Search results for 'Jennifer Cianciollo' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Michael Dickson, Elisabeth A. Lloyd, C. Kenneth Waters, Matthew Dunn, Jennifer Cianciollo, Costas Mannouris, Richard Bradley & James Mattingly (2005). 1. From the New Editor From the New Editor (P. Iii). Philosophy of Science 72 (2).score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. Kutcher Eugene, D. Bragger Jennifer, Jamie Ofelia Rodriguez-Srednicki & L. Masco (forthcoming). The Role of Religiosity in Stress, Job Attitudes, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. C. Chen Jennifer, M. Patten Dennis & W. Roberts Robin (2008). Corporate Charitable Contributions: A Corporate Social Performance or Legitimacy Strategy? Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1).score: 30.0
    This study examines the relation between firms’ corporate philanthropic giving and their performance in three other social domains – employee relations, environmental issues, and product safety. Based on a sample of 384 U.S. companies and using data pooled from 1998 through 2000, we find that worse performers in the other social areas are both more likely to make charitable contributions and that the extent of their giving is larger than for better performers. Analyses of each separate area of social performance, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. A. Knight Jennifer, J. Comino Elizabeth & Lisa Jackson-Pulver Elizabeth Harris (2009). Indigenous Research: A Commitment to Walking the Talk. The Gudaga Study—an Australian Case Study. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4).score: 30.0
    Increasingly, the role of health research in improving the discrepancies in health outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations in developed countries is being recognised. Along with this comes the recognition that health research must be conducted in a manner that is culturally appropriate and ethically sound. Two key documents have been produced in Australia, known as The Road Map and The Guidelines, to provide theoretical and philosophical direction to the ethics of Indigenous health research. These documents identify research themes considered (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jennifer Hornsby & Jason Stanley (2005). I-Paper by Jennifer Hornsby. Semantic Knowledge and Practical Knowledge. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):107–130.score: 15.0
    [Jennifer Hornsby] The central claim is that the semantic knowledge exercised by people when they speak is practical knowledge. The relevant idea of practical knowledge is explicated, applied to the case of speaking, and connected with an idea of agents' knowledge. Some defence of the claim is provided. /// [Jason Stanley] The central claim is that Hornsby's argument that semantic knowledge is practical knowledge is based upon a false premise. I argue, contra Hornsby, that speakers do not voice their (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Matthew Dunn Elisabeth A. Lloyd, Jennifer Cianciollo & and Costas Mannouris (2005). Pluralism Without Genic Causes? Philosophy of Science 72 (2):334-341.score: 15.0
    Since the fundamental challenge that I laid at the doorstep of the pluralists was to defend, with nonderivative models, a strong notion of genic cause, it is fatal that Waters has failed to meet that challenge. Waters agrees with me that there is only a single cause operating in these models, but he argues for a notion of causal `parsing' to sustain the viability of some form of pluralism. Waters and his colleagues have some very interesting and important ideas about (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen Stich (2013). Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions? A Reply to Jennifer Nagel1. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (1):151-178.score: 12.0
    Intuitions play an important role in contemporary epistemology. Over the last decade, however, experimental philosophers have published a number of studies suggesting that epistemic intuitions may vary in ways that challenge the widespread reliance on intuitions in epistemology. In a recent paper, Jennifer Nagel offers a pair of arguments aimed at showing that epistemic intuitions do not, in fact, vary in problematic ways. One of these arguments relies on a number of claims defended by appeal to the psychological literature (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jennifer Saul (2006). Jennifer Saul Gender and Race. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):119–143.score: 12.0
  9. Jennifer Duke-Yonge (2009). Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions • by Jennifer Saul. Analysis 69 (1):174-176.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jennifer M. Saul (2002). Intensionality: What Are Intensional Transitives?: Jennifer Saul. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):101–119.score: 12.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andreas Stokke (forthcoming). Saying Too Little and Saying Too Much. Critical Notice of 'Lying, Misleading and What is Said', by Jennifer Saul. Saying Too Little and Saying Too Much. Critical Notice of 'Lying, Misleading and What is Said', by Jennifer Saul 5 (35):81-91.score: 12.0
    Stokke-Andreas_Saying-too-little-and-saying-too-much2.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Antonietta di Vito (2000). Jennifer COATES, Women Talk. Conversations Between Women Friends, London, Blackwell Publishers, 1996, 324 p. Clio 1:18-18.score: 12.0
    En dépit de sa date de parution un peu ancienne, il semble important de signaler cet ouvrage aux lecteurs de ce numéro de Clio. Les évaluations péjoratives de la conversation féminine sont, comme on sait, un des lieux communs les plus anciens et les plus ancrés ; « bavardage », « caquetage », « ragots »... sont quelques-uns des termes métaphoriques qui stigmatisent une façon d'échanger et un style de contenu situés au plus loin de la parole sûre et pondérée (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jennifer Pitts (2007). Liberalism, Democracy and Empire: Tocqueville on Algeria Jennifer Pitts. In Raf Geenens & Annelien de Dijn (eds.), Reading Tocqueville: From Oracle to Actor. Palgrave Macmillan. 12.score: 12.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Nicola Mößner (2011). The Concept of Testimony. In Christoph Jäger & Winfried Löffler (eds.), Epistemology: Contexts, Values, Disagreement, Papers of the 34. International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.score: 9.0
    Many contributors of the debate about knowledge by testimony concentrate on the problem of justification. In my paper I will stress a different point – the concept of testimony itself. As a starting point I will use the definitional proposal of Jennifer Lackey. She holds that the concept of testimony should be regarded as entailing two aspects – one corresponding to the speaker, the other one to the hearer. I will adopt the assumption that we need to deal with (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Attila Tanyi (2010). Reason and Desire: The Case of Affective Desires. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6 (2):67-89.score: 9.0
    The paper begins with an objection to the Desire-Based Reasons Model. The argument from reason-based desires holds that since desires are based on reasons (first premise), which they transmit but to which they cannot add (second premise), they cannot themselves provide reasons for action. In the paper I investigate an attack that has recently been launched against the first premise of this argument by Ruth Chang. Chang invokes a counterexample: affective desires. The aim of the paper is to see if (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Dan Vaillancourt (2010). Aesthetics and Material Beauty: Aesthetics Naturalized by Mcmahon, Jennifer A. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):76-79.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Kristin Andrews (2005). Chimpanzee Theory of Mind: Looking in All the Wrong Places? Mind and Language 20 (5):521-536.score: 9.0
    I respond to an argument presented by Daniel Povinelli and Jennifer Vonk that the current generation of experiments on chimpanzee theory of mind cannot decide whether chimpanzees have the ability to reason about mental states. I argue that Povinelli and Vonk’s proposed experiment is subject to their own criticisms and that there should be a more radical shift away from experiments that ask subjects to predict behavior. Further, I argue that Povinelli and Vonk’s theoretical commitments should lead them to (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Neil Levy (2009). What, and Where, Luck Is: A Response to Jennifer Lackey. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):489 – 497.score: 9.0
    In 'What Luck Is Not', Lackey presents counterexamples to the two most prominent accounts of luck: the absence of control account and the modal account. I offer an account of luck that conjoins absence of control to a modal condition. I then show that Lackey's counterexamples mislocate the luck: the agents in her cases are lucky, but the luck precedes the event upon which Lackey focuses, and that event is itself only fortunate, not lucky. Finally I offer an account of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Déirdre Dwyer (2009). The Epistemology of Testimony - Edited by Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):214-216.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Christoph Kelp (2009). Learning From Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge – Jennifer Lackey. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):748-750.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Kirstin Borgerson (2010). Harold Kincaid and Jennifer McKitrick (Eds): Establishing Medical Reality: Essays in the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Biomedical Science. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (2):171-174.score: 9.0
  22. G. Parsons (2010). Aesthetics and Material Beauty: Aesthetics Naturalized, by Jennifer A. McMahon. Mind 119 (475):827-830.score: 9.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. P. Faulkner (2009). Review: Jennifer Lackey: Learning From Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Mind 118 (470):479-485.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Annette Baier (2001). Book Review. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy Miranda Fricker Jennifer Hornsby. [REVIEW] Mind 110 (438):464-468.score: 9.0
  25. Nicola Mößner (2011). Jennifer Lackey: Learning From Words. Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 74 (1):131-135.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. R. Teichmann (2012). Essays on Anscombe's Intention * Edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby and Frederick Stoutland. Analysis 72 (4):854-856.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Aaron Z. Zimmerman (2008). Review of Jennifer Lackey, Learning From Words: Testimony As a Source of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Timothy Perrine (forthcoming). In Defense of Non-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Synthese:1-11.score: 9.0
    Almost everyone agrees that many testimonial beliefs constitute knowledge. According to non-reductionists, some testimonial beliefs possess positive epistemic status independent of that conferred by perception, memory, and induction. Recently, Jennifer Lackey has provided a counterexample to a popular version of this view. Here I argue that her counterexample fails.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ayse Pinar Saygin (2001). Robert B. Horn (Illustrator), Jeff Yoshimi, Mark Deering, Russ McBride, David Fleischman (Illustrator), Thierry Didonna (Illustrator), Jennifer Wedel (Editor), Mapping Great Debates. Can Computers Think?: 7 Maps and a Handbook. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 11 (3):442-445.score: 9.0
  30. Rachel Cooper (2010). Moody Minds Distempered – By Jennifer Radden. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):322-324.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Masashi Kasaki (2014). Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Isolated Secondhand Knowledge. Acta Analytica 29 (1):83-98.score: 9.0
    Jennifer Lackey challenges the sufficiency version of the knowledge-action principle, viz., that knowledge that p is sufficient to rationally act on p, by proposing a set of alleged counterexamples. Her aim is not only to attack the knowledge-action principle, but also to undermine an argument for subject-sensitive invariantism. Lackey holds that her examples are counterexamples to the sufficiency version of the knowledge-action principle because (a) S knows the proposition in question, but (b) it is not rational for S to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Georgios Varouxakis (2010). Jennifer Pitts, a Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005), Pp. XIV + 382. Utilitas 22 (1):96-98.score: 9.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Mark Sagoff (1998). Environmental Values in American Culture, Willett Kempton, James S. Boster, and Jennifer A. Hartley. Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (1):119-122.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David DeGrazia (2009). Review of Jennifer S. Hawkins, Ezekiel J. Emanuel (Eds.), Exploitation and Developing Countries: The Ethics of Clinical Research. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. K. Gover (2008). Review of Jennifer Anna Gosetti-Ferencei, The Ecstatic Quotidian: Phenomenological Sightings in Modern Art and Literature. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. N. A. Pinillos (2010). Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions, by Jennifer Saul. Mind 119 (474):523-526.score: 9.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. S. Venkatapuram (2010). Jennifer Prah Ruger. Health and Social Justice. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):186-188.score: 9.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ann Garry (2004). Book Review: Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (4):230-232.score: 9.0
  39. Reviewed by Carol Rovane (2000). Jennifer Radden, Divided Minds and Successive Selves: Ethical Issues in Disorders of Identity and Personality. Ethics 110 (4).score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. C. J. Green (2010). The Translation of Bonhoeffer's Ethics: A Response to Jennifer Moberly. Studies in Christian Ethics 23 (3):316-320.score: 9.0
    Moberly’s article is based on the premise that the translation of Bonhoeffer’s Ethics in the Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works is a critical edition. This article discusses the nature of translation, why this premise is indefensible, and points out many problematic judgments that flow from it and related assumptions. While recognising that errors occur in translations, the response affirms the scholarly value of the translation.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Anthony Hatzimoysis (2009). Review of Jennifer Radden, Moody Minds Distempered: Essays on Melancholy and Depression. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jacqueline Taylor (2006). Joyce Jenkins, Jennifer Whiting, and Christopher Williams, Eds., Persons and Passions: Essays in Honor of Annette Baier:Persons and Passions: Essays in Honor of Annette Baier. Ethics 117 (1):127-130.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Lawrence C. Becker (1999). Stephen Engstrom and Jennifer Whiting, Eds., Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. [REVIEW] Ethics 109 (2):439-442.score: 9.0
  44. Manfred D. Laubichler (2006). Does EvoDevo Equal Regulatory Evolution?: Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom Sean B. Carroll New York and London : Norton , 2005 (350 Pp; $25.95 Hbk; ISBN 0393060160); From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design (2nd Ed.) Sean B. Carroll , Jennifer K. Grenier , Scott D. Weatherbee Malden, MA : Blackwell , 2004 (258 Pp; $49.95 Pbk; ISBN 1405119500). [REVIEW] Biological Theory 1 (1):102-103.score: 9.0
  45. John Mckie, Stephen Engstrom and Jennifer Whiting (Eds.), Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics : Rethinking Happiness and Duty.score: 9.0
  46. Jeremy Snyder (2009). Hawkins, Jennifer S., and Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Eds. Exploitation and Developing Countries: The Ethics of Clinical Research. [REVIEW] Ethics 119 (3):567–571.score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Carl Ginet (1984). Book Review. Actions. Jennifer Hornsby. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 93 (1):120-26.score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Tim Kenyon (1999). Simple Mindedness: In Defense of Naïve Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind Jennifer Hornsby Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997, Xii + 265 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (03):656-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. M. S. Cladis (1995). Book Reviews : Jennifer M. Lehmann, Durkheim and Women. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 1994. Pp. 173. $30.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):535-539.score: 9.0
  50. May Tim (1997). When Theory Fails? The History of American Sociological Research Methods. Jennifer Platt, a History of Sociological Research Methods in America 1920-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 372 Pp.? 40.00. Isbn 0 521 44173 0. [REVIEW] History of the Human Sciences 10 (1).score: 9.0
1 — 50 / 1000