Search results for 'John E. Logan' (try it on Scholar)

6 found
Sort by:
  1. Saundra H. Glover, Minnette A. Bumpus, John E. Logan & James R. Ciesla (1997). Re-Examining the Influence of Individual Values on Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1319-1329.score: 290.0
    This paper presents the results of five years of research involving three studies. The first two studies investigated the impact of the value honesty/integrity on the ethical decision choice an individual makes, as moderated by the individual personality traits of self-monitoring and private self-consciousness. The third study, which is the focus of this paper, expanded the two earlier studies by varying the level of moral intensity and including the influence of demographical factors and other workplace values: achievement, fairness, and concern (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Corina J. Logan & John W. Pepper (2007). Social Learning is Central to Innovation, in Primates and Beyond. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):416-417.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. R. Lal, F. P. Miller & T. J. Logan (1988). Are Intensive Agricultural Practices Environmentally and Ethically Sound? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (3):193-210.score: 60.0
    Soil is fragile and nonrenewable but the most basic of natural resources. It has a capacity to tolerate continuous use but only with proper management. Improper soil management and indiscriminate use of chemicals have contributed to some severe global environmental issues, e.g., volatilization losses and contamination of natural waters by sediments and agricultural fertilizers and pesticides. The increasing substitution of energy for labor and other cultural inputs in agriculture is another issue. Fertilizers and chemicals account for about 25% of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Toivo J. Holopainen (2013). Saint Anselm of Canterbury and His Legacy (Durham Medieval and Renaissance Monographs and Essays, Vol. 2). Edited by Giles E. M. Gasper and Ian Logan . Pp. Xii, 461, Durham University, Institute of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, and Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2012, $95.00. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 54 (3):460-461.score: 36.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Michael Weisberg & Kenneth Reisman (2008). The Robust Volterra Principle. Philosophy of Science 75 (1):106-131.score: 12.0
    Theorizing in ecology and evolution often proceeds via the construction of multiple idealized models. To determine whether a theoretical result actually depends on core features of the models and is not an artifact of simplifying assumptions, theorists have developed the technique of robustness analysis, the examination of multiple models looking for common predictions. A striking example of robustness analysis in ecology is the discovery of the Volterra Principle, which describes the effect of general biocides in predator-prey systems. This paper details (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ryan Muldoon (2007). Robust Simulations. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):873-883.score: 12.0
    As scientists begin to study increasingly complex questions, many have turned to computer simulation to assist in their inquiry. This methodology has been challenged by both analytic modelers and experimentalists. A primary objection of analytic modelers is that simulations are simply too complicated to perform model verification. From the experimentalist perspective it is that there is no means to demonstrate the reality of simulation. The aim of this paper is to consider objections from both of these perspectives, and to argue (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation