34 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Jennifer Saul [17]Jennifer M. Saul [12]Jennifer Mather Saul [5]
See also:
Profile: Jennifer Mather Saul (University of Sheffield)
  1. Michael Brownstein & Jennifer Saul (eds.) (forthcoming). Implicit Bias and Philosophy. OUP.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jennifer Saul (2014). Stop Thinking So Much About 'Sexual Harassment'. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):307-321.
    This article explores two related widespread mistakes in thinking about sexual harassment. One is a mistake made by philosophers doing philosophical work on the topic of sexual harassment: an excessive focus on attempting to define the term ‘sexual harassment’. This is a perfectly legitimate topic for discussion and indeed a necessary one, but its dominance of the literature has tended to prevent philosophers from adequately exploring other topics that are of at least equal importance, particularly that of bystanders' responsibilities. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jennifer Saul (2013). Scepticism and Implicit Bias1. Disputatio 5 (37).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jennifer Hornsby, Louise Antony, Jennifer Saul, Natalie Stoljar, Nellie Wieland & Rae Langton (2012). Review Symposium: Rae Langton, Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. Jurisprudence 2 (2):379-440.
  5. Jennifer Saul (2012). Maker's Knowledge or Perpetuator's Ignorance. Jurisprudence 2 (2):403-408.
    Intentions, Blame, and Contractualism: A review of Tim Scanlon, Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame by Jussi Suikkanen.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jennifer Saul (2012). Ranking Exercises in Philosophy and Implicit Bias. Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3):256-273.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jennifer Saul (2012). The Best of Intentions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):29-47.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jennifer Saul (2012). Women in Philosophy. The Philosophers' Magazine 59 (59):38-43.
  9. Jennifer Mather Saul (2012). Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    1. Lying -- 2. The problem of what is said -- 3. What is said -- 4. Is lying worse than merely misleading? -- 5. Some interesting cases.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jennifer Saul (2011). Enlightened? As If! International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (4):547-549.
  11. Jennifer Saul, Feminist Philosophy of Language. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Much of feminist philosophy of language so far can be described as critical—critical either of language itself or of philosophy of language, and calling for change on the basis of these criticisms. Those making these criticisms suggest that the changes are needed for the sake of feminist goals — either to better allow for feminist work to be done or, more frequently, to bring an end to certain key ways that women are disadvantaged. In this entry, I examine these criticisms. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jennifer Saul & Simple Sentences (2008). And Intuitions. Organon F 15 (4):541-545.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jennifer Mather Saul (2007). Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions. Oxford University Press.
    Substitution and simple sentences -- Simple sentences and semantics -- Simple sentences and implicatures -- The enlightenment problem and a common assumption -- Abandoning (EOI) -- Beyond matching propositions -- App. A : extending the account -- App. B : belief reporting.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sally Haslanger & Jennifer Saul (2006). Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):89-118.
    [Sally Haslanger] In debates over the existence and nature of social kinds such as 'race' and 'gender', philosophers often rely heavily on our intuitions about the nature of the kind. Following this strategy, philosophers often reject social constructionist analyses, suggesting that they change rather than capture the meaning of the kind terms. However, given that social constructionists are often trying to debunk our ordinary (and ideology-ridden?) understandings of social kinds, it is not surprising that their analyses are counterintuitive. This article (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jennifer Saul (2006). Jennifer Saul Gender and Race. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):119–143.
  16. Jennifer Saul (2006). Pornography, Speech Acts and Context. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (2):227–246.
    Catharine MacKinnon has claimed that pornography is the subordination of women. Rae Langton has defended the plausibility and coherence of this claim by drawing on speech act theory. I argue that considering the role of context in speech acts poses serious problems for Langton's defence of MacKinnon. Langton's account can be altered in order to accommodate the role of context. Once this is done, however, her defence of MacKinnon no longer looks so plausible. Finally, I argue that the speech act (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jennifer Mather Saul (2006). On Treating Things as People: Objectification, Pornography, and the History of the Vibrator. Hypatia 21 (2):45-61.
    : This article discusses recent feminist arguments for the possible existence of an interesting link between treating things as people (in the case of pornography) and treating people (especially women) as things. It argues, by way of a historical case study, that the connection is more complicated than these arguments have supposed. In addition, the essay suggests some possible general links between treatment of things and treatment of people.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jennifer Mather Saul (2003). Feminism: Issues & Arguments. Oxford University Press.
    Filling a gap in the textbook market, Feminism: Issues & Arguments provides an accessible and stimulating introduction to feminist philosophy that assumes no background in the subject. Drawing on both philosophical thought and up-to-date empirical research, Jennifer Mather Saul provides lucid arguments for a variety of feminist positions but avoids advocating any particular position so that students will be motivated to think critically. The chapters are organized around key topics including pornography, abortion, sexual harassment, and the politics of work and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jennifer Mather Saul (2003). Feminism: Issues and Arguments. OUP Oxford.
    A stimulating and accessible introduction to feminist philosophy. The chapters are organised around key issues of practical significance, such as pornography, abortion and sexual harassment. Clear arguments are provided for a variety of feminist positions, drawing upon up-to-date empirical research. No background in feminism or philosophy is needed, and the clarity of the narrative ensures that Feminism: Issues and Arguments will appeal to a wide audience.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. David Braun & Jennifer Saul (2002). Simple Sentences, Substitutions, and Mistaken Evaluations. Philosophical Studies 111 (1):1 - 41.
    Many competent speakers initially judge that (i) is true and (ii) isfalse, though they know that (iii) is true. (i) Superman leaps more tallbuildings than Clark Kent. (ii) Superman leaps more tall buildings thanSuperman. (iii) Superman is identical with Clark Kent. Semanticexplanations of these intuitions say that (i) and (ii) really can differin truth-value. Pragmatic explanations deny this, and say that theintuitions are due to misleading implicatures. This paper argues thatboth explanations are incorrect. (i) and (ii) cannot differ intruth-value, yet (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Intensionality: What Are Intensional Transitives?: Jennifer Saul. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):101–119.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated. Noûs 36 (2):228–248.
    [First Paragraph] Unlike so many other distinctions in philosophy, H P Grice's distinction between what is said and what is implicated has an immediate appeal: undergraduate students readily grasp that one who says 'someone shot my parents' has merely implicated rather than said that he was not the shooter [2]. It seems to capture things that we all really pay attention to in everyday conversation'this is why there are so many people whose entire sense of humour consists of deliberately ignoring (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). What is Said and Psychological Reality; Grice's Project and Relevance Theorists' Criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):347-372.
  24. Jennifer M. Saul (2001). Critical Studies: Wayne A. Davis, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Noûs 35 (4):630–641.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jennifer M. Saul (2001). Wayne A. Davis, Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Noûs 35 (4):631-641.
  26. Jennifer M. Saul (2000). Did Clinton Say Something False? Analysis 60 (267):255–257.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jennifer Saul (1999). The Best of Intentions: Ignorance, Idiosyncrasy, and Belief Reporting. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):29 - 47.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jennifer M. Saul (1999). Substitution, Simple Sentences, and Sex Scandals. Analysis 59 (262):106–112.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jennifer M. Saul (1999). The Road to Hell: Intentions and Propositional Attitude Ascription. Mind and Language 14 (3):356–375.
  30. Jennifer M. Saul (1998). The Pragmatics of Attitude Ascription. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):363-389.
  31. Jennifer M. Saul (1997). Reply to Forbes. Analysis 57 (2):114–118.
    No categories
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jennifer M. Saul (1997). Substitution and Simple Sentences. Analysis 57 (2):102–108.
  33. Jennifer Saul (1996). Language In the World. Philosophical Review 105 (2):262-264.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jennifer M. Saul (1993). Still an Attitude Problem. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (4):423 - 435.