Search results for 'Jie Que' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. John Davis, William Giakas, Jie Que, Pavan Passad & Stefan Leucht (2011). Should We Treat Depression with Drugs or Psychological Interventions? A Reply to Ioannidis. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6 (1):8-.score: 120.0
    We reply to the Ioannidis's paper "Effectiveness of antidepressants; an evidence based myth constructed from a thousand controlled trials." We disagree that antidepressants have no greater (...)efficacy than placebo. We present the efficacy from hundreds of trials in terms of the percentage of patients with a substantial clinical response (a 50% improvement or more symptomatic reduction). This meta-analysis finds that 42-70% of depressed patients improve with drug and 21%-39% improve with placebo. The response benefit of antidepressant treatment is 33%-11% greater than placebo. Ioannidis argues that it would be vanishingly smaller because systematic biasing in these clinical trials would reduce the drug-placebo difference to zero. Ioannidis' argument that antidepressants have no benefit is eroded by his failures of logic because he does not present any evidence that there are a large number of studies where placebo is substantially more effective than drug. (To reduce to zero, one would also have to show that some of the unpublished studies find placebo better than drug and have substantial systematic or methodological bias). We also present the empirical evidence showing that these methodological concerns generally have the opposite effect of what Ioannidis argues, supporting our contention that the measured efficacy of antidepressants likely underestimates true efficacy.Our most important criticism is Ioannidisbasic underlying argument about antidepressants that if the existing evidence is imperfect and methods can be criticized, then this proves that antidepressant are not efficacious. He presents no credible evidence that antidepressants have zero effect size. Valid arguments can point out difficulties with the data but do not prove that a given drug had no efficacy. Indeed better evidence might prove it was more efficacious that originally found.We find no empirical or ethical reason why psychiatrists should not try to help depressed patients with drugs and/or with psychotherapeutic/behavioral treatments given evidence of efficacy even though our treatment knowledge has limitations. The immense suffering of patients with major depression leads to ethical, moral, professional and legal obligations to treat patients with the best available tools at our disposal, while diligently and actively monitoring for adverse effects and actively revising treatment components as necessary. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Shang Jie (2008). The Phenomenology of Death. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (s1):133-141.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Lu Jie & Gao Desheng * (2004). New Directions in the Moral Education Curriculum in Chinese Primary Schools. Journal of Moral Education 33 (4):495-510.score: 30.0
    An analysis is presented of the problems that have existed for over 20 years in the moral education curriculum in primary schools of China. These include the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Zhang Jie & Yan Zhijun (forthcoming). Reception and Transformation of Former Soviet Union's Cultural Semiotics in China. Semiotics:87-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Kai-Rong Zhao & Wu Jie (2000). The Dissemination and Research of Laszlo's Systems Philosophy in China. World Futures 56 (2):147-154.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Silvio Seno Chibeni (2012). Hume e as bases científicas da tese de que não acaso no mundo. Principia 16 (2):229-254.score: 18.0
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n2p229 Tanto no Tratado da Natureza Humana como na Investigação sobre o Entendimento Humano , Hume mostra-se convencido de quenão (...) acaso no mundo”, e queaquilo que o vulgo chama de acaso não passa de uma causa secreta e escondida”. Essa tese desempenha papel crucial em sua análise do livre-arbítrio e, conseguintemente, da responsabilidade moral; é também um elemento importante em sua discussão sobre os milagres. No entanto, o próprio Hume ofereceu, no Tratado , um argumento convincente para mostrar que o princípio de causalidade, segundo o qual tudo o que começa a existir tem uma causa, não pode ser conhecido a priori , por intuição ou demonstração. Logo, essaopinião tem necessariamente de provir da observação e experiência”. O presente trabalho examina essa tese, mostrando, inicialmente, qual era a proposta de Hume para fundar na experiência o princípio de causalidade, e depois qual, de fato, teria sido o mais robusto fundamento para esse princípio: a mecânica newtoniana. Explica-se, por fim, como esse fundamento empírico indireto e o próprio argumento de Hume foram solapados pela física quântica, no século XX. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Matthias Schirn & Karl-Georg Niebergall (2003). What Finitism Could Not Be (Lo Que El Finitismo No Podría Ser). Crítica 35 (103):43 - 68.score: 12.0
    In his paper "Finitism" (1981), W.W. Tait maintains that the chief difficulty for everyone who wishes to understand Hilbert's conception of finitist mathematics is this: to (...) specify the sense of the provability of general statements about the natural numbers without presupposing infinite totalities. Tait further argues that all finitist reasoning is essentially primitive recursive. In this paper, we attempt to show that his thesis "The finitist functions are precisely the primitive recursive functions" is disputable and that another, likewise defended by him, is untenable. The second thesis is that the finitist theorems are precisely the universal closures of the equations that can be proved in PRA. /// En su articulo "Finitism" (1981), W.W. Tait sostiene que la dificultad principal para quien quiere comprender la concepción hilbertiana de la matemática finitista es ésta: especificar el sentido de la demostrabilidad de enunciados generales sobre los números naturales sin presuponer totalidades infinitas. Además, Tait argumenta que todo razonamiento finitista es esencialmente primitivo recursivo. En este artículo tratamos de mostrar que su tesis "Las funciones finitistas son precisamente las funciones primitivas recursivas" es discutible y que otra, también defendida por él, resulta insostenible. La segunda tesis es que los teoremas finitistas son precisamente las clausuras universales de las ecuaciones que pueden demostrarse en PRA. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Hannah Ginsborg, Qu'Est-Ce Que la Faculté de Juger?score: 12.0
    Lidée dun jugement [Urteil], et du pouvoir de juger [Vermögen zu urteilen], joue un rôle cardinal dans largumentation de la Critique de la raison pure. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mircea Dumitru & Frederick Kroon (2008). What to Say When There Is Nothing to Talk About (Qué Decir Cuando No Hay Nada de Que Hablar). Crítica 40 (120):97 - 109.score: 12.0
    In Reference without Referents, Mark Sainsbury aims to provide an account of reference that honours the common-sense view that sentences containing empty names like "Vulcan" and " (...)Santa Claus" are entirely intelligible, and that many such sentences -"Vulcan doesn't exist", "Many children believe that Santa Claus will give them presents at Christmas", etc.- are literally true. Sainsbury's account endorses the Davidsonian program in the theory of meaning, and combines this with a commitment to Negative Free Logic, which holds that all simple sentences containing empty names are false. In this critical review, we pose a number of problems for this account. In particular, we question the ability of Negative Free Logic to make appropriate sense of the truth of familiar sentences containing empty names, including negative existential claims like "Vulcan doesn't exist". /// En Reference without Referents, Mark Sainsbury se propone ofrecer una explicación de la referencia que respete la idea de sentido común de que las oraciones con nombres vacíos como "Vulcano" y "Santa Claus" son completamente inteligibles, y que muchas de oraciones de este tipo -"Vulcano no existe", "Muchos niños creen que Santa Claus les traerá regalos en Navidad", y demás- son literalmente verdaderas. La propuesta de Sainsbury se inscribe dentro del programa davidsoniano en teoría del significado, y combina éste con un compromiso con la Lógica Libre Negativa, según la cual todas las oraciones simples que contienen nombres vacíos son falsas. En este estudio crítico, presentamos varios problemas de esta explicación. En particular, ponemos en duda la habilidad de la Lógica Libre Negativa de entender de manera apropiada la verdad de oraciones conocidas que contienen nombres vacíos, incluidas negaciones de existencia como "Vulcano no existe". (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Francesco Fronterotta (forthcoming). « Que Feras-Tu, Socrate, de la Philosophie ? » L'Un Et les Plusieurs Dans L'Exercice Dialectique du Parménide de Platon. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale.score: 12.0
    Cet article propose une nouvelle interprétation de la seconde partie du Parménide de Platon. L'opposition entre l'un et les plusieurs, qui constitue l'objet de l' (...)exercice dialectique suggéré par Parménide, reproduit et illustre l'opposition ontologique entre les idées et les choses empiriques à laquelle était consacrée l'analyse de la première partie du dialogue. L'un (τò Є˵v) représente en effet chaque idée (et le monde des idées dans son ensemble), tandis que les plusieurs ( πολλά) représentent l'infinie multiplicité des choses empiriques en devenir qui participent des idées. This article advances a new interpretation of the second part of Plato's Parmenides. The opposition between the one and the many, which is the object of the dialectical exercise suggested by Parmenides, reproduces and develops the ontological opposition between the ideas and the empirical things to which the analysis carried out in the first part of the dialogue was dedicated. In fact, the one ( εν) represents every idea (and the world of ideas in its totality), while the many ( πολλά) represent the infinite multiplicity of the empirical things of the world of becoming which participate in ideas. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Sneddon (2001). What's Wrong with Selling Yourself Into Slavery? Paternalism and Deep Autonomy (¿Por Qué Está Mal Moralmente Venderse Uno Mismo Como Esclavo? Paternalismo y Autonomía Profunda). Crítica 33 (98):97 - 121.score: 12.0
    Such thinkers as John Stuart Mill, Gerald Dworkin, and Richard Doerflinger have appealed to the value of freedom to explain both what is wrong with slavery and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Dan López de Sa (2006). Por qué la aposterioridad no (basta, según Kripke, ni) basta (Why Aposteriority Is Not (Enough according to Kripke, Nor Is) Enough). Theoria 21 (3):245-255.score: 12.0
    Es conocido que Kripke argumentó que la ilusión de contingencia en el caso de la conciencia no puede explicarse del modo en que se explica en el (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Carlos Pereda (1996). ¿Qué Es Un Buen Argumento? (What is a Good Argument?). Theoria 11 (1):7-20.score: 12.0
    Las preguntas importantes, o que parecen importantes, no tienen por qué tener respuestas importantes, incluso no tienen por qué tener respuestas. Me propongo explorar qué respuestas, importantes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jean Bricmont, Qu'Est-Ce Que le Matérialisme Scientifique ?score: 12.0
    En général, les dogmes matérialistes nont pas été édifiés par des gens qui aimaient les dogmes, mais par des gens qui pensaient que rien de moins (...)net ne leur permettrait de combattre les dogmes quils naimaient pas. Ils étaient dans la situation de gens qui lèvent des armées pour défendre la paix (1). (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ricardo Salles (2007). Necesidad y Lo Que Depende de Nosotros. Sobre la Interpretación de Marcelo Boeri Del Compatibilismo Estoico (Necessity and What Depends on Us. On Marcelo Boeri's Interpretation of Stoic Compatibilism). Crítica 39 (115):83 - 96.score: 12.0
    Este trabajo discute la interpretación de Marcelo Boeri sobre el compatibilismo estoico; esto es, la tesis de que es compatible con el determinismo que rige al mundo (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mauricio Beuchot (2011). Por qué no soy falibilista y otros ensayos filosóficos. Diánoia 56 (66):235-239.score: 12.0
    En esta nota crítica (i) se hace una breve descripción de cada uno de los artículos que componen Orayen: de la forma lógica al significado, (ii) se (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Barbara Botter (2010). Acontece que chove ... em vista de um fim Aristóteles, Phys. II 8, 198b16-199a8. Princípios 17 (27):255-278.score: 12.0
    Resumo: Neste artigo apresentamos um quadro geral da defesa de Aristóteles da teleologia natural em Physica II 8, analisando a aporia que ele levanta, neste contexto, no (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Gustavo A. Caponi (2010). Essas Coisas que Somos Nós (O Sujeito na Filosofia Popperiana). Princípios 2 (3):47-64.score: 12.0
    Neste trabalho estudamos a noçáo popperiana de "eu" e concluimos que, no marco do racionalismo critico, O sujeito é conhecedor e o individuo empírico; porém o mesmo (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Omar Antonio Ponce Carrillo (2008). Del Por Qué Considero Que La Filosofía De La Ciencia Social Constituye Una Parada Obligada En El Acontecer De La Teoría Social Desde Una Perspectiva Sociológica. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:419-427.score: 12.0
    En este escrito intento exponer la manera en que establezco una relación entre la filosofía de la ciencia social y la teoría social. Lo anterior se da (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Dan López de Sa (2006). Por Qué la Aposterioridad No (Basta, Según Kripke, Ni) Basta (Why Aposteriority is Not (Enough According to Kripke, nor is) Enough). Theoria 21 (3):245-255.score: 12.0
    Es conocido que Kripke argumentó que la ilusión de contingencia en el caso de la conciencia no puede explicarse del modo en que se explica en el (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Rivera María Lucía (2010). La protección de la vida vida del que no ha nacido. Saga - Revista de Estudiantes de Filosofía 12.score: 12.0
    Se analizará la manera en que la influencia teórica de las ciencias biológicas y médicas sobre la noción devidaimponen una transformación de las construcciones políticas, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Me Marcelo Silvano Madeira (2012). Pragmatismo ou pragmaticismo? Considerações sobre O conceito de pragmatismo a partir da análise do artigo O que é O pragmatismo. Revista de Teologia (Reveleteo). Issn 2177-952x 6 (10):p. 61-69.score: 12.0
    Charles S. Peirce é considerado o pai do pragmatismo, doutrina filosófica cujo propósito inicial era aliar o conhecimento racional com ação racional. Entretanto, essa doutrina foi amplamente (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Antoni Defez Martín (2012). ¿De qué manera es posible ser un escéptico? Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 45:211-222.score: 12.0
    El objetivo de este artículo es analizar qué tipo de respuesta al escepticismo filosófico podemos esperar de los llamados argumentos transcendentales. La conclusión general es que los (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Magali Mendes de Menezes (2007). A linguagem do dizer em um corpo que se apresenta como ético. Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 52 (2).score: 12.0
    O objetivo deste texto é apresentar o movimento que vai de Totalité et Infini à Autrement quêtre au-delà de lessence, ou seja, da diferença vista (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Emilia Maria Mendonça de Morais (2010). A Filosofia entre o Lógos e o Míthos: Lições que recebemos de Platão. Princípios 4 (5):115-135.score: 12.0
    Com o objetivo de ressaltar a importancia da fabulaç áo , como meio de expressáo do exercicio filosofico, em Plat áo , reconstituem-se inicialmente, neste artigo, os principais (...) passos do Teeteto, cujo final aporético decorreria da n áo exploraç áo pelos interlocutores das hipoteses da Reminiscencia e das Ideias, as quais n áo se restringem ao logos mais estrito nem se dissociam do relato mitico. Em seguida, evidencia-se que, sobretudo a partir dos dialogos da maturidade, a recriaç áo poetica da tradiç áo constitui um suporte doutrindrio indispensável. &nbsp. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Luiz Celso Pinho (2010). A presença de Nietzsche na obra de Foucault: mais do que uma afinidade filosófica. Princípios 16 (26):167-187.score: 12.0
    As referências a Nietzsche proliferam de tal forma ao longo dos quase trinta anos de produçáo teórica de Foucault que fica evidente o forte elo que (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz (2007). ¿Qué queda de la distinción entre contexto de descubrimiento y contexto de justificación? (What remains of the discovery-justification distinction?). Theoria 22 (3):347-350.score: 12.0
    Este comentario se centra en el primer capítulo de Abductive Reasoning (2006), donde Aliseda ofrece nuevas herramien-tas conceptuales para examinar los modelos metodológicos que trazan una (...)distinción de contextos en la investigación científica. Elucidamos la posición de Popper frente al problema del descubrimiento y distinguimos dos sentidos en que deliberadamente utilizadiscoveryen su LSD (1959), distinción que permite reforzar la heterodoxa interpretación que hace Aliseda de la metodología popperiana. Por último, nos detenemos en la comparación entre Popper y Simon frente a lalógica del descubrimiento”, ya que condensa las razones por las que Aliseda considera que la dicotomía descubrimiento-justificación está destinada al fracaso.This brief commentary focuses on the first chapter of Abductive Reasoning (2006), where Aliseda offers new conceptual tools for examining the methodological models in which a distinction between contexts of scientific research is traced. In particular, we analyze Poppers position with respect to the problem of discovery and distinguish two different senses in which he deliberately uses the termdiscoveryin LSD (1959); this, in turn, lends support to Alisedas heterodox interpretation of the Popperian methodology. Last, we examine the comparison the author makes between Popper and Simon as it contains the primary reasons for asserting that the discovery-justification dichotomy is doomed to failure. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz (2007). ¿Qué Queda de la Distinción Entre Contexto de Descubrimiento Y Contexto de Justificación? (What Remains of the Discovery-Justification Distinction?). Theoria 22 (3):347-350.score: 12.0
    Este comentario se centra en el primer capítulo de Abductive Reasoning (2006), donde Aliseda ofrece nuevas herramien-tas conceptuales para examinar los modelos metodológicos que trazan una (...)distinción de contextos en la investigación científica. Elucidamos la posición de Popper frente al problema del descubrimiento y distinguimos dos sentidos en que deliberadamente utilizadiscoveryen su LSD (1959), distinción que permite reforzar la heterodoxa interpretación que hace Aliseda de la metodología popperiana. Por último, nos detenemos en la comparación entre Popper y Simon frente a lalógica del descubrimiento”, ya que condensa las razones por las que Aliseda considera que la dicotomía descubrimiento-justificación está destinada al fracaso.This brief commentary focuses on the first chapter of Abductive Reasoning (2006), where Aliseda offers new conceptual tools for examining the methodological models in which a distinction between contexts of scientific research is traced. In particular, we analyze Poppers position with respect to the problem of discovery and distinguish two different senses in which he deliberately uses the termdiscoveryin LSD (1959); this, in turn, lends support to Alisedas heterodox interpretation of the Popperian methodology. Last, we examine the comparison the author makes between Popper and Simon as it contains the primary reasons for asserting that the discovery-justification dichotomy is doomed to failure. (shrink)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jean Salem & Guillaume Pigeard de Gurbert et Kate E. Tunstall (2006). II. Qu'Est-Ce Que les Lumières? In G. J. Mallinson (ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Qu'est-Ce Que les Lumières: La Reconnaissance au Dix-Huitième Siècle. Voltaire Foundation.score: 12.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Íris Fátima da Silva (2010). Formação da obra de arte O formar comofazerque, enquanto faz, inventa omodo de fazê-lo”: uma perspectiva estética em Luigi Pareyson. Princípios 16 (26):135-148.score: 12.0
    Normal 0 21 false false false PT-BR X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabela normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size: (...)0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} O propósito do presente texto é trazer à luz breves considerações acerca do formar comofazerque, enquanto faz, inventa omodo de fazê-lo”: uma perspectiva estética em Luigi Pareyson, para quem, “produçáo é ao mesmo tempo e indivisivelmente, invençáo”. A interpretaçáo pessoal é o tornar evidente a própria obra, isto é, o dar-se, revelar-se, o descortinar-se da obra em si. O interpretar é de acordo com Pareyson, em si, sempre pessoal; entretanto é apenas uma forma dentre tantas outras possíveis. A pluralidade das interpretações náo deve ser considerada uma desvantagem, longe de ser umdefeitoé uma revelaçáo da inexorabilidade do pensamento humano. Ao conceber a interpretaçáo como singular, evidencia-se a historicidade do contexto e a personalidade do pensante. Iniciaremos com algumas considerações acerca da estética, em seguida, trataremos da forma como execuçáo e o formar como experimento. Palavras-chave : Estética; Formatividade; Interpretaçáo; Luigi Pareyson; Obra de arte. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Josep-Maria Terricabras & Joan Corbella I. Roig (eds.) (2006). Què Ens Mou?: 6 Valors a Debat. Mina.score: 12.0
    Quins són els valors que regeixen la nostra vida? I per què vivim amb aquests valors i no amb uns altres? «Els valors van cap a on (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Howard Sankey (2002). Qu'est-ce que le realisme scientifique? Reseaux 94:69-82.score: 9.0
    Les tables, les chaises, les gens assis sur des chaises, à des tables sont des objets composés de matière. Selon la science, la matière se compose principalement (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. C. Ulises Moulines (1979). ¿Qué Hacer En Filosofía de la Ciencia? Una Alternativa En Catorce Puntos. Crítica 11 (32):51 - 84.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. C. Ulises Moulines (1977). Por Qué No Soy Materialista. Crítica 9 (26):25 - 37.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Stéphane Chauvier (2008). Que Nous Devons-Nous les Uns aux Autres? Revue Philosophique De Louvain 106 (4):771-796.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Vincent Descombes (forthcoming). Que Peut-on Demander à la Philosophic Morale ? Cités.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. R. J. Hankinson (2010). Galen (V.) Boudon-Millot (Ed., Trans.) Galien: Introduction Générale, Sur L'Ordre de Ses Propres Livres, Sur Ses Propres Livres, Que L'Excellent Médecin Est Aussi Philosophe. (Collection des Universités de France Publiée Sous le Patronage de L'Association Guillaume Budé.) Pp. Ccxxxviii + 315. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2007. Paper, €75. ISBN: 978-2-251-00536-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (01):72-.score: 9.0
  38. François-Xavier Chenet (1993). Que Sont Donc L'Espace Et le Temps? Les Hypothèses Considérées Par Kant Et la Lancinante Objection de la «Troisième Possibilité». Kant-Studien 84 (2).score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. M. Villela-Petit (1999). Henri Maldiney, Le Vouloir-Dire de Francis Ponge, Encre Marine, Fougeres, 1993; L'Art, L'Eclair de L'Etre: Traversees, Comp'Act, Paris, 1993; Regard, Parole, Espace, Revised Edition, L'Age de L'Homme, Lausanne, 1994; Aux Deserts Que L'Histoire Accable - L'Art de Tal-Coat, Deyrolle, Paris, 1996; Avenement de L'Oeuvre, Theetete, Sainte-Maximin, 1997. [REVIEW] Diogenes 47 (186):106-109.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Patricia Nourry (2002). Pascal. Qu'Est-Ce Que la Vérité? Martine Pécharman, Directrice de la Publication Collection «Débats Philosophiques» Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2000, 169 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (04):804-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Bruno Poizat (1982). Deux Ou Trois Choses Que Je Sais de Ln. Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (3):641 - 658.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Sylvain Auroux (1976). Qu'Est-Ce Que L'Épistémologie? Dialogue 15 (02):302-320.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Gert Helgesson (2002). What Is Implicit? (¿Qué Está Implícito?). Crítica 34 (100):33 - 54.score: 9.0
    This paper briefly surveys previous analyses of implicitness and proposes a new, two-dimensional account. The first dimension concerns whether an assumption follows or not in terms (...)of analytical or contextual implications or because it is a reasonable interpretation. The second dimension concerns the intentions of the author. Both dimensions are needed for identifying implicit assumptions in critical analyses of texts. A definition of clear cases of implicit assumptions is given. /// Este artículo examina brevemente análisis previos sobre lo implícito y propone una nueva explicación bidimensional. La primera dimensión es sobre si se sigue o no una suposición en términos de implicaciones analíticas o contextuales, o porque la interpretación es razonable. La segunda dimensión se ocupa de las intenciones del autor. Ambas dimensiones son necesarias para identificar suposiciones implícitas en los análisis críticos de textos. Se proporciona una definición de los casos claros de supuestos implícitos. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Neil Kennedy (2009). Savoir Que L'on Sait. La Question de la Transparence Dans les Attitudes Épistémiques. Dialogue 48 (03):451-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Roger Lapointe (1970). Questions II. Par M. Heidegger. (Qu'Est-Ce Que la Philosophie?, Hegel Et les Grecs, La Thèse de Kant Sur L'Être, La Doctrine de Platon Sur la Vèritè, Ce Qu'Est Et Comment Se Détermine la Physis). Trad, de K. Axelos Et Autres. Paris, Gallimard, 1968, 277 Pages. [REVIEW] Dialogue 8 (04):740-744.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Robin George Collingwood (2002). Ce Que « la Civilisation » Veut Dire. 12 (4):149-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Vladimir Safatle (2008). O Amor É Mais Frio Que a Morte: Negatividade, Infinitude E Indeterminação Na Teoria Hegeliana Do Desejo. Kriterion 49 (117):95-125.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Malcolm Schofield (2004). Presocratic Identity A. Laks, C. Louguet (Edd.): Qu'Est-Ce Que la Philosophie Présocratique? What is Presocratic Philosophy? (Cahiers de Philologie: Série Apparat Critique 20.) Pp. 550. Villeneuve D'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 2002. Paper, €29. Isbn: 2-85939-740-X. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (02):289-.score: 9.0
  49. Bernardo Carlos Bazán (1984). Le Thomisme Fernand Van Steenberghen Coll. « Que Sais-Je » Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1983. 127 P. Dialogue 23 (04):729-732.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Philippe Gagnon (2002). Ce Que le Théisme Demande à la Science. Laval Théologique Et Philosophique 58 (3):457-487.score: 9.0
    Close attention to levels of organization leads one to doubt the random character of the regulations of the cosmos as a whole. Scientific knowledge seems able, after (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Enrique Alonso & Hubert Marraud (2003). La Iógica Que Aprendimos. Theoria 18 (3):327-349.score: 9.0
    Este trabajo constituye una revisión de los contenidos, orientación y objetivos de una parte significativa de los manuales de lógica elemental de las décadas de 1960 y (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Josée Brunet (2008). La Conception du Raisonnement de John Broome: «Que Nous Exprimons-Nous Lorsque Nous Raisonnons?». Dialogue 47 (3-4):633-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. A. Morpurgo Davies (1975). Jean Humbert: Histoire de la Langue Grecque. ('Que Sais-Je?', No. 1483.) Pp. 128. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1972. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 25 (01):153-154.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. François Noudelmann (2006). Que Nous Disent Aujourd'Hui Jean-Paul Sartre Et Simone de Beauvoir ? 216 (4):44-.score: 9.0
  55. Wayne J. Froman (1997). MarlèNe Zarander, La Dette impensáE: Heidegger Et L'©Ritage ©braïQue. Man and World 30 (4):497-500.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Guy Hamelin (1994). Averroès Et L'Averroïsme Maurice-Ruben Hayoun Et Alain de Libera Collection «Que Sais-Je?», No 2631 Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1991, 127 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 33 (01):153-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. Alexandre Lowit (1995). Que signifient les δοκοϋντα du Poème de Parménide. Heidegger Studies 11:123-149.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. S. P. Oakley (1991). F. Létoublon: Fonder Une Cité: Ce Que Disent les Langues Anciennes Et les Textes Grecs Et Latins Sur la Fondation des Cités. Pp. 336; 32 Illustrations, Maps and Figures. Grenoble: Ellug (Université des Langues Et Lettres), 1987. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):512-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. Ovidiu-Sorin Podar (2009). La Vie En Tant Que Vie. Studia Phaenomenologica 9:315-330.score: 9.0
    The phenomenological tautology of life in Michel Henrys works shows us that the radical concept of self-affection, in its own immanence, cannot be described in another (...) way, either by metaphor or analogy for example, but only by that immediate relation like adequacy on itself: “life as life”. The reduplication of the fundamental concept in Henrys lasttheologicalturn introduced a new Transcendence: the Self-Affection of the Absolute Life, the Christian God as Revelation. In this way, we can diversify the tautology of life trying to read it using Saint Maximus the Confessors theology: “Life as Lifelike the Absolute phenomenological Life of Trinity in Unity; “life as Lifefor the creation of the human living by the Living God; “life as lifefor the existence of the man, ek-sisting in a world affected by the original transgression; “Life as lifefor the Incarnation of the Logos of God; “life as Life2for the rebirth of the human living into Christ and His Mystical Body. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. John Sellars (2004). Qu'Est-Ce Que la Philosophie Antique? P. Hadot: What is Ancient Philosophy? Translated by Michael Chase. Pp. XIV + 362. Cambridge, Ma and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002. (Originally Published as Qu'Est-Ce Que la Philosophie Antique? , 1995.) Cased, £19.95. Isbn: 0-674-00733-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (01):69-.score: 9.0
  61. Christopher Smith (2005). R. S. P. Beekes: The Origins of the Etruscans . (Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen: Mededelingen van de Afdeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, 66.1.) Pp. 59, Map. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2003. Paper. ISBN: 90-6984-369-2. A. Grandazzi: Les Origines de Rome . (Que Sais-Je? 216.) Pp. 127, Maps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003. Paper. ISBN: 2-13-053219-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (01):361-.score: 9.0
  62. Alberto Bonnet (2006). ¡Qué Se Vayan Todos!: Discussing the Argentine Crisis and Insurrection. Historical Materialism 14 (1):157-184.score: 9.0
  63. Ana M. Martinez Aleman (1999). ?Que Culpa Tengo Yo? Performing Identity and College Teaching. Educational Theory 49 (1):37-51.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Mario Bunge (1985). ¿Qué Es Un Individuo Concreto? Theoria 1 (1):121-128.score: 9.0
    The paper investigates the problems whether a concrete individual can be defined as a set or be characterized by an abstract theory. In particular, Jesês Mosteríns (...)objection to a theory of things proposed by the present author is discussed. Also, the view of scientific theories held by Sneed, and adopted by Mosterln, is analyzed. It is concluded that any adequate description of a concrete individual calls for more than a mathematical formalism. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. Philippe Constantineau (2000). Qu'Est-Ce Que la Démocratie? La Généalogie Philosophique D'Une Grande Aventure Humaine Simone Goyard-Fabre Collection «U-Philosophie» Paris, Armand Colin, 1998, 240 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 39 (03):637-.score: 9.0
  66. C. J. Ducasse (1949). Qu'Est-Ce Que la Philosophie? Synthese 8 (1):272 - 286.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. Guillermo Hurtado (2000). Por Qué No Soy Falibilista. Crítica 32 (96):59 - 97.score: 9.0
  68. F. Jackson (forthcoming). O que Mary não sabia. Crítica.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. A. H. M. Jones (1955). Paul Cloché: Alexandre le Grand. (Que Sais-Je, No. 622.) Pp. 123. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954. Paper, 150 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (3-4):323-324.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. Daniel Laurier (2000). Que Sera Sera. Dialectica 54 (4):247–264.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. André Leclerc (1993). La Grammaire Générale Classique En Tant Que Programme de Recherche Scientifique. Dialogue 32 (01):77-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. Benoit Mathot (2012). Benoît Bourgine, Joseph Famerée, Paul Scolas, dir., Qu’est-ce que la ©rité ? Paris, Les Ãditions du Cerf ; Louvain-la-Neuve, Université Catholique de Louvain (coll. « Théologies »), 2009, 177 p.Benoît Bourgine, Joseph Famerée, Paul Scolas, dir., Qu’est-ce que la ©rité ? Paris, Les Ãditions du Cerf ; Louvain-la-Neuve, Université Catholique de Louvain (coll. « Théologies »), 2009, 177 p. [REVIEW] Laval Thã©Ologique Et Philosophique 68 (3):714-715.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. Jesús Vega (2001). ¿Por Que es Necesario Distinguir entre "Ciencia" y "Tecnica"? (Why do we need to distinguish between "Science " and "Technology "?). Theoria 16 (1):167-184.score: 9.0
    RESUMEN: Este artículo argumenta a favor de la necesidad de mantener una distinción nítida entre ciencia y técnica en contra de ciertas tendencias interpretativas y socio-institucionales (...)dominantes en algunos círculos de filósofos y sociólogos. Se presentan dos argumentos: el primero insiste en la conveniencia analitíca de describir direrencìadamente las actividades científicas y tecnológicas a partir de las nociones de "acto epistémico" y "acto material"; el segundo descubre en las reglas constitutivas de la aceptabilidad de resultados científicos y técnicos respectivamente un modo de distinguir socio-institucionalmente ambas esferas de producción de conocimiento.ABSTRACT: This paper argues for the need to maintain a clear distinction between science and technology against some well-known interpretative tendencies within some dominant circles of philosophers and sociologists. Two arguments are presented: the first one insists on the analytical convenience to describe differently the scientific and the technological activities by introducing the notions of "epistemic act" and "material act"; the second one discovers in the constitutiverules for the acceptability of scientific and technological results a way to distinguish socioinstitutionally both spheres of knowledge production. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. K. D. White (1968). Claude Mossé: Le Travail En Grèce Et à Rome. ('Que Sais-Je?', 1240.) Pp. 126. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966. Paper, 3 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (01):124-125.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. Jean Beaufret (1985). Qu'est-ce que la métaphysique? Heidegger Studies 1:101-117.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. S. Blackburn (forthcoming). Para que serve a filosofia? Crítica.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. Frédérick Bruneault (2011). À quelles conditions une éthique herméneutique est-elle possible? Analyse du jeu et de la philosophie pratique chez Gadamer en tant que propédeutique au Mitsein de Heidegger. Symposium 15 (1):5-28.score: 9.0
    Ce texte souhaite montrer quune compréhension adéquate de la notion heideggerienne de Mitsein et de ces implications pour le fondement dune éthique herméneutique doit partir d (...)une analyse minutieuse des rapports herméneutiques à la tradition et à la connaissance des pratiques sociales. En ce sens, je travaille à partir de lanalyse gadamérienne du « jeu » et de la philosophie pratique. À quelles conditions une éthique herméneutique est-elle possible? Précisément à la condition de sinscrire dans une prise en compte de cette pré-compréhension des relations sociales, pré-compréhension à partir de laquelle nous envisageons toujours déjà notre devoir-être. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. Julie Casteigt (forthcoming). 'La science de l'âme est plus certaine que toute autre science'. Une interprétation eckhartienne du témoignage (Jn 8, 17). [REVIEW] Chôra:295-320.score: 9.0
    The Science of the Soul is Surer than every other Science’. An Eckhartian Interpretation of Bearing Witness (John 8 :17). Why does the knowledge of the soul (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. Ghyslain Charron (1990). Freud Devait-Il Choisir Entre les Deux Conceptions du Symbole Que Lui Attribue Lévi-Strauss? Dialogue 29 (03):375-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. Earl Conee (forthcoming). O que é a metafísica? Crítica.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. Conceição Gislane Nóbrega Lima de Salles (2013). Infância e Educação Infantil: o que dizem os professores? Childhood and Philosophy 8 (16):443-458.score: 9.0
    The attempt to convene a discussion about childhood suggests a plurality of educative issues and raises important problems in the context of basic education. To recognize children (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. Paul Dumouchel (1993). Ce Que L'on Peut Apprendre Sur les Chauves-Souris à L'Aide D'Une Télé Couleur. Dialogue 32 (03):493-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  83. Rudolf Eucken (1904). L'Âme Telle Que Kant L'a Dépeinte. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 12 (3):441 - 444.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. FL (1998). Une Clinique N'Est Responsable D'Une Tentative de Suicide Que Si Sa Faute Est Établie. Médecine Et Droit 1998 (31):18-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Joaquín García-Huidobro (2008). ¿Por qué Lewis es más popular que Chesterton en Chile? The Chesterton Review En Español 2 (1):189-192.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. Demuijnck Geert & Greiner Dominique (2008). Ce Que les Valides Doivent aux Handicapés. la Revue Nouvelle:28-31.score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. Joachim Gentz (2010). Hermeneutics of Multiple Senses: Wang Jie's "Explanations and Commentary with Diagrams to the qingJing Jing". Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (3):346-365.score: 9.0
  88. Matthieu Haumesser (2010). Que Signifie Pour Kant L'Erreur de Leibniz? Autour de LAmphibologie des Concepts de la Réflexion». Kant-Studien 101 (1):1-21.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. Ted Honderich (1999). Que Será, Será. The Philosopher's Magazine (6):43-45.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  90. Normand Lacharité (1981). Bibliographie des Œuvres de Gaston Bachelard, Ainsi Que des Divers Ouvrages Que Sa Pensée Et Sa Personne Ont Inspirés. Par Jacques Ruelland. Montréal Et Trois-Rivières: Universités du Québec à Montréal Et à Trois-Rivières. 1980. Coll. “Recherches Et Théories”, No. 21. 83 P. Prix: $3.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 20 (02):382-384.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Jean Langlois (1973). Ce Que Teilhard a Vraiment Dit. Par Claude Cuénot. Paris, Stock, 1972, 314 Pages. [REVIEW] Dialogue 12 (03):556-559.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. la Rédaction (2009). Le Dispositif Médical. A. Audry, J.-C. Ghislain. Que Sais-Je ? PUF, Paris, 128 P., Septembre 2009 ; 9 Euros. Médecine and Droit 2009 (98-99):169-169.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. Danièle Letocha (1983). Nietzsche Jean Granier Coll. Que Sais-Je?, No. 2042 Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1982. 128 P. Dialogue 22 (04):749-750.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. Pierre Livet (2004). Que Pouvons-Nous Reprendre de la Méthode de Marx Pour Définir Un Critère D'Exploitation. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 102 (2):284-310.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. Lynn A. Struve (1991). Chen Que Versus Huang Zongxi: Confucianism Faces Modern Times in the Seventeenth Century. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18 (1):5-23.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. Iain Macdonald (2012). L'Égalité, le Possible Et Ce Que les «Hommes DevraientPouvoir Être”» : Sur La Gauche Et L'Égalité de Jean-Michel Salanskis. Dialogue 51 (2):247-257.score: 9.0
    ABSTRACT: Jean-Michel Salanskis surveys a number of well-known principles of leftist thought in order to criticize certain illusions to which it falls prey, but also in (...) order to renew its most essential motivation: the search for equality. However, in so doing, Salanskis deploys an ambiguous and problematic notion of possibility that threatens the coherence of his project. The present study analyzes aspects of Salanskisbook, taking possibility as a guiding thread, and proposes adjustments that may help to avoid certain classic pitfalls in the history of dialectical thinking. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. John Moles (1994). The Budé Diodorus F. Chamoux, P. Bertrac (Edd.), Y. Vernière (Ed. Tr.): Diodore de Sicile: Biblioth`Que Historique, Livre I. (Collection des Université de France, Budé.) Pp. Clxvi + 231; 2 Maps. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1993. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 44 (02):272-274.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Patricia Nourry (2002). Pascal. Qu'est-ce que la vérité? Dialogue 41 (4):804-807.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. Jelson Roberto de Oliveira (2010). Nietzsche e o Heráclito que Ri: Solidão, Alegria Trágica e Devir Inocente. Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 55 (3).score: 9.0
    We are discussing the interpretation of Nietzsche about Heraclitus as the most Greek and anti-Platonic of the pre-Platonic philosophers, from the statement of opposites in the (...) agonic game of becoming. Representative of an attitude originally Hellenistic, Heraclitus is interpreted as a true philosopher, as he intuitively captured the flow of becoming as a process of internalization of knowledge, translated by an investigation of himself. Accordingly, the Nietzschean interpretation goes against the tradition that had described Heraclitus as tearful and dark and re-invents the character as the solitude, tragic joy and innocence of becoming, items for which Nietzsche ordering the metaphors of the game, the artist and child. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  100. PB (2000). L'Intérêt du Patient Justifie la Limitation de L'Information Que Lui Fournit Son Médecin. Médecine and Droit 2000 (43):23-23.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 100 / 1000