12 found
Sort by:
  1. Henry E. Allison, John Anderson, Creagh McLean Cole, John Beversluis & James Robert Brown (2008). Appearance in This List Neither Guarantees nor Precludes a Future Review of the Book. Mind 117:468.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John Beversluis (2006). A Defence of Dogmatism in the Interpretation of Plato. In David Sedley (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy Xxxi: Winter 2006. Oup Oxford. 31--85.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Beversluis (2003). Socrates. In Robert L. Arrington (ed.), The World's Great Philosophers. Blackwell Pub.. 302--308.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Beversluis (2002). The Perils of Criticizing Socrates. Ancient Philosophy 22 (2):493-497.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John Beversluis (2000). Cross-Examining Socrates: A Defense of the Interlocutors in Plato's Early Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is a rereading of the early dialogues of Plato from the point of view of the people with whom Socrates engages in debate. Existing studies are thoroughly dismissive of the interlocutors and reduce them to the status of mere mouthpieces for views that are hopelessly confused or demonstrably false. This book takes interlocutors seriously and treats them as genuine intellectual opponents whose views are often more defensible than commentators have generally thought.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John Beversluis (1995). Reforming the “Reformed” Objection to Natural Theology. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):189-206.
    In this paper I offer a critique of Alvin Plantinga’s well known and widely accepted contention that his “Reformed” objection to natural theology can plausibly be said to derive from the writings of John Calvin and traditional Reformed theologians generally. I argue that although there is indeed a traditional Reformed objection to natural theology, Plantinga’s own objection is very different from and, in fact, incompatible with, it. I conclude that whatever the merits of Plantinga’s own position, it should not be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John Beversluis (1993). Viastos's Quest for the Historical Socrates. Ancient Philosophy 13 (2):293-312.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Beversluis (1987). Does Socrates Commit the Socratic Fallacy? American Philosophical Quarterly 24 (3):211 - 223.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John Beversluis (1974). Kant on Moral Striving. Kant-Studien 65 (1-4):67-77.
  10. John Beversluis (1974). Socratic Definition. American Philosophical Quarterly 11 (4):331 - 336.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Beversluis (1971). “I Know”: An Illocutionary Analysis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):345-351.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John Beversluis (1965). Some Remarks Concerning a Non-Propositional Knowledge of God. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):376 – 381.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation