Search results for 'John Robert Gareth Williams' (try it on Scholar)

986 found
Sort by:
  1. Cohen Ga, If You’re an Egalitarian, Crocker Robert, Reason Religion, Crockett Clayton, DUPRÉ John & Human Nature (2002). CHARLES David and William Child (Eds): Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2):325-330.score: 2700.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John Robert Gareth Williams (2008). Gavagai Again. Synthese 164 (2):235 - 259.score: 2130.0
    Quine (1960, Word and object. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press, ch. 2) claims that there are a variety of equally good schemes for translating or interpreting ordinary talk. ‘Rabbit’ might be taken to divide its reference over rabbits, over temporal slices of rabbits, or undetached parts of rabbits, without significantly affecting which sentences get classified as true and which as false. This is the basis of his famous ‘argument from below’ to the conclusion that there can be no fact of the matter (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Patricia J. Williams (1998). Seeing a Cohr-Blind Future: The Paradox of Race (New York: Farrar, Straus and GiroUX, 1997); Robert Gooding-Williams," Race. Multiculturalism, and Democracy,". Constellations 5:i8 - 41.score: 1410.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. H. Grundmann Christoffer & R. Eckrich John (2011). Philosophy, Science and Divine Action Edited by F. LeRon Shults, Nancey Murphy, and Robert John Russell. Zygon 46 (3):764-765.score: 1260.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Timothy E. O'Connor, John W. Murphy, John Riser, Thomas Nemeth & Robert C. Williams (1995). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 47 (1-2):93-95.score: 855.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John R. Williams (2007). Globalization and Catholic Social Thought: Present Crisis, Future Hope. Edited by John A. Coleman and William F. Ryan. Heythrop Journal 48 (2):338–340.score: 840.0
  7. John D. Sommer, Ed Casey, Mary C. Rawlinson, Eva Kittay, Michael A. Simon, Patrick Grim, Clyde Lee Miller, Rita Nolan, Marshall Spector, Don Ihde, Peter Williams, Anthony Weston, Donn Welton, Dick Howard, David A. Dilworth, Tom Foster Digby 3d, Anthony Appiah, David Auerbach, Annette Baier, Seyla Benhabib, Akeel Bilgrami, Richard Boyd, Robert Brandon, Joshua Cohen, Arnold Davidson, Owen Flanagan, Nancy Fraser, Marcia Lind, Alexander Nehamas, Linda Nicholson, Adrian Piper, Lynne Tirrell, Lawrence Blum, Lawrence Foster, Roma Farion, Mitchel Silver, Jenifer Radden, Jack Bayne, Robert K. Shope, Jane Roland Martin, Arthur B. Millman, Beebe Nelson, Robert Rosenfeld, Janet Farrell-Smith, David E. Flesche, Daniel E. Anderson, J. R. Brown, F. Cunningham, D. Goldstick, I. Hacking, C. Normore, A. Ripstein, W. Sumner, Alison M. Jaggar, Harry Deutsch, Irving Stein, John Hund, George Englebretsen, Fred Strohm, D. L. Ouren, P. Bilimoria, F. B. D. & Nora Nevin (1993). Letters to the Editor. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66 (5):97 - 112.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. C. Stephen Evans, Mark C. E. Peterson, Paul G. Muscari, Robert R. Williams, M. Jamie Ferreira, James C. Edwards & John Macquarrie (1990). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 28 (1):47-61.score: 810.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kurt Marko, R. C. Elwood, Fred Seddon, John D. Windhausen, Timothy E. O'Connor & Robert C. Williams (1989). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 37 (4):227-229.score: 810.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John R. Williams (2010). In Defense of Human Dignity: Essays for Our Times (Loyola Topics in Political Philosophy). Edited by Robert P. Kraynak and Glenn Tinder. Heythrop Journal 51 (2):340-341.score: 810.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Timothy E. O'Connor, R. M. Davison, John Riser, Robert C. Williams, N. G. O. Pereira, John W. Murphy & Irving H. Anellis (1993). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 45 (3):59-67.score: 810.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John Casciotti, Cynthia Ryan, Dean Gerald Sienko & Robert C. Williams (2007). Law at the Intersection of Civilian and Military Public Health Practice. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35:83-91.score: 810.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Williams & Robert Aitken (2011). The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing and Marketing Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):439-454.score: 810.0
    Abela and Murphy (J Acad Mark Sci 36(1):39–53, 2007 ) examined Service-Dominant (S-D) logic (Vargo and Lusch, J Mark 68(1):1–17, 2004 ) from the viewpoint of Marketing Ethics and concluded that whilst S-D logic does not have explicit ethical content, the Foundational Premises (FPs) of S-D logic do have implicit ethical content. They also conclude that what may be needed to make the implicit more explicit is the addition of another FP. The aim of this article is to explore whether (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter Albersheim, Curtis Givan, Abraham Flexer, Lefevre, Robert S. Loomis, Charles W. Philpott, Keith R. Porter, John G. Torrey, John H. Welsh, Ralph H. Wetmore, Carroll M. Williams & Paul J. Kramer (1964). Comments From Harvard Biologists. BioScience 14 (6):16-17.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Margaret A. Boden, Richard B. Brandt, Peter Caldwell, Fred Feldman, John Martin Fischer, Richard Hare, David Hume, W. D. Joske, Immanuel Kant, Frederick Kaufman, James Lenman, John Leslie, Steven Luper-Foy, Michaelis Michael, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, Derek Parfit, George Pitcher, Stephen E. Rosenbaum, David Schmidtz, Arthur Schopenhauer, David B. Suits, Richard Taylor & Bernard Williams (2004). Life, Death, and Meaning: Key Philosophical Readings on the Big Questions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.score: 810.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John E. Merryman, Sister Mary Olga Mckenna, George I. Brown, Robert O. Hahn, George Male, Donald P. Sanders, John W. Holland, John Buttrick, Erma F. Muckenhirn, Richard E. Schultz, Richard Elardo, Donald R. Warren, Alfred H. Moore, John Follman, Helen I. Snyder & Chester S. Williams (2009). Book Reviews Section 1. Educational Studies 3 (3):145-155.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David M. Williams, Robert W. Scotland, Christopher J. Humphries & Darrell J. Siebert (1996). Confusion in Philosophy: A Comment on Williams (1992). Synthese 108 (1):127 - 136.score: 600.0
    Patricia Williams made a number of claims concerning the methods and practise of cladistic analysis and classification. Her argument rests upon the distinction of two kinds of hierarchy: a divisional hierarchy depicting evolutionary descent and the Linnean hierarchy describing taxonomic groups in a classification. Williams goes on to outline five problems with cladistics that lead her to the conclusion that systematists should eliminate cladism as a school of biological taxonomy and to replace it either with something that is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Scott M. Williams (2010). Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, and John Duns Scotus: On the Theology of the Father's Intellectual Generation of the Word. Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 77 (1):35-81.score: 540.0
    There are two general routes that Augustine suggests in De Trinitate, XV, 14-16, 23-25, for a psychological account of the Father's intellectual generation of the Word. Thomas Aquinas and Henry of Ghent, in their own ways, follow the first route; John Duns Scotus follows the second. Aquinas, Henry, and Scotus's psychological accounts entail different theological opinions. For example, Aquinas (but neither Henry nor Scotus) thinks that the Father needs the Word to know the divine essence. If we compare the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Robert R. Williams (2006). Review of Robert M. Wallace, Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (1).score: 540.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert R. Williams (2010). G. W. F. Hegel, Robert F. Brown (Ed., Tr.), Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825-6: Volume I: Introduction and Oriental Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).score: 540.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John R. Williams (2013). Placing Nature on the Borders of Religion, Philosophy and Ethics (Transcending Boundaries in Philosophy and Theology). Edited by Forrest Clingerman and Mark H. Dixon . Pp. Xiv, 224, Farnham, Surrey, Ashgate, 2011, £50.00. Turning Images in Philosophy, Science, & Religion: A New Book of Nature. Edited by Charles Taliaferro and Jil Evans . Pp. Xii, 256, Oxford University Press, 2011, £30.00/$50.00. The Singing Heart of the World: Creation, Evolution and Faith. By John Feehan. Pp. 204, Dublin, Columba Press, 2010, €14.99/£12.99. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 54 (4):706-708.score: 540.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John Williams, Eliminativism, Williams' Principle and Evans' Principle.score: 540.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Franklin Donnell, Robert D. Ramsdell & Puthenpeedikail M. John (1987). Robert T. Harris 1912-1987. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 61 (1):171 -.score: 540.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Robert R. Williams (2012). Tragedy, Recognition, and the Death of God: Studies in Hegel and Nietzsche. Oup Oxford.score: 510.0
    Robert R. Williams offers a bold new account of divergences and convergences in the work of Hegel and Nietzsche. He explores four themes - the philosophy of tragedy; recognition and community; critique of Kant; and the death of God - and explicates both thinkers' critiques of traditional theology and metaphysics.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Robert Williams (2008). Chances, Counterfactuals, and Similarity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):385-420.score: 450.0
    John Hawthorne in a recent paper takes issue with Lewisian accounts of counterfactuals, when relevant laws of nature are chancy. I respond to his arguments on behalf of the Lewisian, and conclude that while some can be rebutted, the case against the original Lewisian account is strong.I develop a neo-Lewisian account of what makes for closeness of worlds. I argue that my revised version avoids Hawthorne’s challenges. I argue that this is closer to the spirit of Lewis’s first (non-chancy) (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Robert Williams (2008). Gavagai Again. Synthese 164 (2):235 - 259.score: 450.0
    Quine (1960, "Word and object". Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, ch. 2) claims that there are a variety of equally good schemes for translating or interpreting ordinary talk. 'Rabbit' might be taken to divide its reference over rabbits, over temporal slices of rabbits, or undetached parts of rabbits, without significantly affecting which sentences get classified as true and which as false. This is the basis of his famous 'argument from below' to the conclusion that there can be no fact of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Williams (manuscript). The Surprise Exam Paradox: Disentangling Two Reductios. Philosophical Explorations:67-94.score: 450.0
    One tradition of solving the surprise exam paradox, started by Robert Binkley and continued by Doris Olin, Roy Sorensen and Jelle Gerbrandy, construes surpriseepistemically and relies upon the oddity of propositions akin to G. E. Moore’s paradoxical ‘p and I don’t believe that p.’ Here I argue for an analysis that evolves from Olin’s. My analysis is different from hers or indeed any of those in the tradition because it explicitly recognizes that there are two distinct reductios at work (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John N. Williams (2007). The Surprise Exam Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:67-94.score: 450.0
    One tradition of solving the surprise exam paradox, started by Robert Binkley and continued by Doris Olin, Roy Sorensen and Jelle Gerbrandy, construes surpriseepistemically and relies upon the oddity of propositions akin to G. E. Moore’s paradoxical ‘p and I don’t believe that p.’ Here I argue for an analysis that evolves from Olin’s. My analysis is different from hers or indeed any of those in the tradition because it explicitly recognizes that there are two distinct reductios at work (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. Robert G. Williams (2008). Chances, Counterfactuals, and Similarity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):385 - 420.score: 450.0
    John Hawthorne in a recent paper takes issue with Lewisian accounts of counterfactuals, when relevant laws of nature are chancy. I respond to his arguments on behalf of the Lewisian, and conclude that while some can be rebutted, the case against the original Lewisian account is strong. I develop a neo-Lewisian account of what makes for closeness of worlds. I argue that my revised version avoids Hawthorne's challenges. I argue that this is closer to the spirit of Lewis's first (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Andrew Reeve & Andrew Williams (eds.) (2003). Real Libertarianism Assessed: Political Theory After Van Parijs. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 450.0
    Philippe Van Parijs's Real Freedom for All is widely acclaimed for providing not only the most sophisticated defense of unconditional basic income, but also a rigorous examination of many central issues within contemporary political theory. This collection, including a response by Van Parijs, provides a comprehensive assessment of his "real libertarian" vision of radical social change. The contributors include Richard Arneson, Brian Barry, Thomas Christiano, John Cunliffe, Guido Erreygers, Hillel Steiner, Peter Vallentyne, Robert van der Veen, and Stuart (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Thomas Williams, John Duns Scotus.score: 420.0
    John Duns Scotus (1265/66-1308) was one of the most important and influential philosophertheologians of the High Middle Ages. His brilliantly complex and nuanced thought, which earned him the nickname "the Subtle Doctor," left a mark on discussions of such disparate topics as the semantics of religious language, the problem of universals, divine illumination, and the nature of human freedom. This essay first lays out what is known about Scotus's life and the dating of his works. It then offers an (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. W. H. Williams (1986). Comment on John Yolton's 'is There a History of Philosophy? Some Difficulties and Suggestions'. Synthese 67 (1):23 - 32.score: 420.0
    In this comment on John Yolton's Is There a History of Philosophy? (Yolton, 1985) I review his account of the development during the 17th to 19th centuries of a common sense of the range of philosophical problems and of the canon of philosophical works. I suggest that his account may be read in light of Rorty's four genres of historiography (Rorty, 1984). I criticize his view of the place of the history of philosophy in philosophy as too timid, though (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Melanie Williams (1999). ``Is Alec a Rapist?'' – Cultural Connotations of `Rape' and `Seduction' – A Reply to Professor John Sutherland. Feminist Legal Studies 7 (3):299-316.score: 420.0
    This article is a response to an essay written by an academic in English Literature, Professor John Sutherland. Through close textual analysis,Sutherland purports to resolve a well-known literary question: whether the sexual encounter outlined in the Victorian novel Tess of the d'Urbervilles should be classified as rape or seduction. The present article rejects his conclusion on the matter. An(equally) close analysis of the fictional text in question and of Sutherland's gloss, demonstrates the partiality of his critique, both in literary-critical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. A. N. Williams (2007). “To Observe Well … and Thence to Make Himself Rules”: John Locke's Principles and Practice of Child Healthcare. Medical Humanities 33 (1):22-34.score: 420.0
    It is often forgotten that the philosopher John Locke (1632–1704) was a highly regarded physician with a lifelong interest in medicine and was frequently consulted on medical matters, including the health of children. This child health aspect in Locke’s history has been largely ignored, with even modern commentaries on Locke and medicine giving it only a cursory mention. However, it is clear that, in child health, Locke’s influence is far more substantial than GF Still’s and George Jackson’s opinions, which (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Wayne Hankey (1997). Re-Christianizing Augustine Postmodern Style: Readings by Jacques Derrida, Robert Dodaro, Jean-Luc Marion, Rowan Williams, Lewis Ayres and John Milbank. Animus 2:387-415.score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Re-Christianizing Augustine Postmodern Style (1997). Readings by Jacques Derrida, Robert Dodaro, Jean-Luc Marion, Rowan Williams, Lewis Ayres and John Milbank,". Animus 2.score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Thomas Williams (2008). Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus: Natural Theology in the High Middle Ages (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 483-485.score: 360.0
  38. Michael Williams (1986). Book Review:Science and Scepticism John Watkins. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 53 (2):302-.score: 360.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephen N. Williams (2005). Paul Helm John Calvin's Ideas. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). Pp. VIII+438. £60.00 (Hbk). ISBN 0 19 925569. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 41 (4):467-471.score: 360.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Howard Williams (1997). Jean-Claude Wolf, John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarismus', Freiburg/Munich, Alber, 1992, Pp. 260. Utilitas 9 (01):159-.score: 360.0
  41. Llyod P. Williams (1970). A Liberal's Perspective on the Dismal Science: John Dewey' View of Economic Theory and Practice. Educational Theory 20 (2):177-188.score: 360.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Patricia Williams (1990). Evolved Ethics Re-Examined: The Theory of Robert J. Richards. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):451-457.score: 360.0
    Richards's theory, then, fails on three counts. By illegitimately importing a premise from outside of the theory of evolution in order to construct a valid argument, Richards has failed to achieve his objective of deriving a moral theory exclusively from biological facts. By sliding from a causal use of “ought” to a moral one, Richards commits the fallacy of ambiguity. And by insisting that action from the motive of altruism is moral while claiming that an ethical theory which justifies Hitler's (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Geraint Williams (1993). Michael Laine, Ed., A Cultivated Mind: Essays on J. S. Mill Presented to John M. Robson, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1991, Pp. 192. [REVIEW] Utilitas 5 (02):318-.score: 360.0
  44. David Williams (2008). Gregory the Great. By John Moorhead. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 49 (2):335–336.score: 360.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Simon Williams (2010). Robert Carsen's Production of Les Contes d'Hoffmann : An Exercise in Theatrical Self-Reflection. In Walter Bernhart & Werner Wolf (eds.), Self-Reference in Literature and Other Media. Rodopi.score: 360.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Heather Roberts & John Williams, Chapter 5 Constitutional Law.score: 285.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Aurélien Robert (2012). Le vide, le lieu et l'espace chez quelques atomistes du XIVe siècle. In Joël Biard & Sabine Rommevaux (eds.), La nature et le vide dans la physique médiévale. Brepols.score: 270.0
  48. Bruce H. Weber & John N. Prebble (2006). An Issue of Originality and Priority: The Correspondence and Theories of Oxidative Phosphorylation of Peter Mitchell and Robert J.P. Williams, 1961-1980. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 39 (1):125 - 163.score: 243.0
    In the same year, 1961, Peter D. Mitchell and Robert R.J.P. Williams both put forward hypotheses for the mechanism of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria and photophosphorylation in chloroplasts. Mitchell's proposal was ultimately adopted and became known as the chemiosmotic theory. Both hypotheses were based on protons and differed markedly from the then prevailing chemical theory originally proposed by E.C. (Bill) Slater in 1953, which by 1961 was failing to account for a number of experimental observations. Immediately following (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Marie V. Williams (1912). Plato's Phaedo Plato's Phaedo. Edited, with Introduction and Notes, by John Burnet. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1911. 1 Vol. 8vo. Introduction, Pp. 59; Notes, Pp. 158; About 310 Pp. Altogether. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (5):160-162.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. [deleted]C. Mervis, A. John & C. Cashon (forthcoming). Self-Recognition by Toddlers with Williams Syndrome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.score: 240.0
1 — 50 / 986