50 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
John F. Post [48]John Frederic Post [2]
  1. John F. Post (2006). Naturalism, Reduction and Normativity: Pressing From Below. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):1–27.
    David Papineau’s model of scientific reduction, contrary to his intent, appears to enable a naturalist realist account of the primitive normativity involved in a biological adaptation’s being “for” this or that (say the eye’s being for seeing). By disabling the crucial anti-naturalist arguments against any such reduction, his model would support a cognitivist semantics for normative claims like “The heart is for pumping blood, and defective if it doesn’t.” No moral claim would follow, certainly. Nonetheless, by thus “pressing from below” (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John F. Post (2004). Reply to Gale and Pruss. Philo 7 (1):114-121.
    Richard Gale and Alexander Pruss raise a number of excellent questions in their separate responses to my comments on Gale’s book, On the Nature and Existence of God. They focus on aspects of my discussion that need at least to be clarified, if not retracted, in ways I explain in this reply.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John F. Post (2003). Omniscience, Weak PSR, and Method. Philo 6 (1):33-48.
    Adhering to the traditional concept of omniscience lands Gale in the incoherence Grim’s Cantorian arguments reveal in talk of “all propositions.” By constructing variants and extensions of Grim’s arguments, I explain why various ways out of the incoherence are unacceptable, why theists would do better to adopt a certain revisionary concept of omniscience, and why the Cantorian troubles are so deep as to be troubles as well for Gale’s Weak PSR. I conclude with some brief reflections on method, suggesting that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John F. Post (2002). Review of James Beilby (Ed.), Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John F. Post (2002). Sense and Supervenience. Philo 4 (2):123-137.
    Abstract. Alleged counter-examples based on conceptual thought-experiments, including those involving sense or content, have no force against physicalist supervenience theses properly construed. This is largely because of their epistemological status and their modal status. Still, there are empirical examples that do contradict Kim-style theses, due to the latter's individualism. By contrast, non-individualist supervenience, such as "global" supervenience, remains unscathed, a possibility overlooked by Lynne Baker, as is clear from a physicalist account of sense in the case of non-human biological adaptations (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John F. Post (2001). Global-Anti-Realism. Review of Metaphysics 54 (4):910-911.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John F. Post (2001). Sense and Supervenience. Philo 4 (2):123-137.
    Alleged counter-examples based on conceptual thought experiments, including those involving sense or content, have no force against physicalist supervenience theses properly construed. This is largely because of their epistemological status and their modal status. Still, there are empirical examples that do contradict Kim-style theses, due to the latter’s individualism. By contrast, non-individualist supervenience, such as “global” supervenience, remains unscathed, a possibility overlooked by Lynne Baker, as is dear from a physicalist account of sense in the case of non-human biological adaptations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John F. Post (2000). [Book Chapter] (in Press).
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John F. Post, From is to Ought: Another Way.
    Argues for an objective protomoral normativity in terms of what an adaptation is for, without falling victim to Hume's Law, open-question arguments, queerness arguments, and internalism/externalism debates. Also provides a general strategy for naturalizing objective moral normativity which is likewise proof against the usual-suspect objections.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John F. Post (2000). Is Supervenience Asymmetric? In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
    After some preliminary clarifications, arguments for the supposed asymmetry of supervenience and determination, such as they are, are shown to be unsound. An argument against the supposed asymmetry is then constructed and defended against objections. This is followed by explanations of why the intuition of asymmetry is nonetheless so entrenched, and of how the asymmetric ontological priority of the physical over the non-physical can be understood without the supposed asymmetry of supervenience and determination.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John F. Post, Breakwater: The New Wave, Supervenience and Individualism.
    New-wave psychoneural reduction, a la Bickle and Churchland, conflicts with the way certain adaptation properties are individuated according to evolutionary biology. Such properties cannot be reduced to physical properties of the token items that have the adaptation properties. The New Wave may entail a form of individualism inconsistent with evolutionary biology. All of this causes serious trouble as well for Jaegwon Kim's thesis of the Causal Individuation of Kinds, his Weak Supervenience thesis, Alexander's Dictum, his synchronicity thesis that all psychological (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John F. Post, How to Refute Principles of Sufficient Reason.
    Outlines a conceptual argument against the Principle of Sufficient reason. The argument is presented in detail in earlier work, and is based on deductive inferences from PSR's own concept of explanation. The argument shows that not everything can have an explanation of the sort claimed by PSR. So far from being a presupposition of reason itself, as some think, PSR can be refuted by reason, arguing only from PSR's own concept of explanation. Hence PSR cannot be used to argue that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John F. Post (1999). Is Supervenience Asymmetric? Manuscrito 22 (2):305-344.
    After some preliminary clarifications, arguments for the supposed asymmetry of supervenience and determination, such as they are, are shown to be unsound. An argument against the supposed asymmetry is then constructed and defended against objections. This is followed by explanations of why the intuition of asymmetry is nonetheless so entrenched, and of how the asymmetric ontological priority of the physical over the non-physical can be understood without the supposed asymmetry of supervenience and determination.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John F. Post (1998). Review of Ruth G. Millikan, White Queen Psychology, For. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58:233-237.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. John F. Post (1998). White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):233-237.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John F. Post (1996). The Foundationalism in Irrealism, and the Immorality. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:1-14.
    The foundationalism in irrealism is structural foundationalism, according to which reason giving must terminate with some affair beyond the reach of noncircular inferential justification or critique. Even relativist irrealists are structural foundationalists. But structural foundationalism is only as good as the regress argument for it, which presupposes that the relevant forms of inferential justification are all transitive. Since they are not, structural foundationalism fails. So too does the “God’s-eye-view” or look-see argument against realism, to the effect that when it comes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. John F. Post (1995). Book Review:Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays Jaegwon Kim. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 62 (2):338-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John F. Post (1995). Perspectives on Buchler. Metaphilosophy 26 (3):279-299.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John F. Post (1995). "Global" Determination: Too Permissive? In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John F. Post (1995). Naturalism. In Audi Robert (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 517--518.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John F. Post (1995). Review of Jaegwon Kim, Supervenience and Mind. [REVIEW] Philosophical Explorations.
    "Adaptation properties," as individuated according to evolutionary biology, cannot be reduced to physical properties of the token items that have the adaptation properties. This causes serious if not fatal trouble for several of Kim's crucial theses: the Causal Individuation of Kinds, Weak Supervenience, Alexander's Dictum, the synchronicity thesis (that all psychological kinds supervene on the contemporaneous physical states of the organism), the Correlation Thesis, and indeed his Restricted Correlation Thesis. All these theses are strongly individualist, in the sense of entailing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John F. Post (1993). On the Nature and Existence of God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):950-954.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John F. Post (1991). Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Paragon House.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. John F. Post (1991). Philosophical Logic. Teaching Philosophy 14 (1):92-94.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John F. Post (1990). Objective Value, Realism, and the End of Metaphysics. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 4 (2):146 - 160.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John F. Post (1989). Stuart G. Shanker, Ed., Gödel's Theorem in Focus Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (7):287-290.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John F. Post (1988). Intuition and Ideality. Review of Metaphysics 42 (2):415-417.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John F. Post (1987). The Faces of Existence: An Essay in Nonreductive Metaphysics. Cornell University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John F. Post (1984). Comment on Teller. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (S1):163-167.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John F. Post (1984). On the Determinacy of Valuation. Philosophical Studies 45 (May):315-33.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John F. Post (1984). On the Determinacy of Truth and Translation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (S1):117-135.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. John F. Post (1983). Response: Comment on Teller. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (Supplement):163-167.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. E. D. Klemke, John F. Post & Aryeh Leo Motzkin (1982). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 12 (1-2):127-146.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. John F. Post (1982). Chance, Cause, Reason. New Scholasticism 56 (1):111-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. John F. Post, Harold Morick & Bruce Johnston (1981). Book Reviews and Critical Studies. [REVIEW] Philosophia 9 (3-4):405-435.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. John F. Post (1980). Infinite Regresses of Justification and of Explanation. Philosophical Studies 38 (1):31 - 52.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John F. Post (1979). Presupposition, Bivalence, and the Possible Liar. Philosophia 8 (4):645-650.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John F. Post (1978). Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):73-81.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. John F. Post (1975). Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):73-81.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. John F. Post (1974). Propositions, Possible Languages and the Liar's Revenge. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):223-234.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. John F. Post (1974). Quine with God. Journal of Philosophy 71 (19):736-748.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John F. Post (1974). Shades of Possibility. Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1/2):155 - 158.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John F. Post (1973). Shades of the Liar. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (3):370 - 386.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John F. Post (1972). Referential Presupposition. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):160-167.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John F. Post (1970). The Possible Liar. Noûs 4 (4):405-409.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John Frederic Post (1968). An Analysis of Presupposing. Southern Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):167-171.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. John F. Post (1965). Does Knowing Make a Difference to What is Known? Philosophical Quarterly 15 (60):220-228.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John F. Post (1965). Special Reasons and Specific Answers. Analysis 25 (Suppl-3):86 - 93.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John Frederic Post (1965). A Defense of Collingwood's Theory of Presuppositions. Inquiry 8 (1-4):332 – 354.
    Collingwood's theory of presuppositions has never been taken very seriously. But critics have completely overlooked its significance as a theory or model of inquiry intimately tied to certain aspects of discourse in a context of investigation. Viewed this way, Collingwood's theory is on very strong ground, especially when it is reconstructed with the aid of a formal language. The reconstruction shows what is essential to the theory and what is not, allowing us to disregard those of Collingwood's extravagant claims which (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation