14 found
Sort by:
  1. John Losee (2004). Theories of Scientific Progress: An Introduction. Routledge.
    What is the nature of scientific progress, and what makes it possible? When we look back at the scientific theories of the past and compare them to the state of science today, there seems little doubt that we have made progress. But how have we made this progress? Is it a continuous process, which gradually incorporates past successes into present theories, or are entrenched theories overthrown by superior competitors in a revolutionary manner? Theories of Scientific Progress presents the arguments for (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John Losee (2001). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Fourth Edition. Philosophy 8 (1).
    Designed for those coming to the subject for the first time, this introduction offers a historical exposition of the differing views on the philosophy of science. In this new edition, John Losee also covers contemporary developments within the discipline, incorporating recent work on theory-appraisal, experimental practice, the debate over scientific realism, and the philosophy of biology. (publisher, edited).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Barry Gower & John Losee (1998). Reviews-Scientific Method: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):508-510.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Losee (1998). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):508-510.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John Losee (1993). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.
    This new edition brings up to date this accessible study of the philosophy of science. Since the time of Plato and Aristotle, scientists and philosophers have raised questions about the proper evaluation of scientific interpretations. A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science is an exposition of differing viewpoints on issues such as the distinction between scientific inquiry and other types of interpretation, the relationship between theories and observation reports; the evaluation of competing theories; and the nature of progress in (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John Losee (1992). Hume's Demarcation Project. Hume Studies 18 (1):51-62.
  7. John Losee (1992). Herbert Simon on Scientific Discovery. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (1):41 – 43.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
    Philosophy of science and history of science are both interpretations of scientific practice, and the relationship between these two disciplines can take various forms: they may be mutually exclusive, interdependent, or related by inclusion. Much depends on whether philosophy of science is taken to be a prescriptive or a descriptive science. This book is concerned with the nature of the relationship between philosophy of science and history of science, and sheds new light on our understanding of those activities that comprise (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John Losee (1986). Shapere's Project for a Nonpresuppositionist Philosophy of Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):223-229.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John Losee (1983). Whewell and Mill on the Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):113-126.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John Losee (1978). Laudan on Progress in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (4):333-340.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John Losee (1977). Limitations of an Evolutionist Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8 (4):349-352.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Losee (1964). The Use of Philosophical Arguments in Quantum Physics. Philosophy of Science 31 (1):10-17.
    Two types of philosophical arguments are employed by the defenders and critics of the Copenhagen Interpretation. One type of argument is a confrontation of an opponent's interpretation with criteria of demarcation and criteria of acceptability. The purpose of such arguments is either to exclude an opponent's interpretation from the range of permissible discourse in quantum physics, or to establish the inadequacy of an opponent's interpretation. A second type of argument is a justification of the value, or utility, of the criteria (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John Losee (1963). Two Proposed Demarcations for Theological Statements. The Monist 47 (3):455-465.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation