Search results for 'John P. Stewart' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  4
    Brian R. Clack, C. B. & H. P. (1996). Eberhard Herrmann. Scientific Theory and Religious Belief: An Essay on the Rationality of Views of Life. Pp. 128. Dfl. 69.90.Peter Van Inwagen. God, Knowledge and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology, Pp. 284. Morton Klass. Ordered Universes: Approaches to the Anthropology of Religion. Pp. Xiv + 177. £37.00 Hb, £11.50 Pb.Ian S. Markham. Plurality and Christian Ethics. Pp. Xiv + 225. £32.50.M. A. Stewart & John P. Wright, Ed. Hume and Hume's Connexions. Pp. Xvi + 266. £39.50. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 32 (2):293.
  2.  3
    A. B. P. (1998). Allen P. F. Sell. John Locke and the Eighteenth Century Divines. (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1997.) Pp. 444. £40.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 34 (2):231-234.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. M. A. Stewart & John P. Wright (eds.) (1995). Hume and Hume's Connexions. Penn State University Press.
    Presenting significant new research on the moral and religious philosophy of David Hume, this volume illustrates the importance of intellectual context in understanding the work and career of one of the most important thinkers of the eighteenth century. Distinctive in its reappraisal of the influence of John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and others, it examines how Hume reacted to, and in turn affected, other thinkers whose views, like his own, were bound up with specific philosophical, theological, and scientific traditions and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  13
    John W. Sweigart & John P. Stewart (1959). Another Look at Fact, FIction, and Forecast. Philosophical Studies 10 (6):81 - 89.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Shirley Robin Letwin, John B. Stewart, Carl B. Cone, Alfred Cobban & Joseph Hamburger (1967). The Pursuit of Certainty: David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Beatrice Webb. Science and Society 31 (1):37-47.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. John Stewart (1806). The Conquest of the Moral World [by J. Stewart].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Dugald Stewart, William Hamilton & John Veitch (1854). The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, Ed. By Sir W. Hamilton, [Concluded by J. Veitch].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. John Stewart (1807). The Revelation of Reason and Nature, as Exhibited in the ... Opus Maximum [by J. Stewart].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  30
    John Coggon, Cameron Stewart & Laura Williamson (2009). Recent Developments. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):141-144.
    Recent Developments Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9235-5 Authors John Coggon, University of Manchester Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Institute for Science, Ethics, and Innovation, School of Law Manchester UK Cameron Stewart, University of Sydney Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School Sydney NSW 2006 Australia Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 7 Journal Issue Volume 7, Number 2.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. John Stewart, Olivier Gapenne & Ezequiel A. Di Paolo (eds.) (2010). Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. A Bradford Book.
    This book presents the framework for a new, comprehensive approach to cognitive science. The proposed paradigm, enaction, offers an alternative to cognitive science's classical, first-generation Computational Theory of Mind. _Enaction_, first articulated by Varela, Thompson, and Rosch in _The Embodied Mind_, breaks from CTM's formalisms of information processing and symbolic representations to view cognition as grounded in the sensorimotor dynamics of the interactions between a living organism and its environment. A living organism enacts the world it lives in; its embodied (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    John Stewart, Olivier Gapenne & Ezequiel A. Di Paolo (eds.) (2014). Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. A Bradford Book.
    This book presents the framework for a new, comprehensive approach to cognitive science. The proposed paradigm, enaction, offers an alternative to cognitive science's classical, first-generation Computational Theory of Mind. _Enaction_, first articulated by Varela, Thompson, and Rosch in _The Embodied Mind_, breaks from CTM's formalisms of information processing and symbolic representations to view cognition as grounded in the sensorimotor dynamics of the interactions between a living organism and its environment. A living organism enacts the world it lives in; its embodied (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. J. Somerville (1998). MA Stewart and John P. Wright (Eds), Hume and Hume's Connexions. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6:140-142.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    Adam Stewart (2010). John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):6-17.
    This essay examines the contrasting conceptualizations of reason in the thought of John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn in their articles published in The Contemporary Review in 1885. This essay articulates both Fairbairn’s charge of philosophical scepticism against Newman as well as Newman’s defense of his position and concomitantly details Fairbairn’s and Newman’s competing notions of the efficacy of reason to provide reliable knowledge of God. The positions of Fairbairn and Newman remain two of the most important perspectives (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  4
    Stephen John (2016). From Social Values to P‐Values: The Social Epistemology of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2):n/a-n/a.
    In this article I ask two questions prompted by the phenomenon of ‘politically patterned’ climate change denial. First, can an individual's political commitments provide her with good reasons not to defer to cognitive experts’ testimony? Building on work in philosophy of science on inductive risk, I argue they can. Second, can an individual's political commitments provide her with good reasons not to defer to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's testimony? I argue that they cannot, because of the high epistemic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  8
    A. C. P. (1956). John Duns Scotus. Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):183-183.
  16.  18
    Robert Michael Stewart (1982). John Clarke and Francis Hutcheson on Self-Love and Moral Motivation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (3):261-277.
  17.  12
    Donald Stewart (1972). A Pseudo-Anarchist Belatedly Replies to R. P. Wolff. Journal of Critical Analysis 4 (2):51-61.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  7
    A. B. P. (1997). Stewart Guthrie. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.) Pp. 336. $30.00 Hbk, $16.95 Pbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 33 (1):131-134.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  7
    H. Stewart (1929). Aere Perennius—Scherts en Ernst in de Oden van Horatius. Door C. P. Burger, Pp. xii + 336. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1926. The Classical Review 43 (01):42-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  6
    H. F. Stewart (1926). Saint Augustin : Confessions, Livres I.–XVIII. Texte Établi Et Traduit Par P. De Labriolle. Pp. Xxxi + 202. Paris: Soc. d'Édition ' Les Belles Lettres,' 1925. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (01):37-38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  15
    Carole Stewart (1986). John Locke's Moral Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1):127-129.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  3
    M. P. (1980). Margot H. King and Wesley M. Stevens, Eds., Saints, Scholars and Heroes: Studies in Medieval Culture in Honour of Charles W. Jones, 1: The Anglo-Saxon Heritage, 2: Carolingian Studies, Collegeville, Minn.: Hill Monastic Manuscript Library, Saint John's Abbey and University, 1979. Paper. 1: Pp. 300; Frontispiece Portrait. 2: Pp. 417. $39 North America; $44.75 Elsewhere. May Be Ordered From University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich. [REVIEW] Speculum 55 (4):868-869.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  7
    H. F. Stewart (1904). Gifford's Eusebius Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae Praeparationis. Libr. XV. Ad Codices Manuscriptos Denuo Collatos Recensuit Anglice Nunc Primum Reddidit Notis Et Indicibus Instruxit E. H. Gifford, S.T.P. Oxford Univ. Press, 1903. £5 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (06):323-325.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  3
    Felice Accrocca & Robert M. Stewart (1994). Concerning the Case of the Heretical Pope: John XXII and the Question of Poverty: Ms. XXI of the Capestrano Convent. Franciscan Studies 54 (1):167-184.
  25. Carole Stewart (1988). John E. Thomas and Wilfrid J. Waluchow, Well and Good: Case Studies in Biomedical Ethics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (2):76-78.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    R. P. (2008). Gregory the Great (Ed. With Introduction). By John Moorhead. Heythrop Journal 49 (1):170–170.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. E. P. (2002). Technological Innovation as an Unusual and Non-Biological Evolutionary Process - John Ziman (Ed.) Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, XVII + 379 Pp., Hardback, ISBN 0-521-62361-. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (4):735-739.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. M. A. Stewart (1999). Index and Corrigenda to The Correspondence of John Locke. The Locke Newsletter 30:13-14.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  5
    Garrett Stewart (1976). Modern Hard Times: Chaplin and the Cinema of Self-Reflection. Critical Inquiry 3 (2):295-314.
    Charles Chaplin, like Charles Dickens, knew the deep allegiance between theme and visual symbol, and the greatest popular genius of our century, when he began a film called Modern Times with a nondescript clockface upon which the second hand inexorably spins, negotiated this alliance between satiric narrative and its props with the bold assurance of the nineteenth-century master. To have seen Modern Times again for the first time in nearly a decade, as I did recently, after in the interval having (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Susan Stewart (1983). Shouts on the Street: Bakhtin's Anti-Linguistics. Critical Inquiry 10 (2):265-281.
    According to Bakhtin, the reason that literature is the most ideological of all ideological spheres may be discovered in the structure of genre. He criticizes the formalists for ending their theory with a consideration of genre; genre, he observes, should be the first topic of poetics. The importance of genre lies in its two major capacities: conceptualization and “finalization.” A genre’s conceptualization has both inward and outward focus: the artist does not merely represent reality; he or she must use existing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  35
    F. C. Bartlett, A. E. Taylor, J. C. Gregory, H. F. Hallet, Salvatore Messina, E. J. Thomas, James Drever, W. J., John Laird, R. P. & C. A. Mace (1924). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 33 (129):94-113.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  17
    A. Ibrahim Nabil, P. Howard Donald & P. Angelidis John (forthcoming). The Relationship Between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are There Differences Between Business Managers and Students? Journal of Business Ethics.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  11
    Joseph P. DeMarco & Douglas O. Stewart (2009). Expanding Autonomy; Contracting Informed Consent. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):35 – 36.
  34.  70
    Eva-Maria Engelen, Kurt Gödels mathematische Anschauung und John P. Burgess’ mathematische Intuition. XXIII Deutscher Kongress Für Philosophie Münster 2014, Konferenzveröffentlichung.
    John P. Burgess kritisiert Kurt Gödels Begriff der mathematischen oder rationalen Anschauung und erläutert, warum heuristische Intuition dasselbe leistet wie rationale Anschauung, aber ganz ohne ontologisch überflüssige Vorannahmen auskommt. Laut Burgess müsste Gödel einen Unterschied zwischen rationaler Anschauung und so etwas wie mathematischer Ahnung, aufzeigen können, die auf unbewusster Induktion oder Analogie beruht und eine heuristische Funktion bei der Rechtfertigung mathematischer Aussagen einnimmt. Nur, wozu benötigen wir eine solche Annahme? Reicht es nicht, wenn die mathematische Intuition als Heuristik funktioniert? (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  8
    John P. Portelli (forthcoming). John P. Portelli & Douglas J. Simpson. Journal of Thought.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  11
    John P. Doyle (1973). "Cajetan's Notion of Existence," by John P. Reilly. Modern Schoolman 51 (1):73-74.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  9
    John P. Ferre (1995). A 'Great Man' Approach: A Book Review by John P. Ferre. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (1):55 – 56.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  6
    John P. Ferre (1991). Book Review: Toward a History of Journalism Ethics: An Essay Review by John P. Ferre. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (3):182 – 187.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  4
    John P. Ferre (1998). The American View: A Book Review by John P. Ferre. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (3):196-198.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    John P. Ferre (1998). Book Review: The American View: A Book Review by John P. Ferre. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (3):196 – 198.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  9
    George P. Klubertanz (1966). "The Essential Erasmus," Trans., with Introd. And Commentary by John P. Dolan. Modern Schoolman 43 (3):304-305.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  9
    John L. Treloar (1975). "Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy," Ed. John P. Anton and George L. Kustas. Modern Schoolman 52 (4):466-466.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    Ilya P. Winham (2012). Machiavellian Democracy. By John P. McCormick. The European Legacy 17 (6):860-861.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    Jake Earl (2015). Review of John P. Lizza, Ed., Potentiality: Metaphysical and Bioethical Dimensions. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):10-12.
    Each of the 13 articles in this collection wrestles with intricate metaphysical and moral aspects of the widespread belief that a thing’s potential—what it could, would, might, or will be, but isn’t yet—matters for how we should treat that thing. As John Lizza explains in his lucid introduction, the articles are grouped into three parts according to their aims and theoretical constraints. In this review, I briefly summarize and offer some critical discussion of each part.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  7
    Jude P. Dougherty (2003). Hittinger, John P. Liberty, Wisdom, and Grace: Thomism and Democratic Political Theory. Review of Metaphysics 57 (1):151-152.
  46.  1
    John Ferguson (1984). Raymond E. Brown and John P. Meier. Antioch and Rome: New Testament Cradles of Catholic Christianity. Pp. Xii + 242. Price Not Stated. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 20 (3):514.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Marianne Hammerl, Andy P. Field, Benjamin Libet, Peter Cariani & Steven Ravett Brown (1999). John P. Kline, Gary E. Schwartz, Ziya V. Dikman, and Iris R. Bell. Electroencephalographic Regis. Consciousness and Cognition 8:585.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. John Mccarthy (1954). John P. Kenny, O.P., Principles of Medical Ethics. [REVIEW] The Thomist 17:100.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. H. D. Rankin & P. J. Bicknell (1967). Review: Buffalo Studies, Vol.II,No.2: Science, Philosophy and Our Educational Tasks: Papers for a Symposium Held at the Annual Meeting of the American Philosophical Association, Western Division, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. April 29, 1964. Edited by John P.Anton and George Kimball Plochmann. [REVIEW] Apeiron 1 (2):32-33.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Jacques Schlosser (2008). La méthodologie de John P. Meier dans sa quête du Jésus historique. Recherches de Science Religieuse 2 (2):201-218.
    Au début de son livre sur la religion de Jésus, Geza Vermes exprimait son aversion pour la méthodologie. Selon lui, elle menace l'inventivité du chercheur, car « la recherche ne doit pas être liée par des règles trop strictes » et mieux vaut faire preuve de « pragmatisme ». La vigueur de la critique que John Meier adresse à son collègue illustre fort bien son refus de l'amateurisme. « Au bout du compte, dit-il dans l'introduction au troisième volume , (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000