28 found
Order:
  1.  29
    Johan Brännmark (2008). Excellence and Means: On the Limits of Buck-Passing. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (3):301-315.
    The article explores the limits of buck-passing analysis in evaluating value or goodness. It talks about the inability of back-passers to account for two important types of value or goodness, which include excellence and means. The use of delimiting strategy in buck-passing analysis in order to be in possession of goodness is discussed.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2.  36
    Johan Brännmark (2004). Leading Lives: On Happiness and Narrative Meaning. Philosophical Papers 32 (3):321-343.
    Abstract In contemporary moral philosophy, the standard way of understanding the constituents of the human good is in terms of a fairly limited number of features that contribute to our happiness independently of how they are situated in our lives. Even when this approach is supplemented by Moorean ideas about organic wholes, it still cannot do justice to the deep importance of how things are situated and even when meaning is seen as an important factor, it still tends to be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  13
    Johan Brännmark (2006). From Virtue to Decency. Metaphilosophy 37 (5):589-604.
    In her work on virtue ethics Rosalind Hursthouse has formulated an Aristotelian criterion of rightness that understands rightness in terms of what the virtuous person would do. It is argued here that this kind of criterion does not allow enough room for the category of the supererogatory and that right and wrong should rather be understood in terms of the characteristic behavior of decent persons. Furthermore, it is suggested that this kind of approach has the added advantage of allowing one (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4.  48
    Andreas Lind & Johan Brännmark (2008). Particularism in Question: An Interview with Jonathan Dancy. Theoria 74 (1):3-17.
    Jonathan Dancy works within almost all fields of philosophy but is best known as the leading proponent of moral particularism. Particularism challenges “traditional” moral theories, such as Contractualism, Kantianism and Utilitarianism, in that it denies that moral thought and judgement relies upon, or is made possible by, a set of more or less well-defined, hierarchical principles. During the summer of 2006, the Philosophy Departments of Lund University (Sweden) and the University of Reading (England) began a series of exchanges to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  14
    Johan Brännmark (forthcoming). Future Generations as Rightholders. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-19.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  45
    Johan Brännmark (2009). Ethical Theories and the Transparency Condition. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):449 - 462.
    Following John Rawls, writers like Bernard Williams and Christine Korsgaard have suggested that a transparency condition should be put on ethical theories. The exact nature of such a condition and its implications is however not anything on which there is any consensus. It is argued here that the ultimate rationale of transparency conditions is epistemic rather than substantively moral, but also that it clearly connects to substantive concerns about moral psychology. Finally, it is argued that once a satisfactory (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  86
    Johan Brännmark (2009). Goodness, Values, Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):329 - 343.
    Contemporary value theory has been characterized by a renewed interest in the analysis of concepts like "good" or "valuable", the most prominent pattern of analysis in recent years being the socalled buck-passing or fitting-attitude analysis which reduces goodness to a matter of having properties that provide reasons for pro-attitudes. Here I argue that such analyses are best understood as metaphysical rather than linguistic and that while the buck-passing analysis has some virtues, it still fails to provide a suitably wide-ranging pattern (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  18
    Johan Brännmark (2006). Leading a Life of One's Own: On Well-Being and Narrative Autonomy. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 81 (59):65-82.
    We all want things. And although we might disagree on just how significant our wants, desires, or preferences are for the matter of how well we fare in life, we would probably all agree on some of them having some significance. So any reasonable theory about the human good should in some way acknowledge this. The theory that most clearly meets this demand is of course preferentialism, but even pluralist theories can do so. However, then they will at the same (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  52
    Johan Brännmark, Morality and the Pursuit of Happiness : A Study in Kantian Ethics.
    This work seeks to develop a Kantian ethical theory in terms of a general ontology of values and norms together with a metaphysics of the person that makes sense of this ontology. It takes as its starting point Kant’s assertion that a good will is the only thing that has an unconditioned value and his accompanying view that the highest good consists in virtue and happiness in proportion to virtue. The soundness of Kant’s position on the value of the good (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  13
    Johan Brannmark (2006). Like the Bloom on Youths: How Pleasure Completes Our Lives. In T. D. J. Chappell (ed.), Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics. Oxford University Press
  11. Johan Brännmark (2008). Dygdetik och moraliskt beslutsfattande. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 2.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  19
    Johan Brännmark (2001). Good Lives: Parts and Wholes. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (2):221 - 231.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  53
    Johan Brännmark (2009). The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology – by Christine M. Korsgaard. [REVIEW] Theoria 75 (4):358-361.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  5
    Nils-Eric Sahlin & Johan Brännmark, How Can We Be Moral When We Are so Irrational?
    Normative ethics usually presupposes background accounts of human agency, and although different ethical theorists might have different pictures of human agency in mind, there is still something like a standard account that most of mainstream normative ethics can be understood to rest on. Ethical theorists tend to have Rational Man, or at least some close relative to him, in mind when constructing normative theories. It will be argued here that empirical findings raise doubts about the accuracy of this kind of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    Johan Brännmark, The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  10
    Krister Bykvist, Garrett Cullity, Åsa Carlson, Johan Brännmark, Klemens Kappel, Ulrik Kihlbom, Ian Law, Hans Mathlein, Derek Parfit & Ingmar Persson (2005). A Distinction in Value: Intrinsic and for its Own Sake1. In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value. Springer 115.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  23
    Johan Brännmark (2008). Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations After Wrongdoing – by Margaret Urban Walker. Theoria 74 (2):169-172.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  22
    Johan Brännmark (2008). Normative Ethics: 5 Questions – Edited by Thomas S. Petersen and Jesper Ryberg. Theoria 74 (4):363-366.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  14
    Johan Brännmark (1999). Rules and Exceptions. Theoria 65 (2-3):127-143.
    Over the last decades the traditional emphasis on moral rules, or principles, has been attacked by particularists like Jonathan Dancy. I argue that particularists are correct in rejecting traditional attempts at moral codification, but that it is still possible to have a rule-oriented approach to morality if we distinguish between different ways in which features can be morally relevant. I suggest that there are first a limited number of features that can serve as basic moral reasons for action, and then (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Johan Brännmark (2004). Att göra sig själv till undantag – Kant om omoralens natur. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 3.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Johan Brännmark (1998). Deltagarmodellen för preferensutilitarism. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 3.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Johan Brännmark (2009). Ethical Theories and the Transparency Condition. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):449-462.
    Following John Rawls, writers like Bernard Williams and Christine Korsgaard have suggested that a transparency condition should be put on ethical theories. The exact nature of such a condition and its implications is however not anything on which there is any consensus. It is argued here that the ultimate rationale of transparency conditions is epistemic rather than substantively moral, but also that it clearly connects to substantive concerns about moral psychology. Finally, it is argued that once a satisfactory form of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Johan Brännmark (1999). Fem fel med utilitarismen. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 3.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Johan Brännmark (2009). Goodness, Values, Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):329-343.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Johan Brännmark (2011). Litteraturen som guide till godhet. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 1.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Johan Brännmark, Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations After Wrongdoing.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Johan Brännmark (2009). Review. [REVIEW] Theoria 75 (4):358-361.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Johan Brännmark (2002). Sällsynthet och finalt värde. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 1.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography