Search results for 'Johan Eriksson' (try it on Scholar)

957 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Johan RA Eriksson (Umeå University)
  1. Johan Eriksson, Anne Larsson, Katrine Riklund Åhlström & Lars Nyberg (2007). Similar Frontal and Distinct Posterior Cortical Regions Mediate Visual and Auditory Perceptual Awareness. Cerebral Cortex 17 (4):760-765.score: 240.0
  2. S. E., Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå, Mats Knutson, Jacob Sundberg, Anki Gundhäll, Professor Lars Gustafsson, Alan Dershowitz, Svante Nycander, Bengt Johansson, Magnus Eriksson, Lotta Gustavson, Marianne Gunnarsson, Kristina Vallström, Monique Wadsted, Mary Ann Glendon, Professor Gerhard Radnitzky, Jescheck, Anders Victorin, Johan åsard & Lars Isaksson (1991). Academic Freedom at the University of Stockholm. Minerva 29 (3):321-385.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Johan Eriksson, Anne Larsson, Katrine Riklund Åhlström & Lars Nyberg (2004). Visual Consciousness: Dissociating the Neural Correlates of Perceptual Transitions From Sustained Perception with fMRI. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):61-72.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Nicholas Southwood & Lina Eriksson (2011). Norms and Conventions. Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):195 - 217.score: 30.0
    What is the relation between norms (in the sense of ?socially accepted rules?) and conventions? A number of philosophers have suggested that there is some kind of conceptual or constitutive relation between them. Some hold that conventions are or entail special kinds of norms (the ?conventions-as-norms thesis?). Others hold that at least some norms are or entail special kinds of conventions (the ?norms-as-conventions thesis?). We argue that both theses are false. Norms and conventions are crucially different conceptually and functionally in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Lina Eriksson & Alan Hájek (2007). What Are Degrees of Belief? Studia Logica 86 (2):185-215.score: 30.0
    Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees—call them degrees of belief, or credences. 2) The degrees of belief of a rational agent obey the probability calculus. Correspondingly, a natural way to argue for probabilism is: i) to give an account of what degrees of belief are, and then ii) to show that those things should be probabilities, on pain of irrationality. Most of the action in the literature concerns stage ii). Assuming that stage i) has been (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Fredrik Björklund, Gunnar Björnsson, John Eriksson, Ragnar Francén Olinder & Caj Strandberg (2012). Recent Work on Motivational Internalism. Analysis 72 (1):124-137.score: 30.0
    Reviews work on moral judgment motivational internalism from the last two decades.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert E. Goodin & Lina Eriksson (2009). Democratically Relevant Alternatives. Analysis 69 (1):9-17.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Eriksson (2011). Straight Talk: Conceptions of Sincerity in Speech. Philosophical Studies 153 (2):213-234.score: 30.0
    What is it for a speech act to be sincere? The most common answer amongst philosophers is that a speech act is sincere if and only if the speaker is in the state of mind that the speech act functions to express. However, a number of philosophers have advanced counterexamples purporting to demonstrate that having the expressed state of mind is neither necessary nor sufficient for speaking sincerely. One may nevertheless doubt whether these considerations refute the orthodox conception. Instead, it (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John Eriksson (2009). Homage to Hare: Ecumenism and the Frege‐Geach Problem. Ethics 120 (1):8-35.score: 30.0
    The Frege‐Geach problem is probably the most serious worry for the prospects of any kind of metaethical expressivism. In a recent article, Ridge suggests that a new version of expressivism, a view he calls ecumenical expressivism, can avoid the Frege‐Geach problem.1 In contrast to pure expressivism, ecumenical expressivism is the view that moral utterances function to express not only desire‐like states of mind but also beliefs with propositional content. Whereas pure expressivists’ solutions to the Frege‐Geach problem usually have rested on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Manne Sjöstrand, Gert Helgesson, Stefan Eriksson & Niklas Juth (2013). Autonomy-Based Arguments Against Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: A Critique. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2):225-230.score: 30.0
    Respect for autonomy is typically considered a key reason for allowing physician assisted suicide and euthanasia. However, several recent papers have claimed this to be grounded in a misconception of the normative relevance of autonomy. It has been argued that autonomy is properly conceived of as a value, and that this makes assisted suicide as well as euthanasia wrong, since they destroy the autonomy of the patient. This paper evaluates this line of reasoning by investigating the conception of valuable autonomy. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Anders Eriksson & Kalle Grill, Who Owns My Avatar? -Rights in Virtual Property. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play.score: 30.0
    This paper presents a framework for discussing issues of ownership in connection to virtual worlds. We explore how divergent interests in virtual property can be mediated by applying a constructivist perspective to the concept ownership. The simple solutions offered today entail that a contract between the game producer and the gamer gives the game developer exclusive rights to all virtual property. This appears to be unsatisfactory. A number of legitimate interests on part of both producers and gamers may be readily (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. F. Kuhlau, A. T. Hoglund, S. Eriksson & K. Evers (2013). The Ethics of Disseminating Dual-Use Knowledge. Research Ethics 9 (1):6-19.score: 30.0
    In 2011, for the first time ever, two scientific journals were asked not to publish research papers in full detail. The research in question was on the H5N1 influenza virus (bird flu), and the concern was that the expected public health benefits of disseminating the findings did not outweigh the potential harm should the knowledge be misused for malicious purposes. This constraint raises important ethical concerns as it collides with scientific freedom and openness. In this article, we argue that constraining (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Eriksson (2010). Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism – Mark Schroeder. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):878-882.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gunnar Björnsson, John Eriksson, Caj Strandberg, Ragnar Francén Olinder & Fredrik Björklund (forthcoming). Motivational Internalism and Folk Intuitions. Philosophical Psychology:1-20.score: 30.0
    Motivational internalism postulates a necessary connection between moral judgments and motivation. In arguing for and against internalism, metaethicists traditionally appeal to intuitions about cases, but crucial cases often yield conflicting intuitions. One way to try to make progress, possibly uncovering theoretical bias and revealing whether people have conceptions of moral judgments required for noncognitivist accounts of moral thinking, is to investigate non-philosophers' willingness to attribute moral judgments. A pioneering study by Shaun Nichols seemed to undermine internalism, as a large majority (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Douglas Cumming & Sofia Johan (2007). Socially Responsible Institutional Investment in Private Equity. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):395 - 416.score: 30.0
    This article studies institutional investor allocations to the socially responsible asset class. We propose two elements influence socially responsible institutional investment in private equity: internal organizational structure, and internationalization. We study socially responsible investments from Dutch institutional investments into private equity funds, and compare socially responsible investment across different asset classes and different types of institutional investors (banks, insurance companies, and pension funds). The data indicate socially responsible investment in private equity is 40–50% more common when the decision to implement (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Eriksson (2014). Elaborating Expressivism: Moral Judgments, Desires and Motivation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):253-267.score: 30.0
    According to expressivism, moral judgments are desire-like states of mind. It is often argued that this view is made implausible because it isn’t consistent with the conceivability of amoralists, i.e., agents who make moral judgments yet lack motivation. In response, expressivists can invoke the distinction between dispositional and occurrent desires. Strandberg (Am Philos Quart 49:81–91, 2012) has recently argued that this distinction does not save expressivism. Indeed, it can be used to argue that expressivism is false. In this paper I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Lina Eriksson & Robert E. Goodin (2007). The Measuring Rod of Time: The Example of Swedish Day-Fines. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):125–136.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Eriksson (2010). Self-Expression, Expressiveness, and Sincerity. Acta Analytica 25 (1):71-79.score: 30.0
    This paper examines some aspects of Mitchell Green’s account of self-expression. I argue that Green fails to address the distinction between success and evidential notions of expression properly, which prevents him from adequately discussing the relation between these notions. I then consider Green’s explanation of how a speech act shows what is within, i.e., because of the liabilities one incurs and argue that this is false. Rather, the norms governing speech acts and liabilities incurred give us reason to think that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Björn Eriksson (2005). Understanding Narrative Explanation. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):317-344.score: 30.0
    The paper describes and defends an eclectic approach to narrative explanation in history and social sciences (as well as in natural history). The view of narrative explanation defended allows combinations of several recent ideas concerning the nature of narrative explanation.The guiding idea is that the explanatory power of narratives consists in their capacity to accommodate various forms of explanations and interpretations. Narrative explanations are seen as theories abouthappenings that may consist of diverse forms of explanations, interpretations and explanation sketches. There (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Björn Eriksson, The Methods of Ethics. Conflicts Built to Last.score: 30.0
    An impressive amount of evidence from psychology, cognitive neurology, evolutionary psychology and primatology seems to be converging on a ‘dual process’ model of moral or practical (in the philosophical sense) psychology according to which our practical judgments are generated by two distinct processes, one ‘emotive-intuitive’ and one ‘cognitive-utilitarian’. In this paper I approach the dual process model from several directions, trying to shed light on various aspects of our moral and practical lives.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Frida Kuhlau, Anna T. Höglund, Kathinka Evers & Stefan Eriksson (2011). A Precautionary Principle for Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences. Bioethics 25 (1):1-8.score: 30.0
    Most life science research entails dual-use complexity and may be misused for harmful purposes, e.g. biological weapons. The Precautionary Principle applies to special problems characterized by complexity in the relationship between human activities and their consequences. This article examines whether the principle, so far mainly used in environmental and public health issues, is applicable and suitable to the field of dual-use life science research. Four central elements of the principle are examined: threat, uncertainty, prescription and action. Although charges against the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Stefan Eriksson (2012). On the Need for Improved Protections of Incapacitated and Non-Benefiting Research Subjects. Bioethics 26 (1):15-21.score: 30.0
    In this article, it is claimed that the protective provisions for adults with impaired decision-making capacity are misguided, insofar as they do not conclusively state whether research on this group should be permitted only as an exception, and as they arbitrarily allow for some groups to benefit from such research while others will not. Moreover, the presumed or former will of the subject is given insufficient weight, and the minimal risk standard does not make sense in this context. Because of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Lina Eriksson & Wlodek Rabinowicz (2013). The Interference Problem for the Betting Interpretation of Degrees of Belief. Synthese 190 (5):809-830.score: 30.0
    The paper’s target is the historically influential betting interpretation of subjective probabilities due to Ramsey and de Finetti. While there are several classical and well-known objections to this interpretation, the paper focuses on just one fundamental problem: There is a sense in which degrees of belief cannot be interpreted as betting rates. The reasons differ in different cases, but there’s one crucial feature that all these cases have in common: The agent’s degree of belief in a proposition A does not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Frida Kuhlau, Stefan Eriksson, Kathinka Evers & Anna T. Höglund (2008). Taking Due Care: Moral Obligations in Dual Use Research. Bioethics 22 (9):477-487.score: 30.0
    In the past decade, the perception of a bioterrorist threat has increased and created a demand on life scientists to consider the potential security implications of dual use research. This article examines a selection of proposed moral obligations for life scientists that have emerged to meet these concerns and the extent to which they can be considered reasonable. It also describes the underlying reasons for the concerns, how they are managed, and their implications for scientific values. Five criteria for what (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Anna-lydia Svalastog & Stefan Eriksson (2010). You Can Use My Name; You Don't Have to Steal My Story – a Critique of Anonymity in Indigenous Studies. Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):104-110.score: 30.0
    Our claim in this paper is that not being identified as the data source might cause harm to a person or group. Therefore, in some cases the default of anonymisation should be replaced by a careful deliberation, together with research subjects, of how to handle the issues of identification and confidentiality. Our prime example in this article is community participatory research and similar endeavours on indigenous groups. The theme, content and aim of the research, and the question of how to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Geoffrey Brennan, Lina Eriksson, Robert E. Goodin & Nicholas Southwood (2013). Explaining Norms. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Norms are a pervasive yet mysterious feature of social life. In Explaining Norms, four philosophers and social scientists team up to grapple with some of the many mysteries, offering a comprehensive account of norms: what they are; how and why they emerge, persist and change; and how and to what extent they themselves serve to explain what we do. Norms, they argue, should be understood in non-reductive terms as clusters of normative attitudes that serve the function of making us accountable (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. S. Eriksson, G. Helgesson & A. T. Höglund (2007). Being, Doing, and Knowing: Developing Ethical Competence in Health Care. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):207-216.score: 30.0
    There is a growing interest in ethical competence-building within nursing and health care practising. This tendency is accompanied by a remarkable growth of ethical guidelines. Ethical demands have also been laid down in laws. Present-day practitioners and researchers in health care are thereby left in a virtual cross-fire of various legislations, codes, and recommendations, all intended to guide behaviour. The aim of this paper was to investigate the role of ethical guidelines in the process of ethical competence-building within health care (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John Eriksson (2009). Self-Expression – Mitchell S. Green. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):375-379.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John Eriksson (2006). Moved by Morality: An Essay on the Practicality of Moral Thought and Talk. Dissertation, Uppsala Universityscore: 30.0
    It is part of our everyday experience that there is a reliable connection between moral opinions and motivation. Thinking that an act is right (wrong) tends to be accompanied by motivation to (avoid to) perform the act in question. This is mirrored in moral talk. We tend to think that someone who says that he thinks that it is right (wrong) to act in a certain way without being motivated, to some extent, will most likely be speaking insincerely. Moveover, moral (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. C. Sainio, S. Lauri & E. Eriksson (2001). Cancer Patients' Views and Experiences of Participation in Care and Decision Making. Nursing Ethics 8 (2):97-113.score: 30.0
    The purpose of this study was to explore the views and experiences of adult cancer patients about patient participation in care and decision making and the preconditions for this participation. The data were collected by means of focused interviews; in addition the patients completed depression and problem-solving instruments. The sample comprised 34 cancer patients from the haematological and oncological wards of one university hospital in Finland. The results revealed considerable variation in the patients’ views on their participation in care and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Stefan Eriksson, Anna T. Höglund & Gert Helgesson (2007). Do Ethical Guidelines Give Guidance? A Critical Examination of Eight Ethics Regulations. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (01):15-29.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. J. Eriksson, A. Larsson, K. Alstrom & Lars Nyberg (2004). Visual Consciousness: Dissociating the Neural Correlates of Perceptual Transitions From Sustained Perception with fMRI. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):61-72.score: 30.0
  33. Linus Johnsson, Gert Helgesson, Mats G. Hansson & Stefan Eriksson (2013). Adequate Trust Avails, Mistaken Trust Matters: On the Moral Responsibility of Doctors as Proxies for Patients' Trust in Biobank Research. Bioethics 27 (9):485-492.score: 30.0
    In Sweden, most patients are recruited into biobank research by non-researcher doctors. Patients' trust in doctors may therefore be important to their willingness to participate. We suggest a model of trust that makes sense of such transitions of trust between domains and distinguishes adequate trust from mistaken trust. The unique position of doctors implies, we argue, a Kantian imperfect duty to compensate for patients' mistaken trust. There are at least three kinds of mistaken trust, each of which requires a different (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Björn Eriksson (1997). Utilitarianism for Sinners. American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):213 - 228.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Gert Helgesson & Stefan Eriksson (2011). Four Themes in Recent Swedish Bioethics Debates. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (3):409-417.score: 30.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Nina Nikku & Bengt Erik Eriksson (2006). Microethics in Action. Bioethics 20 (4):169–179.score: 30.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. S. Eriksson (2005). Keep People Informed or Leave Them Alone? A Suggested Tool for Identifying Research Participants Who Rightly Want Only Limited Information. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):674-678.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Manne Sjöstrand, Stefan Eriksson, Niklas Juth & Gert Helgesson (2013). Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht049.score: 30.0
    Different ideas of the normative relevance of autonomy can give rise to profoundly different action-guiding principles in healthcare. If autonomy is seen as a value rather than as a right, it can be argued that patients’ decisions should sometimes be overruled in order to protect or promote their own autonomy. We refer to this as paternalism in the name of autonomy. In this paper, we discuss different elements of autonomy (decision-making capacity, efficiency, and authenticity) and arguments in favor of paternalism (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. L. Tapp, A. Edwards, G. Elwyn, S. Holm & T. Eriksson (2010). Quality Improvement in General Practice: Enabling General Practitioners to Judge Ethical Dilemmas. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):184-188.score: 30.0
    Quality improvement (QI) is fundamental to maintaining high standards of health care. Significant debate exists concerning the necessity for an ethical approval system for those QI projects that push the boundaries, appearing more similar to research than QI. The authors discuss this issue identifying the core ethical issues in family medicine (FM), drawing upon the fundamental principles of medical ethics, including principles of autonomy, utility, justice and non-maleficence. Recent debate concerning the application of QI ethics boards is discussed with relevance (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Lennart Fredriksson & Katie Eriksson (2003). The Ethics of the Caring Conversation. Nursing Ethics 10 (2):138-148.score: 30.0
    The aim of this study was to explore the ethical foundations for a caring conversation. The analysis is based on the ethics of Paul Ricoeur and deals with questions such as what kind of person the nurse ought to be and how she or he engages in caring conversations with suffering others. According to Ricoeur, ethics (the aim of an accomplished life) has primacy over morality (the articulation of aims in norms). At the ethical level, self-esteem and autonomy were shown (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. G. Helgesson & S. Eriksson (2008). Against the Principle That the Individual Shall Have Priority Over Science. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1):54-56.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Christina Juthberg, Sture Eriksson, Astrid Norberg & Karin Sundin (2007). Perceptions of Conscience in Relation To Stress of Conscience. Nursing Ethics 14 (3):329-343.score: 30.0
    Every day situations arising in health care contain ethical issues influencing care providers' conscience. How and to what extent conscience is influenced may differ according to how conscience is perceived. This study aimed to explore the relationship between perceptions of conscience and stress of conscience among care providers working in municipal housing for elderly people. A total of 166 care providers were approached, of which 146 (50 registered nurses and 96 nurses' aides/enrolled nurses) completed a questionnaire containing the Perceptions of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Oili Kärkkäinen, Terese Bondas & Katie Eriksson (2005). Documentation of Individualized Patient Care: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Nursing Ethics 12 (2):123-132.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Kim Lützén, Vera Dahlqvist, Sture Eriksson & Astrid Norberg (2006). Developing the Concept of Moral Sensitivity in Health Care Practice. Nursing Ethics 13 (2):187-196.score: 30.0
    The aim of this Swedish study was to develop the concept of moral sensitivity in health care practice. This process began with an overview of relevant theories and perspectives on ethics with a focus on moral sensitivity and related concepts, in order to generate a theoretical framework. The second step was to construct a questionnaire based on this framework by generating a list of items from the theoretical framework. Nine items were finally selected as most appropriate and consistent with the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Darek Eriksson (2007). Phenomeno-Semantic Complexity: A Proposal for an Alternative Notion of Complexity as a Foundation for the Management of Complexity in Human Affairs. Emergence 9:1-2.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Lina Eriksson (2008). The Concept(s) and Controversies of Equilibrium. Biology and Philosophy 23 (3):447-454.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Gert Helgesson & Stefan Eriksson (2011). The Moral Primacy of the Human Being: A Reply to Parker. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (1):56-57.score: 30.0
    In a previous paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics, the authors argued that the research ethical principle stating that the individual shall have priority over science, found in many guidelines, is utterly unclear and because of this should be explicated or otherwise deleted. In a recent commentary, Parker argued that this leaves us defending a position that would allow totalitarian regimes to pursue glory at the expense of its citizens. The present response addresses this and similar accusations.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Anette Kjellgren & Anders Eriksson (2011). Experiences During Shamanic-Like Monotonous Drumming: A Phenomenological Study. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 29 (2):1-10.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Mats Knutson, Jacob Sundberg, Anki Gundhäll, Lars Gustafsson, Alan Dershowttz, Svante Nycander, Bengt Johansson, Magnus Eriksson, Lotta Gustavson & Marianne Gunnarsson (forthcoming). Academic Freedom at the University of Stockholm. Minerva.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Vera Dahlqvist, Sture Eriksson, Ann-Louise Glasberg, Elisabeth Lindahl, Kim Lü tzén, Gunilla Strandberg, Anna Söderberg, Venke Sørlie & Astrid Norberg (2007). Development of the Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire. Nursing Ethics 14 (2):181-193.score: 30.0
    Health care often involves ethically difficult situations that may disquiet the conscience. The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire for identifying various perceptions of conscience within a framework based on the literature and on explorative interviews about perceptions of conscience (Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire). The questionnaire was tested on a sample of 444 registered nurses, enrolled nurses, nurses’ assistants and physicians. The data were analysed using principal component analysis to explore possible dimensions of perceptions of conscience. The (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 957