24 found
Sort by:
  1. Jesper Hoffmeyer (forthcoming). Some Semiotic Aspects of the Psycho-Physical Relation: The Endo-Exosemiotic Boundary. Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2014). The Semiome: From Genetic to Semiotic Scaffolding. Semiotica 2014 (198):11-31.
    Journal Name: Semiotica - Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique Volume: 2014 Issue: 198 Pages: 11-31.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2010). A Biosemiotic Approach to the Question of Meaning. Zygon 45 (2):367-390.
    A sign is something that refers to something else. Signs, whether of natural or cultural origin, act by provoking a receptive system, human or nonhuman, to form an interpretant (a movement or a brain activity) that somehow relates the system to this "something else." Semiotics sees meaning as connected to the formation of interpretants. In a biosemiotic understanding living systems are basically engaged in semiotic interactions, that is, interpretative processes, and organic evolution exhibits an inherent tendency toward an increase in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2010). Relations: The True Substrate for Evolution. Semiotica 2010 (178):81-103.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2010). Semiotic Freedom: An Emerging Force. In P. C. W. Davies & Niels Henrik Gregersen (eds.), Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. 185--204.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kalevi Kull, Terrence Deacon, Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer & Frederik Stjernfelt (2009). Theses on Biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a Theoretical Biology. Biological Theory 4 (2):167-173.
    Theses on the semiotic study of life as presented here provide a collectively formulated set of statements on what biology needs to be focused on in order to describe life as a process based on semiosis, or sign action. An aim of the biosemiotic approach is to explain how life evolves through all varieties of forms of communication and signification (including cellular adaptive behavior, animal communication, and human intellect) and to provide tools for grounding sign theories. We introduce the concept (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2008). “Biology Is Immature Biosemiotics”. Semiotics:927-942.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2008). The Semiotic Body. Biosemiotics 1 (2):169-190.
    Most bodies in this world do not have brains and the minority of animal species that do have brained bodies are descendents from species with more distributed or decentralized nervous systems. Thus, bodies were here first, and only relatively late in evolution did the bodies of a few species grow supplementary organs, brains, sophisticated enough to support a psychological life. Psychological life therefore from the beginning was embedded in and served as a tool for corporeal life. This paper discusses the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kalevi Kull & Jesper Hoffmeyer (2005). Obituary: Thure von Uexküll 1908–2004. Sign Systems Studies 2:487-494.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Kalevi Kull & Jesper Hoffmeyer (2005). Thure von Uexküll 1908–2004. Sign Systems Studies 33 (2):487-494.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2004). «Плановость» юкскюлла. Резюме. Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):96-96.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2004). Uexküllian Planmässigkeit. Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):73-95.
    In strict opposition to the prevailing positivist conception of nature as senseless and deprived of meaning Jakob von Uexküll claimed that a certain planmässigkeit was operative in nature. This idea however might be taken to mean that organic evolution is not itself a creative process but a gradual, if majestic, unfolding of Nature's own master plan. Such an idea would threaten to restore determinism in the center of biological theory, and this would seriously contradict the vision of biosemiotics shared by (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2004). Uexkülli 'plaanipärasus'. Kokkuvõte. Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):96-97.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jesper Hoffmeyer & Kalevi Kull (2003). Baldwin and Biosemiotics: What Intelligence is For. In Bruce H. Weber & David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. Mit Press. 253--272.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Claus Emmeche, Jesper Hoffmeyer & Kalevi Kull (2002). Editors' Comment. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):11-13.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2002). Obituary. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):383-386.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2002). Obituary: Thomas A. Sebeok. Σημιοτκή-Sign Systems Studies 1:384-386.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2002). The Central Dogma: A Joke That Became Real. Semiotica 2002 (138):1-13.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2001). S/E ≥ 1. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):277-290.
    Natural (non-cultivated) systems are nmed to economize their use of energy as much as possible, and thereby to produce minimal amounts of entropy. It is suggested that this has been obtained by optimizing the evolutionary creation of semiotic controls on all processes of life. As long as biological (ultimately photosynthetic) energy sources satisfied most human needs for energy consumption, these biosemiotic controls remained largely undisturbed, with the result that production systems remained sustainable. The industrial revolution instantiated a ruphure of this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2001). Seeing Virtuality in Nature. Semiotica 2001 (134).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jesper Hoffmeyer (2000). The Biology of Signification. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43 (2):252-268.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jesper Hoffmeyer (1999). Order Out of Indeterminacy. Semiotica 127 (1-4):321-344.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas A. Sebeok, Jesper Hoffmeyer & Claus Emmeche (1999). Biosemiotica. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Semiotica 127 (1-4).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jesper Hoffmeyer (1998). Semiosis and Biohistory: A Reply. Semiotica 120 (3-4):455-482.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation