20 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
John M. Vickers [22]John Michael Vickers [1]
See also:
Profile: John Vickers
  1. John M. Vickers (2004). Ramsey on Judgment: The Theory of "Facts and Propositions". Dialectica 58 (4):499–516.
    Ramsey's “Facts and Propositions” is terse, allusive, and dense. The paper is far from easy to understand. The present essay is an effort, largely following Brian Loar's account,1 to say what Ramsey's goal is, to spell out what he took to be the means to accomplish it, and to show how those means, at least in the terms of F&P, cannot accomplish that end. I also contrast Loar's own account of judgment, explicitly modeled on Ramsey's view, with the latter. The (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John M. Vickers (2001). Logic, Probability, and Coherence. Philosophy of Science 68 (1):95-110.
    How does deductive logic constrain probability? This question is difficult for subjectivistic approaches, according to which probability is just strength of (prudent) partial belief, for this presumes logical omniscience. This paper proposes that the way in which probability lies always between possibility and necessity can be made precise by exploiting a minor theorem of de Finetti: In any finite set of propositions the expected number of truths is the sum of the probabilities over the set. This is generalized to apply (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John M. Vickers (2000). I Believe It, but Soon I'll Not Believe It Any More: Scepticism, Empiricism, and Reflection. Synthese 124 (2):155-174.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John M. Vickers (1993). Probability and Utility. In J. Dubucs (ed.), Philosophy of Probability. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 109--127.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John M. Vickers (1991). Objectivity and Ideology in the Human Sciences. Topoi 10 (2):175-186.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Miller & John M. Vickers (1990). Chance and Structure. Philosophical Quarterly 40 (158):103.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John M. Vickers (1990). Compactness in Finite Probabilistic Inference. Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (3):305 - 316.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John M. Vickers (1989). An Agenda for Subjectivism. Erkenntnis 31 (2-3):397 - 416.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John M. Vickers (1988). Chance and Structure: An Essay on the Logical Foundations of Probability. Oxford University Press.
    Discussing the relations between logic and probability, this book compares classical 17th- and 18th-century theories of probability with contemporary theories, explores recent logical theories of probability, and offers a new account of probability as a part of logic.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John M. Vickers (1983). Gottlob Frege. Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (1):123-124.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John M. Vickers (1983). Hans Sluga, "Gottlob Frege". [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (1):123.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John M. Vickers (1979). Definability and Logical Structure in Frege. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (3):291-308.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. P. Day & John M. Vickers (1978). Belief and Probability. Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John M. Vickers (1978). On the Reality of Chance. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:563 - 578.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. John M. Vickers (1976). On the Phenomenology of Partial Judgment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 2:105-132.
    The main sources here are Hume, Husserl, and De Finetti. The problem is how phenomenological investigation has to do with partial or probabilistic judgment. Behavioristic, frequentist and subjectivistic views are briefly surveyed. A variant of Hume's account of the probability of chances is developed with the help of De Finetti's concept of exchangeability. The question of transcendental elements in or behind partial judgment is considered in the light of understanding disagreement and error in partial judgment.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John M. Vickers (1976). The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (3):366-367.
  17. John M. Vickers (1973). Rules for Reasonable Belief Change. In Radu J. Bogdan & Ilkka Niiniluoto (eds.), Logic, Language, and Probability. Boston,D. Reidel Pub. Co.. 129--142.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John M. Vickers (1967). Characteristics of Projectible Predicates. Journal of Philosophy 64 (9):280-286.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John M. Vickers (1966). Some Features of Theories of Belief. Journal of Philosophy 63 (8):197-201.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John M. Vickers (1965). Some Remarks on Coherence and Subjective Probability. Philosophy of Science 32 (1):32-38.
    The interpretation of the calculus of probability as a logic of partial belief has at least two advantages: it makes the assignment of probabilities plausible in cases where classical frequentist interpretations must find such assignments meaningless, and it gives a clear meaning to partial belief and to consistency of partial belief.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation