Search results for 'Jeroen Rooijevann' (try it on Scholar)

234 found
Sort by:
  1. Jeroen Rooijevann (1987). Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.score: 120.0
  2. Van Der Aa Jeroen, Honing Henkjan & Ten Cate Carel (2013). Interval Based Rhythm Perception in the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia Guttata). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 30.0
  3. Van Boxtel Jeroen & Lu Hongjing (2013). Distraction by Action: Higher Autism Spectrum Quotients, Less Distraction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 30.0
  4. Samuel Vriezen (2012). The Poetry of Jeroen Mettes. Continent 2 (1):22-28.score: 12.0
    continent. 2.1 (2012): 22–28. Jeroen Mettes burst onto the Dutch poetry scene twice. First, in 2005, when he became a strong presence on the nascent Dutch poetry blogosphere overnight as he embarked on his critical project Dichtersalfabet (Poet’s Alphabet). And again in 2011, when to great critical acclaim (and some bafflement) his complete writings were published – almost five years after his far too early death. 2005 was the year in which Dutch poetry blogging exploded. That year saw the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Johanna Thoma (2012). Jeroen Van Bouwel, Ed. 2009. The Social Sciences and Democracy (Johanna Thoma). Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (2):247-251.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel Kennefick (2011). Review of Einstein's Unification by Jeroen van Dongen. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 41 (2):278-280.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter Pesic (2010). Review of Jeroen Van Dongen, Einstein's Unification. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (12).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Laurinda B. Harman (2008). Review of Jeroen Van den Hoven, John Weckert (Eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (10).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Vicente Muñoz-Reja (2012). Van Bunge, Wiep; Krop, Henri; Steenbakkers, Piet; Van de Ven, Jeroen (Eds.):" The Continuum Companion to Spinoza.". Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 29 (1):412-414.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Sara Whiteley (2010). Geert Brône and Jeroen Vandaele (Eds), Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains, and Gaps. Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (1):211-218.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Brandon Fogel (2012). Jeroen van Dongen . Einstein's Unification . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. X+213. £55.00 (Cloth). Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):372-376.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Bernard Gert (forthcoming). Reply to Jeroen van der Hoven:“Applying Our Common Morality: The Case of Privacy”. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Explanatory Pluralism (2008). Jeroen Van bouwel. In Edward Fullbrook (ed.), Pluralist Economics. Distributed in the Usa Exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan. 151.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jeroen de Ridder (2012). Epistemology Socialized. Metascience 21 (2):477-481.score: 6.0
    Epistemology socialized Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-5 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9579-4 Authors Jeroen de Ridder, Faculty of Philosophy, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jeroen Mettes (2012). Political Poetry: A Few Notes. Poetics for N30. Continent 2 (1):29-35.score: 6.0
    continent. 2.1 (2012): 29–35. Translated by Vincent W.J. van Gerven Oei from Jeroen Mettes. "Politieke Poëzie: Enige aantekeningen, Poëtica bij N30 (versie 2006)." In Weerstandbeleid: Nieuwe kritiek . Amsterdam: De wereldbibliotheek, 2011. Published with permission of Uitgeverij Wereldbibliotheek, Amsterdam. L’égalité veut d’autres lois . —Eugène Pottier The modern poem does not have form but consistency (that is sensed), no content but a problem (that is developed). Consistency + problem = composition. The problem of modern poetry is capitalism. Capitalism—which has (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jeroen Van Bouwel (ed.) (2009). The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
  17. Christopher Gauker, Comments on Dynamic Semantics.score: 3.0
    This is the text of my comments on the project of dynamic semantics for the session on that topic at the Central Division APA meeting on April 21, 2007. The other speakers were Jeroen Groenendijk, Frank Veltman and Thony Gillies. I question the philosophical basis for dynamic semantics. My doubts have to do with the nature of information states and the norms of semantics. I also question the data that inspire the project. In particular, I question the data concerning (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jeroen de Ridder (2011). Religious Exclusivism Unlimited. Religious Studies 47 (4):449-463.score: 3.0
    Like David Silver before them, Erik Baldwin and Michael Thune argue that the facts of religious pluralism present an insurmountable challenge to the rationality of basic exclusive religious belief as construed by Reformed Epistemology. I will show that their argument is unsuccessful. First, their claim that the facts of religious pluralism make it necessary for the religious exclusivist to support his exclusive beliefs with significant reasons is one that the reformed epistemologist has the resources to reject. Secondly, they fail to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jeroen Van Bouwel (2009). The Problem with(Out) Consensus : The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism. In , The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
  20. Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof (1991). Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1):39-100.score: 3.0
    This paper is devoted to the formulation and investigation of a dynamic semantic interpretation of the language of first-order predicate logic. The resulting system, which will be referred to as ‘dynamic predicate logic’, is intended as a first step towards a compositional, non-representational theory of discourse semantics. In the last decade, various theories of discourse semantics have emerged within the paradigm of model-theoretic semantics. A common feature of these theories is a tendency to do away with the principle of compositionality, (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Richard Heersmink, Jeroen van den Hoven, Nees Jan van Eck & Jan van den Berg (2011). Bibliometric Mapping of Computer and Information Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):241-249.score: 3.0
    This paper presents the first bibliometric mapping analysis of the field of computer and information ethics (C&IE). It provides a map of the relations between 400 key terms in the field. This term map can be used to get an overview of concepts and topics in the field and to identify relations between information and communication technology concepts on the one hand and ethical concepts on the other hand. To produce the term map, a data set of over thousand articles (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. René Zeelenberg, Gijs Plomp & Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers (2003). Can False Memories Be Created Through Nonconscious Processes? Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):403-412.score: 3.0
    Presentation times of study words presented in the Deese/Roediger and McDermott (DRM) paradigm varied from 20 to 2000 ms per word in an attempt to replicate the false memory effect following extremely short presentations reported by . Both in a within-subjects design (Experiment 1) and in a between-subjects design (Experiment 2) subjects showed memory for studied words as well as a false memory effect for related critical lures in the 2000-ms condition. However, in the conditions with shorter presentation times (20 (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jeroen Van Bouwel (2009). Where the Epistemic and the Political Meet : An Introduction to the Social Sciences and Democracy. In , The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
  24. Erik Weber & Jeroen Van Bouwel (2009). Causation, Unification, and the Adequacy of Explanations of Facts. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 24 (3):301-320.score: 3.0
    Pluralism with respect to the structure of explanations of facts is not uncommon. Wesley Salmon, for instance, distinguished two types of explanation: causal explanations (which provide insight in the causes of the fact we want to explain) and unification explanations (which fit the explanandum into a unified world view). The pluralism which Salmon and others have defended is compatible with several positions about the exact relation between these two types of explanations. We distinguish four such positions, and argue in favour (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jeroen van Bouwel (2010). Why Social Emergence? Discussing the Use of Analytical Metaphysics in Social Theory. In Robrecht Vanderbeeken & Bart D'Hooghe (eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us: Studies of Analytical Metaphysics. World Scientific.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Erik Weber, Jeroen Van Bouwel & Robrecht Vanderbeeken (2005). Forms of Causal Explanation. Foundations of Science 10 (4):437-454.score: 3.0
    In the literature on scientific explanation two types of pluralism are very common. The first concerns the distinction between explanations of singular facts and explanations of laws: there is a consensus that they have a different structure. The second concerns the distinction between causal explanations and uni.cation explanations: most people agree that both are useful and that their structure is different. In this article we argue for pluralism within the area of causal explanations: we claim that the structure of a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jeroen de Ridder (2006). The (Alleged) Inherent Normativity of Technological Explanations. Techné 10 (1):79-94.score: 3.0
    Technical artifacts have the capacity to fulfill their function in virtue of their physicochemical make-up. An explanation that purports to explicate this relation between artifact function and structure can be called a technological explanation. It might be argued, and Peter Kroes has in fact done so, that there issomething peculiar about technological explanations in that they are intrinsically normative in some sense. Since the notion of artifact function is a normative one (if an artifact has a proper function, it ought (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Erik Weber, Jeroen Van Bouwel & Merel Lefevere (2012). The Role of Unification in Explanations of Facts. In Henk de Regt, Samir Okasha & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer.score: 3.0
    In the literature on scientific explanation, there is a classical distinction between explanations of facts and explanations of laws. This paper is about explanations of facts. Our aim is to analyse the role of unification in explanations of this kind. We discuss five positions with respect to this role, argue for two of them and refute the three others.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Robert Ayres, Jeroen van den Berrgh & John Gowdy (2001). Strong Versus Weak Sustainability: Economics, Natural Sciences, and Consilience. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168.score: 3.0
    The meaning of sustainability is the subject of intense debate among environmental and resource economists. Perhaps no other issue separates more clearly the traditional economic view from the views of most natural scientists. The debate currently focuses on the substitutability between the economy and the environment or between “natural capital” and “manufactured capital”—a debate captured in terms of weak versus strong sustainability. In this article, we examine the various interpretations of these concepts. We conclude that natural science and economic perspectives (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jeroen van Bouwel & Erik Weber (2011). Explanation in the Social Sciences. In Ian Jarvie Jesus Zamora Bonilla (ed.), The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Sage.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Martijn Blaauw & Jeroen de Ridder (2012). Unsafe Assertions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):1-5.score: 3.0
    John Turri has recently provided two problem cases for the knowledge account of assertion (KAA) to argue for the express knowledge account of assertion (EKAA). We defend KAA by explaining away the intuitions about the problem cases and by showing that our explanation is theoretically superior to EKAA.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jeroen de Ridder (2006). Mechanistic Artefact Explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):81-96.score: 3.0
    One thing about technical artefacts that needs to be explained is how their physical make-up, or structure, enables them to fulfil the behaviour associated with their function, or, more colloquially, how they work. In this paper I develop an account of such explanations based on the familiar notion of mechanistic explanation. To accomplish this, I (1) outline two explanatory strategies that provide two different types of insight into an artefact’s functioning, and (2) show how human action inevi- tably plays a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Bernd Stahl, Richard Heersmink, Philippe Goujon, Catherine Flick, Jeroen van den Hoven, Kutoma Wakunuma, Veikko Ikonen & Michael Rader (2010). Issues, Concepts and Methods Relating to the Identification of the Ethics of Emerging ICTs. Communications of the IIMA 10 (1):33-43.score: 3.0
    Ethical issues of information and communication technologies (ICTs) are important because they can have significant effects on human liberty, happiness, their ability to lead a good life. They are also of functional interest because they can determine whether technologies are used and whether their positive potential can unfold. For these reasons policy makers are interested in finding out what these issues are and how they can be addressed. The best way of creating ICT policy that is sensitive to ethical issues (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jan van Eijck, A Conversation with Wittgenstein.score: 3.0
    Thinking about Martin Stokhof as a philosopher and colleague, his formal analysis (together with Jeroen Groenendijk) of questions and question answering is the first thing that comes to mind. This work is part of a fruitful tradition that has recently spawned inquisitive semantics, and the focus on question answering in dynamic epistemic logic. The theme is still very much alive at ILLC today. Next, I am reminded of the dynamic turn in natural language semantics, of the way he and (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jeroen van den Hoven & John Weckert, The Social Epistemology of Blogging.score: 3.0
    The impact of the Internet on democracy is a widely discussed subject. Many writers view the Internet, potentially at least, as a boon to democracy and democratic practices. According to one popular theme, both e-mail and web pages give ordinary people powers of communication that have hitherto been the preserve of the relatively wealthy (Graham 1999, p. 79). So the Internet can be expected to close the influence gap between wealthy citizens and ordinary citizens, a weakness of many procedural democracies.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jeroen van Dongen (2010). Einstein's Unification. Cambridge University Press.score: 3.0
    Why did Einstein tirelessly study unified field theory for more than 30 years? In this book, the author argues that Einstein believed he could find a unified theory of all of nature's forces by repeating the methods he used when he formulated general relativity. The book discusses Einstein's route to the general theory of relativity, focusing on the philosophical lessons that he learnt. It then addresses his quest for a unified theory for electromagnetism and gravity, discussing in detail his efforts (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jeroen Van Rooijen (1987). Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.score: 3.0
  38. Erik Weber, Jeroen Van Bouwel & Leen De Vreese (2013). Scientific Explanation. Springer.score: 3.0
    When scientist investigate why things happen, they aim at giving an explanation. But what does a scientific explanation look like? In the first chapter (Theories of Scientific Explanation) of this book, the milestones in the debate on how to characterize scientific explanations are exposed. The second chapter (How to Study Scientific Explanation?) scrutinizes the working-method of three important philosophers of explanation, Carl Hempel, Philip Kitcher and Wesley Salmon and shows what went wrong. Next, it is the responsibility of current philosophers (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jeroen van Bouwel (2011). An Atlas for the Social World: What Should It (Not) Look Like? Interdisciplinarity and Pluralism in the Social Sciences. In D. Aerts, B. D'Hooghe, R. Pinxten & I. Wallerstein (eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Worlds, Cultures and Society. World Scientific..score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jeroen Van Bouwel (2012). Book Review: Sandra Mitchell, Unsimple Truths. Science, Complexity, and Policy. [REVIEW] Science and Education 22 (2):411-418.score: 3.0
  41. Bernd Carsten Stahl, Richard Heersmink, Philippe Goujon, Catherine Flick, Jeroen van den Hoven, Kutoma Wakunuma, Veikko Ikonen & Michael Rader (2010). Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method. International Journal of Technoethics 1 (4):20-38.score: 3.0
    Ethical issues of information and communication technologies (ICTs) are important because they can have significant effects on human liberty, happiness, and people’s ability to lead a good life. They are also of functional interest because they can determine whether technologies are used and whether their positive potential can unfold. For these reasons, policy makers are interested in finding out what these issues are and how they can be addressed. The best way of creating ICT policy that is sensitive to ethical (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jeroen van Bouwel, Erik Weber & Leen de Vreese (2011). Indispensability Arguments in Favour of Reductive Explanations. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (1):33-46.score: 3.0
    Instances of explanatory reduction are often advocated on metaphysical grounds; given that the only real things in the world are subatomic particles and their interaction, we have to try to explain everything in terms of the laws of physics. In this paper, we show that explanatory reduction cannot be defended on metaphysical grounds. Nevertheless, indispensability arguments for reductive explanations can be developed, taking into account actual scientific practice and the role of epistemic interests. Reductive explanations might be indispensable to address (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jeroen Van Den Hoven & Pieter E. Vermaas (2007). Nano-Technology and Privacy: On Continuous Surveillance Outside the Panopticon. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (3):283 – 297.score: 3.0
    We argue that nano-technology in the form of invisible tags, sensors, and Radio Frequency Identity Chips (RFIDs) will give rise to privacy issues that are in two ways different from the traditional privacy issues of the last decades. One, they will not exclusively revolve around the idea of centralization of surveillance and concentration of power, as the metaphor of the Panopticon suggests, but will be about constant observation at decentralized levels. Two, privacy concerns may not exclusively be about constraining information (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Erik Weber & Jeroen Van Bouwel (2002). Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense with Structural Explanations of Social Facts? Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):259-275.score: 3.0
    Some social scientists and philosophers (e.g., James Coleman and Jon Elster) claim that all social facts are best explained by means of a micro-explanation. They defend a micro-reductionism in the social sciences: to explain is to provide a mechanism on the individual level. The first aim of this paper is to challenge this view and defend the view that it has to be substituted for an explanatory pluralism with two components: (1) structural explanations of P-, O- and T-contrasts between social (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers & René Zeelenberg (2004). Evaluating the Evidence for Nonconscious Processes in Producing False Memories. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):169-172.score: 3.0
  46. Johannes Van Delden, Ineke Bolt, Annemarie Kalis, Jeroen Derijks & Hubert Leufkens (2004). Tailor-Made Pharmacotherapy: Future Developments and Ethical Challenges in the Field of Pharmacogenomics. Bioethics 18 (4):303–321.score: 3.0
    In this article ethical issues are discussed which play a role in pharmacogenetics. Developments in pharmacogenetics have a large impact on many different practices such as clinical trials, the practice of medicine and society at large. In clinical trials, questions rise regarding the exclusion of genetic subgroups that may be non- or poor-responders to the experimental drug. Also, the question is asked how pharmaceutical companies should deal with their growing knowledge about the relations between genetic variation and adverse effects. Moreover, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Erik Weber & Jeroen Van Bouwel (2007). Assessing the Explanatory Power of Causal Explanations. In Johannes Persson & Petri Ylikoski (eds.), Rethinking Explanation. Springer.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jeroen de Ridder (2013). Epistemic Dependence and Collective Scientific Knowledge. Synthese 191 (1):1-17.score: 3.0
    I argue that scientific knowledge is collective knowledge, in a sense to be specified and defended. I first consider some existing proposals for construing collective knowledge and argue that they are unsatisfactory, at least for scientific knowledge as we encounter it in actual scientific practice. Then I introduce an alternative conception of collective knowledge, on which knowledge is collective if there is a strong form of mutual epistemic dependence among scientists, which makes it so that satisfaction of the justification condition (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jeroen de Ridder (2014). Why Only Externalists Can Be Steadfast. Erkenntnis 79 (1):185-199.score: 3.0
    What is the rational response to disagreement with an epistemic peer? Some say the steadfast response of holding on to your own belief can be rational; others argue that some degree of conciliation is always rationally required. I argue that only an epistemological externalist about rationality—someone who holds that the rationality of a belief is partly constituted by factors outside a subject’s cognitive perspective—can defend the steadfast view. Or at least that this is so in the kinds of idealized cases (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 234