10 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Joel Walmsley (University College Cork)
  1.  34
    Joel Walmsley & Cara Nine (2014). The Emergence of Borders: Moral Questions Mapped Out. Russian Sociological Review 13 (4):42-59.
    In this paper, we examine the extent to which the concept of emergence can be applied to questions about the nature and moral justification of territorial borders. Although the term is used with many different senses in philosophy, the concept of “weak emergence”—advocated by, for example, Sawyer (2002, 2005) and Bedau (1997)—is especially applicable, since it forces a distinction between prediction and explanation that connects with several issues in the dis-cussion of territory. In particular, we argue, weak emergentism about borders (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  37
    Joel Walmsley (2008). Explanation in Dynamical Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines 18 (3):331-348.
    In this paper, I outline two strands of evidence for the conclusion that the dynamical approach to cognitive science both seeks and provides covering law explanations. Two of the most successful dynamical models—Kelso’s model of rhythmic finger movement and Thelen et al.’s model of infant perseverative reaching—can be seen to provide explanations which conform to the famous explanatory scheme first put forward by Hempel and Oppenheim. In addition, many prominent advocates of the dynamical approach also express the provision of this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  3. Joel Walmsley (2008). Methodological Situatedness; or, DEEDS Worth Doing and Pursuing. Cognitive Systems Research 9:150-159.
    This paper draws a distinction between two possible understandings of the DEEDS (Dynamical, Embodied, Extended, Distributed and Situated) approach to cognition. On the one hand, the DEEDS approach may be interpreted as making a metaphysical claim about the nature and location of cognitive processes. On the other hand, the DEEDS approach may be read as providing a methodological prescription about how we ought to conduct cognitive scientific research. I argue that the latter, methodological, reading shows that the DEEDS approach is (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  43
    Joel Walmsley (2010). Emergence and Reduction in Dynamical Cognitive Science. New Ideas in Psychology 28:274-282.
    This paper examines the widespread intuition that the dynamical approach to cognitive science is importantly related to emergentism about the mind. The explanatory practices adopted by dynamical cognitive science rule out some conceptions of emergence; covering law explanations require a deducibility relationship between explanans and explanandum, whereas canonical theories of emergence require the absence of such deducibility. A response to this problem – one which would save the intuition that dynamics and emergence are related – is to reconstrue the concept (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. André Kukla & Joel Walmsley (2006). Mind: A Historical and Philosophical Introduction to the Major Theories. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  41
    Joel Walmsley & André Kukla (2004). Mysticism and Social Epistemology. Episteme 1 (2):139-158.
    This article deals with the grounds for accepting or rejecting the insights of mystics. We examine the social-epistemological question of what the non-mystic should make of the mystic's claim, and what she might be able to make of it, given various possible states of the evidence available to her.For clarity, let's reserve the term “mystic” for one who claims to have had an ineffable insight. As such, there are two parts to the mystic's claim: first, a substantive insight into the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  12
    Joel Walmsley (2011). Cognitive Science. An Introduction to the Science of Mind, de José Luis Bermúdez. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):186-191.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Joel Walmsley (2015). Emergence, Group Judgment and the Discursive Dilemma. Mind and Society 14 (2):185-201.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Joel Walmsley (2003). Theres Room in the Lab for an Armchair Report on the Philosophy and Neuroscience Conference Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, 17-20, October 2002. [REVIEW] Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (3):89-93.
    Max Tegmark, a physicist at the University of Pennsylania recently remarked, 'To tell you the truth, I think most of my colleagues are terrified of talking to philosophers -- like being caught coming out of a pornographic cinema.' Fortunately, it would seem that at least some neuroscientists do not suffer from such reticence when it comes to their professional relationship with philosophy. Testament to this was the quality and variety of the papers in both philosophically- ambitious-neuroscience and neuroscience-inspired-philosophy at what (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  50
    Joel Walmsley (forthcoming). Mind and Machine. Palgrave-Macmillan.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography