8 found
Sort by:
  1. Geoffrey P. Goodwin & John M. Darley (2010). The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy. [REVIEW] Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):161-188.
    Ethical disputes arise over differences in the content of the ethical beliefs people hold on either side of an issue. One person may believe that it is wrong to have an abortion for financial reasons, whereas another may believe it to be permissible. But, the magnitude and difficulty of such disputes may also depend on other properties of the ethical beliefs in question—in particular, how objective they are perceived to be. As a psychological property of moral belief, objectivity is relatively (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Geoffrey P. Goodwin & John M. Darley (2008). The Psychology of Meta-Ethics: Exploring Objectivism. Cognition 106 (3):1339-1366.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & John M. Darley (2008). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition. In Shaun Nichols & Joshua Knobe (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 61.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Robert L. Woolfolk, John M. Doris & John M. Darley (2006). Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition: Studies in the Attribution of Moral Responsibility. Cognition 100 (2):283-301.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley (2004). Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2):173-205.
    Having a criminal justice system that imposes sanctions no doubt does deter criminal conduct. But available social science research suggests that manipulating criminal law rules within that system to achieve heightened deterrence effects generally will be ineffective. Potential offenders often do not know of the legal rules. Even if they do, they frequently are unable to bring this knowledge to bear in guiding their conduct, due to a variety of situational, social, or chemical factors. Even if they can, a rational (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley (1998). Objectivist Versus Subjectivist Views of Criminality: A Study in the Role of Social Science in Criminal Law Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (3):409-447.
    The authors use social science methodology to determine whether a doctrinal shift—from an objectivist view of criminality in the common law to a subjectivist view in modem criminal codes—is consistent with lay intuitions of the principles of justice. Commentators have suggested that lay perceptions of criminality have shifted in a way reflected in the doctrinal change, but the study results suggest a more nuanced conclusion: that the modern lay view agrees with the subjectivist view of modern codes in defining the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Michael Athay & John M. Darley (1985). The Role of Power in Social-Exchange Relationships. In Michael Frese & John Sabini (eds.), Goal Directed Behavior: The Concept of Action in Psychology. L. Erlbaum Associates. 230--247.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John M. Darley (1980). Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: A Future Research Agenda. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):469.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation