80 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Jerrold J. Katz [75]Jerrold Katz [5]Jerrold Jacob Katz [1]
  1. Jerrold J. Katz (1972). Semantic Theory. New York,Harper & Row.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   117 citations  
  2.  2
    Jerrold J. Katz (2000). Realistic Rationalism. A Bradford Book.
    In _Realistic Rationalism_, Jerrold J. Katz develops a new philosophical position integrating realism and rationalism. Realism here means that the objects of study in mathematics and other formal sciences are abstract; rationalism means that our knowledge of them is not empirical. Katz uses this position to meet the principal challenges to realism. In exposing the flaws in criticisms of the antirealists, he shows that realists can explain knowledge of abstract objects without supposing we have causal contact with them, that numbers (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  3.  2
    Jerrold J. Katz (1980). Language and Other Abstract Objects. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    To find more information about Rowman and Littlefield titles, please visit www.rowmanlittlefield.com.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   53 citations  
  4.  44
    Jerrold J. Katz (1977). Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts. Harvester.
    Katz offers such a grammatical account, in which makes it possible for the first time to explain the illocutionary potential of sentences within grammar.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   43 citations  
  5.  4
    Jerrold J. Katz (1966). The Philosophy of Language. New York, Harper & Row.
  6. Thomas G. Bever, Jerrold J. Katz & D. Terence Langendoen (1977). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability. Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 9 (26):123-127.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   52 citations  
  7. Jerrold Katz & Jerry Fodor (1963). The Structure of a Semantic Theory. Language 39:170-210.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   59 citations  
  8.  5
    R. H. Robins, Jerrold J. Katz & Paul M. Postal (1966). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):391.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   52 citations  
  9.  78
    Jerrold J. Katz (1994). Names Without Bearers. Philosophical Review 103 (1):1-39.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  10.  27
    Jerrold J. Katz (2004). Sense, Reference, and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Sense, Reference, and Philosophy develops the far-reaching consequences for philosophy of adopting non-Fregean intensionalism, showing that long-standing problems in the philosophy of language, and indeed other areas, that appeared intractable can now be solved. Katz proceeds to examine some of those problems in this new light, including the problem of names, natural kind terms, the Liar Paradox, the distinction between logical and extra-logical vocabulary, and the Raven paradox. In each case, a non-Fregean intentionalism provides a philosophically more satisfying solution.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  11.  25
    Fred M. Katz & Jerrold J. Katz (1977). Is Necessity the Mother of Intension? Philosophical Review 86 (1):70-96.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   30 citations  
  12.  5
    L. Jonathan Cohen, Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (1966). The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (63):165.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  13.  95
    Jerrold J. Katz (2001). The End of Millianism: Multiple Bearers, Improper Names, and Compositional Meaning. Journal of Philosophy 98 (3):137-166.
  14.  2
    Jerrold J. Katz (1990). The Metaphysics of Meaning. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  15. Jerrold J. Katz (1981). Literal Meaning and Logical Theory. Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):203-233.
    In "Literal Meaning," John Searle claims to refute the view that sentences of a natural language have a meaning independent of the social contexts in which their utterances occur. The present paper is a reply on behalf of this view. In the first section, I show that the issue is not a parochial dispute within a narrow area of the philosophy of language, of interest only to specialists in the area, but is at the heart of a wide range of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16. Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (1963). The Availability of What We Say. Philosophical Review 72 (1):57-71.
    Fodor and katz criticize cavell's position on the relation between ordinary language philosophy and empirical investigations of ordinary language, In "must we mean what we say?," _inquiry, Volume 1, Pages 172-212, And "the availability of wittgenstein's later philosophy," "philosophical review", Volume 71, Pages 67-93. Cavell holds that disagreements between ordinary language philosophers over grammar and semantics are in no sense empirical. Fodor and katz show that ordinary language philosophers are engaged in empirical investigation. (staff).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  17. Jerrold J. Katz (1964). Semantic Theory and the Meaning of `Good'. Journal of Philosophy 61 (23):739-766.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  46
    Jerrold J. Katz & Paul M. Postal (1991). Realism Vs. Conceptualism in Linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (5):515 - 554.
  19.  94
    Jerrold J. Katz (1997). Analyticity, Necessity, and the Epistemology of Semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):1-28.
    Contemporary philosophy standardly accepts Frege's conceptions of sense as the determiner of reference and of analyticity as (necessary) truth in virtue of meaning. This paper argues that those conceptions are mistaken. It develops referentially autonomous notions of sense and analyticity and applies them to the semantics of natural kind terms. The arguments of Donnellan, Putnam, and Kripke concerning natural kind terms are widely taken to refute internalist and rationalist theories of meaning. This paper shows that the counter-intuitive consequences about the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  20. Jerrold J. Katz (1990). Has the Description Theory of Names Been Refuted. In George S. Boolos (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam. Cambridge University Press 31--61.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  21. Noam Chomsky & Jerrold J. Katz (1974). What the Linguist is Talking About. Journal of Philosophy 71 (12):347-367.
  22.  69
    Jerrold J. Katz (1992). The New Intensionalism. Mind 101 (404):689-719.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  23.  59
    Jerrold J. Katz (1977). A Proper Theory of Names. Philosophical Studies 31 (1):1 - 80.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  24.  60
    Jerrold J. Katz (1995). What Mathematical Knowledge Could Be. Mind 104 (415):491-520.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  25
    Jerrold J. Katz (1977). The Advantage of Semantic Theory Over Predicate Calculus In The Representation of Logical Form In Natural Language. The Monist 60 (3):380-405.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  26.  48
    Christina Graves, Jerrold J. Katz, Yuji Nishiyama, Scott Soames, Robert Stecker & Peter Tovey (1973). Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 70 (11):318-330.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  27.  65
    Noam A. Chomsky & Jerrold J. Katz (1975). On Innateness: A Reply to Cooper. Philosophical Review 84 (January):70-87.
  28.  64
    Jerrold J. Katz (2002). Mathematics and Metaphilosophy. Journal of Philosophy 99 (7):362-390.
  29.  32
    Jerrold J. Katz (1979). Semantics and Conceptual Change. Philosophical Review 88 (3):327-365.
  30.  17
    Jerrold J. Katz (ed.) (1985). The Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
    In light of the sharp linguistic turn philosophy has taken in this century, this collection provides a much-needed and long-overdue reference for philosophical discussion. The first collection of its kind, it explores questions of the nature and existence of linguistic objects--including sentences and meanings--and considers the concept of truth in linguistics. The status of linguistics and the nature of language now take a central place in discussions of the nature of philosophy; the essays in this volume both inform these discussions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  31.  20
    Jerrold J. Katz (2001). The End of Millianism. Journal of Philosophy 98 (3):137 - 166.
  32.  34
    Jerrold J. Katz (1996). The Unfinished Chomskyan Revolution. Mind and Language 11 (3):270-294.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33.  41
    Jerrold J. Katz (1967). Some Remarks on Quine on Analyticity. Journal of Philosophy 64 (2):36-52.
  34.  58
    Jerrold J. Katz (1988). The Refutation of Indeterminacy. Journal of Philosophy 85 (5):227-252.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  1
    Jerrold J. Katz (1988). Cogitations. Journal of Philosophy 85 (9):500-505.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36.  54
    Jerrold J. Katz (1974). Where Things Now Stand with the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. Synthese 28 (3-4):283 - 319.
  37.  52
    Jerrold Katz & Jerry Fodor (1962). What's Wrong with the Philosophy of Language? Inquiry 5 (1-4):197 – 237.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Jerrold J. Katz (1996). Semantics in Linguistics and Philosophy: An Intensionalist Perspective. In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell Reference 599--616.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  51
    Jerrold J. Katz (1998). The Problem in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 95 (11):547-575.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  4
    Jerrold J. Katz & Richard I. Nagel (1974). Meaning Postulates and Semantic Theory. Foundations of Language 11 (3):311-340.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41.  5
    Jerrold J. Katz (1967). Recent Issues in Semantic Theory. Foundations of Language 3 (2):124-194.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  42. Jerrold J. Katz (1986). Cogitations: A Study of the Cogito in Relation to the Philosophy of Logic and Language and a Study of Them in Relation to the Cogito. Oxford University Press.
    The cogito ergo sum of Descartes is one of the best-known--and simplest--of all philosophical formulations, but ever since it was first propounded it has defied any formal accounting of its validity. How is it that so simple and important an argument has caused such difficulty and such philosophical controversy? In this pioneering work, Jerrold Katz argues that the problem with the cogito lies where it is least suspected--in a deficiency in the theory of language and logic that Cartesian scholars have (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  27
    Jerrold J. Katz (1961). A Reply to "Projection and Paraphrase in Semantics". Analysis 22 (2):36 - 41.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Jerrold J. Katz (1979). The Neoclassical Theory of Reference. In Peter A. French, T. E. Uehuling Jr & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. University of Minnesota Press 103--124.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  45.  26
    Jerrold J. Katz (1998). The Problem in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 95 (11):547 - 575.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  42
    Michael Edwards & Jerrold J. Katz (1985). Sentence Meaning and Speech Acts. Metaphilosophy 16 (1):12–20.
  47.  39
    Jerrold J. Katz (1993). Précis of "the Metaphysics of Meaning". Philosophical Issues 4 (1):128-134.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  22
    Jerrold J. Katz (1978). The Theory of Semantic Representation. Erkenntnis 13 (1):63 - 109.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  3
    Jerrold J. Katz (1970). Interpretative Semantics Vs. Generative Semantics. Foundations of Language 6 (2):220-259.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50.  10
    Jerrold J. Katz (1987). Descartes's 'Cogito'. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (3/4):175-196.
    THIS PAPER PRESENTS THE INTERPRETATION OF DESCARTES'S "COGITO" IN MY BOOK "COGITATIONS" IN A CONCISE AND SLIGHTLY EXTENDED FORM. THE EMPHASIS IS ON CONVEYING THE ESSENTIALS OF THE ARGUMENT THAT "COGITO ERGO SUM" IS AN ANALYTIC ENTAILMENT, BUT I HAVE TAKEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE MY ARGUMENT IN A FEW SMALL WAYS AND TO RELATE THE EXPLICIT FORM OF THE "COGITO" TO SIMILAR REASONING IN DESCARTES'S "SECOND MEDITATION". MY PRIMARY AIM IS TO EXPLAIN HOW THE "COGITO" CAN BOTH BE THE (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 80