Search results for 'John H. Barker' (try it on Scholar)

106 found
Sort by:
  1. Joseph C. Banis, John H. Barker, Michael Cunningham, Cedric G. Francois, Allen Furr, Federico Grossi, Moshe Kon, Claudio Maldonado, Serge Martinez, Gustavo Perez-Abadia, Marieke Vossen & Osborne P. Wiggins (2004). Response to Selected Commentaries on the AJOB Target Article “On the Ethics of Facial Transplantation Research”. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):W23-W31.score: 290.0
    Main Response Topics ? Introduction ? Open display and public evaluation ? Publicity versus patient privacy ? Facial tissue donation ? Validity of Louisville Instrument for Risk Acceptance ? Patients' understanding of risk ? Face versus hand transplantation ? Rejection rates/risks ? Patient compliance ? Exit strategy ? Functional recovery ? Societietal implications ? Psychological implications ? Conclusion: Uncertainty likely to persist.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Osborne P. Wiggins, John H. Barker, Serge Martinez, Marieke Vossen, Claudio Maldonado, Federico V. Grossi, Cedric G. Francois, Michael Cunningham, Gustavo Perez-Abadia, Moshe Kon & Joseph C. Banis (2004). On the Ethics of Facial Transplantation Research. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):1 – 12.score: 290.0
    Transplantation continues to push the frontiers of medicine into domains that summon forth troublesome ethical questions. Looming on the frontier today is human facial transplantation. We develop criteria that, we maintain, must be satisfied in order to ethically undertake this as-yet-untried transplant procedure. We draw on the criteria advanced by Dr. Francis Moore in the late 1980s for introducing innovative procedures in transplant surgery. In addition to these we also insist that human face transplantation must meet all the ethical requirements (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. H. Barker, F. C. S. Schiller, P. Leon, J. Loewenberg, T. E. Jessop, James Drever, T. E. & John Laird (1932). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 41 (162):242-269.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Laird, H. Barker, A. E. Taylor, A. G. Widgery & A. E. Taylor (1926). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 35 (139):379-398.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. J. H. Muirhead, R. R. Marett, Alfred W. Benn, T. Loveday, F. C. S. Schiller, John Burnet, H. Barker, J. A. J. Drewitt & L. T. (1900). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 9 (36):539-557.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Siobhan M. Leary, Charles A. Davie, Geoff J. M. Parker, Valerie L. Stevenson, Liqun Wang, Gareth J. Barker, David H. Miller & A. J. Thompson (1999). 1 H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Normal Appearing White Matter in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Neurology 246 (11).score: 240.0
    Recent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological studies have indicated that axonal loss is a major contributor to disease progression in multiple sclerosis. 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), through measurement of N -acetyl aspartate (NAA), a neuronal marker, provides a unique tool to investigate this. Patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis have few lesions on conventional MRI, suggesting that changes in normal appearing white matter (NAWM), such (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. H. Barker (1940). Spinoza's “Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione”: A Commentary By the Late Harold H. Joachim. [REVIEW] Philosophy 15 (60):434-.score: 210.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. H. Barker (1903). Book Review:Leaders of Religious Thought in The Nineteenth Century. S. H. Mellone. [REVIEW] Ethics 13 (4):528-.score: 210.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Sue Barker (2013). The Road to Eternal Life: Reflections on the Prologue of Benedict's Rule [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 90 (1):122.score: 150.0
    Barker, Sue Review(s) of: The road to eternal life: Reflections on the prologue of benedict's rule, by Michael Casey OCSO, (Mulgrave VIC: John Garratt Publishing, 2011), pp.182, $29.95.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John Barker (2009). Disquotation, Conditionals, and the Liar. Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):5-21.score: 150.0
    In this paper I respond to Jacquette’s criticisms, in (Jacquette, 2008), of my (Barker, 2008). In so doing, I argue that the Liar paradox is in fact a problem about the disquotational schema, and that nothing in Jacquette’s paper undermines this diagnosis.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. M. T. Alkire, R. J. Haier, J. H. Fallon & S. J. Barker (1996). PET Imaging of Conscious and Unconscious Verbal Memory. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3:448-62.score: 140.0
  12. H. Andersen, P. Barker & X. Chen (1998). Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Revolutions and Cognitive Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 11:5-28.score: 140.0
  13. Godfrey H. Thomson, H. Barker, S. V. Keeling, F. C. S. Schiller, T. Whittaker, O. de Selincourt, Thomas Greenwood & L. Roth (1927). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 36 (143):371-387.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John A. Barker (2002). Computer Modeling and the Fate of Folk Psychology. Metaphilosophy 33 (1-2):30-48.score: 120.0
  15. Darren A. Natale, Cecilia N. Arighi, Winona Barker, Judith Blake, Ti-Cheng Chang, Zhangzhi Hu, Hongfang Liu, Barry Smith & Cathy H. Wu (2007). Framework for a Protein Ontology. BMC Bioinformatics, Nov. 2007, 8(Suppl. 9) 8 (9):S1.score: 120.0
    Biomedical ontologies are emerging as critical tools in genomic and proteomic research where complex data in disparate resources need to be integrated. A number of ontologies exist that describe the properties that can be attributed to proteins; for example, protein functions are described by Gene Ontology, while human diseases are described by Disease Ontology. There is, however, a gap in the current set of ontologies—one that describes the protein entities themselves and their relationships. We have designed a PRotein Ontology (PRO) (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Barker & Fiona Smith (2001). Power, Positionality and Practicality: Carrying Out Fieldwork with Children. Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (2):142 – 147.score: 120.0
    In this paper we provide a reflexive account of fieldwork in out of school clubs in a range of localities across England and Wales. By reflecting upon our personal experiences of researching with children aged between 5 and 12 years, we examine the impact of the positionality of the researcher on the research encounter, and highlight the ways in which relationships between adult researchers and child subjects are gendered. Finally, we identify a number of issues for researchers to consider when (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. John A. Barker (1975). Relevance Logic, Classical Logic, and Disjunctive Syllogism. Philosophical Studies 27 (6):361 - 376.score: 120.0
  18. John A. Barker (1976). Presupposition and Entailment. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (2):272-278.score: 120.0
  19. John A. Barker (1973). Hypotheticals: Conditionals and Theticals. Philosophical Quarterly 23 (93):335-345.score: 120.0
  20. John A. Barker (1976). The Fallacy of Begging the Question. Dialogue 15 (02):241-255.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Fred Adams, John A. Barker & Julia Figurelli (2012). Towards Closure on Closure. Synthese 188 (2):179-196.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. H. Barker (1938). Notes on the Second Part of Spinoza's Ethics (III.). Mind 47 (188):417-439.score: 120.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John A. Barker (1976). What You Don't Know Won't Hurt You? American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (4):303 - 308.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. John A. Barker (1975). A Paradox of Knowing Whether. Mind 84 (334):281-283.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John A. Barker & Fred Adams (2012). Conclusive Reasons, Knowledge, and Action. Philosophical Issues 22 (1):35-52.score: 120.0
  26. John A. Barker (1974). 'If', '⊃', and the Principle of Exportation. Philosophical Studies 26 (2):127 - 133.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jeffrey H. Barker & Lauren Polcrack (2001). Respect for Persons, Informed Consent Andthe Assessment of Infectious Disease Risks in Xenotransplantation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):53-70.score: 120.0
    Given the increasing need for solid organ and tissue transplants and the decreasing supply of suitable allographic organs and tissue to meet this need, it is understandable that the hope for successful xenotransplantation has resurfaced in recent years. The biomedical obstacles to xenotransplantation encountered in previous attempts could be mitigated or overcome by developments in immunosuppression and especially by genetic manipulation of organ source animals. In this essay we consider the history of xenotransplantation, discuss the biomedical obstacles to success, explore (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Andrew Barker (2000). DIABOLUS IN MUSICA John G. Landels: Music in Ancient Greece and Rome . Pp. Xii + 296, Ills. London and New York: Routledge, 1999. Cased, £50. ISBN: 0-415-16776-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):168-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. H. Barker (1938). Notes on the Second Part of Spinoza's Ethics (I). Mind 47 (186):159-179.score: 120.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John A. Barker (1975). Socratic Ignorance Vindicated. Philosophical Studies 28 (1):71 - 75.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John A. Barker (1975). A Note on Knowledge and Belief. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):143 - 144.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. John A. Barker & Thomas D. Paxson Jr (1985). Aristotle Vs. Diodorus. Philosophy Research Archives 11:41-76.score: 120.0
    We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic (ASL), and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary to prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logic and a full system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John A. Barker (1972). Knowledge and Causation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):313-324.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. John A. Barker (1978). The Nature of Question-Begging Arguments. Dialogue 17 (03):490-498.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. H. Barker, William L. Davidson, W. H. Winch, W. P. Paterson, G. R. T. Ross, F. C. S. Schiller, G. Dawes Hicks, B. Russell, M. D. & A. W. Benn (1905). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 14 (53):116-131.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. H. Barker (1938). Notes on the Second Part of Spinoza's Ethics (II). Mind 47 (187):281-302.score: 120.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John A. Barker (1972). Pragmatics and Definite Descriptions. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 21:63-84.score: 120.0
  38. John A. Barker (1974). Brand and Swain on Causation. Synthese 26 (3-4):396 - 400.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. H. Barker (1929). Critical Notices. Mind 38 (150):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. John A. Barker (1974). Knowledge, Ignorance and Presupposition. Analysis 35 (2):33 - 45.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. John A. Barker (1974). Paradox Without Knowledge. Synthese 28 (2):261 - 270.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. H. Barker (1909). The Roots of Reality: Reply. Mind 18 (72):640.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. H. Barker (1900). Book Review:Elements of the Science of Religion. C. P. Tiele. [REVIEW] Ethics 10 (2):261-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. G. Dawes Hicks, M. L., F. C. S. Schiller, H. Barker, H. R. Mackintosh, Alan Dorward & A. C. Ewing (1923). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 32 (128):491-506.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. W. D. Lamont, H. R. Mackintosh, H. Barker, R. I. Aaron, H. B. Acton, M. H., Ralph Tyler Flewelling & J. W. Scott (1935). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 44 (173):98-114.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. J. L. McIntyre, A. C. Haddon, Henry Barker, J. Rickaby, F. C. S. Schiller, R. F. Alfred Hoernle, John Burnet, W. Leslie Mackenzie, G. R. T. Ross & C. A. F. Rhys Davids (1906). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 15 (57):109-124.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (16 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. R. Adamson, S. F., James Seth & H. Barker (1898). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 7 (25):112-127.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John A. Barker (1969). A Formal Analysis of Conditionals. [Carbondale, Southern Illinois University].score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John A. Barker (1983). Abstract of Comments: Pollock on Epistemology and Probability. Noûs 17 (1):68 - 69.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John A. Barker (1991). Audi's Theory of Practical Reasoning. Behavior and Philosophy 19 (2):49 - 58.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Jeffrey H. Barker (1990). Beyond Individualism. Teaching Philosophy 13 (4):407-409.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. H. Barker (1927). Critical Notices. Mind 36 (144):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. H. Barker (1928). Critical Notices. Mind 37 (148):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. H. Barker (1931). Critical Notices. Mind 40 (160):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. H. Barker (1921). Critical Notices. Mind 30 (118):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. H. Barker (1936). Critical Notices. Mind 45 (178):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. H. Barker (1939). Critical Notices. Mind 48 (190):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. H. Barker (1948). Critical Notices. Mind 57 (225):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. H. Barker (1924). Critical Notices. Mind 33 (132):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. H. Barker (1925). Critical Notices. Mind 34 (135):423-426.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (19 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. H. Barker (1901). Factors in the Efficiency of Religious Belief. International Journal of Ethics 11 (3):329-340.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. Donald R. Barker (1972). Hypothetical Promising and John R. Searle. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):21-34.score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  63. John A. Barker (1980). If' and 'Even If. Analysis 40 (2):93 - 98.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. H. Barker (1935). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 44 (173):366-368.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. H. Barker (1923). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 32 (128):366-368.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. H. Barker (1925). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 34 (135):366-368.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. H. Barker (1926). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 35 (139):366-368.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (21 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. H. Barker (1927). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 36 (143):366-368.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. H. Barker, Beatrice Edgell, C. C. J. Webb & J. Laird (1918). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 27 (107):371-378.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (21 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. H. Barker, F. C. S. Schiller, Stanley V. Keeling, A. C. Ewing, E. J. Thomas, Helen Knight & O. de Selincourt (1928). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 37 (146):239-251.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. H. Barker, S. S., P. Leon, J. S. Mackenzie, F. C. S. Schiller, A. C. Ewing, Rex Knight & E. S. Waterhouse (1931). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 40 (158):242-259.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. H. Barker, J. R. Jones, Richard Robinson & A. T. Shillinglaw (1947). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 56 (223):276-287.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (22 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. H. Barker (1922). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 31 (124):366-368.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. John C. Barker (1975). Strange Contrarieties: Pascal in England During the Age of Reason. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. John A. Barker (1975). Scriven on The Logic of Cause. Theory and Decision 6 (1):43-55.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. John Barker (2008). Undeniably Paradoxical. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):137-142.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. H. Barker (1899). Vi.--New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 8 (4):553-554.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. Robert M. Gordon & John A. Barker (1994). Autism and the "Theory of Mind" Debate. In George Graham & G. Lynn Stephens (eds.), Philosophical Psychopathology. MIT Press.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. H. Barker (1900). Book Review:Idealism and Theology: A Study of Presuppositions. Charles F. d'Arcy. [REVIEW] Ethics 11 (1):132-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. H. Barker (1901). Book Review:Evolution and Theology, and Other Essays. Otto Pfleiderer, Orello Cone. [REVIEW] Ethics 11 (4):533-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. H. Barker (1923). Hugh A. Reyburn, The Ethical Theory of Hegel: A Study of the Philosophy of Right. [REVIEW] Ethics 33 (2):216-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. H. Barker (1905). Book Review:The Pathway to Reality. Richard Burdon Haldane. [REVIEW] Ethics 15 (2):256-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  83. Jeffrey H. Barker (2003). Common-Pool Resources and Population Genomics in Iceland, Estonia, and Tonga. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2):133-144.score: 120.0
    This paper addresses the application of the ethical concept of trust and the legal and political concept of public trust to population genomics projects in Iceland, Estonia, and Tonga. Focusing on trust and public trust, the paper explores analogies between the genomics projects and the treatment of other common-pool resources, making use of the notion of trust as an ethical demand, derived from the works of Emmanuel Levinas and Knud Eljer Lgstrup. The paper discusses the degree to which the ethical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. W. Leslie Mackenzie, T. Whittaker, F. C. S. Schiller, H. Barker & C. A. F. Rhys Davids (1899). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 8 (32):544-557.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. J. Lewis McIntyre, H. Barker, Joseph Rickaby, Foster Watson, Herbert W. Blunt, T. B., S. H., A. E. Taylor, B. Russell & C. A. F. Rhys Davids (1904). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 13 (49):123-134.score: 120.0
    Direct download (16 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. F. C. S. Schiller, H. Barker, H. Wildon Carr, Eric S. Waterhouse, A. E. Taylor, M. A., R. A. & V. W. (1925). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 34 (135):373-388.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. Alfred Sidgwick & H. Barker (1909). Notes on a Note. Mind 18 (72):639-640.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. A. K. Stout, P. V. M. Benecke, H. Barker, H. R. Mackintosh, E. S. Waterhouse, T. Whittaker, C. A. Mace & A. C. Ewing (1926). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 35 (140):508-523.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. Stephen J. Barker (2007). Semantics Without the Distinction Between Sense and Force. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  90. Chris Barker (2007). Parasitic Scope. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (4):407-444.score: 60.0
    I propose the first strictly compositional semantic account of same. New data, including especially NP-internal uses such as two men with the same name, suggests that same in its basic use is a quantificational element taking scope over nominals. Given type-lifting as a generally available mechanism, I show that this follows naturally from the fact that same is an adjective. Independently-motivated assumptions extend the analysis to standard examples such as Anna and Bill read the same book via a mechanism I (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Robert Gordon, Autism and the "Theory of Mind" Debate Robert M. Gordon and John A. Barker.score: 42.0
    With this understanding, children are better able to anticipate the behavior of others and to attune their own behavior accordingly. In mentally retarded children with Down's syndrome, attainment of such competence is delayed, but it is generally acquired by the time they reach the mental age of 4, as measured by tests of nonverbal intelligence. Thus from a developmental perspective, attainment of the mental age of 4 appears to be of profound significance for acquisition of what we shall call psychological (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. Alex Levine (2010). Thomas Kuhn's Cottage Fred d'Agostino ,Naturalizing Epistemology: Thomas Kuhn and the Essential Tension(London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010) Edwin H.-C. Hung ,Beyond Kuhn: Scientific Explanation, Theory Structure, Incommensurability and Physical Necessity(Hants: Ashgate, 2006) Hanne Andersen , Peter Barker , and Xiang Chen ,The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). [REVIEW] Perspectives on Science 18 (3):369-377.score: 36.0
  93. Walter C. Summers (1933). Seneca's Letters Seneca's Letters to Lucilius, Translated by E. P. Barker. Vol. I: Pp. Xxvi + 324. Vol. II: Pp. 334. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. Notes and Emendations to the Epistulae Morales of L. Annaeus Seneca. By W. H. Alexander. Pp. 16. Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press, 1932. Paper, 30 Cents. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 47 (02):77-78.score: 36.0
  94. T. A. Sinclair (1931). Saint Augustine: The City of God. Translated by John Healey. With an Introduction by Ernest Barker. Three Volumes in One: Pp. Lxiv + 252 + 265 + 267. London and Toronto: J. M. Dent and Sons, Ltd., 1931. 7s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (05):201-.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. Robert Audi (1991). The Nature and Assessment of Practical Reasoning: A Reply to John Barker and Richard Foley. Behavior and Philosophy 19 (2):73 - 81.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. David H. Sanford (1977). The Fallacy of Begging the Question: A Reply to Barker. Dialogue 16 (03):485-498.score: 26.0
    According to John A Barker, whether an argument begs the question is purely a matter of logical form (Dialogue, 1976). According to me, it is also a matter of epistemic conditions; some arguments which beg the question in some contexts need not beg the question in every context (Analysis, 1972). I point out difficulties in Barker's treatment and defend my own views against some of his criticisms. In the concluding section, "Alleged difficulties with disjunctive syllogism," I defend (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. David H. Sanford (1975). Causal Necessity and Logical Necessity. Philosophical Studies 28 (2):185 - 194.score: 15.0
    Myles Brand and Marshall Swain advocate the principle that if A is the set of conditions individually necessary and jointly sufficient for the occurrence of B, then if C is a set of conditions individually necessary for the occurrence of B, every member of C is a member of A. I agree with John Barker and Risto Hilpinen who each argue that this principle is not true for causal necessity and sufficiency, but I disagree with their claim that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Alex Levine (2010). Thomas Kuhn's Cottage. Perspectives on Science 18 (3):369-377.score: 12.0
    Books reviewed in this essay:Fred d'Agostino, Naturalizing Epistemology: Thomas Kuhn and the Essential Tension (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010)Edwin H.-C. Hung, Beyond Kuhn: Scientific Explanation, Theory Structure, Incommensurability and Physical Necessity (Hants: Ashgate, 2006)Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, and Xiang Chen, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Forty-eight years after the publication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, fourteen since the death of its author, Thomas S. Kuhn, and ten since the publication of the posthumous Road Since (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. V. H. Dudman (1998). On the Grammar of Conditionals: Reply to Barker. Analysis 58 (4):277–285.score: 12.0
  100. Nick Zangwill, Sztuka I Filozofia.score: 12.0
    John Barker’s beautiful paper was full of elegant arguments against my view that mathematical proofs cannot really be beautiful or elegant, except in a metaphorical sense. The same is true of Barker’s impressive paper if I am right! On first and second readings, I was almost ready to wave a white flat of surrenderhis arguments, positive and negative, seemed unassailable. I contemplated a brief, if unsporting, “I agree” response. Nevertheless, I think I can offer something in reply.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 100 / 106