27 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
John Blackmore [17]John T. Blackmore [13]
  1. John T. Blackmore, Ryōichi Itagaki & S. Tanaka (eds.) (2010). Ernst Mach's Graz (1864-1867): Where Much Science and Philosophy Were Developed. Distributed by Enfield Publishing and Distribution Co..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John T. Blackmore, Ryōichi Itagaki & S. Tanaka (eds.) (2009). Ernst Mach's Influence Spreads. Distributed by Enfield Pub. And Distribution Co..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Blackmore (2006). Ernst Mach’s World Elements: A Study in Natural Philosophy. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 97:163-164.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Blackmore (2006). To the Editor. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 97:534-534.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John T. Blackmore (2006). Three Autobiographical Manuscripts by Ernst Mach. Annals of Science 35 (4):401-418.
    This paper is a collection of original source material for the use of all scholars interested in understanding Ernst Mach's life as an aid to comprehending his unique and controversial impact on the development of modern physics and both the history and philosophy of science. The documents are complete; and to encourage points of view other than my own, I have listed a number of very recent articles in my footnotes which reflect a wide spectrum of opinion on Ernst Mach (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John T. Blackmore, R. Itagaki & S. Tanaka (2001). Ernst Mach's Vienna, 1895-1930, or, Phenomenalism as Philosophy of Science.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John Blackmore (1999). Boltzmann and Epistemology. Synthese 119 (1-2):157-189.
    This paper is an attempt to clarify why Ludwig Boltzmann from about 1895 to 1905 seemed to adopt a series of extreme epistemological positions, ranging from phenomenalism to pragmatism, while emphatically rejecting what he called ‘metaphysics’ (by which he meant all traditional philosophy). He concluded that all philosophical differences were merely linguistic and most were ultimately meaningless. But at about the time that young Ludwig Wittgenstein began absorbing these desperate ideas (1905), Boltzmann himself under the influence of Franz Brentano seemed (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Blackmore (1999). Introduction. Synthese 119 (1-2):1-9.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John Blackmore (1998). Franz Brentano and the University of Vienna Philosophical Society 1888-1938. In Roberto Poli (ed.), The Brentano Puzzle. Ashgate.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John Blackmore (1996). Ludwig Boltzmann: His Later Life and Philosophy, 1900-1906. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):630-632.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Blackmore & Lawrence Sklar (1996). Ludwig Boltzmann: His Later Life and Philosophy 1900-1906 Book/One: A Documentary History Book Two: The Philosopher. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):630-632.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John T. Blackmore (1992). Ernst Mach-a Deeper Look Documents and New Perspectives.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Blackmore (1989). Ernst Mach Leaves 'the Church of Physics'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):519-540.
    A study of the published and unpublished parts of Ernst Mach's last notebook (1910–14) suggests that Max Planck's attack (1908–11) provoked Mach into opposing ‘The Church of Physics’ more strongly than previously realized. Shortly after Mach threatened to leave the discipline if belief in atoms were required. Albert Einstein tried to persuade him to accept atomism (September 1910). Mach declined to mention Einstein again in his publications and increasingly criticized ‘The Church of Physics’. Evidence that Mach opposed relativity theory and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John Blackmore (1989). "Mach I, Mach II, Einstein Und Die Relativitatstheorie-Eine Faischung Und Ihre Folgen" by Gereon Wolters. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (2):235.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ben-Ami Scharfstein, Stewart Shapiro, Gary Jason, John Blackmore, R. A. Naulty & F. Bradford Wallack (1987). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 17 (4):551-570.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Blackmore (1985). An Historical Note on Ernst Mach. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):299-305.
  17. N. C. A. Costa, David Harrah, Michael Tye, D. S. Clarke, Jeffrey Olen, Robert Young, Richard Campbell, Michael McKinsey, John Peterson, Alex C. Michalos, John Glucker, John T. Blackmore, Eileen Bagus & Barbara Goodwin (1985). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 15 (1-2):279-281.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ernst Mach, John T. Blackmore & Klaus Hentschel (1985). Ernst Mach Als Aussenseiter Machs Briefwechsel Über Philosophie Und Relativitätstheorie Mit Persönlichkeiten Seiner Zeit.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John Blackmore (1983). "Science, Revolution, and Discontinuity" by John Krige. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 13 (4):513.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John Blackmore (1983). Vom Positivismus Zur "Wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung"--Am Beispiel der Wirkungsgeschichte von Ernst Mach in Osterreich von 1895 Bis 1934 by Friedrich Stadler. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 74:621-622.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John T. Blackmore (1983). Philosophy as Part of Internal History of Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 13 (1):17-46.
    The primary purpose of the paper is to try to prove that it is impossible to write or understand history without making epistemological and ontological assumptions, In particular assumptions about whether physical objects and processes are within or beyond the limits of what can be made empirical or conscious.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John T. Blackmore (1983). Should We Abolish the Distinction Between Science and Metaphysics? Philosophia 12 (3-4):393-400.
    The distinction between science and metaphysics tends to be invidious and is often used to set up a prejudice against foundation theory in general and indirect realism in particular. It should probably be replaced by distinctions between idealized and non-Idealized science on the one side and direct and indirect foundation theory on the other.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John Blackmore (1981). Éloge: Joachim Thiele, 13 September 1931-19 July 1980. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 72:636-637.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. John Blackmore (1979). On the Inverted Use of the Terms 'Realism' and 'Idealism' Among Scientists and Historians of Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):125-134.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John T. Blackmore (1978). Discussion Notes: IS planck'S ‘PRINCIPLE’ TRUE? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):347-349.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John T. Blackmore (1978). Is Planck's 'Principle' True? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):347-349.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Blackmore (1976). Theory of Science by Bernard Bolzano; Rolf George; Theory of Science by Bernard Bolzano; Jan Berg; Burnham Terrell. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 67:319-321.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation