's political philosophy. Other contributors examine earlier figures in the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (1992). The Good Life and the Human Good. Cambridge University Press.
    What is the good life? This question captured the attention of ancient philosophers and it remains with us today, because it compels us to consider what it is to be human. To inquire about the good life is to ask, not about the proper conduct in one specific situation, but about the proper course of an entire life. It is to ask what we ought to make of ourselves as moral beings, what standards we ought to follow, and what goals (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Boaz Miller (2016). What is Hacking’s Argument for Entity Realism? Synthese 193 (3):991-1006.
    According to Ian Hacking’s Entity Realism, unobservable entities that scientists carefully manipulate to study other phenomena are real. Although Hacking presents his case in an intuitive, attractive, and persuasive way, his argument remains elusive. I present five possible readings of Hacking’s argument: a no-miracle argument, an indispensability argument, a transcendental argument, a Vichian argument, and a non-argument. I elucidate Hacking’s argument according to each reading, and review their strengths, their weaknesses, and their compatibility with each other.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  38
    John Corcoran & Joaquin Miller (2012). Lies, Half-Truths, and Falsehoods About Tarski’s 1933 “Liar” Antinomies. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):140-141.
    We discuss misinformation about “the liar antinomy” with special reference to Tarski’s 1933 truth-definition paper [1]. Lies are speech-acts, not merely sentences or propositions. Roughly, lies are statements of propositions not believed by their speakers. Speakers who state their false beliefs are often not lying. And speakers who state true propositions that they don’t believe are often lying—regardless of whether the non-belief is disbelief. Persons who state propositions on which they have no opinion are lying as much as those who (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000