17 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Jennifer M. Saul [12]Jennifer Mather Saul [5]
See also:
Profile: Jennifer Mather Saul (University of Sheffield)
  1. Jennifer Mather Saul (2012). Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    1. Lying -- 2. The problem of what is said -- 3. What is said -- 4. Is lying worse than merely misleading? -- 5. Some interesting cases.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jennifer Mather Saul (2007). Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions. Oxford University Press.
    Substitution and simple sentences -- Simple sentences and semantics -- Simple sentences and implicatures -- The enlightenment problem and a common assumption -- Abandoning (EOI) -- Beyond matching propositions -- App. A : extending the account -- App. B : belief reporting.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jennifer Mather Saul (2006). On Treating Things as People: Objectification, Pornography, and the History of the Vibrator. Hypatia 21 (2):45-61.
    : This article discusses recent feminist arguments for the possible existence of an interesting link between treating things as people (in the case of pornography) and treating people (especially women) as things. It argues, by way of a historical case study, that the connection is more complicated than these arguments have supposed. In addition, the essay suggests some possible general links between treatment of things and treatment of people.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jennifer Mather Saul (2003). Feminism: Issues & Arguments. Oxford University Press.
    Filling a gap in the textbook market, Feminism: Issues & Arguments provides an accessible and stimulating introduction to feminist philosophy that assumes no background in the subject. Drawing on both philosophical thought and up-to-date empirical research, Jennifer Mather Saul provides lucid arguments for a variety of feminist positions but avoids advocating any particular position so that students will be motivated to think critically. The chapters are organized around key topics including pornography, abortion, sexual harassment, and the politics of work and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jennifer Mather Saul (2003). Feminism: Issues and Arguments. OUP Oxford.
    A stimulating and accessible introduction to feminist philosophy. The chapters are organised around key issues of practical significance, such as pornography, abortion and sexual harassment. Clear arguments are provided for a variety of feminist positions, drawing upon up-to-date empirical research. No background in feminism or philosophy is needed, and the clarity of the narrative ensures that Feminism: Issues and Arguments will appeal to a wide audience.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Intensionality: What Are Intensional Transitives?: Jennifer Saul. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):101–119.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated. Noûs 36 (2):228–248.
    [First Paragraph] Unlike so many other distinctions in philosophy, H P Grice's distinction between what is said and what is implicated has an immediate appeal: undergraduate students readily grasp that one who says 'someone shot my parents' has merely implicated rather than said that he was not the shooter [2]. It seems to capture things that we all really pay attention to in everyday conversation'this is why there are so many people whose entire sense of humour consists of deliberately ignoring (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). What is Said and Psychological Reality; Grice's Project and Relevance Theorists' Criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):347-372.
  9. Jennifer M. Saul (2001). Critical Studies: Wayne A. Davis, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Noûs 35 (4):630–641.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jennifer M. Saul (2001). Wayne A. Davis, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Noûs 35 (4):631-641.
  11. Jennifer M. Saul (2000). Did Clinton Say Something False? Analysis 60 (267):255–257.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jennifer M. Saul (1999). Substitution, Simple Sentences, and Sex Scandals. Analysis 59 (262):106–112.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jennifer M. Saul (1999). The Road to Hell: Intentions and Propositional Attitude Ascription. Mind and Language 14 (3):356–375.
  14. Jennifer M. Saul (1998). The Pragmatics of Attitude Ascription. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):363-389.
  15. Jennifer M. Saul (1997). Reply to Forbes. Analysis 57 (2):114–118.
    No categories
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jennifer M. Saul (1997). Substitution and Simple Sentences. Analysis 57 (2):102–108.
  17. Jennifer M. Saul (1993). Still an Attitude Problem. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (4):423 - 435.