22 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Jennifer M. Saul [15]Jennifer Mather Saul [7]
See also:
Profile: Jennifer Mather Saul (University of Sheffield)
  1.  18
    Jennifer Mather Saul (2012). Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    1. Lying -- 2. The problem of what is said -- 3. What is said -- 4. Is lying worse than merely misleading? -- 5. Some interesting cases.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). What is Said and Psychological Reality; Grice's Project and Relevance Theorists' Criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):347-372.
  3.  46
    Jennifer Mather Saul (2007). Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions. Oxford University Press.
    Substitution and simple sentences -- Simple sentences and semantics -- Simple sentences and implicatures -- The enlightenment problem and a common assumption -- Abandoning (EOI) -- Beyond matching propositions -- App. A : extending the account -- App. B : belief reporting.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  4. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated. Noûs 36 (2):228–248.
    [First Paragraph] Unlike so many other distinctions in philosophy, H P Grice's distinction between what is said and what is implicated has an immediate appeal: undergraduate students readily grasp that one who says 'someone shot my parents' has merely implicated rather than said that he was not the shooter [2]. It seems to capture things that we all really pay attention to in everyday conversation'this is why there are so many people whose entire sense of humour consists of deliberately ignoring (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  5. Jennifer M. Saul (1997). Substitution and Simple Sentences. Analysis 57 (2):102–108.
  6. Jennifer Mather Saul (2003). Feminism: Issues & Arguments. Oxford University Press.
    Filling a gap in the textbook market, Feminism: Issues & Arguments provides an accessible and stimulating introduction to feminist philosophy that assumes no background in the subject. Drawing on both philosophical thought and up-to-date empirical research, Jennifer Mather Saul provides lucid arguments for a variety of feminist positions but avoids advocating any particular position so that students will be motivated to think critically. The chapters are organized around key topics including pornography, abortion, sexual harassment, and the politics of work and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  7.  63
    Jennifer M. Saul (1998). The Pragmatics of Attitude Ascription. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):363-389.
  8. Jennifer Mather Saul (2006). On Treating Things as People: Objectification, Pornography, and the History of the Vibrator. Hypatia 21 (2):45-61.
    : This article discusses recent feminist arguments for the possible existence of an interesting link between treating things as people and treating people as things. It argues, by way of a historical case study, that the connection is more complicated than these arguments have supposed. In addition, the essay suggests some possible general links between treatment of things and treatment of people.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Jennifer M. Saul (1993). Still an Attitude Problem. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (4):423 - 435.
  10.  81
    Jennifer M. Saul (1999). Substitution, Simple Sentences, and Sex Scandals. Analysis 59 (262):106–112.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11. Jennifer Mather Saul (2003). Feminism: Issues and Arguments. OUP Oxford.
    A stimulating and accessible introduction to feminist philosophy. The chapters are organised around key issues of practical significance. Clear arguments are provided for a variety of feminist positions, drawing upon up-to-date empirical research. No background in feminism or philosophy is needed, and the clarity of the narrative ensures that Feminism: Issues and Arguments will appeal to a wide audience.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  40
    Jennifer M. Saul (2001). Critical Studies: Wayne A. Davis, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Noûs 35 (4):630–641.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  88
    Jennifer M. Saul (2000). Did Clinton Say Something False? Analysis 60 (267):255–257.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  41
    Jennifer M. Saul (2001). Wayne A. Davis, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Noûs 35 (4):631-641.
  15.  49
    Jennifer M. Saul (1999). The Road to Hell: Intentions and Propositional Attitude Ascription. Mind and Language 14 (3):356–375.
  16.  35
    Jennifer M. Saul (1997). Reply to Forbes. Analysis 57 (2):114–118.
    No categories
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  24
    Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Intensionality: What Are Intensional Transitives?: Jennifer Saul. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):101–119.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Jennifer Mather Saul (2015). Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Jennifer Saul presents a close analysis of the distinction between lying to others and misleading them, which sheds light on key debates in philosophy of language and tackles the widespread moral preference for misleading over lying. She establishes a new view on the moral significance of the distinction, and explores a range of historical cases.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Jennifer M. Saul (2006). On Treating Things as People: Objectifi Cation, Pornography, and the History of the Vibrator. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 21 (2):45-61.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Jennifer M. Saul (2006). On Treating Things as People: Objectification, Pornography, and the History of the Vibrator. Hypatia 21 (2):45-61.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Jennifer M. Saul (2010). Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuition. Oxford University Press Uk.
    The phenomenon of substitution failure is a longstanding focus of discussion for philosophers of language. Jennifer Saul presents the first full-length treatment of this puzzling feature of language, and explores its implications for the theory of reference and names, and for the methodology of semantics.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Jennifer Mather Saul (1996). The Problem with Attitudes. Dissertation, Princeton University
    In this dissertation, I argue that no account of propositional attitude reporting which does not include a significant degree of context-sensitivity can succeed in accommodating our intuitions about the truth conditions of such reports. Next, I argue that there are two general problems to be faced by any context-sensitive theory of attitude ascription, whether semantic or pragmatic. First, any theory which preserves our intuitions about which inference schemas are valid will violate our intuitions about truth conditions of particular attitude reports. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography