15 found
Sort by:
  1. Johan de Tavernier (2012). Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):895-907.
    Labeling of food consumption is related to food safety, food quality, environmental, safety, and social concerns. Future politics of food will be based on a redefinition of commodity food consumption as an expression of citizenship. “Citizen-consumers” realize that they could use their buying power in order to develop a new terrain of social agency and political action. It takes for granted kinds of moral selfhood in which human responsibility is bound into human agency based on knowledge and recognition. This requires (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Johan De Tavernier (2012). Review: Alison Hills, The Beloved Self. Morality and the Challenge From Egoism. [REVIEW] Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):169-171.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Johan De Tavernier (2012). Review: Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin and Daniel Moore, What is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter? From Science to Ethics. [REVIEW] Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):177-178.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Johan De Tavernier (2012). Review: Jean-Claude Michéa, The Realm of Lesser Evil. An Essay on Liberal Civilization. [REVIEW] Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):173-174.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Loïc Moureau & Johan De Tavernier (2011). The Politics of Authenticity: Charles Taylor's Authentic Self Revisited. Bijdragen 72 (4):432-455.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Johan De Tavernier (2009). Per Pinstrup-Andersen & Peter Sandøe (Eds.): Ethics, Hunger and Globalization. In Search of Appropriate Policies. (The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics 12), Dordrecht, Springer, 2007. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (4):383-388.
  7. Johan de Tavernier (2009). The Historical Roots of Personalism. Ethical Perspectives 16 (3):361-392.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Roger Burggraeve & Johan de Tavernier (eds.) (2008). Responsibility, God, and Society: Theological Ethics in Dialogue: Festschrift, Roger Burggraeve. Peeters.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Johan Evers, Stefan Aerts & Johan De Tavernier (2008). An Ethical Argument in Favor of Nano-Enabled Diagnostics in Livestock Disease Control. NanoEthics 2 (2):163-178.
    Livestock production has been confronted with several epidemics over the last decades. The morality of common animal disease strategies—stamping out and vaccination—is being debated and provokes controversies among farmers, authorities and the broader public. Given the complexity and controversy of choosing an appropriate control strategy, this article explores the potential of nano-enabled diagnostics in future livestock production. At first glance, these applications offer promising opportunities for better animal disease surveillance. By significantly shortening the reaction time from diagnosis to appropriate control, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Stefan Aerts, Dirk Lips, Stuart Spencer, Eddy Decuypere & Johan De Tavernier (2006). A New Framework for the Assessment of Animal Welfare: Integrating Existing Knowledge From a Practical Ethics Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):67-76.
    When making an assessment of animal welfare, it is important to take environmental (housing) or animal-based parameters into account. An alternative approach is to focus on the behavior and appearance of the animal, without making actual measurements or quantifying this. None of these tell the whole story. In this paper, we suggest that it is possible to find common ground between these (seemingly) diametrically opposed positions and argue that this may be the way to deal with the complexity of animal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Johan De Tavernier & Stefan Aerts (2006). Special Issue on Animals and Their Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):3-5.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stuart Spencer, Eddy Decuypere, Stefan Aerts & Johan De Tavernier (2006). History and Ethics of Keeping Pets: Comparison with Farm Animals. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):17-25.
    Perhaps the commonest reasons for the keeping of pets are companionship and as a conduit for affection. Pets are, therefore, being “used” for human ends in much the same way as laboratory or farm animals. So shouldn’t the same arguments apply to the use of pets as to those used in other ways? In accepting the “rights” of farm animals to fully express their natural behavior, one must also accept the “right” of pets to express their intrinsic natural behavior. Dogs (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Eric Tollens & Johan de Tavernier (2006). World Food Security and Agriculture in a Globalizing World. Ethical Perspectives 13 (1):91-115.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Johan De Tavernier (2000). Workshop on Greenpeace and the Agriculture Industry. Ethical Perspectives 7 (2-3):168-174.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Johan de Tavernier (1988). Sociale ethiek en eschatologie. Bijdragen 49 (4):378-401.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation