Search results for 'Jennifer J. Ratcliff' (try it on Scholar)

8 found
Sort by:
  1. Keith D. Markman, Ronald A. Elizaga, Jennifer J. Ratcliff & Matthew N. McMullen (2007). The Interplay Between Counterfactual Reasoning and Feedback Dynamics in Producing Inferences About the Self. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (2):188 – 206.score: 290.0
    Counterfactual reasoning research typically demonstrates contrast effects—nearly winning evokes frustration, whereas nearly losing evokes exhilaration. The present work, however, describes conditions under which assimilative responses (i.e., when judgements are pulled towards a comparison standard) also occur. Participants solved analogies and learned that they had either nearly attained a target score or nearly failed to attain it. Participants in the no trajectory condition received this feedback in the absence of any prior feedback, whereas those in the trajectory condition received feedback after (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Martha J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (eds.) (1994). The Neuropsychology of High-Level Vision. Lawrence Erlbaum.score: 140.0
    This book provides a state-of-the-art review of high-level vision and the brain.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Marc J. Ratcliff (2012). Ordre Naturel, Désordre Culturel? Michel Adanson au Laboratoire des Mots. In Adrien Paschoud & Nathalie Vuillemin (eds.), Penser l'Ordre Naturel, 1680-1810. Voltaire Foundation.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Michael Beaton, J. Bricklin, Louis C. Charland, JCW Edwards, Ilya B. Farber, Bill Faw, Rocco J. Gennaro, C. Kaernbach, C. M. H. Nunn, Jaak Panksepp, Jesse J. Prinz, Matthew Ratcliffe, Jacob J. Ross, S. Murray, Henry P. Stapp & Douglas F. Watt (2006). Switched-on Consciousness - Clarifying What It Means - Response to de Quincey. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (4):7-12.score: 4.7
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. A. J. Stuart & M. Ratcliffe (2005). Metaphysics. Philosophical Books 46 (1):83-86.score: 4.7
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Various (2006). Peer Commentary: Response to de Quincey. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (4):13-36.score: 4.0
    Short commentaries on Christian de Quincey' paper by Michael Beaton, Jonathan Bricklin, Louis Charland, Jonathan Edwards, Ilya Farber, Bill Faw, Rocco Gennaro, Christian Kaernbach, Chris Nunn, Jaak Panksepp, Jesse Prinz, Matthew Ratcliffe, J. Andrew Ross, Murray Shanahan, Henry Stapp, Douglas Watt.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Steven Galt Crowell (ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism. Cambridge University Press.score: 4.0
    Machine generated contents note: Part I. Introduction: Introduction; 1. Existentialism and its legacy Steven Crowell; Part II. Existentialism in Historical Perspective: 2. Existentialism as a philosophical movement David E. Cooper; 3. Existentialism as a cultural movement William McBride; Part III. Major Existentialist Philosophers: 4. Kierkegaard's single individual and the point of indirect communication Alastair Hannay; 5. 'What a monster then is man': Pascal and Kierkegaard on being a contradictory self and what to do about it Hubert L. Dreyfus; 6. Nietzsche: (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Matthew Ratcliffe (2005). An Epistemological Problem for Evolutionary Psychology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):47-63.score: 3.0
    This article draws out an epistemological tension implicit in Cosmides and Tooby's conception of evolutionary psychology. Cosmides and Tooby think of the mind as a collection of functionally individuated, domain-specific modules. Although they do not explicitly deny the existence of domain-general processes, it will be shown that their methodology commits them to the assumption that only domain-specific cognitive processes are capable of producing useful outputs. The resultant view limits the scope of biologically possible cognitive accomplishments and these limitations, it will (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation